Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Who is This Guy in the Oval Office? (Part 25)


Putin Tells Everyone Exactly Who Created ISIS
Published on Oct 1, 2015
Here's something you probably never saw or heard about in the west. This is Putin answering questions regarding ISIS from a US journalist at the Valdai International Discussion Club in late 2014.
Say what you want about Putin... when he's right, he's right.

Obama finally tells the truth!
Published on Aug 17, 2015
Obama tries telling Brits wanting out of the EU what to do
But then again Marxist name-calling of their enemies is now universal
By  Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives 
April 24, 2016
The most ridiculous sound in the world has gotta’ be the one of an overbearing Barack Obama rattling his saber at Brits who want out of the EU.
It’s going to take more than insipid “back off” orders from from the likes of Obama to frighten Brits from voting the way they want on Brexit.
A feeble quack from a lame duck on his way out of public office will never dim the knowledge that it comes from a no-boots-on-the-ground in jihadist-held territory, no-skin-in-any-game-but-his-own, semi-golf pro, part-time president.
Tough talk from politicians rarely leave any traction of note.
True-grit Brits with a storied history have no fear from a man whose own history is one held under lock and key.
As a fighter, Obama’s only a fop.
It would take the imagination of a Walt Disney for anyone to ever conceive of an Obama crossing the Delaware to fight the Brits on that long ago frigid Christmas night.
Had Obama, or anyone even remotely like him, donned a red coat during America’s fight for independence, Cornwallis would have yelled, “Back of the queue for you, Buddy!”
“President Barack Obama told Britain today that it would have to ‘go to the back of the queue’ if it leaves the European Union, then tries to negotiate its own trade deal with the United States.” (Daily Mail, April 22, 2016)
One can almost hear the long gone, heroic Winston Churchill calling out Obama’s self-proclaimed ‘bro’ Prime Minister David Cameron for letting Obama get away with stating:” A US-UK trade agreement is not going to happen ‘any time soon.”
“A US-UK trade agreement is not going to happen ‘any time soon,’ Obama said during a joint news conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron. (Daily Mail)
‘Not because we don’t have a special relationship but because given the heavy lift on any trade agreement, us having access to a big market with a lot of countries rather than trying to do piecemeal trade agreements, which is hugely inefficient,’ the U.S. leader said.”
Obama fancies himself still being in charge through Hillary Clinton after the November 8 presidential election, a fantasy that depends on her making it to the Oval Office.
“Obama faced a furious backlash overseas this morning over what has been called a ‘downright hypocritical’ push for Britain to stay in the European Union. (Daily Mail)
“In a highly controversial intervention in the EU referendum campaign, Obama pleaded with British voters in a local newspaper and then the press conference not to cut ties with Brussels.
‘The United States wants a strong United Kingdom as a partner, and the United Kingdom is at its best when it is helping to lead a strong Europe,’ Obama said during a news conference at Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
In his op-ed Obama also invoked the spirit of the Second World War by claiming the sacrifice of GIs meant America has a stake in the EU debate and said the decision in June’s referendum ‘will echo in the prospects of today’s generation of Americans as well’.
Most Brits would know that these words are from the same Obama who has gutted the American Armed Forces; the same one who saw Marine duty as one that had two Marines hold umbrellas over his and the head of his friend, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in the light rain of a White House Rose Garden press conference.
“London Mayor Boris Johnson accused him of making an ‘incoherent’ and ‘inconsistent’ argument.” (Daily Mail)
Is it too late to draft Boris as a Republican presidential candidate?
“A furious Johnson said this morning: ‘The Americans would never contemplate anything like the EU for themselves or for their neighbors in their own hemisphere. Why should they think it right for us?’ (Daily Mail)
“Obama told residents of the UK today he doesn’t believe he’s overstepping.”
He doesn’t believe wiping out America in his unasked for Fundamental Transformation of America is overstepping either, Your Worship.
In any case, like most social justice engineering Marxists, Obama thinks there is no such thing as overstepping, period.
“Ultimately ‘this is a decision for the people of the United Kingdom to make,’ he told them.(Daily Mail)
‘I’m not coming here to fix any votes. I’m not casting a vote myself. I’m offering my opinion, and in democracies everybody should want more information, not less, and you shouldn’t be afraid to hear an argument being made.
He said, ‘That’s not a threat, that should enhance the debate.’
What a joke from a president who labels all American dissidents who happen to disagree with any of his policies as ‘racists’, ‘bigots’, ‘homophobes’ and ‘Islamophobes’.
“The U.S. president said he feels it’s his prerogative to clarify the U.S. position rather than have it defined by British politicians.
‘So they are voicing an opinion about what the United States is going to do, I figured you might want to hear from the president of the United States what I think the United States is going to do,’ he said.
‘And on that matter, for example, I think it’s fair to say that maybe some point down the line there might be a UK-US trade agreement, but it’s not going to happen any time soon because our focus is in negotiating with a big bloc, the European Union, to get a trade agreement done.
He added, ‘The UK is going to be in the back of the queue.’
With friends like Obama who needs enemies?
“Obama brought up WWII and the international institutions the US and UK designed together including the United Nations, the IMF, the World Bank, and NATO.
‘All of those in some degree constrained our freedom to operate and occasionally we had to deal with some bureaucracy,’ he said, ‘it meant that on occasion we had to persuade other countries and we don’t get 100 percent of what we want in each case but we knew that by doing so, everybody was going to be better off.’
Obama’s Recipe For Disaster
By Chip McLean
November 27, 2015
Growing up with an interest in government and politics as I did, I often thought about having conversations with various leaders – especially U.S. presidents. I had visions of lengthy philosophical discussions and asking questions to gain a perspective on the ideas that drove those men. I never dreamed that one day we would have a president - as we do today - that only one question comes to mind …“Mr. Obama, are you out of your damn mind?”
Barack Obama has spent the last seven years making good on his promise to “fundamentally transform” our nation. The problem is that the nation didn’t need any fundamental transformation – the system of government given to us by our founders, or as Ben Franklin said in 1787, “a republic, if you can keep it”, served us well.
The tough thing has been the “keeping it” part. Through the years, those seeking to exert more government control over our existence have been incrementally chipping away at it. Barack Obama is but the latest miscreant attempting to do so, but in his case – especially in his second term – he has dropped any pretense at “preserving, protecting and defending the Constitution of the United States.”
At this point there is very little left of a republic that was based upon limited government and individual liberty. Through the gradual erosion by those who prefer to replace those ideals with a socialistic, globalist vision, the “transformation” (destruction) is all but complete.
Despite this unbridled growth of the federal behemoth, the one most imperative responsibility of the federal government – that of providing for the common defense - has been abrogated. Obama’s desire to flood our nation with 250,000 Syrian refugees isn’t just a misguided policy – it’s a recipe for a disaster of epic proportions. Obama, along with his fellow travelers on both the left and the right who support open borders/amnesty have already caused this “transformation” to change the very makeup and culture of the United States to the point that – as Breitbart news said in a recent headline, the “Majority of Americans Feel Like ‘Stranger in Own Country’”.
The Breitbart article was linked to results from an Ipsos poll where a strong majority of people agree that they do indeed feel like strangers in their own country. Who can blame them? When millions are here illegally who don’t speak English and won’t learn, who care nothing about our culture and history and prefer that which they left behind, who gobble up benefits provided by the American taxpayer, who wind up displacing American workers who need jobs, not to mention that every day the news includes more stories about illegal aliens who have murdered, raped, driven drunk and killed innocent Americans and then fill our streets demanding their “rights”- and do so without any fear of being deported by the Obama administration – is it any wonder that Americans feel like they are indeed strangers in their own land? Is it any wonder that Donald Trump is resonating with so many?
The recent attacks in France have demonstrated just how reckless unchecked immigration truly is. Europe is seeing the inevitable chickens coming home to roost. The Islamic invasion of Europe has been allowed to go unchecked for a number of years, resulting in large enclaves of Islamists that reside in what has come to be known as “no go zones”, or perhaps more accurately as Daniel Pipes said, “semi-autonomous sectors”. Regardless of what you choose to call it, granting any form of autonomy to hostile groups on your own soil is a less than safe proposition.
The groundswell of European natives had already been rising, calling on their governments to put an end to this insanity before the recent Paris attacks. Now the opposition from everyday Europeans has reached fever pitch, resulting in at least some of those nations to rethink their stances on immigration. The fact that at least one of the attackers in France arrived using a Syrian passport demonstrates just how easily Jihadists can embed themselves with the wave of “refugees”.
Implementing a temporary freeze on all immigration – legal and illegal – is a logical safeguard as we sort out what is going on. At the very least, halting any and all “refugee” resettlements into our country is the compellingly logical first step. Unfortunately this president has been incredibly devoid of logic with regard to the situation (or any other for that matter). He has doubled down on his call for more refugees to be brought into our cities and towns against our wishes – this despite the fact that in addition to a majority of Americans, a majority of states’ governors are now on record opposing the resettlement. The states have this right by virtue of the tenth amendment but Obama no doubt will show no more fealty to the constitution on this matter than he has on any other.
As this article was being written, Obama made a statement that he is “not afraid” of ISIS defeating us (or ISIL, as he for some reason prefers to call them). No, I don’t suppose Obama would be particularly afraid when the government spends millions of taxpayer dollars annually on armed secret service agents, equipment, armor-plated limousines, intel and the like for his protection. It is disturbingly ironic that while the president is afforded this much protection he remains vehemently opposed to our own second amendment rights (although that would be a subject for another column).
As far as Obama is concerned, it’s full steam ahead for Syrian (and all other Islamic) “refugee” resettlement. His recent statements that those opposed to his policy are “scared of widows and orphans” and that we who prefer Christian refugees to Muslims coming to America are “un-American” are as Pat Buchanan said in a recent column, “petulant and unpresidential.” On target as usual, Buchanan said later in his column, “Who is this man of the left to dictate to us what is ‘un-American’?” Indeed. Stopping our borders from being overrun by people who at the least do not wish to assimilate into our culture, and at the worst, pose a threat to our very existence isn’t being “xenophobic, hateful, bigoted, racist, ad nauseum” – it’s common sense – something in short supply in Washington these days.
The aforementioned Donald Trump, on a recent interview with radio host Michael Savage, basically stated that we are “19 trillion in debt and bringing in refugees” – the Middle East is letting the U.S. do it because (our leaders) “are dumb”.
“Dumb” would be an improvement. When you really boil it down, Obama’s bizarre insistence on flooding us with refugees from an area of the world that is a hotbed for jihadists – and home to a religion that is completely incompatible with western values comes down to three possibilities:
1. Obama really is “dumb”
2. Obama is insane
3. Obama is deliberately destroying our nation
I’m going with all of the above, with the added caveat that number three needs to include the question, “and at whose behest?” (still another subject for a future column).
The fact is that Obama’s stance is reckless and dangerous – so much so that there should be a serious investigation into removing him from office through impeachment or perhaps the 25th amendment.
There is an old saying that even a broken clock is right twice a day. Sadly, Barack Obama does not even possess the acumen of a broken clock.
© 2015 Chip McLean - All Rights Reserved
Chip McLean is the founder and editor/publisher of CHO News Publishing, the umbrella for both Capitol Hill Outsider and Capitol Hill Coffee House. He is also the co-founder, along with Chris Adamo, of Rino Tracker.
Chip is a former broadcaster and long time sales professional whose interest in politics began in 1964 at the age of eight, when his parents took him to a Barry Goldwater rally during the presidential campaign. In addition to his work at Outsider News Publishing, Chip’s columns have appeared in a number of online conservative publications.
Website: CapitalHillCoffeHouse

Will Obama Suspend 2016 Election & Become 3rd Term President Under Martial Law?
Published on Jan 10, 2016
A dictator Obama seeks to suspend the 2016 election and become 3rd term President under the Martial Law.
Obama Announces Plans For A Third Term Presidential Run
by Darius Rubrics
October 2015
Washington, DC — President Barack Obama shocked the country this morning with news that he is running for a third term.
“I can’t abandon the American people now when they need me more than ever,” Obama told reporters at a press conference this morning. “We’ve come this far as a nation, now is not the time to do something different. This is the change you wanted and this is the change you’re getting.”
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky told CNN he does not agree with Obama and his announcement. “This defies everything the Constitution stands for,” Paul said. “We can not let this man have a third term.”
In the history of this country only two presidents have served more than two terms, Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin D. Roosevelt. The major problem for Obama when he runs in 2016, is the 22nd Amendment. In short, the 22nd Amendment states, “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice…”
The U.S. Constitution does make an exception in the 22nd Amendment though: “This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several states within seven years from the date of its submission to the states by the Congress.” This means Obama’s third term presidential run is only valid if he receives 75% approval from the Congress.
A bill to abolish the 22nd Amendment was recently introduced into Congress by New York Democratic Rep. Jose Serrano and is gaining popularity. This is exactly the kind of news that makes an Obama 2016 Presidential run possible.
Paul Horner who is a spokesman for the Obama Administration told reporters how amazing this news is for the country. “Obama is guaranteed to win in 2016 and then we’ll all be able to enjoy this great man for another four years. Things could not get any better for the American people. I’m so stoked!”
Also See:
Who is This Guy in the Oval Office?
 (Part 1)
16 February 2009
(Part 2)
22 April 2009
(Part 3)
16 June 2009
(Part 4)
03 August 2009
(Part 5)
03 January 2010
(Part 6)
20 May 2010
(Part 7)
21 November 2010
(Part 8)
14 February 2011
(Part 9)
03 August 2011
(Part 10)
10 October 2011
(Part 11)
11 December 2011
(Part 12)
18 April 2012
(Part 13)
01 July 2012
(Part 14)
25 October 2012
(Part 15)
14 December 2012
(Part 16)
22 May 2013
(Part 17)
27 July 2013
(Part 18)
07 October 2013
(Part 20)
10 February 2014
(Part 21)
03 June 2014
(Part 22)
22 December 2014
(Part 23)
23 October 2015
(Part 24)
01 February 2016
Who will be the Next First Lady?
01 July 2008
Is Michelle Obama a Princess?
02 October 2013

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Stop Agenda 21 Now Before It's Too Late!


Yellowstone National Park - UNESCO World Heritage Site - United States  

Ancient Burmese kingdom awarded World Heritage status  


ANONYMOUS: NWO Documentary *Agenda 21 Exposed*  
Published on Apr 6, 2015
This is a documentary series exposing the truth and possibilities of the operations of Agenda 21, Project Bluebeam, Project Blue Book, HAARP, and a few others and how might each operation bring forth the New World Order all working together on the one world goal agenda. Please do share it to others.

Agenda 21: Bankrupting America into Utopia--One City at a Time  
Published on May 31, 2013
Agenda 21 is a 1992 United Nations' policy document which calls for using Smart Growth and Sustainability to remake the world into a new global order--devoid of private property and free enterprise. In this address, Alexandra talks about what Agenda 21 is, how it is being implemented throughout the U.S., and what you can do about it.
In 1986, Alexandra Swann graduated at fifteen years of age with a bachelor's degree in liberal arts from Brigham Young University and a GPA of 3.85. The following year, when she was sixteen, she received a Master's Degree in History from California State University. After graduation, she taught history and English as a second language for four years at El Paso Community College before opening her own business.. In 1989, her book, "No Regrets: How Homeschooling Earned me a Master's Degree at Age Sixteen", was published. She currently writes "Paying for Protection",
http://www.protectionmoney.blogspot.com, a regular blog about the impact of excessive government regulations, including regulations designed to prevent climate change, on American society and freedom. She is author of "The Planner", a novel about the impact of Agenda 21 in America, and co-author of "The Chosen" about the NDAA. For more information visit her website at http://www.frontier2000.net.
The Politburo of the United Nations is already U.S. President
Call on Ted Cruz and Donald Trump with this on-point message: “The most important issue before America and the Free World is STOPPING AGENDA 21 FULL STOP"
By  Judi McLeod -- Bio and Archives 
April 14, 2016
No matter who emerges as the 45th president of the USA on November 8, it is not the newly-elected president who will get to control civil life.
That privilege belongs to The Politburo of the United Nations, which while most people still seem to hold only in the abstract, now controls almost every facet of civilian life.
The United Nations Politburo is already president of the United States; the president,  prime minister and king of almost every other country on Earth.  Long before gaining—through breath-taking stealth—the highest offices of the lands, they already owned the mayors and municipal councils of both towns and cities, whose elected officials were used both knowingly and unknowingly to spread their toxic Agenda 21.
The mainstream media, which gives saturation coverage to gossip about all Republican presidential contenders, virtually ignore UN encroachment on civilian lives and file the far-reaching Agenda 21 under ‘c’ for ‘conspiracy’.
But the UN Politburo wields more power than any Ted Cruz or Donald Trump, even though operating from the shadows.
Their members are real people.  Look at their pictures and keep their names on file.  They are the ones imposing Agenda 21 on you and your neighbourhood by pretending to have a monopoly on “sustainability”.
Participation in the Chief Executives Board includes the Executive Heads of the United Nations, its 11 Funds and Programmes, the 15 Specialized Agencies, and the Related Organizations - International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Trade Organization. Under the chairmanship of the United Nations Secretary-General, the Executive Heads meet twice a year to consider policy and management issues impacting organizations of the United Nations system.
This cabal that both runs the world and readies to impose One World Government on humankind.
Few of these people, whose pictures appear on Canada Free Press (CFP) are ever elected.  They are appointed in privacy.
This cabal that both runs the world and readies to impose One World Government on humankind, is going into overdrive to elect Hillary Clinton only because she will be the president who will give it the least resistance.
It was J. Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s Council on Sustainable Development, who provided an alibi for the UN push for world takeover, hiding Agenda 21’s UN roots from the people: (Canada Free Press  March 1, 2011)
“Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy- fixated groups and individuals in our society… This segment of our society who fear “one-world government‟ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined “the conspiracy‟ by undertaking LA21. So we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.”
Protected by diplomatic immunity and masquerading as ‘peace makers’,  the UN is reaching its über zenith some seven months before the American election.  On April 22, 130 of its world leaders will sign COP21, the all-encompassing Agenda 21, bequeathed on a largely unknowing society by an equally unknown to society, late Maurice Strong.  (Agenda 21)
U.N. Agenda 21 calls for governments to take control of all land use and decision-making power from private property owners.  It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if in control.
“Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.  Moreover, it is proposed that people be resettled into islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.  Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
“U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected.  It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more…i.e. redistribution of wealth.  Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in the United States and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world.  Only then, proponents say, will there be Social Justice, a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.” 
And all of the above is just the top, peeled-back layer of the insidious Agenda 21 killing off freedom and liberty not just in America but almost everywhere on earth.
Since Clinton’s presidency and even before, no U.S. administration has ever tried to stop Agenda 21 from its chokehold on civilian life.
CFP, who learned everything it ever knew about Agenda 21 by decades observing Canadian Maurice Strong in action, and at at the knee of the late Henry Lamb, respectfully disagrees with writer/activist Tom DeWeese, who suggests trios of citizens asking questions at public forums to “watch those clueless candidates squirm” as the best way to bring Agenda 21 to public attention.
“Do this to them at enough public gatherings and I guarantee they will start to look into the issue so they aren’t unprepared the next time,” he writes.
If Agenda 21 officially becomes the law of the land on April 22, there won’t be a “next time”, Mr. DeWeese.
There are seven short months between now and November 8, time to call on Ted Cruz and Donald Trump with this on-point message: “The most important issue before America and the Free World is STOPPING AGENDA 21 FULL STOP.”
The only possible remedy for the 2016 presidential election is to come out of the weeds to coalesce around one or both of the two Republican front-runners. That’s the only way out in keeping Agenda 21 enabler Hillary Clinton out of office.
Also See:
Days Before the Two Candidates Are Known!
(Part 2)
03 March 2016
Agenda 21 Comes to Canada!
30 December 2013
Agenda 21! The Death Knell of Liberty!
(Part 1)
02 March 2011
(Part 2)
22 January 2012
(Part 3)
21 May 2012
(Part 4)
07 January 2013
United Nations Oversees Over 830 World Heritage Sites
25 December 2010
Who is Maurice Strong?
14 May 2010

Monday, April 11, 2016

Where's the Gratitude? Muslim Refugees Attack Canadian Students!

I'm in Halifax, Nova Scotia to get to the bottom of story that's making international news. This weekend, TheRebel.media told you about a news story in the Chronicle Herald, containing a mother's claim that her Grade Three daughter had been attacked by refugee students who had allegedly said, "Muslims rule the world."

What REALLY happened to that Halifax news story about Muslim "bullies"?  
Published on Apr 11, 2016
Faith Goldy is reporting from Halifax, Nova Scotia about a local news story that went viral, then was pulled from the paper's website. MORE: http://www.therebel.media/truth_about...
That version of the story was later altered on the paper's website with no explanation.
Then it was replaced by an apologetic editorial statement -- the most politically correct statement of its kind I've ever seen in the media.
(Since I filmed my report, above, the Chronicle Herald has replaced that statement with ANOTHER statement, which I'll report on later today.)
I'm in Halifax to seek the truth.
Frankly, I'd prefer to find out that children were not being hurt and that newcomers are assimilating to their new home -- who wouldn't?
But ultimately, I'm here to get the facts and will bring them to you.
Stay tuned.
Canada: Muslim migrant children choking, brutalizing non-Muslim students
By Robert Spencer
April 9, 2016
UPDATE: The Chronicle Herald first deleted references to Muslims, and then pulled this story entirely. It reflects badly on the multicultural project, you see. But Blazing Cat Fur has the original and every iteration here. The Rebel has them here.
“One boy yelled ‘Muslims rule the world’ while choking her daughter. School staff intervened, but to her knowledge, the students were not disciplined further.” That could be Canada’s epitaph.
“Parents worried over school kids’ brutality at Chebucto Heights Elementary School,” Chronicle Herald, April 8, 2016:
HALIFAX — Concerned parents are reporting incidents of violence by refugee students at Chebucto Heights Elementary School.
Reports of students choking, pushing, slapping and verbally abusing their fellow classmates are causing parents to worry about the school’s disciplinary action.
“There has always been some fighting and bickering going on at the school but never to this degree,” said Missy, the mother of two children who attend Chebucto Heights. She asked to be referred to by her nickname for this story.
Missy said her daughter, who is in Grade 3, was choked on Monday and Thursday last week by two refugee boys. A chain was used on both occasions, but she cannot confirm the size or strength of the chain. She said one boy yelled “Muslims rule the world” while choking her daughter. School staff intervened, but to her knowledge, the students were not disciplined further….

Friday, April 08, 2016

What Happened to Justice Scalia?

Nobody Seems to Know How Exactly Antonin Scalia Ended Up Dead Underneath a Pillow
J.K. Trotter
On the morning of February 13, the owner of Cibolo Creek Ranch, in the west
Texas town of Shafter, discovered the cold body of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in one of the ranch’s hotel rooms. The owner, John Poindexter, later told the San Antonio Express-News, “We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled. He was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap.”
In quick, confusing succession, local news outlets declared three different causes of death. First it was unspecified “natural causes.” Then it was a heart attack (or a “myocardial infarction”), which is considered a natural cause of death. Then, finally, it reverted to “natural causes” again—not a heart attack—with one additional detail: According to a local judge chosen to assess the circumstances of Scalia’s death, his heart had simply stopped beating. The confusion apparently arose from a quirk in Texas law that allows judges to officially attribute deaths to natural causes without personally inspecting the deceased person’s body. As a triple-bylined Washington Post report explained last night:
It [took] hours for authorities in remote West Texas to find a justice of the peace, officials said Sunday. When they did, Presidio County Judge Cinderela Guevara pronounced Scalia dead of natural causes without seeing the body — which is permissible under Texas law — and without ordering an autopsy.
One of two other officials who were called but couldn’t get to Scalia’s body in time said that she would have made a different decision on the autopsy. “If it had been me . . . I would want to know,” Juanita Bishop, a justice of the peace in Presidio, Tex., said in an interview Sunday[.]
In her interview with the Post, Guevera insisted that she issued her evaluation of Scalia’s death after consulting with on-scene law enforcement officers, who detected no signs of foul play, and Scalia’s doctor in Virginia, who disclosed that his patient had been dealing with unspecified health issues in recent weeks.
The judge did not elaborate on why she declined to have Scalia’s body undergo an autopsy. That decision is particularly notable given the fact that members of Scalia’s family apparently told employees of the El Paso funeral home where his service was held on Sunday that they did not want the state to perform an autopsy. The same decision seems even more conspicuous in light of unconfirmed reports that Scalia requested the cremation of his remains in his written will. A cremation would, after all, likely destroy any evidence of foul play.
(If the reports about Scalia’s requested cremation are true—and, as of now, there’s nothing beyond a few joking tweets to suggest they are—then his understanding of religious doctrine was slightly more flexible than he let on. You may recall that the justice was a devout Catholic who disputed the validity of the Second Vatican Council, a sweeping set of changes enacted by Church officials in the 1960s. One of those changes consisted of lifting the Church’s centuries-long ban on cremation. Considering the show he made of rejecting Vatican II’s legitimacy, the idea that he would ask to be cremated in his will is, if not unbelievable, at least fairly odd.)
As of Monday morning, it’s still unclear whether authorities will perform an autopsy on Scalia’s body, a state of limbo that has already inspired more than a few conspiracy-minded conservatives to demand more information about Scalia’s demise. According to CBS News, officials are still debating the next steps to take. The justice’s remains are scheduled to be transported on a Monday flight from El Paso to an undisclosed location in Virginia, near the home where Scalia lived with his wife, Maureen, and their nine children.
Did Obama Murder Antonin Scalia? The Conspiracy Theories, Explained
Ashley Feinberg
A dead Supreme Court Justice, a mysterious pillow, missing autopsies, the 10-year anniversary of Dick Cheney shooting a guy in the face, and he was a mere 79 years young. Whether or not these factors have any bearing on what happened to Antonin Scalia is irrelevant, because put together, it’s a conspiracy theorist’s dream come true.
For the hordes of amateur internet sleuths asking the questions no one else dares, the question is less what happened to Scalia than who. Some of their cases are more diligently compiled than others, and none of them totally make sense, but then again—that’s what They want you to think.
So, to support the pursuit of truth, here are some of the best Scalia conspiracies the internet has to offer. Trust no one.
Obama Murdered Scalia
Is there anything Barack Hussein Obama wouldn’t do?
Exhibit A: Obama was told hours before the public knew
According to (what else but) Infowars.com, President Obama knew about Scalia’s death hours before the information became publicly available. They point us to a report from DC Whispers, which, according to the internet’s leading Jade Helm conspiracy resource, “routinely publishes controversial reports based on inside sources”:
Word reached the White House hours before formal media announcements were made regarding longtime Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia having been found dead while vacationing at a Texas resort. First the speechwriters were summoned to provide the appropriate tone for Barack Obama’s remarks.
During that same time, Obama and Valerie Jarrett were already initiating a long-standing plan for what they viewed as a prime opportunity to make Mr. Obama relevant once again and an opportunity that the President was said to be thrilled to have before him.
Thrilled, you say, Mr. Hussein Obama? How very curious, indeed.
Exhibit B: The Judge who blocked an autopsy was previously accused of a murder coverup
Now that Justice Scalia’s body has been embalmed (at the “family’s” “request,” so they say), any hope that an autopsy might reveal the truth is null and void. Which is awfully convenient considering the fact that the usual justice of the peace for Presidio, Texas, Juanita Bishop, just so happened to be indisposed that day for a “work-related event.”
The justice that took her place, Judge Cinderella Guevara, had previously not ordered an autopsy on a young girl whose parents allegedly would have preferred otherwise, according to this blog post from a Daily Kos user named “Singing Lizard.”
Exhibit C: The last roadblock to Obama’s global climate change agenda
Conveniently for Obama and his coterie of climate change alarmists, Scalia’s death came just a few days after the Supreme Court blocked Obama’s centerpiece climate legislation. But now, with that pesky judge out of the way, there’s a good chance the plan will move over to the D.C. Circuit Court, where it’s very likely to finally get approved.
Exhibit D: Huge if true

Sure—unless it’s a false flag attack from the Republican base to rally their voters.
Scalia Dead: Eyes Wide Shut With Queen Of The Damned
By Paul McGuire
March 1, 2016
While staying at the Cibolo Creek Ranch in Presidio County, Texas, Justice Scalia died in his room. One might think he actually died of natural causes except the official narrative keeps changing like something from Alice in Wonderland. First a pillow is found completely over his head; then the pillow is found just on the top portion of his head. When the reports of Scalia’s death first came out there was no mention of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine being found on the nightstand next to him, although, as one who suffered from sleep apnea, he normally needed one. Then, mysteriously, the Washington Post reported that Justice Scalia was found lying in bed with his arms to his side and “his bed covers smooth.” Clearly the Washington Post is trying to tell us something. Who sleeps without ever moving a muscle so that bed covers are smooth? Certainly not a man who had sleep apnea.
A man with sleep apnea tosses and turns like crazy during the night, snoring very loudly, except for the countless times he becomes silent and it appears he is almost dying and then all of a sudden there is a loud gasping for air! A man with sleep apnea doesn’t wake up with his covers smooth. John Poindexter (owner of Cibolo Creek) said Scalia retired around nine p.m. saying he wanted a long night’s sleep. This would have indicated that he was probably very tired because, having sleep apnea, he did not sleep well, so he would have almost certainly plugged in and physically put on the (CPAP) machine breathing mask. At the very least, he would have taken sleep medication because he would have wanted to make sure he slept. Either of these two choices alone would have demanded an autopsy. But let’s suspend logic for a moment, since apparently the authorities charged with carrying out their duties threw logic out the window before they knew any facts to begin with.
The authorities in were Sheriff Danny Dominguez and the Justice of the Peace, Cinderela Guevara. She did not come out to view the body and refused to order an autopsy, and declared that Scalia had died from “heart failure,” then changed it to “natural causes.” This is contrary to Texas law when someone dies alone, no doctor is present before or after death, and the cause of death is unknown (despite all of Cinderela’s magical pronouncements).
As it turns out Justice Scalia belonged to a secret society…the International Order of St. Hubertus, whose American branch was started in 1966 by members of the Bohemian Club associated with the Bohemian Grove. This where things begin to sound conspiratorial, because in an identical manner the Illuminati founded Skull and Bones at Yale University in 1832 as Chapter 322 of a pre-existing German secret order. Apparently, members of the International Order of St. Hubertus, who wear long green robes and use terms and symbols (like the Maltese Cross) also used by the Masons, the Rosicrucian’s, and the Knights Templar), were having a meeting at the Cibolo Ranch. When you see the artwork and the decorative masks hanging prominently on the walls of the resort it looks like something from Stanley Kubrick’s movie Eyes Wide Shut. The artwork is dark and demonic with skeletons and a disfigured woman with her eyeball ripped out of its socket. Just the normal kind of artwork which you would have at a normal spa designed to relax you.
It’s almost as if the artist who decorated the Cibolo Creek Ranch is the same one who painted the sinister paintings of World War III and the apocalypse on the walls of the Denver International Airport. According to a Washington Post article entitled “Justice Scalia Spent His Last Hours With Members of this Secretive Society of Elite Hunters” dated February 24, 2016, “the Society of St. Hubertus, an elite international men’s only hunting club has its roots going back to 1695 in the Czech Republic.”
But let’s go back to the connection of the Society of St. Hubertus with the Bohemian Grove, where numerous U.S. presidents, senators, congressmen, heads of multi-national corporations, and world leaders attend. When the elite gather at the Bohemian Grove they participate in a “mock” sacrifice ceremony called the “Cremation of Care,” in front of a giant owl statue which symbolizes the ancient god of the Canaanites: Moloch. In the Old Testament we read how the Canaanites would offer up their infant children to Moloch and burn them alive as a sacrifice to this demon god. When the ancient Israelites would rebel from the Biblical god they would also participate in the worship of Moloch. But the question has to be asked: why do so many members of the elite, including U.S. presidents, participate in a “mock” worship ceremony to the pagan god Moloch where they burn effigies of human infants? On whatever level you look at this, it is extremely dark, sick, and satanic.
We may never know exactly how Justice Scalia died, but his involvement in a secret society connected to the Bohemian Grove raises far more important questions. In our book The Babylon Code, I and my co-author Troy Anderson, a Pulitzer Prize-nominated journalist, look at the important role secret societies have played in world events and in the founding of America up until present times. In Stanley Kubrick’s movie Eyes Wide Shut the famous satanic cult-orgy scene where the participants were wearing masks to hide their true identities was filmed in one of the Rothschild castles.
While we focus in on how Scalia died and consider the probability that he was assassinated, the bigger question is who were the other 35 members of this secret cult who were at the Cibolo Creek Ranch? We may never know the answers to these questions because their identities have not been made public.
One final note. If you think those masks that were left up on the wall of the Cibolo Creek Ranch were left there by accident and that the empty beds eerily lined up in the hall on the way to Scalia’s room were there because they were cleaning, you better think again. Whatever happened at the Cibolo Creek Ranch was done in plain sight, as Kubrick suggested with his play on words in the title of his movie, Eyes Wide Shut, or we could say, “Eyes Wide Open!” For the average American who lives in a surreal trance state, it does not matter if their eyes are wide open because even when they appear to be open, they are actually “wide shut.” One of the most powerful men in the world, Justice Scalia, died under very questionable circumstances. With so many critical decisions before the Supreme Court, Scalia’s mysterious death, can appear very convenient.
But, ultimately for the mass majority of Americans it does not matter because most of them will have already forgotten. Scalia’s death is just another image among countless images of death and chaos which remain buried in the collective consciousness of America’s kaleidoscopic soul. May God have mercy on us all, or we to will walk with “eyes wide shut” into Hades hand in hand with the Queen of the Damned.
© 2016 Paul McGuire - All Rights Reserved
Paul McGuire: radio talk show host, author, feature film producer and television commentator.
Paul McGuire is the author of 22 books, such as the best-selling, The Day the Dollar Died and Are You Ready for the Microchip? Paul is the host of the syndicated television show, The Paul McGuire Report. Paul McGuire hosted the nationally syndicated talk radio show, "The Paul McGuire Show" for 10 years. Paul McGuire is a television commentator and has been a frequent guest on the Fox News Network and CNN.
Paul is the producer of two science fiction films in Hollywood. The History Channel did a 2-hour special with Paul McGuire entitled Seven Signs of the Apocalypse. Paul has interviewed numerous world leaders, Presidents and Prime Ministers. Paul lives in Los Angeles, California.
At fifteen years old, Paul was demonstrating with radical activist Abbie Hoffman and made an honorary member of the Black Panther Party. However, while studying Altered States of Consciousness at the University of Missouri, Paul had a miraculous experience hitchhiking in a remote area similar to the movie Field of Dreams. Paul re-thought his socialist and humanist world view and rejected it as completely false. Paul has devoted his life to communicating truth to people.
Website: PaulMcGuire.us
Supreme Court Justice Scalia — Murdered By A Hooker
By National ENQUIRER Staff
Posted on Mar 4, 2016
In a bombshell world exclusive, The National ENQUIRER has learned that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia’s death was a highly planned “political assassination” orchestrated by the CIA and carried out by a $2,000-a-night hooker! A top Washington, D.C. source said the Feb. 13 death of the 79-year-old jurist at a remote Texas ranch just 15 miles from Mexico was part of a “shocking conspiracy that tracks back to the CIA and the White House!"
Why Some People Believe Scalia Was Murdered
By R. Kelly Garrett  
On February/22/2016
This article first appeared on The Conversation.
The Conversation following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death on February 13, a former criminal investigator for Washington, D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department named William O. Ritchie, took to Facebook.
“My gut tells me there is something fishy going on in Texas,” he wrote.
With those words, Ritchie helped draw national attention to an emerging conspiracy theory: that Scalia may have been murdered.
According to The Washington Post, Ritchie continued that he was “stunned that no autopsy was ordered for Justice Scalia,” before pointing out the many flaws he saw in published accounts on the subject.
Ritchie wasn’t the first to float this conspiracy. Conservative radio talk show host Alex Jones suggested as much in a video he posted to Facebook on the day of Scalia’s death (“The question is: Was Antonin Scalia murdered?”).
The next morning, the Drudge Report pointed out that the judge was found with a pillow over his head, presumably providing additional evidence of foul play. Conservative political commentator Michael Savage also weighed in, wondering, “Is it a conspiracy theory to ask questions that are so obviously in need of answer, or is it just common sense?”
But as someone who has studied how and why misperceptions emerge and spread, Ritchie’s words struck me as noteworthy. Unlike Savage or Jones, Ritchie’s livelihood isn’t dependent on appealing to a conservative audience or making shocking allegations.
To the contrary, this is a man who made his living investigating crimes through the accumulation of evidence and the judicious use of reason. It is at least plausible that his primary motivation is to ensure that the truth is known.
The Scalia conspiracy theory is likely to strike many—especially liberal Democrats—as hard to fathom. Why should anyone be surprised at the death of a 79-year-old man when the  average life expectancy of a man in the U.S. is 77?
Why is the decision by Scalia’s family not to have an autopsy performed met with skepticism?
And why second-guess the U.S. Marshals Service, an agency  charged with protecting justices of the Supreme Court, when it concluded that there was no foul play?
Is It Really So Strange?
It may be tempting to assume that reasonable people are immune to conspiracy theories, but doing so would be a mistake. Research into misperception, rumor and conspiracy theory suggests that even reasonable individuals can reach conclusions that don’t align with the best available evidence.
Researchers have identified numerous strategies that individuals use to assess what is true. Under the right circumstances, each can lead to misperceptions. For example, if a claim is consistent with other things you know, you will likely find it easier to understand, which in turn makes it seem more truthful—a phenomenon that has been called the illusory truth effect. Claims that contradict a prior belief, in contrast, tend to elicit counterargument.
The coherence and explanatory power of a causal story also influence whether it is believed. Individuals will often stick with a plausible explanation even if the available evidence doesn’t support it. In a  classic study, researchers found that individuals would continue to attribute a warehouse fire to paint held in a storage room even after they were told—and could recall—that the storage room was empty at the time of the fire.
For those who see government-supported conspiracies as an everyday reality, the suggestion that Justice Scalia’s death is part of a coordinated plot to gain political advantage may well seem sensible, even if solid evidence is lacking. Without knowing anything about Ritchie’s political views, we can’t say whether this was a factor here, but it is likely to play a role in some individuals' assessments.
One final consideration that individuals use when assessing whether a claim is true is the belief of others. The more often we hear a claim,  the easier it is to believe—especially claims that come from people we know and trust.
For example, one of the most important predictors of what Americans think about the risks posed by climate change is what members of Congress say and do about this issue. The more Democrats voice support for the issue, and the more Republicans are critical of it,  the more polarized Americans have become.
In light of this, we should expect Donald Trump’s  recent speculations about the Scalia conspiracy theory to contribute to growing public concern about this possibility.
The Challenge of Setting the Record Straight
Notably, research suggests that misperceptions—including belief in unsupported conspiracy theories—are  not primarily due to a lack of information. Nor can such beliefs be attributed to so-called media echo chambers.
My colleagues and I have found that most Americans consume news  from a diverse range of outlets. (And if you’re skeptical of analyses based on Americans’ self-reported news exposure, note that behavioral studies yield similar results, both  online and  off.)
So is there anything we can do to defuse the Scalia conspiracy theory or others like it? Many studies, including  this one by a colleague and me, find that attempts to correct misperceptions often fail. Sometimes they  fail spectacularly. Indeed, some scholars conclude that humans are hopelessly irrational, that emotional biases  will always win out.
Yet, even if we are inherently emotional beings, there may still be hope for humans’ ability to reach reasoned conclusions. Studies suggest that fact-checking—whether by the  media or by  members of one’s own social network—can help promote more accurate beliefs. Fact-checking can also  motivate political leaders to be more careful about the claims they make.
Some of the best strategies—as journalist Craig Silverman points out in his article “Lies, Damn Lies, and Viral Content”—include focusing debunking efforts on the idea, not the person, and being mindful of the biases described here. (Other good reviews of correction strategies are  here and  here.)
There may also be things that individuals can do to reduce the biases to which all humans are prone. We can, in psychologist Daniel Kahneman’s  words, “think slowly,” striving to reduce our reliance on intuition and gut feelings, instead focusing on more thorough examination of the evidence. Indeed, there is evidence that when individuals are made aware of their biases,  they are often able to compensate.
But this will not always be enough, since there is ample evidence that  reasoning skills and  careful thought can actually increase bias.
Taken as a whole, research suggests that even thoughtful individuals with good intentions—including Ritchie—are prone to embrace claims for which there is little evidence, and to defend those claims in the face of contradictory evidence. This is particularly likely when stakes are high, when outcomes are hard to explain or accept, or when a claim is consistent with one’s political values.
The evidence suggests that Ritchie’s speculations are wrong, but there is nothing surprising about his suspicions.
R. Kelly Garrett is associate professor of communication, The Ohio State University.