*******
The US is the Aggressor in Iran by Branden Moore
(henrymakow.com)
March 3, 2012
http://www.henrymakow.com/usisthe_aggressor.html
(left, one of the many explosions at Iranian facilities, and assassinations of nuclear scientists) The US launched an undeclared war on Iran long ago and Iran has not retaliated in any serious way so far.
Despite attempts by Western media whores to portray Iran as a grave threat to US national security, the truth is far more sinister.
The US has been at war with Iran since the 1950's at least, starting with operation AJAX, also know as TPAJAX. This was a joint US-British intelligence operation that overthrew the democratically elected government of Prime Minister Mosaddegh in 1953.
The media whores characterize Iran as an evil aggressor who must be neutralized by Western intervention. The accusations include: conspiring to attack a neighboring country with nuclear weapons, orchestrating 9/11, creating instability in Iraq and cooperating with Al-Qaeda.
How dumb they think we are? The US (and Israel), fronts for the central banking cartel, are the aggressors.
For example: Al-Qaeda is a Sunni group and a sworn enemy of the predominantly Shiite population in Iran. Al-Qaeda was created by US government officials to create instability.
The US put Saddam Hussein into power and backed his regime during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980 to 1988. Like so many others, Saddam was betrayed by the US when he became a liability to the globalist agenda. [1]
The invasion of Iraq by the US in 2003 was not done solely to take over the natural resources, but to use Iraq as a launch pad against Iran.
Iran Slow to Acknowledge Undeclared War
As early as 2005 former UN weapons inspector, Scott Ritter, was sounding the alarm on US covert
operations in Iran, stating: "The US war with Iran has already begun. As we speak, American overflights of Iranian soil are taking place, using pilotless drones and other, more sophisticated, capabilities. The violation of a sovereign nation's airspace is an act of war in and of itself. But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the intelligence-gathering phase." [2]He also stated that the MEK (The People's Mujahedin of Iran) once run by Saddam Hussein's intelligence services was working exclusively for the CIA's Directorate of Operations to carry out bombings in Iran.
In February 2007, a high-ranking CIA official reported anonymously to the Telegraph newspaper, that terrorist funding in Iran comes directly from the CIA's classified budget and is "no great secret".
The claim was backed by former State Department counter-terrorism agent, Fred Burton who said: "The latest attacks inside Iran fall in line with US efforts to supply and train Iran's ethnic minorities to destabilize the Iranian regime." [3]
In 2010, The New York Times revealed that Gen. David H. Petraeus had signed a secret directive that: "authorizes the sending of American Special Operations troops to both friendly and hostile nations in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa to gather intelligence and build ties with local forces".
According to the report the directive was intended to make previous activities initiated under the Bush administration more "systematic and long term" [4]
The number of "mysterious" bombings and "unexplained" fatalities in Iran since 2005 has increased dramatically. The events are virtually impossible to compile due to the reluctance of Iran's media to report them and its government to address it.
Only recently has Iran reacted to these events via military exercises and threats to close down the Strait of Hormuz. These reactions have been strategically characterized as "aggressive" behavior by Western media whores.
Examples of Covert Operations
The Israeli newspaper Ha aratz has compiled 8 documented explosions and assassinations from 2010 - 2011 alone, and those are only the incidents related to Iran's nuclear development at the time. The most recent fatality according to the report occurred on January 11, 2012 when nuclear scientist, Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan was killed by a magnetic bomb placed on the side of his car by a motorcyclist. [5]
In November, 2011 an Iranian missile base was completely destroyed after an explosion which Iranian authorities had described as an "accident". Satellite images of the site before and after the explosion reveal the extensive damage. The blast occurred just as Iran had achieved a milestone in the development of a new missile. [6]
Iran just happens to be one of the few countries left on the planet that refuses to allow the banks and their fortune 100 front companies to operate on it's soil with impunity.
If the bankers succeed in using America to colonize Iran they will take control of the Iranian central bank which will operate as the shadow government of Iran. Americans will experience a similar demise once the bankers have full control of the planet and America has been exhausted of it's use.
References:
[1] http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-consp.htm
[2] http://www.uruknet.info/?p=m12776&l=i&size=1&hd=0
[3] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1543798/US-funds-terror-groups-to-sow-chaos-in-Iran.html
[4] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/world/25military.html?hp
[5] http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/timeline-mysterious-deaths-and-blasts-linked-to-iran-s-nuclear-program-1.406704
[6] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/checkpoint-washington/post/image-shows-than-an-iranian-missile-site-was-destroyed/2011/11/28/gIQA7KZW5N_blog.html?tid=sm_twitter_washingtonpost
Branden Moore, 24, lives in Florida.
*******
President Obama's goal in upcoming talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to persuade him that the United States "has Israel's back" so that Israel has no need to rush toward air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, the president said in a newly published interview.
Many of the president's supporters are concerned about that commitment, an uneasiness Obama reportedly hopes to allay in a Sunday speech to a pro-Israel lobby. Obama's agenda the next day in his meeting with Netanyahu is to convince Israeli leadership that they can rely on that assurance enough to delay military action of their own.
There have been endless recent visits to Israel from high-ranking U.S. officials regarding the Iran issue, including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and most recently National Security Advisor Tom Donilon.
Obama on Iran: 'I don't bluff'
By Christi Parsons
Los Angeles Times
March 2, 2012
President Obama's goal in upcoming talks with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to persuade him that the United States "has Israel's back" so that Israel has no need to rush toward air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, the president said in a newly published interview.In a meeting at the White House on Monday, the president told journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, he will try to persuade the Israeli leader that an attack now would backfire at a time when Iran is under increasing international pressure.
In an interview granted earlier this week and posted on the Atlantic magazine's website Friday morning, Goldberg reported that Obama is dismissive of a strategy of containment as unworkable and called it "unacceptable" for Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
Obama said he plans to tell Netanyahu that he will order military strikes against Iran's nuclear program if the current international sanctions are not successful in deterring its pursuit of nuclear weapons. The possibility of an American strike against Iran is a serious one, Goldberg reported.
"I think that the Israeli government recognizes that, as president of the United States, I don't bluff," Obama said, according to the report. "I also don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."
Many of the president's supporters are concerned about that commitment, an uneasiness Obama reportedly hopes to allay in a Sunday speech to a pro-Israel lobby. Obama's agenda the next day in his meeting with Netanyahu is to convince Israeli leadership that they can rely on that assurance enough to delay military action of their own.Obama said in the interview that all options are on the table in the Iranian situation, the final one being what he referred to as the "military component." He said his concerns are not just about Israel's security but about the proliferation of nuclear weapons more generally.
Still, Obama said he has faith that the sanctions coordinated by his administration have hurt Iran and that they may soon force the regime in Tehran to abandon its nuclear ambitions.
"Without in any way being under an illusion about Iranian intentions, without in any way being naive about the nature of that regime, they are self-interested," Obama said. "It is possible for them to make a strategic calculation that, at minimum, pushes much further to the right whatever potential breakout capacity they may have, and that may turn out to be the best decision for Israel's security."
*******Obama Promises Israel Use Of Bases For Iran Attack If It Will Wait
Richard Silverstein
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
There have been endless recent visits to Israel from high-ranking U.S. officials regarding the Iran issue, including Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and most recently National Security Advisor Tom Donilon.The AP reports that during the last set of meetings the Israelis defiantly told the U.S. that if they attacked Iran, they would leave the U.S. in the dark. Here’s how Mike Rogers, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee put it:
Rogers told CNN on Monday: “I got the sense that Israel is incredibly serious about a strike on their nuclear weapons program. It’s their calculus that the administration … is not serious about a real military consequence to Iran moving forward.
“They believe they’re going to have to make a decision on their own, given the current posture of the United States,” he added.
Now, Israel’s two top leaders head to Washington for separate sets of talks in the coming days. Bibi comes for his annual triumphal curtain call before the Aipac national conference. There he will certainly repeat his baleful predictions of what a world with Iranian nukes would be like. It could be his last speech in this country before an Israeli attack.
It’s uncertain what he will discuss with Pres. Obama, with whom he will meet. The president seems more the supplicant than the officiant in this relationship. He doesn’t want Israel to attack. But both he and Bibi know that he doesn’t have the will to stop him. It feels to me like possibly the final stop on the way to war.
Obama is so desperate, if this account is to be believed, that he’s offered Israel use of our Middle East bases from which to launch its attack at a later date:
U.S. intelligence and special operations officials have tried to keep a dialogue going with Israel despite the high-level impasse, offering options such as allowing Israel to use U.S. bases in the region to launch such a strike, as a way to make sure the Israelis give the Americans a heads-up, according to the U.S. official and a former U.S. official with knowledge of the communications.
The idea that Israel would use U.S. bases or that we would consider allowing the Israelis to do so seems wild and far-fetched. But if true, it indicates just how far and how harebrained we’ve grown in latching on to something, anything to stop the Israelis.
From the tone of this Wall Street Journal article, it appears that Bibi is coming to Washington seeking a 
virtual guarantee that the U.S. will attack Iran if Israel does not do so. Israel’s chief Congressional water carriers (in this case Sen. Lindsay Graham) also appear to think that such a promise is the least Obama can offer our ever faithful ally:
virtual guarantee that the U.S. will attack Iran if Israel does not do so. Israel’s chief Congressional water carriers (in this case Sen. Lindsay Graham) also appear to think that such a promise is the least Obama can offer our ever faithful ally:“The president needs to be reassuring to the Israelis that the policy of the United States is etched in stone: we will do everything, including military action, to stop a nuclear-armed Iran. I hope the administration when they talk about ‘all options’ will better define what those options are. We’re getting too far into the game to be overly nuanced now.”
I’m beginning to feel like a character in a movie watching a train barreling down the track. He knows there will be a crash, and a disaster to follow. There’s nothing he can do to stop it. He can only watch and wait for the crunch of steel and the screeching of brakes that cannot stop it in time.
In a related matter, an Israeli publication, Inyan Merkazi, writes (based on a Russian media report) that Avigdor Lieberman, who is known to have an exceedingly close relationship with the Kremlin, was told by Vladimir Putin to oppose an Israeli attack on Iran. There are those within Israel who believe the current foreign minister is a Russian intelligence asset, not just a close Russian political ally, though these are so far rumors rather than proven fact.
One way to test the theory is to watch which way Lieberman votes in the ministerial meeting at which an Israeli attack much be approved. If Lieberman votes No, you’ll have a pretty decent indication of where his bread is buttered. If he votes Yes, then at least according to this report, he’ll be biting the Russian hand that feeds him, indicating he is much more of an independent figure than many believe.
*******Germany warns Israel against Iran attack
Press TV
February 13, 2012
Germany’s Defense Minister has warned Tel Aviv against any militaryadventurism in Iran amid the escalating anti-Iran war rhetoric by the US and the Israeli regime.
Thomas de Maiziere insisted in a Saturday interview with Frankfurter Allgemeinen Sonntagszeitung that the success of such an effort against the Islamic Republic would be highly unlikely.
The German defense minister also cautioned the Israeli regime against “obvious political damages” should it venture on an attack against Iran.
Israeli officials have ramped up their war rhetoric over the past few weeks, threatening Iran with military strikes in case the US-led Western sanctions against the country fail to force Tehran into abandoning its civilian nuclear program.
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said on February 9 that “Israel has a large selection of ways, when the world of international sanctions fails to persuade Iran to halt its nuclear program.”
Earlier this month, the Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak said if Western sanctions against Iran fail to stop its nuclear program, military action against the country must be placed on its agenda.
Meanwhile, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta claimed on February 2 that there is a strong possibility the Tel Aviv regime will launch an attack on Iran in April, May, or June 2012.
Washington and Tel Aviv have repeatedly threatened Tehran with various ‘military options’ in an attempt to force the Islamic Republic to halt its peaceful nuclear program, which has been closely monitored by inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Iran has fiercely rejected Western publicity that its nuclear program may be diverted to military objectives while insisting that as a signatory to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and a member of the IAEA, it is entitled to pursue nuclear technology for its numerous civilian uses and benefits.
*******Also See:
War with Iran - Is it Inevitable?
(Part 1)
11 November 2011
and
Israel and Iran - Who will Bomb Who First?
21 July 2010
and
What's Happening in Iran?
12 February 2010
and
Iranians' Protest Election Results
25 June 2009
Neo-Cons Want to Attack Iran
17 September 2007
and
The Iran-Contra Scandal!
29 December 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment