Sunday, September 29, 2013

What Do You Know About Saudi Arabia?

*******
*******
NGO: Saudi Arabia refusal to take seat on UN Security Council is “victory for human rights”
UN Watch now calls on Saudis to drop bid for next month's election to Human Rights Council
By UN Watch
Friday, October 18, 2013
GENEVA, – Saudi Arabia’s refusal to take its seat on the UN Security Council, announced today via the Saudi Press Agency, is a “victory for human rights,” said a Geneva-based human rights group today.
“A country whose legal system routinely lashes women rape victims rather than punish the perpetrators never belonged in the UN Security Council in the first place,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of the non-governmental human rights group UN Watch, which has for years reported on Saudi Arabia’s oppression of women and its other gross human rights abuses.
UN Watch also noted that Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest source of funds for Islamist terrorist groups (see below), and was an “absurd choice” to legislate for the world on combating terrorism.
“While the Saudi statement invoked UN ‘double standards’ as their grounds for refusal, the truth is that Saudi Arabia’s entire system is a double standard. Under Saudi law and practice, there is one standard for men, and another for women, who cannot vote, drive a car, or travel without a male guardian; one for Muslims, and another for Christians, 53 of whom who were arrested this year by religious police for praying in a private home; one for heterosexuals, and another for gays, where homosexuality is punishable by death, and where gays have been publicly beheaded,” said Neuer.
“Saudi Arabia has an abysmal human rights record, and by logic and morality never belonged on a Security Council where members need to address critical human rights and humanitarian issues. Saudi Arabia continues to rank as one of the worst places on the planet when it comes to the rights of women, freedom of religion, and other fundamental liberties,” said Neuer.
“We are now calling on Saudi Arabia to also pull out of next month’s election to the Human Rights Council. The Saudi bid is the height of hypocrisy.”
Council members not only decide UN action on international peace and security, but also shape global legislation and enforcement of hot-button issues concerning the protection of civilians in wartime, sexual violence as a weapon of war, accountability for war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, international justice, and counter-terrorism and human rights.
“The Saudi pull-out is a relief for the cause of justice in Darfur, given Saudi Arabia’s despicable record of repeatedly praising and shielding Sudan. Anyone who cares about Security Council action on Darfur—including the ICC arrest warrant against the Sudanese president for genocide—ought to be gratified to see Riyadh excluded from this situation.”
The UN Charter provides that “due regard” be “specially paid” to candidates who contribute to the purposes of the world body, which are defined as “promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.”
“Saudi Arabia never qualified under any imaginable interpretation of the UN criteria, said Neuer. “Women are subjugated in Saudi Arabia. They suffer gross and systematic inequality, and discrimination in law and practice. It is shocking but true that technological progress in Saudi Arabia means that the government now sends male guardians automatic text messages on the cross-border movements of female dependents.”
“Freedom of religion does not exist under the Wahabist regime. Saudis are required by law to be Muslims, while the practice of Christianity and other religions is completely forbidden.”
Saudi Support for Terrorism
Neuer welcomed the facts that the Saudis will not be legislating for the world on vital issues like combating terrorism, given its egregious record.
According to a December 2009 diplomatic cable signed by former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as revealed by Wikileaks and The Guardian, Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest source of funds for Islamist terrorist groups.
“Saudi Arabia remains a critical financial support base for al-Qaida … and other terrorist groups,” Clinton said. “Donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide,” she said.
UN Watch is a Geneva-based human rights organization founded in 1993 to monitor UN compliance with the principles of its Charter. It is accredited as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and as an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information (DPI).
*******
Wahhabi Islam: The Royal Puppet Masters
By Kristie Pelletier and Michael S. Coffman, Ph.D
December 21, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/Coffman/mike138.htm
Many in the West, and especially in America, are still holding to the claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is a moderate, largely secular, and peace-loving organization. The leaders in the U.S. who are chanting this mantra are either incredibly naïve and uninformed, simply not understanding the Islamic Eastern mind; or are more likely, they are outright liars. The long hidden goals of the Brotherhood have been revealed and should move every freedom lover to action.What we are experiencing since 9/11 with al Qaeda and other terrorist groups is partly because of “blowback,” the natural consequence, of the U.S.’ practice of working with radicals. Our government allied itself with the most radical, militant Afghan mujahedeen, training and arming them, in the fight against the Soviets. And more recently, it is being revealed that the U.S. worked in much the same way as in Afghanistan in the 1980’s with members of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood in order to oust Qaddafi.
The primary goal of the Brotherhood in the West is to establish an Islamic-Shariah based infrastructure that they can put into place to rule when the time is right. This is not a secret. Anyone with a computer and an internet connection can easily discover these facts. So why is it that our government continues to not only dialogue with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, but to give them key positions of influence?
Saudi Arabia—Birthplace of Wahhabism
One nation stands out as home base for the global Islamic mischief; that is Saudi Arabia. Hillary Clinton has stated that Saudis are the largest financiers of terrorism. A December 2009 classified memo from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton indicated donors in Saudi Arabia were "the most significant source" of funding to Wahhabist terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda.
The Wahhabist form of Islam is considered by its adherents to be the purest form. Founded by Muhammad bin Abd al-Wahhab, a Salafi Islamist Theologian in the 1700’s, it is a very radical form of Islam which considers all who don’t follow it, including Muslims who follow other branches of Islam, to be heathens and enemies. Osama bin Laden and the Muslim Brotherhood both have their roots in Wahhabist Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, recall that fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. This brand of Islam seeks to conquer all other religions through whatever means necessary. (As discussed in previous articles: Radical Islam in the House and Civilization Jihad.)
The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCirf) once again recommends Saudi Arabia be designated by the State Department as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC). The following is from that report issued in March of 2012:
More than 10 years since the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, the Saudi government has failed to implement a number of promised reforms related to promoting freedom of thought, conscience, and religion or belief. The Saudi government persists in banning all forms of public religious expression other than that of the government‘s own interpretation of one school of [Wahhabi] Islam; prohibits churches, synagogues, temples, and other non-Muslim places of worship; uses in its schools and posts online state textbooks that continue to espouse intolerance and incite violence; and periodically interferes with private religious practice.The report further states that the Saudis continue to practice and promote activities lobally which serve to exacerbate extremist action and ideology. These activities include the building and the support of mosques, religious schools and Islamic centers that propagate the very extreme Wahhabist Islam coming out of Saudi Arabia. The report also expresses concern for the vast numbers of Muslim clerics who are coming out of schools in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia which teach this politico-religious ideology which seeks global domination and promotes hatred for and violence against non-Muslims.
Others such as Shi‘a, Ahmadi, and Ismaili Muslims are often violently persecuted, many having been detained, beaten and even be-headed while visiting Saudi Arabia performing Hajj, or pilgrimage. The Saudi government uses their rigid apostasy and blasphemy laws to persecute anyone they choose.
The 1998 International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) mandated the promotion of religious liberty around the world as a central element of American foreign policy. The IRFA provides the standard for a CPC designation. It requires for such designation that: The particular government has “engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious freedom,” which is defined as “systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom.” The U.S. can exercise influence on CPC’s to bring about compliance with USCirf standards such as economic sanctions. In spite of blatant human rights violations, Saudi Arabia continues to get waivers from any kind of action that might bring about real change ever since 2006, two years after it was first designated a Country of Particular Concern. Ali al Ahmed, a Shia Muslim living in Saudi Arabia, in an interview with PBS’ Frontline described what it is like for a non Wahhabist in that country;
[The Saudi government] It's intolerant toward other Muslims who are not Salafis. (Wahhabist) You can see a book that is printed [by] a branch of Imam, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud University in Washington area, and they printed this book where they say that 95 percent of Muslims are [merely] claimant to Islam [They are not considered real Muslims]. If you don't believe in Salafi, you are not a human being. You are something of a lower grade, that you can be persecuted or hurt, and it is OK, accepted, in that ideology. It's accepted to be killed, or maimed... The religious authority in Saudi Arabia controls the justice system. This is very important. ... All the judges in Saudi Arabia are Salafi.
They control all education. Saudi Arabia private and public schools, their curriculum is prescribed by the government. The religious curriculums are written and monitored and taught by Salafi Saudis only. Well, here, this is a book, Hadeeth, for ninth grade. Hadeeth is a statement of Prophet Mohammed. “The day of judgment will not arrive until Muslims fight Jews, and Muslim will kill Jews until the Jew hides behind a tree or a stone. Then the tree and the stone will say, 'Oh Muslim, oh, servant of God, this is a Jew behind me. Come and kill him'.” This is taught for 14-year-old boys in Saudi Arabia. This is a book printed by Saudi government Ministry of Education.
Ali al Ahmed went on to make this blunt and shocking statement:
Because the hijackers, 15 hijackers who are Saudis, they studied this thinking–destructive thinking–in Saudi Arabia. They spent a few months in Afghanistan. But they lived their life, they studied this in government mosques. They studied this kind of curriculum that I talked to you about. ... Government curriculum inspired what happened in New York. …there is an (sic) another fatwa by a government official, who is still working for the government, who said the same thing: that jihad should be waged against Shi'a. So the hate message ... that some Salafi carries, started against it locally ... until it reached New York.We cannot afford to forget that the only difference beteen the seemingly peaceful members of the Muslim Brotherhood and the 9/11 murderers is tactics. They have the same endgame in mind.
9/11 InconsistenciesPresident George W. Bush frequently promised to use the power of the U.S. to stop the flow of money to militant Islamists, all the while pledging to hold financers of terrorism just as responsible as those who pulled the triggers. In fact, the access of members of the Muslim Brotherhood to positions of power increased, both in number and scope of influence, under his leadership. The facts of 9/11 continue to surface. President Bush went out guns blazing to get the ones who attacked us. At least that is what we were supposed to believe. In reality, the Bush administration did not target many of the backers of the terrorists, especially those with Saudi connections.
The Rabita Trust is one organization which happened to be targeted. Designated a “Global Terrorist Entity” its assets were frozen one month after the 9/11 attacks. However, its founder, Saudi born, Abdullah Omar Naseef has escaped accountability. Organizations are made up of individuals. Individuals like Naseef were never held accountable. Naseef, has powerful friends in high places. One of his well-placed associates is Huma Abedin, a deputy chief of staff and aide to Hillary Clinton. She was once part of Naseef’s organization, the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA). (There will be more on Huma in the next article.)
In the days following the 9/11 attacks, air travel was severely restricted because of national security. Craig Unger reported in the New York Times that 300 Saudis left the U.S. with the apparent clearance of the Bush Whitehouse. Two dozen of those leaving our country were members of Osama bin Laden’s family. One of those permitted to leave was Prince Turki bin Faisal, the widely feared head of the Saudi Intelligence Agency, until he was abruptly fired in August of 2001, just days before the 9/11 attacks. His replacement was officially announced on August 31. This begs the question asked so pointedly by Walid Shoebat in his investigative report on these events, “What, exactly, was the longtime head of Saudi Arabia's secret police doing in the United States, while 15 young Saudis were carrying out their attacks?” Walid Shoebat is a former radicalized PLO terrorist. He is one of the founders of the Forum for Middle East Understanding, and is a well-connected expert on the Middle East. As a Palestinian/American growing up mostly in the Middle East, and as former Muslim terrorist himself, he understands the Islamist mind.
The 9/11 hijackers made at least 6 trips to Las Vegas. Prince Turki flew with more than 30 others out of Vegas just a few days after the attacks. This Saudi prince had documented connections to Osama bin Laden and Pakistan's Inter Service Intelligence, which propped up the Taliban, yet the Bush Administration allowed them to leave from Las Vegas. None of them were interviewed. Inexplicably, Turki later became the Saudi Ambassador to the U.S.
So many questions remain since 9/11. It has been reported that names of key Saudi’s were scrubbed from the 9/11 Commission’s report. The captured number 3 man in al Qaeda, Abu Zubaydah, named three Saudi Princes as intermediaries when he was interrogated by the U.S.; Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdulaziz, Prince Sultan bin Faisal bin Turki bin Abdullah, and Prince Ahmed bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz. Zubaydah was a leading member of Osama bin Laden's organization involved with the operational control of al-Qaeda's millennium bomb plots, as well as the attack on the USS Cole.
Johanna McGeary wrote in Time Magazine that after Zubaydah was captured in Pakistan, he was transferred to Afghanistan where he was sedated with sodium pentothal. Intending to intimidate the prisoner, what they found in Zubaydah’s reaction “was not fear, but utter relief.”
During the interrogation, Zubaydah was told he was being held in Saudi Arabia and that his interrogators, two Arab Americans, were actually Saudis. McGeary reports that he was happy to see ‘Saudi agents.’ Seeming relieved, he rattled off phone numbers of the three princes named above. He said these princes were senior members of the Saudi royal family and would “tell you what to do.” All three of the princes named by Zubaydah met untimely ends under suspicious circumstances a few months after Zubaydah’s capture and within a week of each other. The Bush administration had warned the Saudis that they would take matters into their own hands. One administration official was quoted as saying, “We don't care how you deal with the problem; just do it or we will.”
A detailed report of the Saudi Princes’ deaths was written by Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack. The first prince, young and healthy, died of a reported heart attack during routine surgery. The second died in a reported car accident on his way to the first prince’s funeral. The third died of thirst in the desert, or so they say. With great discernment, Barrack and Shoebat call into question the reported events;
Three princes named by Abu Zubaydah as having helped plan 9/11 all die mysteriously within four months of Zubaydah's capture and within one week of each other.
The stories of these three princes are not included in the 9/11 Commission Report or available in the original Arabic media sources.
There are no photos or verifiable names of individuals present during these deaths.
The second prince dies after leaving behind a functioning mobile phone and walking through the desert without water, before dying next to the car he left to find help.
The details of the deaths of these three men do not add up. A reading of the complete Shoebat article is very enlightening.
The Obama ConnectionIt gets worse. Avi Lipkin, a well-known author of Is Fanatic Islam a Global Threat?, was one of the first people to raise the alarm of Islamic fanaticism in 1995. Well before 2008, he and his wife Rachel reported radio broadcasts from Saudi Arabia that were claiming “we will have a Muslim in the Whitehouse in 2008.” If true, it would give new meaning to the deep bow Obama gave to the King of Saudi Arabia in 2009 during his global apology trip that shocked Americans. It would also explain the mystery of how Obama, coming from a low-income family, could comfortably attend so many prestigious and very expensive universities.
Rachel was an Egyptian Jewess who spoke fluent Arabic before immigrating to Israel in 1969. On January 19th 2010, Rachel recorded a broadcast from Nile TV from Egypt. She reports it was a roundtable discussion wherein Egypt’s foreign minister reportedly said that he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he is a Muslim. Obama then explained to him about all his Muslim family background and practices. Obama then said “I have a problem with some domestic issues, and as soon as I finish with the health care question you Muslims will see what I will do for Islam regarding Israel.” It is interesting, and perhaps telling, that Obama has shunned Israel, and on May 5, 2011 shocked the world by calling for Israel to withdraw back to its pre-1967 borders. Doing so would make Israel indefensible. Could it be true? We don’t know. Obama has spent millions of dollars preventing anyone from uncovering his very secret past. Yet, the majority of Americans voted for him—twice!
One thing we do know, however. The American media has been virtually silent on the topic of President Obama’s Wahhabi Muslim roots in Kenya. It is a matter of record that his family, his close family in Africa, is devout Muslims. That they adhere to this austere form of Islam doesn’t play well in Peoria so the media is silent. After the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency of the United States, the Obamas of Kogelo were catapulted to exponentially heightened status; rags to riches overnight. In an interview on Al Jazeera the president’s first cousin proudly revealed that he studied Arabic and Shariah in Saudi Arabia in Medina. Only one brand of Islam is taught at that Islamic University; Salafist, aka, Wahhabist Islam. The Kenyan Obamas’ power and influence both in Kenya and internationally has given them the ability to pursue significant advancement of Wahhabist Islam. In 2009, Barack Obama’s uncle, Sayid Obama, his grandmother, Sarah Omar, and cousin, Musa Ismail Obama, made their pilgrimage to Mecca. They were received by members of the Saudi royal family including Prince Faisal bin Thamer bin Abdul Aziz, Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Mamdouh Bin Abdul Aziz, and Prince Abdullah bin Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, as well as a number of other princes and officials. The Saudis provided extensive security for the President’s family while they were in Saudi Arabia.
Musa Obama gave his interview on Al Jazeera TV after the trip. During that interview, Musa discussed his own devotion to Islam as well as that of his family. He talked about how it had been a lifelong dream of his grandmother (she is also President Obama’s grandmother) to perform Hajj. Hajj is one of the 5 pillars of Islam and is the ultimate act of worship for the Muslim. Musa said that his grandmother, Sarah, had believed that it would never be a reality for her to perform Hajj by making the trek to Mecca and that she was deeply moved that she was able to do so.
Musa is very proud of the fact that he has memorized the Koran and studied Arabic and Sharia in Saudi Arabia at the Islamic University in Medina. This university is nothing but a channel for the proliferation of Wahhabist beliefs. He stated during the Al Jazeera interview that he had to travel 700 miles away from home in his village of Kogelo in Western Kenya in order to study the Koran. He laments the fact that Western Kenya has no Islamic centers for this kind of study. Musa wants to see Wahhabi education in the school systems of Kenya in the same way as it is taught in the schools in Saudi Arabia. During the interview, Musa also bemoaned the fact that proselytizing for Islam in Kenya has been very difficult because of the influence of Christianity. President Obama’s cousin was very careful during the interview not to allow questions that might be politically damaging for the president.
Musa also talked about his family’s charitable organization started by his grandmother, the Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund Institute. The purported function of this organization is to help orphans and widows, those suffering from HIV/AIDS, as well as offering aid to students by providing scholarships to university. The Al Jazeera interview revealed that the majority of the funds raised go to send students to the Wahhabist educational institutions in Saudi Arabia.
Musa also stated that the organization is helping orphans, though they are only aiding a mere 50 orphans and 150 widows. At the same time, they are sending so many students, a “flood,” to the radical Islamic University in Medina, that Musa and Sayid had to meet with the head of another Wahhabist university, Umm Al-Qura University in Mecca, to start sending students there as well because the university in Medina didn’t have enough slots for all the students they were sending. President Obama’s Uncle Sayid Obama is very active in his work with the Muslim World League. The Muslim World League has numerous connections with terrorist groups including al Qaeda. They provided sponsorship as well as material support to Osama bin Laden. According to President Obama’s cousin Musa, the president is in continual contact with the Kenyan branch of his family through regular phone calls to his favorite uncle, Sayid. The Kenyan branch of the Obama family uses funds raised through Sarah Omar’s charitable organization to propagate this radical form of Islam.
The penetration of Islam into the federal government is astonishing and more than concerning. It will be explored further in the last article in this series. The potential direct link of the Obama clan, and possibly Obama himself, to Wahhabi Islam has staggering implications for the very future of the United States of America. Yet, not one word of this has been brought up in the mainstream press over the past four years. It is very doubtful Obama would have been elected the first time, let alone the second, if the American people knew of his potential extreme Islamist connections. It is small wonder Obama has spent millions hiding his past.
© 2012 Michael Coffman - All Rights Reserved
Kristie Pelletier is a researcher and freelance writer who works frequently with Dr. Coffman on a variety of issues.
Dr. Coffman is President of Environmental Perspectives Incorporated (epi-us.com) and CEO of Sovereignty International (sovereignty.net) in Bangor Maine. He has had over 30 years of university teaching, research and consulting experience in forestry and environmental sciences and now geopolitics. He was one of four who stopped the ratification of the Convention on Biological Diversity one hour before the Senate cloture vote. The Biodiversity Treaty is one of the major treaties promoted by Agenda 21. He produced the acclaimed DVD Global Warming or Global Governance (warmingdvd.com) disproving man-caused global warming—another major theme of Agenda 21. Dr. Coffman’s newest book, Plundered, How Progressive Ideology is Destroying America (AmericaPlundered.com) details how the American people are being indoctrinated and bullied into a very destructive belief system called progressivism. His last book, Rescuing a Broken America (rescuingamericabook.com) is receiving wide acclaim. He can be reached at 207-945-9878.
E-Mail: mcoffman@epi-us.com
Website: DiscerningToday.org
*******

Saturday, September 28, 2013

Economic Collapse! How Did We Get Here? (Part 2)

*******
Obummer and Moochelle
*******
Two conversations with two insiders: “Expect the unexpected”
We must think bigger, much bigger, and expect the unexpected, from false flags to real collapse
By Doug Hagmann
Saturday, September 28, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/58208?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=bc4dd0072c-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-bc4dd0072c-291118033


America is a captured operation, captured from within. Time is too short to mince words or to fear the ridiculous accusations of “doom porn,” made either by the factually challenged or some paid, professional government trolls (see DHS Insider article by this author, later verified in the media) describing what you are about to read.
Within the last 24 hours, I had two separate conversations with two different sources, each saying nearly the same thing: Expect the unexpected. Wake up. Understand that everything we’re being told is a lie. We are at the epicenter of a ‘perfect storm.’
The opening words coming from my source inside the intelligence community tell much. “These people [the Obama regime and his handlers] are ‘pissed.’ They did not get what they wanted with Syria because we put them behind schedule by exposing Benghazi. The ‘alternative media’ put them behind, but that doesn’t mean they’ve given up. Far from it. What it means is that they have the same objective, but are switching plans.”
To be clear, I asked about their end-game objective.
“The takedown of America as a viable global power, economically and militarily. They are counting on people’s attention being diverted to political theater, which is exactly what’s happening right now with the budget showdown. But no one is looking beyond the stage act and if they are, very few are understanding what they are seeing. They are thinking too small and are still clinging to the right-left paradigm of political theater,” he stated.
The objective is to create a new global economic and power structure by removing the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. By making the U.S. subservient to a global power structure. Why isn’t anyone in the media talking about this? Because they are complicit. Why aren’t the majority of those in the ‘alternative media’ talking about this? Because they are not looking at the bigger picture. The lie is bigger than they realize.”
At this point, I informed my intelligence source about my conversation hours before with a financial insider who uses the internet pen-name “V, The Guerrilla Economist.” This financial insider has a near perfect record of accurate financial predictions as documented by his multiple disclosures on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, from the Bank of Japan through, most recently, Deutsche Bank. In addition to being a regular guest on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, he recently founded the website Rogue Money and appeared on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory last week. He was emphatic about the current liquidity crisis in the U.S. “We’re broke, bankrupt, and not by accident, but by design.” he stated. “While some 18,000-plus Yankee fans who incredibly stood in line for hours last week to stake their claim to some cheap and meaningless plastic bobble-head of a retiring sports figure, their country and their pensions and retirement accounts are about to be looted. Sadly, this is the prevailing mentality that is allowing the power brokers and the complicit media to do what they will. But it’s even bigger. A perfect military, economic and political storm is brewing.”
“What people must realize is that China and Russia are acutely aware of our economic and military vulnerabilities, and are exploiting those vulnerabilities. China has positioned their economy for domination, world domination. Additionally, they have increased their military power to surpass that of the U.S.,” he added
“Currently, the Russians are teaming up with the Chinese and conducting war exercises. Remember that in 2008, a war simulation conducted using U.S. Joint Strike Force F-35 fighters against the Russian Su-35 heavy fighters, it was clear that the clear victors were the Russians. The U.S. JSF f-35s were ‘clubbed like baby seals.’ Don’t think for a minute that the Chinese and the Russians aren’t positioning themselves to dominate the U.S. militarily. In light of the U.S. involvement against Syria and Russia’s pushback, this is very significant,” stated this financial insider. Concurrent with the information I received from my intelligence insider, “V” added that the time clock for the U.S. dollar as holding the position of the world’s reserve currency is a ticking time bomb.
“Thanks to the policies of the Federal Reserve and this regime of economic psychopaths, the U.S. is in very deep financial trouble. Yet, you have politicians and talking heads on the news telling everyone that everything is okay. It’s far from okay, and we’ll be experiencing the same that is happening in Europe, with bank runs and bank holidays, in addition to the looting of our pensions and retirement accounts. It’s just a matter of when, not if.” He also added that it is obvious that the plan is a single global currency, a one world economy. And with that comes a one world power structure to oversee this new world financial order.
“One more thing,” added this financial insider. “Domestically, watch more municipalities go belly up across the U.S., like Detroit. Do you know which city is right behind Detroit in terms of teetering on bankruptcy,” he asked me. “New York City. That’s right, New York City is right behind Detroit” and headed for a financial apocalypse.
Looking at the larger picture, we are at the precipice of an economic collapse that will make the Great Depression look like a holiday at “Club Med,” compliments of the elite membership within “Club Fed.” “Club Fed” is populated by both democrats and republicans, progressives and conservatives, those elected and others appointed, all rabidly pining for a new world economic order. It is an incestuous group of international and domestic families consumed and propelled by greed and power who have been at this for decades, even generations.
As a result of their insatiable greed and lust for power and control, we are about to experience the pain of a world-wide crash and economic depression that will leave no one untouched. Moreover, it has been planned, awaiting the “perfect storm” to be formed. The last few isobars have been drawn on the map of devastation, and we are now in a short and deceptive calm before this storm hits us like a freight train.
As I continued my discussion with my intelligence insider, I asked what we might expect next from Syria and the Russia-China pushback against U.S. and Saudi hegemony in the Middle East. “We can expect to get hit, the other shoe to drop, but perhaps not in the manner we expected. They, the powerbrokers, the international bankers, the globalists will implement their agenda by whatever means fits the conditions that exist at the time. We’ve been saying that World War III will start in Syria, but their plans are not always foolproof. I don’t think they counted on the ‘alternative media’ to be as effective in exposing the real deal behind Benghazi, which was a weapons running operation to Syria, to slow them down. But it did. Now, they are switching to plan B, C or even plan Q,” he stated.
We’re in one of the most dangerous times in our history“We’re in one of the most dangerous times in our history. Think about this, and I mean really think about it. If we believe that the real power masters were behind some of the most historic, life-altering and bloodiest events in history, whether it’s Benghazi, the military overthrows of sovereign countries, or even elements of 9/11 and going back even further to the assassination of JFK, what are they capable of now? It’s the same groups, the same families, but different generations. Their objectives have not changed.”
“Look at D-Day as a classic example of the art of deception in wartime. And make no mistake, we are at war being waged by the globalists. Based on elaborate deceptions that convinced Hitler that Patton would lead an attack at Calais, the real invasion happened at Normandy,” stated this intelligence insider. “They are using the same principals. They want to take us out from being politically, militarily and economically viable to implement their plans for a new global power structure. While we think the trigger event could happen in the Middle East, maybe it will happen in the U.S. instead. While we expected Syria to be the causative factor to usher in an economic collapse, perhaps the sequence of events have been changed,” he stated.
Regardless, their plans remain. We must think bigger, much bigger, and expect the unexpected, from false flags to real collapse.
Prepare. Pray.
Copyright © Douglas J. Hagmann and Canada Free PressDouglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
*******
Also See:
Food Shortage, Then Anarchy!
25 July 2012
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2012/07/food-shortage-then-anarchy.html
and
Disasters Happen! Be Prepared!
(Part 1)
31 March 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/03/disasters-happen-be-prepared.html
and
(Part 2)
30 August 2012
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2012/08/disasters-happen-be-prepared-part-2.html
and
The Collapse of the Entire World’s Economic System has Begun!
18 March 2013
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2013/03/the-collapse-of-entire-worlds-economic.html
and
Economic Collapse! How Did We Get Here?
(Part 1)
27 February 2013
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2013/02/economic-collapse-how-did-we-get-here.html
and
Are We Facing a Global Financial Crisis?
31 May 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/05/are-we-facing-global-financial-crisis.html
and
Financial Crunch! Economic Collapse!
(Part 1)

31 July 2008
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2008/07/financial-crunch-economic-collapse.html
and
(Part 2)
20 November 2008
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2008/11/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 3)
25 January 2009
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2009/01/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 4)
17 April 2009
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2009/04/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 5)
23 June 2009
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2009/06/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 6)
23 August 2009
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2009/08/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 7)
30 November 2009
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2009/11/xxxx.html
and
(Part 8)
23 February 2010
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2010/02/debt-dynamite-dominoes-coming-financial.html
and
(Part 9)
28 August 2010
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2010/08/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 10)
13 January 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/01/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 11)
29 April 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/04/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 12)
28 July 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/07/financial-crunch-economic-collapse-part.html
and
(Part 13)
04 April 2012
(Part 15)
02 November 2012
and
Recession? ... Depression? ... What is Going On?
(Part 1)
06 October 2008
(Part 2)
02 February 2009
and
(Part 3)
19 April 2009
and
(Part 4)
02 August 2009
and
(Part 5)
17 September 2010
and
(Part 6)
17 September 2010
and
Jobs, Jobs, Where are the Jobs?
(Part 1)
20 April 2010
*******

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Angela Merkel, the Choice of the German People!

*******
Angela Merkel: Germany’s “Stealth Chancellor” is Returned to Office
By Dr. T. P. Wilkinson
Global Research, September 23, 2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/angela-merkel-germanys-stealth-chancellor-is-returned-to-office/5351219
Numerous reasons have been given for the sudden reluctance of the USG to fly bombs to Damascus and turn it into a Tripoli or Bagdad. One that has not received much attention was the coming German federal elections. These are over, stability is assured, now the USG can continue on course, even if not at full speed ahead.



Why were the German parliamentary elections important for Mr Obama? Certainly most people in the US have little if any idea where Berlin is, let alone who heads the government there. However the people who form the base of Mr Obama’s government, like that of his predecessor, know very well how important Ms Merkel has been for the pursuit of the two-pronged strategy of finance capital in Europe.
To grasp just how critical Ms Merkel is one needs to rewind the film to 2002. Gerhard Schroeder of the SPD was chancellor and was challenged by Ms Merkel leading the CDU/ CSU, also called the Union because it is an electoral combination of the German federal CDU and the Bavarian CSU party. When the reigning US President Mr George W. Bush solicited the support of allies, Mr Schroeder– whether opportunistically or not– followed the opinion polls that showed the majority of Germans opposed to the Iraq War. He refused to contribute regular German troops to the invasion (sending only small covert units with a whisper). During the 2002 parliamentary election campaign Ms Merkel was seen on television visiting Mr G W Bush in Washington, criticising the position of Schroeder’s government and advocating German military support for the US invasion. It is generally accepted that this open violation of parliamentary protocol (both in Britain and in Germany it is considered unacceptable to publicly criticise the government of the day while abroad) together with her advocacy of a war for which no German support was to be found (except perhaps in the weapons industry) cost Ms Merkel the election.

When Mr Schroeder finally retired to work for oil companies and banks, no surprise since his nickname in Germany was “der Genosse der Bosse” (comrade to the company bosses, as opposed to the workers), the SPD was left without anyone with either charisma or a programme. So the opportunistic SPD – Green coalition was ended in favour of a Grand Coalition which was ultimately led by the CDU after Schroeder’s return to working directly for the “bosses”.
Ms Merkel was a creation of the last years of the Helmut Kohl regime. She was adopted by him as a kind of poor sister from the newly absorbed GDR and replaced the insufficiently subservient vice chancellor Lothar de Maziere, a leftover from the short-lived post-Honnecker GDR government who was part of the government that signed the GDR over to the BRD in return for an absurd currency reform and lots of promises. Ms Merkel learned quickly from Kohl two things quickly: how to eliminate intra-party competitors and how to manipulate the media. She is treated as business-like, motherly (although she has no children), a post-GDR success story (although she was entirely GDR conformist until 1989), steady and uncontroversial (although she has presided over intensified military involvement overseas in violation of German law and privileging of German banks and industry in the ruin of Greece). In short Angela Merkel is coated with a far more advanced version of political teflon than was available in Ronald Reagan’s day.
There is an explanation for this phenomenon too. Since 1989 the German media has been substantially transformed. Under US occupation the Federal Republic (West Germany) was officially well aligned with USG/ NATO policy and the media reflected that. However, the conditions of the competing Germany east of the Elbe still had to be countered. One of these was the official and psychologically very deep aversion to wars and military action. It is a matter of record that Konrad Adenauer introduced the rearmament of Germany in the 1950s at the behest of the USG only by parliamentary tricks– although there was massive opposition to it from Right to Left. The 1980s fight over stationing of Pershing II missiles in Germany was not only opposed by the Left. In 1991 the SPD even tried to appeal against Mr Genscher’s triggering of the war against Yugoslavia by appealing to the Federal Constitutional Court, arguing that the actions violated the German Basic Law forbidding anything but defensive military operations.
By 1989 however the alternative Germany was gone and an enormous market emerged to show just how happy we should all be about the GDR’s demise. A key media instrument emerged: the weekly Focus, published by the Burda Group, with a format that was a carbon copy of US News and World Report. Burda, along with the Springer publishing house in Hamburg, could be considered real “cold warrior publishers”. They worked very closely with the interests of the USG and there is certainly every reason that they received the support which USG agencies are known to have provided and still provide to sympathetic media. In any case Focus became despite enormous losses (if the accounts are to be believed) an overnight sensation, setting the agenda even for the established “serious” media like Der Spiegel and Die Zeit. It did not take long before the mainline “serious” press had completely shifted from political issues to the self-fulfilment/ consumer interest focus Americans associate with People or Oprah. Only the FAZ, the staid German equivalent of the New York Times, resisted this trend– even rejecting the controversial new German orthography adopted in the 2005.
This new Americanised media landscape pronounced for good three months prior to the actual elections– there were no issues and it would be a boring election campaign– although Ms Merkel’s government had authorised a very controversial deployment of troops to Afghanistan and measures that definitely worsened the condition of wage-earners and unemployed. Unlike in the USA, Germans still tend to vote. Hence it was very clear that the media was erasing the issues which were really controversial– esp. sending German troops abroad– to avoid the loss Merkel suffered when she supported Bush against Schroeder.
One could go into details about the importance of Germany for US Europe/ NATO policy but it should suffice that any uncertainty about how public opinion or public policy in Germany is managed would complicate the US plans for Syria. Germany is also the main force on the Continent for enforcing financial policies desired by the Anglo-American banking cartels, e.g. keeping the EU political management (as opposed to the technical management in Brussels) from interfering with US plans in Euroland. Ms Merkel is not so important for what she does but for what actions she is able to conceal from public debate or examination.
The certainty of a renewed Merkel chancellorship includes reasonable certainty that Anglo-American banks, together with their German allies, will be able to determine fiscal policy on the Continent– with the euro. There will be no threats to the present parasitic processes. Ms Merkel will also continue to conceal the extent of German industrial and military involvement in US imperial wars. Any doubt Ms Merkel aims to conceal can be seen in two major changes in the government during her last term. The Federal President, and former IMF director, Mr Horst Köhler, resigned after he told German journalists in an interview returning from Afghanistan that Germany would have to be willing to use military means to protect its economic interests. Later Ms Merkel’s defense minister was forced to resign, ostensibly because of plagiarism in obtaining his doctorate. Mr zu Guttenberg however had become almost a German Bob Hope with his frequent rallying visits to German troops stationed in Afghanistan– about whom the less said the better.

Now enter Mr Obama with his party (in the widest sense of the word) requiring escalation against Syria. Germany and Russia have a strained but nonetheless strong and dependent relationship to each other. Germany is also closely tied in its relations to Turkey. Although Germany is regularly bludgeoned with the “Holocaust” club to maintain its subordination to Israeli policy, there is no great love for wars on Tel Aviv’s behalf: there are enough people who also are tired of being called Nazis after more than 60 years. In short, launching cruise missiles before 22 September could well have forced Ms Merkel into an open statement supporting or opportunistically opposing the US attacks. A debate about Ms Merkel’s military policy led to her defeat in 2002. If the US had attacked before the election, Ms Merkel would not be able to avoid a public statement and the debate that followed.
Today the election returns are not official but it seems clear– barring some kind of mysteries– that the CDU/ CSU– the Union that Ms Merkel leads as chancellor will have by far the most seats but short of an absolute majority. Whatever government is formed in the next few weeks will not have to debate US military action. However the fact that the Left (Linke) Party won slightly more than the Green Party is probably an indication that had there been a clear issue like “war or no war against Syria”, the Union would have lost with the SPD many more votes. Despite US propaganda for “humanitarian” pretexts, most Germans are still aware of the burden of two world wars for which they have been blamed and which destroyed much of their country. Americans have never known this kind of defeat or destruction (except perhaps Daughters of the Confederacy). It is still possible to find people who oppose deploying German troops abroad– if only to avoid blame or repercussions. The risks to Ms Merkel’s reelection were there– even though the Press did its best not to talk about them.
There is another aspect of this whole seemingly monotonous drama: since Germany is not only a major silent partner in US wars but also a partner in the currency manipulations within the Eurozone, consistent policy in Berlin is important for maintaining the “Goldman Sachs line” in Southern Europe and Brussels. Berlin brings the necessary political power to bear. Since Middle East policy is not only about oil but about the stability of the US dollar as the “oil currency” with which the US is able to subsidise its otherwise moribund economy, Germany’s predictability in Brussels and Athens is just as important for currency speculators and dollar supremacy as the military force it contributes to US war efforts.
The re-election of the Union assures for now that German politics will pose no threats to the transatlantic agenda.
Copyright © 2013 Global Research
*******

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Are You a Victim of Mind Control? (Part 2)

*******
*******

"Witnesses asked to be anonymous for fear of reprisal"
How many billions are spent equipping and arming SWAT teams around the country every year?
And what are they for again?
I know they're good at breaking down the doors (some times the wrong doors) of people accused of minor crimes.
But aren't they supposed to be super-trained special ops gunslingers ready to jump into to situations beyond the skill set of regular police?
Apparently not. A well armed, presumably well trained team of SWAT style operatives were in full gear just fifteen minutes away from the Navy Yard shooting, their help was requested, and their commander told them to "stay away."
Nice.
This is the BBC reporting this one.
*******

*******

*******
CIA, mind control & mass shootings - Is there a correlation?
By Doug Hagmann
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/58093?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=bf71336abe-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d8f503f036-bf71336abe-291118033
Consider the common public characterizations of the perpetrators of the last several mass shootings in the U.S., such as James Holmes (the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting), Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook Elementary School) and most recently, Aaron Alexis, the named shooter at the Naval Sea Systems Command inside the Washington Navy Yard in Southeast Washington, D.C. Even the most skeptical among us would have to agree that there is not only something eerily similar about the characterizations made public of each alleged perpetrator, but there is something not quite right with the changes made to the official narratives in “real time” as well as after the fact.
Perhaps the circumstances of Aaron Alexis are the most blatant as well as the most current. The man who brought wholesale death to a quiet morning at a secure military location has been characterized as mentally ill, with the media noting that he was plagued by voices in his head.
More than a month before the shooting, on August 7, 2013, Alexis reported to police that he was being stalked by unidentified individuals who followed him to three different motels, and these individuals were using some sort of “microwave machine” to send voices into his body and keeping him awake at night. It is interesting and potentially relevant that Alexis refused to tell police what the voices were instructing him to do. [A copy of the redacted police report can be downloaded in PDF format here]. At this point, I suspect that the majority of the “sane” among us would simply write Alexis off as mentally ill and unworthy of any further intellectual discourse. But could there be something more to this story?
While the media has been consistently reporting that Alexis had a long history of mental illness, those who knew Alexis long before and up to the shooting defended his mental stability. Although he reportedly had several previous altercations with the law, it is rather curious that Alexis was not criminally charged in at least two of the more severe of those occasions. A review of his criminal records history might suggest that something else was going on, especially considering his self-described “blackouts” during those events.
Despite his reported checkered history and claims of recent public questions regarding his mental stability, Alexis was granted security clearance as a government subcontractor, working for a company called “The Experts,” which is a subsidiary of HP Enterprise Services owned by Hewlett Packard. Notably, congressional oversight is now asserting that there were faults with the company performing the background checks for government workers and subcontractors. Nonetheless, is it reasonable, although certainly unpopular, to ask whether incompetence alone is responsible for Alexis being granted the security clearance.
It is unpopular if not unacceptable in “normal” social circles to discuss other possibilities or facilitating factors associated with not only the homicidal actions of Aaron Alexis, but of others including James Holmes, Adam Lanza and others. Such discussion will result in one labeled as residing in the lunatic fringe of society, with accusers quick to shut down any intellectual discourse of the topic.
An example of this appears in a September 20, 2013 article in Wired Magazine by author Allen McDuffee, titled Conspiracy Theories Abound After Navy Yard Shooting [also see below]. While the title seems to tell it all, it is interesting that the author nearly makes the case in favor of a “mind control” conspiracy regarding the most recent shooting. Excerpted from the article:

“The microwave weaponry theory would be just as absurd as some of the other conspiracies if the Pentagon hadn’t been researching the possibility of using similar voice-projection technology in the past as a nonlethal weapon.”
“According to one report on the project, such a weapon would create a condition similar to schizophrenia. ‘Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard ‘voices within one’s head.’”

Behind the looking glass
Just a few short years ago, I too would have scoffed at the mere mention that these mass shooting events were anything but tragedies at the hands of sick and mentally-ill psychopaths. Granted, there are some sick and twisted people out there who need no help to kill others. But looking at these events collectively, a pattern seems to be emerging beyond the confines of the individual events themselves.
If we confine our investigation to the most recent shooting alone, it is unlikely that we are seeing all of the facts pertinent to the numerous shootings over the last few years - even the last several decades. If we look back into history, even as far back as the shooting death of Robert F. Kennedy, might we be seeing something more to the story of these random shooting events? Is it possible that there are agendas at play, and programs at work behind the scenes to which we are not privy?
Is it possible for rogue, criminal elements inside of the U.S. government to target the minds of certain individuals through electronic means to engage in certain behavior, including killing others? Before dismissing this possibility as some conspiracy theory unworthy of further consideration, please do some research, starting with the 1975 findings of the Church Committee. The disclosures from this investigation alone confirmed that our government was engaged in mind control experiments, spending billions of dollars and using unwitting subjects on which to test their latest drugs and electronic weaponry.
This CIA activity was further verified in the August 6, 2010 publication of Time Magazine, not exactly considered to be a fringe publication. A list of “Top Ten Weird Government Secrets” was published with number two on that list being “mind control.”
Within that article, it is stated that “some historians argue that the goal of the program was to create a mind-control system by which the CIA could program people to conduct assassinations.” Is it possible that we’ve been seeing this being played out in different venues, for different reasons? For today’s purposes, for gun control, perhaps? To condition the population to accept tighter “security” measures?
Before dismissing this as nonsense, consider the highly credentialed and well-researched Dr. John Hall, MD, who authored the book A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America. Just five-(5) days before the mass shooting event at the Washington Navy Yard, Dr. Hall appeared as a guest on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, speaking about his documentation of stalking and mind control. Interestingly, Aaron Alexis complained of being stalked, or harassed and having voices thrust into his head prior to his shooting spree last week. Listening to the broadcast could have been a template for what we observed not only at the Naval Yard, but at previous historical shooting events.
In addition to the mind control aspect of this and other such events, is it not reasonable to consider and even question the many inconsistencies in nearly all of the official narratives of the incident reports, from the shooting of Robert Kennedy to the latest shooting at the Navy Yard? Is it responsible for us to simply dismiss these documented inconsistencies in light of what we know about CIA mind control experimentation? I would argue that failing to address such issues is not only irresponsible, but possibly being complicit in these events.
We are living in strange times where it would irresponsible of us not to ask questions, demand answers and accountability, despite the risks of being described as a conspiracy theorist. Based on factual evidence presented before congress nearly 40 years ago, CIA mind control is not a conspiracy. What would make you believe their actions have stopped following the disclosure by the Church Committee?
Related: Listen to the interview with Dr. John Hall here (advance to the second hour)
Copyright © Douglas J. Hagmann and Canada Free PressDouglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com

*******

Conspiracy Theories Abound After Navy Yard Shooting
By Allen McDuffee
September 20, 2013
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/09/navy-yard-conspiracies/
Washington Navy Yard shooter Aaron Alexis had been receiving mental health treatment, had anger management issues, and told Rhode Island police that he had been hearing voices and was being harassed through microwave mind control. Most people who heard that needed no further explanation for Monday’s tragic events. They understood the 12 deaths and eight injuries to be the sad result of severe mental illness, perhaps even paranoid schizophrenia.
But before (and even after) the details of Alexis’ difficult past emerged, many people on the fringe had instead opted for a range of conspiracy theories — just as they did in the Sandy Hook massacre, the Aurora, CO movie theatre shooting, and even 9/11. The conflicting reports as to whether the shooter was a civilian or a servicemember, the number of shooters involved, the incorrect identification of the suspect, and a whole host of other unanswered questions were all fodder for conspiracy theorists of varying intensity to take to Twitter, YouTube, discussion boards, blogs, and other online outlets to assert the sometimes absurd and the sometimes plausible.
For some, it was a “false flag,” a covert military operation:
For others, the event was premeditated or a hoax, and the media was in on it:
Or it was an attempt by nefarious overlords to distract the public:
Some conspiracists suggest that Alexis was a “targeted individual,” or “TI,” the term-of-art used by anguished people who believe they’re being “gang stalked” by shadowy enemies, often in the government. The elements of Alexis’ police report — covert microwave weapons, conspiracies and sleep disturbances — are common elements in gang stalking accounts. (Of course, they’re also common elements in schizophrenia.) But even believers in those accounts didn’t support Alexis’ violent rampage. “Aaron is a murderer. I do not agree on any level with his actions or guns,” writes one poster to gang stalking forum. “But this story has more evidence than most pointing to the use of microwave weapons, gang-stalking.”
Another writes: “Using Aaron Alexis as an example could look bad, after all he killed 12 people. He had made a choice to keep and use guns. I would hope any real TI would see the danger in keeping a gun. The perps could influence you or even just take over your body, and make you use that gun on someone else, maybe even a loved one.”
The microwave weaponry theory would be just as absurd as some of the other conspiracies if the Pentagon hadn’t been researching the possibility of using similar voice-projection technology in the past as a nonlethal weapon.
According to one report on the project, such a weapon would create a condition similar to schizophrenia. “Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message transmission. It may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard ‘voices within one’s head.’”
Of course, the chances of mental illness versus microwave mind control greatly favor the former.


*******


*******

Also See:

Are Suspicious 'Suicides' Really Government Murders?
(Part 1)
21 January 2013
(Part 2)
25 March 2013
and
Remember the 1960s?
20 April 2008
and
Secrets of the CIA!
10 June 2012
and
Manchurian Candidate - Is It for Real?
20 September 2011
 and
Social Engineering - Really?

28 May 2011
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2011/05/social-engineering-really.html
and
Are You a Victim of Mind Control?

(Part 1)
21 September 2007

http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2007/09/manipulation-of-minds.html
and
What Really Happened at the Boston Marathon?

22 April 2013
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2013/04/what-really-happened-at-boston-massacre.html
and
Silenced by Execution, FBI Responsible! 

31 May 2013
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2013/05/fbi-bandits-executed-friend-of-boston.html
and
What's Not Being Told About Newtown, Sandy Hook Elementary School?
(Part 1)
19 December 2012
and
(Part 2)
and
(Part 3)
19 April 2013

http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2013/04/whats-not-being-told-about-newtown.html
and
Were the Batman Murders a Covert Op?

30 July 2012
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2012/07/were-batman-murders-covert-op.html
*******