Friday, December 31, 2010

Our Society is Now Advocating Homosexuality

Salute Her While She Sinks
Pentagon: After refusing to honor their oath to defend the Constitution; choosing to ignore America in extremis, and turning their backs on Lady Liberty as she is scuttled, the least they can do is salute her while she sinks
Jim ONeill
Thursday, December 8, 2011
“College professors have felt the heat of this repressive new order; researchers and scientists have encountered its ire; ministers have found themselves muzzled; teachers have been intimidated; employees have lost their jobs; even parents have been told that they cannot exercise their rights. Queer has become something to fear, and gay is beginning to rule the day.” —Dr. Michael L. Brown “A Queer Thing Happened to America” (from the chapter “Big Brother is Watching, and He Really is Gay”)
I started to write an article about the banning of Bibles at the Walter Reed (“Wally World”) military hospital the other day, but I was concerned that it would end up sounding like an off-the-leash rant by the late comedian Sam Kinison. Although righteous anger is certainly apropos given the nature of the insult, clear-eyed resolve will be more effective in the long run. (Note: the “old” Walter Reed has moved shop, and is now known as Walter Reed at Bethesda).
The news about the banning of the Bible at Walter Reed followed closely on the heels of the announcement that the US Senate had voted to repeal the ban on sodomy and bestiality in the US military.
Which left me to wonder exactly how traitorous is the US military High Command these days—are most of them quislings, or is it still a minority? It is no secret that many of our bravest and best fighting men and women have left the service in frustration and disgust. What have they left behind—who have they left behind? Bureaucratic paper pushers, or something more sinister and dangerous? What kind of patriot warriors are our military academies turning out these days? Who is running the show, and what sort of show is it?
I recently had reason to send someone a copy of an old article of mine in which I wrote “when you’re sworn to defend your country, and you see your country sliding down the tubes, what’re you supposed to do—salute while it sinks?” The person that I sent the article to (a former Army SF operative) wrote back that he was afraid that the US military was indeed doing exactly that—saluting while America sinks. Nice send-off at least, right troops?
As they are symbolic of the type of “heroes” we have leading our military these days let me briefly discuss two individuals: First, Gen. George Casey, who was the Army Chief of Staff at the time of the Ft. Hood shootings, was more concerned about the safety of political correctness than the safety of his troops. You perhaps recall his words at the time: “As horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.” That’s worse.
First of all, it was not simply a tragedy. It was a vicious terrorist attack by a Muslim who murdered 14 defenseless people in cold blood (if you count Francheska Velez’s unborn child, as we should), and injured 30 others. The Muslim, Maj. Nidal Hasan, had no legitimate reason to be in the US Army, after he had exhibited a plethora of warning signs indicating his disturbed mental state prior to the shooting—signs that were ignored because of the asinine politically correct rules instituted by morons like Casey in the first place. Secondly, abstract doctrines like “diversity” do not become casualties—people do. Casey can take his diversity and shove it where the sun doesn’t shine. The US military needs leaders, not arrogant idiots, who do not know the difference between protecting the troops, and politically correct butt-kissing.
Next, let us turn to Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who has been a driving force behind arm-twisting the US military into embracing homosexuality. He must have been positively ecstatic when the Senate repealed the ban on butt f—king and screwing animals.
Actually, forget Mullen, let’s discuss homosexuality itself. Let me say up front that while some people might think that I hate homosexuals, that simply is not the case. I take people as they come, and if they are decent and respectful to me, I generally treat them the same—the exception being people that I know are vile scumbags behind a veneer of polite sophistication. I do not hate homosexuals, but I detest having our military and culture force-fed homosexual behavior as being on a par with heterosexual behavior—it is not.
Rather than explain how unhealthy and life-shortening the homosexual lifestyle is, or how socially destructive it is, or go into how it has been slyly inserted into the American culture (talk about stealth jihad), I would like to take this opportunity to focus on two important issues—one I have written about before, and the other I have not.;;
The first topic I’ll discuss (the one I have written about previously) is the importance of being aware that the majority of homosexuals do not normally act gay—by which I mean effeminate. The “stealth jihad” waged by the militant homosexual clique has promoted the falsehood that homosexuals are by and large unmanly—such is not the case, not at all. Most homosexuals are, if anything, hyper-masculine.
You would be making a grave mistake to remain unaware of the machismo and arrogant attitude at the core of many of the militant homosexuals. Far from being effeminate, soft, or weak; they are often arrogant, strong, and ruthless. There are any number of homosexuals who would laugh at the idea of backing away from a fight—they would just as soon tear your head off and s—t in the hole. An example would be the late Ernest Rohm, the scar-faced thug in charge of Hitler’s brown shirts (although it is well to keep in mind that a number of militant homosexuals would consider such a man to be a déclassé Neanderthal).
So I would never accuse homosexuals as a whole of lacking strength, stamina, courage, or any of the other qualities one might look for in a military operative. They can, and have served honorably in the past, and no doubt will in the future. My problem—and it is a big one—is with the military being forced to swallow the lie that homosexuality is essentially no different from heterosexuality, and that embracing it will not hamper the military’s effectiveness at all. Oh really? I would love to discuss the topic at length, but it would unfortunately lead us too far afield at present—some other time, with pleasure.
There are a number of very serious issues that arise from such misguided, short-sighted, and ultimately destructive missteps by the Pentagon and Congress. A couple of the more obvious pitfalls were mentioned above. The mental and emotional quirks alone would fill volumes (it is not by happenchance that one of the first professional areas to be targeted, infiltrated, and subverted by militant homosexuals was the mental-health field). Due diligence was not performed before DADT (Don’t Ask Don’t Tell) was repealed during the lame-duck session of the 111th Congress—or if it was performed, it was suppressed.
This leads me to the second topic that I wish to focus on: the minority within the minority—pedophiles and pederasts. A pederast is of course an adult homosexual who preys on young boys (a “chicken-hawk”), and pedophilia is an umbrella term that can signify sexual exploitation of either young boys or girls.
These practices are some of the few taboos left in our society, but their illegality and social stigma has been under long-term attack by their proponents. Thanks to homosexual/liberal icons such as John Maynard Keynes, and Dr. Alfred Kinsey, America now has abominations like the pederasty at Penn State, and the recent revelations about pandemic pedophilia in Hollyweird.;
Why do I bring this up? It is not because that in any way I accuse the homosexual community as a whole of practicing pederasty and/or pedophilia—they do not, and I do not wish to imply that they do. There is, however, a significant minority who do practice and promote pederasty and pedophilia (there is some confusion on the terminology here because homosexual pederasts are often classified as pedophiles), and this vile bunch has power and influence way out of proportion to their numbers. They have for many years (centuries in some cases) made it their business to infiltrate and take over positions of power and authority.
This powerful and influential cabal of perverts is at the heart of the subtle, slow, steady seduction of America’s culture. You had better believe that there are some powerful “movers and shakers” involved. The “if it feels good do it” philosophy of polymorphous perversity is essentially a codification of the homosexual lifestyle—and starting under the auspices of child abuser Alfred Kinsey it has wormed its way into the American psyche.
Where does such depravity end? It does not—there is no end to the debauched chaos of polymorphous perversity. The perverted movers and shakers who saw to it that the US Senate repealed the ban on bestiality, are the same ones who saw to it that DADT was repealed, and who applaud the “strange beauty” of the movie “Zoo,” which depicts the true story of a man in Oregon who was f—ked to death by a horse in 2005—but it was “consensual” sex, so it was okay (unfortunate, but okay). Kenneth Turan of the “LA Times” called the movie “Elegantly made and eerily lyrical.” Sure it is. (That is not to imply anything about Mr. Turan. He may a man among men and the salt of the earth as far as I know—I know nothing about him).;
It is nice to know that the US Senate gave such a big thumbs up to endorsing similar behavior for our men and women in uniform. Is this a great country or what? And we wonder why much of the Muslim world sees America as a degenerate, depraved and corrupt cesspool. It is a win/win situation for Far Left atheists—they destroy America’s moral standards, and then turn to their Islamist buddies and whisper “Look, look how bad they are.”
Speaking of Far Left atheists; while researching the many troubles America faces and the history behind them, I came to the conclusion some time ago that the militant homosexual agenda and the Far Left agenda are virtually identical. (Again, I am not speaking of homosexuals as a whole, but the relatively small subset that is behind much of the cultural chaos we see around us. I am discussing a very specific type of homosexual—not homosexuals in general).
I have no time to do justice to the topic here, and I hope that the reader will do some investigating of their own. I should underline the fact that I have been dealing with a general “rule of thumb,” and that there are of course, exceptions to the rule. In addition, it is of some importance to take note of the fact that the ranks of the militant homosexual pederasts are swelled by heterosexuals and bisexuals who have taken the same polymorphously perverse lifestyle to heart, and there are also those who are neither pedophiles nor pederasts, but who simply share common interests in other areas. In any event, I would like to write a few words about atheism and homosexuality before closing.
The authors of “The Pink Swastika” believe that Hitler’s genocide against the Jews was in large part fueled by his distaste for, and disgust with, the Judeo/Christian ethos. According to the authors, Hitler’s animosity toward the Judeo/Christian tradition traces its roots to the Bible’s condemnation of homosexuality. Before you scoff, read the book with an open mind, and I believe you will see that they make a good case for their hypothesis. By the by, being the well read and knowledgeable reader that you are, you are no doubt aware by now that the Nazis were [are] a Far Left phenomena and not a right-wing outfit. That opens a whole other avenue to explore that unfortunately we will have to leave for another day.
If you can see your way past all of the leftist nonsense about Hitler being a staunch Christian (bulls—t), the atheist/pagan/occult nature of Nazism becomes quite evident (you might want to throw in a strong dash of Hellenic homosexuality as well). The militant homosexual subset that I have been discussing follows much the same formula as the Far Left Nazis of WW II did. In short, they despise the Judeo/Christian tradition, and have been working with a will to suppress it, and drive it out of America’s culture—quite successfully I might add.
Although the type of homosexual that I have been discussing (arrogant, vain, predatory) infests our government and military from the lowest levels to the highest, they are probably not America’s chief problem at this time—but they are a problem, and a big one. It is because of men like them (and the collusion of like-minded women) that the Senate repealed the ban on sodomy and bestiality in the armed forces. It is because of men like them, and the insidious poison they have spread, that things like the banning of Bibles at Walter Reed happen.
(Sidebar: Kudos are due to Rep. Steve King [R-IA] for bringing this abomination up on the House floor—as well as the topic of the illegal order for military chaplains to marry same-sex couples. This occurred a few days before Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told an appreciative crowd in Geneva, Switzerland that “Gay rights are human rights”);
So what can “we the people” do—anything? I suggested to a friend the other day that we should turn the pitiless searchlight of Critical Theory upon them. Shine its bright glare upon the demented Marxist/Fascist drivel that they peddle, and see how long their vaunted ideologies stand up to the remorseless pick, pick, picking of constant fault finding. My friend replied that he felt that would be beneath us, and bring us down to their level.
I answered that “we the people” used to understand that sometimes it is necessary to fight fire with fire—not because we wish to; not because we want to, but simply because we must. Allowing that which is good, decent, virtuous, and holy to be trampled in the mud is not Christian; it is not civilized, and by God it is not American. It is ignorance, sloth, and cowardice dressed up as something admirable. When push comes to shove sometimes the only thing that will beat back evil is physical resistance, and your life becomes forfeit for a cause more important than you. Freedom was once such a cause to Americans.
From what I have seen of the Pentagon these days, let me say that after refusing to honor their oath to defend the Constitution; choosing to ignore America in extremis, and turning their backs on Lady Liberty as she is scuttled, the least they can do is salute her while she sinks.
Laus Deo.
Born in June of 1951 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Jim O’Neill ( proudly served in the U.S. Navy from 1970-1974 in both UDT-21 (Underwater Demolition Team) and SEAL Team Two. A member of MENSA, he worked as a commercial diver in the waters off Scotland, India, and the United States. In 1998 while attending the University of South Florida as a journalism student, O’Neill won “First Place” in the “Carol Burnett/University of Hawaii AEJMC Research in Journalism Ethics Award.” The annual contest was set up by Carol Burnett with the money she won from successfully suing the National Enquirer for libel.
Jim can be reached at:
The Queering of America's Churches
By: Devvy Kidd
June 14, 2011
"Satan is an artist. He paints sin in rainbow colors." - Billboard in front of a local church where I live in Big Spring, Texas
Christians believe the King James Bible is the word of God. We (Christians) are to live our lives under His Commandments (not requests) or surrender our souls to eternal damnation. Growing numbers of Americans simply slough that off as something out dated or hocus pocus.
Recent headlines proclaimed:
"The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) on Tuesday voted to allow the ordination of openly gay and lesbian ministers. The church put the vote to its 173 presbyteries, or governing bodies, nationwide.
"On Tuesday, the Twin Citites Area presbytery, which covers Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, became the 87th presbytery -- and the deciding vote -- to approve an amendment that will remove the constitutional requirement that all ministers, elders and deacons live in "fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or chastity in singleness."
"The change, which opens up the possibility that people in same-sex relationships can be considered for ordination, is expected to take effect starting on July 10. It is the latest move by a Protestant denomination toward the inclusion of gay and lesbian clergy.
"I see this as an opportunity to build a stronger church. Faithful and qualified lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Presbyterians will be able to openly serve the church with energy, intelligence, imagination and love," said Rev. Dr. Janet Edwards, a Presbyterian minister in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, soon after the vote."
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) above has slapped God in the face. Their churches will now have male reverends who have sex in each other's rectums and feces (sodomy or what I call bowel movement sex) and female reverends who slobber in each other's vaginas and suck on each other's breasts (lesbian sex) stand at the podium "in God's house of worship" and teach "the word of God."
The word of God? Could it be any easier to understand?
"You shall not lie with a male as those who lie with a female; it is an abomination." -- Leviticus 18:22
"For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions: for their women exchanged the natural use for that which is against nature. And in the same way also the men abandoned the natural use of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error." -- Romans 1:26-27
"Who, knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:32
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." Leviticus 18:22
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." Leviticus 20:13
Well, perhaps the churches above use what's called the NIV - New International Version of the Holy Bible. But, did this "new" version of the Bible have a little help from a sexual deviant with an agenda?
Virginia Ramey Mollenkott, Ph.D.
"In the mid-1970's, while still closeted personally, Mollenkott began to advocate at church conferences in behalf of lesbian and gay Christians. In l978, with Letha Dawson Scanzoni, she published Is the Homosexual My Neighbor?, which became the spearhead volume of Harper San Francisco's collection of LGBT texts. The book, which won an Integrity award for "extraordinary support of the gay Christian movement," was revised and vastly expanded in 1994.
"Mollenkott served as Stylistic Consultant for the New International Version of the Bible, and as a member of the National Council of Churches' Inclusive Language Lectionary Committee, coming out to the NCC convention in support of the Metropolitan Community Church's application for membership. She has guest lectured at hundreds of universities, church conferences and seminaries, and testified on behalf of the New Jersey anti-discrimination law, receiving a l992 Achievement Award from the NJ Lesbian and Gay Coalition. In 1999, SAGE (Senior Action in a Gay Environment) presented her with a Lifetime Achievement Award for her work of combating heterosexism in religion.
"Mollenkott has served as Board Member for various GLBT-friendly organizations, including Evangelicals Concerned, The Center for Sexuality and Religion, and Kirkridge Retreat Center, where for many years has led several GLBT events annually. She is a founding member of the GLBT-inclusive Evangelical and Ecumenical Women's Caucus.
"Among her twelve books, the most explicitly lesbian is Sensuous Spirituality: Out From Fundamentalism, although lesbians have also enjoyed The Divine Feminine: Biblical Imagery of God as Female. Her most recent and most radical work, Omnigender: A TransReligious Approach, won the 2002 Lambda Literary Award in the bisexual/transgender category."
A butch dyke blaspheming the word of God all in the name of tolerance. Tolerance? Excuse me while I spit out such foul vomit.
How can any Christian bring their children to a church that teaches such filth? How can any Christian who believes the Holy Bible is the word of God attend a church that openly and aggressively uses propaganda in convincing their flock that such dangerous sexual preferences are good for your body and soul? How can any Christian bring their children to a "House of God" presided over by sexual deviants who don't reproduce, but must recruit the young and vulnerable into believing they are "born that way" - a myth shoved down the throat of people anxious not to offend others for their "alternative lifestyle". Sin is not an alternative life style.
In my column, The Cloning of the American Mind & Gays, February 19, 2007, I wrote, "Political Correctness: The Cloning of the American Mind, is a short but very precise book published back in 1992 by David Thibodaux, Ph.D., English professor, University of South-western Louisiana. Dr. Thibodaux hit it right on the mark. In a relatively few pages (212), he succinctly chronicled the foundations of the disease called "political correctness," how it will destroy America's moral foundation, educational excellence in this country and how it can be corrected." Dr. Thibodaux has been right on point all along.
Are other Christian denominations leading their flocks into the absyss of Hell?
Church Touts Homosexuality as a Gift, Not a Sin
Being Gay is a Gift From God Campaign
Central United Methodist Church - Ohio
"This simple statement is intended to be a gift to those who have experienced hurt and discrimination because of their real or perceived sexual orientation. The Church seeks nothing less than the healing of the world, and Central UMC wants to offer words and acts of healing to those hurt and marginalized. Also, declaring that being gay is a gift from God is a prophetic call to the Church to get out of the business of marginalizing gay and lesbian persons from the Church, and to welcome them as full members."
A nugget of truth mixed with the propaganda: "real or perceived sexual orientation." The 1992 newly minted sexual orientation vs sexual preference is just more clever marketing.
Let me again quote from Dr. Edwin Vieria's superb book, How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary, regarding the Lawrence v Texas case: "On the other side, Justice O'Connor did not deny that homosexuality is a voluntarily chosen lifestyle.."
O'Connor used those words because there isn't a scintilla of scientific evidence to prove sexual deviants are "born that way":
"This is the Way God Made Me"- A Scientific Examination of Homosexuality and the "Gay Gene" by Brad Harrub, Ph.D. and Bert Thompson, Ph.D. and Dave Miller, Ph.D,. should be read by anyone who wants to understand that it's propaganda driven by an agenda that has pushed the acceptance of sodomy and lesbian sex, not science.
The 'gay gene' hoax
"In the 1990s, homosexual activists believed that if they could convince the courts that they were "born gay" they would acquire protected-class status and could then legally challenge anti-sodomy laws in the United States.
"Dean Hamer played an enormous role in this effort. In fact, on April 3, 1994, the The Washington Times reported that while Hamer was testifying against Colorado's Amendment 2 – which sought to keep men who have sex with men from winning minority-class status – Sen. Robert C. Smith, R-N.H., knew of Hamer's motives and accused the doctor of "actively pursuing a gay agenda."
"Immediately after Hamer's "gay gene" study was published in 1993, a media explosion ensued. Hamer's results, however, were a fraud. The title of an article appearing on page 25 of the July 10, 1995, edition of the pro-gay magazine New York Native explains:
"Gay Gene" Research Doesn't Hold Under Scrutiny, Chicago Tribune's John Crewdson Uncovers Possible Scientific Misconduct by NCI Researcher.
"What is at the heart of evil in our world, and how do we lessen its power in our own lives? Check out David Kupelian's newest book, "How Evil Works: Understanding and Overcoming the Destructive Forces That Are Transforming America"
"The article begins:
"In addition to the political and social firestorm Hamer's research has ignited, he has also been criticized by numerous scientists for not performing what seems to be an obvious control experiment: examining the genes of heterosexual brothers.
"The omission of a control group in a scientific experiment is significant, because it essentially renders the experiment inconclusive. Why would a supposedly professional researcher like Hamer conduct an experiment in such an unacceptable and unprofessional fashion?
"According to the article, another researcher who worked on the project claimed that although Hamer conducted the experiment correctly by including a control variable, the results he obtained did not lead to the conclusion he was hoping to find: that some men are "born gay." Hamer therefore did not release the information related to the control group and published pseudo-scientific results. All went well for Hamer until a junior researcher on his team exposed his scheme. The article continues:
"Even worse for Hamer, the National Institute of Health's Office of Research Integrity is now investigating his "gay gene" research, according to Crewdson. The inquiry concerns allegations that Hamer was selective about which data he chose to report (i.e., that he ignored data that didn't support his contention that homosexuality is genetically determined). The data manipulation was reported to NIH's integrity office by a junior researcher who performed research crucial to Hamer's claimed discovery, according to Crewdson."
"Aren’t some people born gay?
"We have all heard of individuals who entered homosexuality later in life after marrying and having children with an opposite-sex spouse. No scientific evidence has established a genetic cause for homosexuality or found a “gay gene.” There is no DNA or medical test to determine if a person is homosexual. Sexual orientation is a matter of self-affirmation and public declaration. “Gay” is a self-chosen identity. According to the American Psychiatric Association, there are no replicated scientific studies to support that people can be born “gay” or that homosexuality is innate.
"According to the American Psychological Association, “[a]lthough much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors.” [2008]
In other words, sodomy is a chosen sexual preference as is lesbian sex. The whole lie about "born that way" is falling apart.
"Was America's innocence lost ... or stolen?
Exclusive: Jim Fletcher shocked by 'scientific' scheme to advance sexual deviancy [article below]
The word "gay" as I have said so many times before, is a marketing tool to make people forget what homosexuals and lesbians do with each other, not because they are "born that way". Sexual deviants choose to practice dangerous and filthy sexual activities. It's also a public health issue:
What if some other behavior cost 25 million lives?
Campaign chief says actions linked to terminal AIDS largely ignored
HIV/AIDS is predominately a homosexual disease
Shame on the churches in this country who condone that which God has called an abomination. God's laws and what he commands us to do in our lives isn't a fad. God's laws and what he commands us to do has not changed over the millenniums, only people have by cultural influences. It's easier to embrace sin than to live as our Creator has commanded. For decades, the created have mocked God by willfully accepting a bastardized version of His word all in the name of political correctness and tolerance.
Shame on those who support churches who push sexual deviancy. This isn't about tolerance. It's about sin. It's about sexual deviants who have convinced their flocks they are above God and that sin is a thing of the past. That they have a "right" to mock His laws and you must accept such blasphemy or not be accepted into their circle of perversion they call Sunday Services.
#No doubt I'll get the usual emails from people telling me "I'm gay and God loves me". The Holy Bible (KJV) says different when you violate what God has called an abomination and spelled it out quite clearly.
Satan is an artist who paints sin in rainbow colors says it so well. The symbol for sexual deviants is the rainbow and the color purple. It is being flown all across this country. A symbol of immoral, filthy sexual preferences like bowel movement sex. Cover our nation in the cloak of sin. And, God should bless our country? A good question to ponder.
Judgment day comes to all of us because no one escapes death. Those who choose to slap God in the face will learn the true meaning of the word tolerance.
Also See:
Was America's innocence lost ... or stolen?

Exclusive: Jim Fletcher shocked by 'scientific' scheme to advance sexual deviancy
By Jim Fletcher
February 01, 2011
When Alfred Kinsey emerged in American culture, "we" were, in some sense, still innocent. Certainly the horrors of world wars had forced us to eat from the forbidden fruit, but even our new-found knowledge of good and evil was kept in check by America's fresh-faced turn toward a future of almost unlimited possibilities.
Kinsey changed all that.
If America was fresh-faced, Kinsey's dour visage presaged an assault on our values that remains a wholly unique event in our country's history.
The infamous Kinsey Report, which purported to research sexuality, brought society to the gates of hedonism and debauchery. Kinsey had begun studying the sexual behaviors of wasps about the time Hitler came to power – clearly the Harvard-trained biologist didn't get out much – and this led him to study the same behaviors in humans.
The result was the "sexual revolution," which not only loosened but also jettisoned social mores. Now, in a new book that shatters the myth that Kinsey was an important scientist, Dr. Judith Reisman explores the sordid world of the man who made sexual deviancy OK in America.
"Sexual Sabotage: How One Mad Scientist Unleashed a Plague of Corruption and Contagion on America" is a masterfully researched investigation into one of the most compelling figures of the last century.
Above all else, I value the teaching factor in any book. In other words, I like to know why things are the way they are. Sometimes, that might come in an obscure, old biography of change agents like Herbert Spencer. Happily, in the case of "Sexual Sabotage," Reisman has provided us with an old-fashioned investigative piece that helps explain why we now live in such a sex-obsessed culture.
Reisman, who studied at Case Western Reserve University, is perhaps the leading authority on Kinsey today. Her work in advocating for children and women has been informed largely due to her knowledge of Kinsey's diabolical effect on how we think about sex. Her research and tenacity in exposing the dangers of pornography have resulted in convenience store 7-11 no longer stocking Playboy and Penthouse magazines, among other achievements.
In "Sexual Sabotage," Reisman reveals that to Kinsey, there were no sexual boundaries. That his "research" led to the abuse of children is one of the darker chapters of American history, yet few know about him.
As Reisman reports: "Kinsey says, 'the only abnormal sex is no sex; that the human animal needs orgasms; and that the earlier boys and girls have orgasms, the better for them.'"
In other words, his evolutionary worldview enabled him to preach that morality is a human construct that impedes the progress of us "animals."
As Reisman points out, Kinsey engaged in the ultimate character assassination, alleging that an entire generation – the "greatest generation," as it has been called – was in fact "promiscuous, adulterous, homosexual and even bestial"!
Reisman begins her book by making a most compelling point: At the very moment Kinsey and his friends were crafting their deviant bias into "research," she and her friends lived in a world in which debauchery was not known. It is but one fascinating point in a wholly fascinating book in which "Sexual Sabotage" becomes a clear window into the world of Kinsey's pornographic propaganda. That it fooled entire generations is nothing short of amazing.
Reisman's research is so thorough and engrossing, one gains a real understanding of how far-reaching Kinsey's bogus research really was. In Chapter 12 ("Pandemic, Predatory Criminals"), we learn that a common Kinsey tactic was introducing an allegedly good intention, which in the end opened the floodgates of deviancy:
"Blaming the lack of sex education for high levels of sex crimes in the early 1950s," Reisman writes, "Kinseyan reformers testified tirelessly before state legislatures and asserted in professional, academic and legal literature that 'sex education' would reduce the number of sex crimes and high recidivism rates."
Incredibly, a friend of Kinsey's, law professor Ralph Slovenko, alleged that victims of child molesters "seduce" their molesters: "Even at the age of four or five, this seductiveness may be so powerful as to overwhelm the adult into committing the offense."
One struggles to comprehend such evil! Yet as Reisman points out, Kinsey and his depraved friends appeared as even-handed researchers uncovering important truths about humans. In fact, their deviancy doomed millions to a lifetime of sexual turmoil and exponentially increased the very crime rate they claimed to hate.
"Sexual Sabotage" is one of those books that polite company wishes to avoid. However, we would then fail to understand not only why we are in the shape we're in, but begin to gather the courage and wisdom to confront the kind of evil Kinsey peddled. Reisman's landmark work should be read widely, and may I suggest a niche group that should study this book: church youth pastors.
Reviewer Protests American Library Association Youth Media Award for Books Advocating Homosexuality
Bookviews Editor, Alan Caruba, Says Genre is Harmful to Society
By News on the Net
Friday, December 31, 2010
A charter member of the National Book Critics Circle and editor of Bookviews, a monthly Internet report about new fiction and non-fiction, Alan Caruba has issued a protest of the forthcoming American Library Association Youth Media Award called The Stonewall Children’s and Young Adult Literature Award for books that focus on homosexuality and bisexuality.
In the January edition of the Bookviews section devoted to books for children and young adult readers, Caruba includes a protest of the awards, the winners of which will be announced on January 10th.
Caruba took issue with the ALA statement that said, “The demand for quality gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender (GLBT) children’s books continues to grow as the nation becomes more diverse and the ALA will be awarding a young adult book that brings these issues to the forefront.”
“I would argue that the nation is not becoming ‘more diverse’ when it comes to fundamental moral values,” said Caruba, adding that “I regard this award as harmful to a society being harangued to accept homosexuality as ‘normal’.”
Caruba went on to say, “I long have had a problem with books claiming unscientifically and falsely that the Earth is either experiencing “global warming” or will be. This hoax was discredited in 2009”, said Caruba, referring to the release of emails between key scientists who are alleged to have manipulated climate data.
“Like environmentalism, much of whose claims are baseless,” said Caruba, “homosexuality is being pushed on children as an acceptable, alternative lifestyle. I do not believe most parents want their children to be exposed to such advocacy.”
The ALA is well known for its nearly twenty annual awards that include the Randolph Caldecott, John
Newbery, and Coretta Scott King awards. “I was frankly unaware of the Stonewall Award,” said Caruba.
When the National Book Critics Circle was founded in April 1974, Caruba was among the first reviewers to be invited to join. He is also a longtime member of the American Society of Journalists and Author, formerly the Society of Magazine Writers. Since 1979 he has been a member of the Society of Professional Journalists and has been a longtime member of the National Association of Science Writers as well.
“I believe there is something particularly insidious concerning books for children about homosexual and other aberrant lifestyles. It is, as often as not, advocacy, not of so-called ‘diversity’, but of a critical choice a child might make regarding his or her own sexual orientation,” says Caruba.
“It is a subject that should be entirely the decision and under the control of parents, not teachers, and not librarians.”
Caruba has been writing Bookviews in one form or another for more than forty years since his days as a journalist when he syndicated it as a column. Later Bookviews became a newsletter and, with the advent of the Internet, it became a site that was later converted to a blog.
He resides at the Gaslight Commons in South Orange, N.J. These days he is best known as a daily commentator on headline issues that include politics, science, national security, energy and others. Drawn frp, his blog, “Warning Signs”, he is a daily contributor to and his commentaries are widely disseminated on many leading news and opinion websites and blogs.
The text of the ALA news release below
ALA adds GLBT youth literature award to prestigious Youth Media Award announcements
CHICAGO – As the publishing industry prepares for the announcement of the American Library Association’s (ALA) Youth Media Awards, authors and illustrators of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (GLBT) literature for youth will have their fingers crossed in hopes of receiving the coveted Stonewall Children’s and Young Adult Literature Award.
The Stonewall Children’s and Young Adult Literature Award joins the ALA Youth Media Award announcements, which include such prominent literary prizes as the Coretta Scott King Book Award, John Newbery Medal, Michael Printz Award, Randolph Caldecott Medal, Schneider Family Book Awards and 13 other distinguished awards for youth literature.
The award is administered by the ALA’s Stonewall Book Awards Committee of the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Round Table and is awarded annually to English-language works for children and teens of exceptional merit relating to the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered experience.
“Children’s books regarding the GLBT experience are critical tools in teaching tolerance, acceptance and the importance of diversity,” said ALA President Roberta Stevens. “Our nation is one of diverse cultures and lifestyles and it is important for parents, educators and librarians to have access to quality children’s books that represent a spectrum of cultures.”
The demand for quality GLBT children’s books continues to grow as the nation becomes more diverse. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services an estimated 14 million children have a gay or lesbian parent, and the most current U.S. Census data shows that one-third of female partner households and one-fifth of male partner households contain children.
Recognized worldwide for the high quality they represent, the ALA Youth Media Awards guide parents, educators, librarians and others in selecting the best materials for youth. Selected by committees composed of librarians and other literature and media experts, the awards encourage original and creative work in the field of children’s and young adult literature and media.
The members of the 2011 Stonewall Book Awards Committee are: Chair Lisa Johnston, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Va..; W. Stephen Breedlove, Connelly Library, La Salle University, Philadelphia; Amanda Clay, Lakeview Elementary School, Norman, Okla.; Dave Combe, Ventura County Library, Ventura, Calif.; Lewis Day, Houghton Library, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.; Sharon Flesher-Duffy, Nashua High School Media Center, Nashua, N.H.; Roland Hansen, Columbia College Library, Chicago.; Analisa Ornelas, Innovative Interfaces, San Francisco; Stephen Patrick, Jonesborough, Tenn.; Jason Phillips, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.; Roseann Szalkowski, Skokie Public Library, Skokie, Ill.; Gypsey Teague, Clemson University, Clemson, S.C.; Corwin Watts, Lincoln Public Schools, Lincoln, Neb.; and Rose Yndigoyen, St. Joseph’s College, Brooklyn, N.Y.
For information on the Stonewall Children’s and Young Adult Literature Award and other ALA Youth Media Awards, please visit
Gay Promotion Proves Illuminati Are Real
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
December 31, 2010
(Jan 26, 2006, revised Dec 31,2010)
Apart from false-flag 9-11, nothing better demonstrates Illuminati subversion than their attempt to make us behave like homosexuals.
Until 1973, homosexuality was recognized for what it is, a developmental disorder.
Then, overnight it was redefined as a "lifestyle choice," one that government, schools and media actively promoted.
In the military, soldiers now have to live in close quarters with openly gay men. This is like letting sex-starved men bivouac with beautiful young women. No it won't affect military capability. And, as Joe Biden admitted, the next step is universalizing "gay marriage."
Thanks to feminism, which in many ways is lesbian, the day is fast approaching when heterosexuals will lose interest in the opposite sex. They will decide the other sex has nothing to offer in terms of love, marriage and family. The new family model will be single parents or homosexuals raising the products of one-night stands and sperm clinics.
The Illuminati goal is to redefine and manipulate human beings by taking away our family identity (husband, wife, sister, brother, father, son, mother, daughter.) The Illuminati Communist Manifesto (1848) listed the destruction of the family as one of its goals. Communist traitors are in power.
Brokeback Mountain
The movie "Brokeback Mountain" (2006) was part of this subversive campaign to mainstream homosexuality. Throughout history, the enemies of society have used "art," "tolerance," "progress," "cool" and "chic" to trick people into behaving self-destructively.
Effective propaganda mixes truth with deception. Brokeback Mountain acknowledges that gay love often has tragic consequences. At the end, Ennis Del Mar is a pathetic figure living alone in a dilapidated trailer. He treasures items of clothing that once belonged to his lover Jack Twist, who died in an implied gay bashing hit.
The deception lies in the movie's assumption that it is normal and natural for men to indulge in homosexual
behavior. These men do not look or act gay and as cowboys, they engage in masculine activities. The actors aren't gay.
"I ain't queer," one says. "Me neither," the other replies. Then they jump into the sack together. The implication is that all men are in denial.
In reality, healthy men and women naturally find homosexual sex repugnant, a fact the movie tacitly recognizes by mercifully portraying little of it. The movie image of homosexuality is sanitized and made to seem just like heterosexuality. In fact, a monogamous long-term relationship like this one is exceptional.
For example, in Holland, male homosexual relationships last, on average, 1.5 years, and gay men have an average of eight partners a year outside of their supposedly "committed" relationships. No matter how much the media disguises it, most gays want sex not marriage.
These two cowboys aren't typical homosexuals and they certainly aren't normal heterosexuals. If you listen closely, you'll hear them both mention they were alienated from their biological fathers at a young age.
Ennis' parents died in a car accident while Jack's father shunned him. Homosexual males typically are trying to compensate for this loss. Another cause is sexual abuse in youth. A small minority may have been "born that way" because of a testosterone imbalance during gestation.
In spite of the fact that homosexuality is usually the result of father-loss or sexual assault, the Illuminati is foisting this disability on society.
They are using the tired guilt tactics they used in promoting their other "oppressed minorities" for socially subversive ends. They accuse people like me of "intolerance" and bigotry. I "hate" homosexuals because I don't want to become one.
"Homosexual rights" disguises a vicious underhanded attack on heterosexuals. Yet, most heterosexuals are oblivious to it.
Family Betrayal
In the movie, there is an amazing scene when Alma accidentally sees her husband passionately kissing Jack Twist, (played by Jake Gyllenhaal.) She has two daughters and this is her first realization her husband is gay. On her face you can see her life crashing down around her. After tolerating this long-distance romance for a few years, she finally gets a divorce.
Jack's marriage to Laureen is also a sham headed for divorce. I apologize for repeating myself but we are soaked in a toxic media bath that trashes the family and considers homosexuality cool.
Heterosexuality is much more than opposite-sex attraction. It's about monogamy (marriage) reproduction and child-rearing. This is how most of us develop and fulfill ourselves. Obviously, this natural process is also essential for societal health.
Our culture militates against healthy marriage and families. Men no longer learn that manhood involves supporting and raising a family. Women waste their most fertile years at university learning to fear and compete with men. The media encourages them to be sluts, and experiment with lesbianism.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder resulting in failure to permanently bond with a member of the opposite sex. This has become a common social affliction as divorce rates soar and marriage and birth rates plummet.
Generally speaking, homosexuality is characterized by a belief in sex for its own sake and a fixation on sex appeal as the main criterion of personal worth. Haven't we all succumbed in many respects?
Our attitude to children is also homosexual. Children are viewed as a nuisance rather than as an extension of ourselves, organic growth, and a source of infinite love and joy.
This is not an accident. In 2008, E. Baumgartner, a former leftist Hollywood Jewish TV writer, who worked on the Mary Tyler Moore Show, wrote that TV was "nothing more than [Illuminati] Jewish tools (for the most part) to undermine the innocence of American WASP culture."
"I became disturbed with the studio editorial 'rule' that children should be portrayed as sassy and disrespectful towards their parents. A few times I presented a script to my editor (also a Jewish guy) in which I had the child character behaving politely and respectfully towards his parents. The editor changed the lines to make the child bratty/sassy and then told me "... that's the way it should be done from now on, unless I tell you otherwise". That's when I started to see that something else was going on besides just making TV shows. I could see the changes in American society resulting from all this TV propaganda. I eventually left writing and became a teacher."
Cheating is Cheating
In the movie, the two men betray their wives and children. Yet the movie ends on a nostalgic note recalling the glory days having sex on Brokeback Mountain. In our Illuminist culture, self-indulgence always trumps personal and social responsibility.
The human race is a dysfunctional family too. Our leaders are betraying us in the most egregious fashion. They have literally sold out to the Illuminati, a Luciferian cult that promotes pedophilia, human sacrifice, and every form of degradation, corruption and organized crime. They stage wars and atrocities, incl. the Sept. 11 massacre, for profit and power. They secretly plot a world police state called "the New World Order."
In the Illuminati-controlled USSR, all cinema was "agitprop" or indoctrination. This applies to us as well. Brokeback Mountain was made into a social phenomenon with the potential to influence millions. It had the top box office, won the Golden Globe for Best Picture and was nominated for many Oscars (which surprisingly it did not win.)
I have no argument with homosexuals who behave responsibly. My argument is with the Luciferian (i.e. Rockefeller Foundation) social engineers who peddle homosexuality as a weapon to shred the social fabric and enslave us. We are not going to be fooled by their smears and hypocritical appeals to "tolerance". We will defend ourselves.
The Queering of Our Military and God's Wrath
By: Devvy Kidd
December 21, 2010
© 2010 -
December 18, 2010, another black day for a once moral country. The unlawfully seated U.S. Senate, led by degenerates, Joe Libermann and Hooter Harry Reid, voted to sanction bowel movement sex between men by repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy put in place by morally bankrupt, Bill Clinton. Are you offended by my use of bowel movement sex? Just what is it people think "gay" men do? They have sex with each other's feces. That's what sodomy is: a man inserting his Johnson into another man's rectum where feces is stored until elimination via the anus. For sodomites, the anus is the gateway to their playground.
Politically correct excuses were parroted by so called conservative Republicans, i.e., adulterer, Sen. John Ensign [R-NV]: "Ensign said in a statement that he opposed the procedural vote earlier because Democrats would not allow consideration of amendments.
"[I]t is my firm belief that any American wishing to fight and potentially die for this great country ought to be able to do so regardless of sexual orientation," the Nevada Republican said. "These fine individuals should not have to hide who they are." Conservatives in Massachusetts tried to warn their fellow Republicans about Scott Brown, but voters didn't listen. I wasn't surprised to find out Libertarian - Republican, Ron Paul voted for it in the house along with 14 other Republicans like sodomite David Drier.
No surprise Susan Collins (Maine, Olympia Snowe (Maine), Lisa Murkowski, retiring George Voinovich (Ohio) and freshman Sen. Mark Kirk (Ill.) voted to promote and condone filth. Their past voting records reflect wallowing in the sewer of political correctness for years.
Outright lies were used in selling out our military: 'The REAL Pentagon Poll: 91% reject open homosexual service
Let me point out a few things I used when calling the outlaws who "serve" me in Congress:
1. Serving in the military is NOT a constitutional right.
We have an all voluntary military force. No one is forced to enlist. Sexual deviants knew DOD policy when they signed up. If they don't like the policy, don't enlist or get out. You don't destroy the entire military to satisfy a small group of sexual deviants with big mouths who buy the favors of the prostitutes in Congress with campaign donations.
2. My husband is a retired Army Colonel. Military bases are family oriented. Do we want children of families to see queers kissing, holding hands or worse? A large number of military bases have child care centers. Those children will now see sin their little innocent lives should not be exposed to; yeah, it will happen "by accident."
3. The military is the ideal place for sodomites and lesbians to recruit. All that young meat to gaze upon in the showers and living quarters. Think enlisted or officers who are queer won't use their rank to get what they want? Just you wait.
With a dead economy and no jobs, it's likely a lot of Christian men and women will remain in service because they need a job or are a year or two away from full retirement with benefits. The evil doers know this and don't care. We know what the agenda is: destroy the moral fabric of this country. Destroy the traditional family: a heterosexual mother and father. Force acceptance of sin and filth by Christians in our military or face the consequences.
4. Because I do a lot of research, our military has increasing problems with suicide, females in the military and domestic violence. A new set of problems has just been added. Our soldiers will now be forced to undergo indoctrination to flush their value system to accept queers as normal or there will be no promotions. Yes, I use the word queer. (We're queer, we're here) I refuse to call them "gays." Using the word 'gay' to describe those who engage in sodomy is nothing more than clever marketing to distract people from what a homosexual does with another man. The word 'gay' is used to present an uplifting feeling instead of picturing what sodomites and lesbians do between the sheets and openly on the streets. "Alternative lifestyles" is more clever word smithing to take people's attention away from the act of sodomy and lesbian sex. Here, go take a look at "they're just like us" --- sodomites and lesbians.
The same applies to the clever marketing term: sexual orientation. There isn't a scintilla of scientific evidence to support humans are born queer. Many years ago in the State of Colorado, courageous Americans decided to do something about all the special privileges and status being given to sexual deviants who had the gall to compare "homosexual rights" to the plight of black Americans during the civil rights era. In 1992, Colorado voters approved Amendment 2 to their state constitution. This Amendment [later overturned by the Gods who sit on the U.S. Supreme Court], was to ensure that no one received preferential treatment, that all are equal under the law. The voice of the people was once again tossed into the ocean of political correctness and the homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transsexual, et al, community rejoiced.
An interesting thing happened while this battle was raging on in Colorado. I lived there during this time and watched first hand how words are used to deceive and manipulate. Up until the time of the vote, the homosexual, et al, community referred to their perversions as "sexual preference." It was the constant mantra that we heard on the stupid tube and read in leftist newspapers throughout the state for almost a year during the Amendment 2 battle.
Those seeking to stop this onslaught by the homosexual crowd continually reminded everyone that these people preferred their deviant sexual practices. The key word here being preferred. When the pro homosexual bunch suddenly realized they were losing the battle in the court of public opinion, America was introduced to a new label, "sexual orientation."
The homosexual crowd figured they could hoodwink most people into believing that all of a sudden, their sexual appetites were no longer a matter of preference, but rather "orientation." How clever and what nonsense. "...former Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day O'Connor did not deny that homosexuality is a voluntarily chosen lifestyle..." in Lawrence v Texas. Source: How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary, pg 26. What the degenerate animals in the U.S. Senate unleashed on us is just the first step. Next will be bi-sexuals, transgenders and those who practice bestiality claiming it's their right to openly serve in the military.
Gay and lesbian vs. other opposite-sex intimate partner relationships
"Surveys conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice confirm that homosexual and lesbian relationships had a far greater incidence of domestic partner violence than opposite-sex relationships including cohabitation or marriage.
"The National Violence against Women Survey, sponsored by the National Institute of Justice, found that "same-sex cohabitants reported significantly more intimate partner violence than did opposite-sex cohabitants. Thirty-nine percent of the same-sex cohabitants reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked by a marital/cohabitating partner at some time in their lifetimes, compared to 21.7 percent of the opposite-sex cohabitants. Among men, the comparable figures are 23.1 percent and 7.4 percent."[50]
Male Homosexuals
"Research indicates that the average male homosexual has hundreds of sex partners in his lifetime:
"The Dutch study of partnered homosexuals, which was published in the journal AIDS, found that men with a steady partner had an average of eight sexual partners per year.[12]
"Bell and Weinberg, in their classic study of male and female homosexuality, found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent having one thousand or more sex partners.[13]
"In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in the Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that "the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101-500." In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1,000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than one thousand lifetime sexual partners.[14]
"A survey conducted by the homosexual magazine Genre found that 24 percent of the respondents said they had had more than one hundred sexual partners in their lifetime. The magazine noted that several respondents suggested including a category of those who had more than one thousand sexual partners.[15]
5. For large numbers of Christian men and women serving in the military, not only do they find it abhorrent to serve with sexual deviants, I've received a lot of email from active duty who are terrified of being injured because of blood tainted with AIDS. They should be very worried if they are deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan fighting in those illegal, grotesque invasions. We know AIDS has an incubation period of up to ten years. Getting a blood transfusion can now mean a death sentence.
6. Bowel movement sex between men is neither natural nor healthy. Let me be frank and graphic here because you and I will now pay for such filth with our tax dollars. Sodomites will continue to enlist and down the line, their medical bills from engaging in sodomy will skyrocket. Those who contract AIDS/HIV will get those enormously expensive cocktail drugs paid for by Christians because those soldiers chose to have dangerous sex.
Putting their fists up each other's rectums and playing in each other's feces is not natural nor healthy, but it is practiced by butt jumpers. So is putting live gerbils into their anus to stimulate the lining of their rectums. So is inserting their fist into each other's rectum. Females putting their face between another woman's legs, slobbering in each other's vaginas and sucking their breasts is not natural or normal. It is sickening to even think of, but that IS what lesbians do "behind closed doors." We the taxpayers will end up paying for all their lavender diseases. For those who have been influenced by "superstars" such as Cher and Elton John to "accept those of the gay lifestyle," here's a short laundry list of what sexual deviancy brings to the participant:
(Anal) Douches, Lubricants: Allergic reactions, Rectal fatty tumors Active Fellatio: Physical abrasions, Oral gonorrhea, Herpes progenitalis I and II, Nongonococcal pharyngitis (Chlamidia and others), Oral condyloma acuminatum, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Enteric diseases, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inquinale, Chancroid Passive Fellatio: Herpes type 1 and 2, Nongonococcol urethritis (Chlamidia and others), Gonorrhea, Neisseria meningitidis. Anal Intercourse, Active: Nongonococcol urethritis, Escherichia coli, Gonorrhea, Hepatitis A, B, non-A/non-B, Herpes, Warts -molluscum and condyloma, Syphilis, Trichomoniasis, Epididymitis/prostatitis, Fungal infections, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus. Anal Intercourse, Passive: Physical protitis, Rectal gonorrhea, Warts -condyloma and molluscum (rare), Nonspecific proctitis (Chlamidia and others), Herpes, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, Trichomoniasis, Corynebacterium, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid, Cytomegalovirus, Candidiasis.
Analinction (dung-eating, "rimming"): Enteric diseases: Gay bowel syndrome PLUS Escherichia coli and Helminthic parasites, Oral warts, Oral gonorrhea, Syphilis, Lymphogranuloma venereum, Granuloma inguinale, Chancroid. Fist/Finger Insertion, Passive: Internal scrapes, Anal sphincter tears, Perforations of the colon, having to wear a diaper. Toys/Apparatus: Allergic reactions, Friction dermatitis, Physical torsions, Varicoceles, Peyronie's disease, Fungal infections, Lost rectal objects, Testicular strangulation ("cock rings"). Gay Bowel Syndrome is a collection of bowel diseases which lead to dysfunction of the lower bowel tract and is prevalent throughout the "gay" community. GBS requires one wear a colostomy bag. Shigellosis is an acute bacteria infection like salmonellosis, it can lead to a diarrhea-induced dehydration death in infants and the elderly. Infected individuals [HIV] should never handle food, yet how many "gays" work in restaurants and handle food?
Hepatitus A and B - a viral liver disease spread by fecal contamination (A), or by blood (B). The latter type is considered to be transmitted "by 'parenteral injection' of saliva or semen positive for B antigen through breaks in anal or oral mucosa during anilingual (tongue/anus) contact or proctogenital intercourse (penile/rectal sodomy)" (New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, p.302.) Hepatitus A and B - a viral liver disease spread by fecal contamination (A), or by blood (B). The latter type is considered to be transmitted "by 'parenteral injection' of saliva or semen positive for B antigen through breaks in anal or oral mucosa during anilingual (tongue/anus) contact or proctogenital intercourse (penile/rectal sodomy)" (New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, p.302.) January 2009: Homosexual Men Account for 65 Percent of Syphilis Cases, CDC Study Finds. Of the 12,000 cases of syphilis in the United States in 2007, making them the “primary driver” of increased syphilis rates overall. For further information, see: The Health Risks of Gay Sex and Sexually transmitted disease among homosexuals.
Do you suppose their diapers will fit under uniforms?
How about lesbians? "Compared to heterosexual women, lesbians appear to have higher rates of smoking, obesity and alcohol use." A strange thing about lesbians. They don't want to have sex with a man, but many of them use dildos, as in you know what one is - if you don't, here's a description about "strap on dildos":
"Use plenty of water-based lube and a condom for easy clean-up. Penetrate your partner with fingers before entering her with the strap-on. All of this goes double if you're penetrating her anally. But you said she hinted that she likes penetration: she may not even want to be penetrated with a dildo--she may be hinting that she wants to be finger-f**ked or fisted. So ask her."
Nice, huh? The penis without the male. Sometimes research makes me want to throw up.
When God created man and woman, do you really think he would have intentionally programmed humans to engage in behavior that brings such pain, misery and death?
God's wrath
Last, but more important than all the facts above, God calls sodomy an abomination. A sin.
"If a man lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination and they shall surely be put to death." -- Leviticus 20:13:
"For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions: for their women exchanged the natural use for that which is against nature. And in the same way also the men abandoned the natural use of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error."-- Romans 1:26-27:
"The unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God. So do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revelers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the realm of God." -- I Corinthians 6:9:
"Law is not made for a righteous person but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and fornicators and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound (healthy) teaching." -- I Timothy 1:9-10:
According to sexual deviants and their supporters, the words above, God's word as written in the King James Bible, really means it's okay for men to have sex with each and the same for women!
Romans 1:26-32. "Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Think about that as you support "gays".
83% of the American people identify themselves as Christians, yet they continue to vote morally dead incumbents back into office who vote to glorify and sanction the filth of sodomy. They vote to slap God in the face. How do those Christians justify their actions while they profess to believe the Bible is the word of God? Because they want to be tolerant of politically correct behavior? I'm sure God will be real understanding on judgment day.
Blame the churches
Where are the churches in this country? Well, many of them have become folk singing Sunday events. Lots of boogie-woogie and "Christian music" every Sunday at those social meetings, er, church. Mega churches run by millionaires like Joel Osteen are nothing more than feel good sessions. Yes, I've taken the time to watch Osteen on Sunday via the tv. Even fifteen minutes made me want to take a hot shower. Net worth: $40 million bux, pass the plate! I find Rick Warren even slimier. His net worth is a paltry $14 million bux, so pass the plate twice. Some Christian denominations have told God to buzz off and openly accept sodomites and lesbians into their churches as individuals to be respected, tolerated. Their pastors or reverends are also sexual deviants. Slap God in the face.
The majority of America's churches who are shackled by the IRS as tax exempt entities have remained silent on this issue and sin. Shame on them for their cowardice. Do they think God won't notice? Do preachers, reverends and other clergy really believe God will forgive their sin of leading their flocks astray by condoning moral depravity and remaining silent while political animals run our country into Hell? Shame on them for spending time in front of the pulpit cowering as they duck their duty and obligation to remind those who sit before them that actions have consequences and that sin in God's eyes is to be taken seriously.
A master of eloquent writing and a vocabulary beyond my ability, Jim Schwiesow, wrote in one of his columns:
"At the risk of offending the true believers who sit among the nominal Christians in the denominational churches I submit that a predominant number of these churches today abet the heathen in the suppression of the teachings of Christ. When the preachers of these congregations avoid the hard lessons of scripture and displace, avoid, or eliminate the Gospel and replace it with humanism and the secular doctrines of social justice they fall to the desires of the powers and principalities in high places. "
Do the people of this country really believe God will continue to reward this nation with his blessings when the people have become as debased and filthy as whores on a street corner? Absolutely not.
"The Bible was given to mankind for his instruction and we ignore it at our peril. Men can laugh at it, scoff at and denigrate the words thereof and denounce it as myth and superstitious nonsense, but that will not erase any of God's works, it will not circumvent His control over all of nature and current events nor will it prevent every last prophetic word of the Bible from being carried out. God holds the wisdom of men in derision; man's every prideful worldly self-centered work is as foolishness to Him..
Jim Schwiesow, Beyond a Fiery Gate Lies Our Destiny:
"God's wrath is poised to be poured out upon this world with a fullness of fury and the United States will be the first to fall, while its English speaking allies will either fall simultaneously or succumb to similar judgment in quick succession. This nation has fallen into a depth of depravity unparalleled in our history. It is not necessary to enumerate our sins they are well known. The perverseness of the minds of the people sickens the soul. Government supported vice is rampant, and the people are of a corrupt mind and their hearts are continually fixed on evil. The killing of millions of babies is sanctioned and protected by government decree, as is sexual perversion and various other vices."
Personally, I have been around sodomites. They are nice people, but I will not shake their hand because I know where its been. If I suspect a waiter at a restaurant is queer, I quietly ask to be seated someplace else in the restaurant. If that request isn't granted, I simply leave. I will not give my consumer dollars to companies like Campbell's because they financially support sin. I certainly don't hate sexual deviants. I pity them because they have bought into the propaganda they're "born that way." I sincerely pray they will stop their destructive behavior and ask for God's forgiveness. Otherwise, in my personal belief system based on the word of God, they condemn their soul to Hell for eternity and eternity is a long, long time.
Now, it's not too late to stop this abomination according to Cliff Kincaid: The “procedural steps” that are part of the bill give the new conservative-controlled House an opportunity to derail the repeal policy." We shall see what this "new" conservative Outlaw Congress does next month. You can still make your voice heard.
Illuminati Persecute Heterosexuals
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
August 21, 2010
Turkey baster families? Three Hollywood movies tout artificial insemination.
Every day, heterosexuals face an insidious mass media campaign designed to make homosexuality the social norm.
This vicious underhanded attack on heterosexual identity is disguised as defending "homosexual rights."
To defend gay rights, heterosexuals are taught to deny gender, marriage and family. The fundamental human rights of 98% of the population -- the right to natural human development -- are violated.
I'd call that hate.
People get their identity, meaning and support from family. The Illuminati is re engineering humanity to serve them.
The Big Picture
Humanity is satanically possessed. This sounds incredible and bizarre but it is literally true.
Humanity is controlled by a satanic cult called the Illuminati. They grew out of the Sabbatean heresy, a satanic Jewish movement from the 17th and 18th century that engulfed half the Jews of Europe. This led directly to the growth of Communism, Socialism, and Zionism.
Jewish rabbis identified them as Satanist and said they would destroy Judaism.
Their blueprint for world satanic domination is the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Homosexuality is just one of many "false doctrines" designed to weaken and enslave the goyim. "We must introduce into their education all those principles which have so brilliantly broken up their order." (Protocols 16)
Sigmund Freud was a Sabbatean Jew. The Sabbateans practiced every sexual deviance including wife swapping, incest and pedophilia as a means of flaunting God and the natural/spiritual order. This satanic practice has been introduced as "sexual liberation" "feminism" and "gay rights." .
Sabbatean Jews have incredible power by virtue of their control of government credit. They have created a puppet Gentile elite using Freemasonry (Cabalism for goyim.) Barack Obama is one of many such Masonic puppets. They control corporations (advertising), government, education and the mass media which is devoted to social engineering.
Cabalism - Distorting Reality
The Illuminati substitute their self-serving reality for true reality. They make lies seem truth; evil seem good.
This is why the world is becoming a zanier and zanier place. History and current events are literally scripted. We are living in a matrix.
Remember that scene of people fleeing from the crashing towers on 9-11. Remind you of a Hollywood disaster movie? The same Illuminati mentality scripted and funded the "Al Queda" attack as the summer blockbuster in your local theater.
The world wars were similarly choreographed complete with costumes and songs. Better to kill the goyim. Expendable non-Sabbatean Jews had to die in order to disguise this plot.
To control the world, the Sabbateans must recreate it in their own image. That requires destruction of religion, race, nation, and of course family. They use homosexuality to destroy family.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder caused by gender confusion. It is promoted as a normal lifestyle choice to undermine heterosexuals and ultimately enslave society.
Despite what the mass media says, the vast majority of homosexuals want sex not marriage or children. This is the Illuminati vision for heterosexuals.
As I have said, they are turning us into homosexuals. (How would gays feel if they were subjected to such a campaign in reverse?) My readers tell me that between 25 and 50% of the young females they meet are bisexual. Do you think this is conducive to successful heterosexual marriage and family?
Hollywood's Turkey Baster Families
Here are some examples of the current media barrage intended to undermine and replace heterosexual norms:
Movie - "The Switch" with Jennifer Aniston. Aging feminist resorts to turkey baster to have child. Discovers male friend switched his sperm. Only way men can have children these days.
Aniston got headlines by saying "women don't need men to have a child." She is a role model for millions of young girls. "A List" actors and actresses are Illuminati mouthpieces.
Movie - "The Back up Plan" - Jennifer Lopez plays a woman who conceives twins through artificial insemination, only to meet the man of her dreams on the very same day.
Movie - "The Children are all Right" - The children of two lesbians find their common sperm donor father who is only too happy to enter the family dynamic.
All three movies mimic normal healthy heterosexual families in order to show that they aren't necessary.
News Item - Gay Actor Neil Patrick Harris and partner will have twin boys with "beautiful surrogate " in Oct.
News Item- Kathy Griffin tells Larry King: "Heterosexual marriage should be a criminal offense."
She says gay marriage is a "civil rights issue." What about the civil rights of 96% of the population who don't want their institutions attacked and redefined out of existence?
News Item - ABC news is the most Illuminati Jewish network of the three. In the show "What Would You DO?" August 20 they showed two beautiful "lesbians" kissing on a park bench and filmed the reaction of passers-by. Although some criticism was noted, the message is that "love conquers all." I wonder what the reaction would have been if those girls looked like butches? In another episode, they showed people defending gays against "gay bashing." Heterosexuals, not gays are being oppressed.
News Item - "Gender Differences Due to Socialization not Genetics" The Guardian Aug. 15 In her new book "Delusions of Gender" feminist scientist Cordelia Fine says there are no neurological differences between the sexes."
More "News" Items -
Children Of Lesbians May Do Better Than Their Peers [Time]
Few Psychological Problems For Children Of Lesbian Mothers [Medpage Today]
Kids Of Lesbians Have Fewer Behavioral Problems, Study Suggests [CNN]
As with climate warming and homosexuality, the Illuminati manufacture their own science and then tout it in their wholly owned mass media.
The Illuminati attack on gender has resulted in untold suffering and degradation for millions of heterosexuals. Young men and women depend on marriage and family for purpose and satisfaction. Instead, many young women are turning to pornography, satanism and prostitution.
The Illuminati takeover is entering its final stages. War, financial upheaval, migrations, natural disasters, plagues etc. are all part of the agenda. We can only keep our head by recognizing that it is all being engineered by the Illuminati and their lackeys, our so-called political and cultural leaders.
Annual Stockholm Pride Parade (2007)

Gay and Lesbian Police
Gay and lesbian soldiers serving in the Swedish Armed Forces.

Gay Cops Bringing in Totalitarian NWO
Richard Evans
June 3, 2010
UK, May 3rd. Christian campaigners have expressed alarm that the Public Order Act, introduced in 1986 to tackle violent rioters and football hooligans, is being used to curb religious free speech.
Dale McAlpine was charged with causing "harassment, alarm or distress" after a homosexual police community support officer (PCSO) overheard him reciting a number of "sins" referred to in the Bible, including blasphemy, drunkenness and same sex relationships.
The 42-year-old Baptist, who has preached Christianity in Workington, Cumbria for years, said he did not mention homosexuality while delivering a
sermon from the top of a stepladder, but admitted telling a passing shopper that he believed it went against the word of God.
Police officers are alleging that he made the remark in a voice loud enough to be overheard by others and have charged him with using abusive or insulting language, contrary to the Public Order Act.
Mr McAlpine, who was taken to the police station in the back of a marked van and locked in a cell for seven hours on April 20, said the incident was among the worst experiences of his life.
"I felt deeply shocked and humiliated that I had been arrested in my own town and treated like a common criminal in front of people I know," he said.
"My freedom was taken away on the hearsay of someone who disliked what I said, and I was charged under a law that doesn't apply."
England has these political police now. They're not real police, they're just snitches with arrest power.
They give them little Twinky blue uniforms. (wonder if they run recruiting ads in UK gay websites?)
In the US, BOSTON and San Francisco have predominantly homosexual/lesbian police forces.
We do not have a predominantly homosexual police force here in Houston - yet - but the police women are dykes. There is no doubt about it now: military and police are being homosexualized. Police are invariably military first.
Many have wondered how American police and soldiers will react to orders from a totalitarian regime. We've banked on the fact that cops and soldiers with families won't stand for being ordered against other Americans.
Now it dawns on me they're found the demographic of Americans that have a greater allegiance to the gay government than to mom and pop.
Researching this I found there's a homosexual cops NGO - 'G.O.A.L ' Gay Officers 'Action' League..
(I bet they got a lot of 'action' driving their 'cruisers' in the Boston 'pride' parade).
Here's the G.O.A.L. website
This is a highly organized, funded, and condoned agenda. Lesbian and gay mayors popped up like mushrooms in the 2008 election which swept in the left. We got one. G's and L's like to get on school boards, and into municipal and corporate administrations. It's getting noticeable, but nobody seems to be noticing.
Makow Comment - As you can see, "human rights and tolerance" is a veil for a higher form of discrimination. The "rights" of sodomites trump the rights of Christians. Human rights is just the Satanist ruse for taking power and freedom away from Christians.
More from Richard Evans:
I think they're really going in for the kill from now on silencing the heterosexual family based population.
(left, available again, one slightly used political whore)
Not skipping a beat, National Propaganda Radio ran a story with two women talking - the 'reporter' and a Brandeis sociology professor. They're spinning Gore's marriage split as a 'successful' marriage by 'todays' standards. They twisted it around to make it sound like people who stay married for 60, 70 years are desperate losers.
Granted, our generation didn't have the early maturity in life that made that possible for earlier generations. But there's no denying successful marriage was a measure of genuine success in life.
Get a load of this -
Expecting Our Leaders to Be In 'Functional, Heterosexual, Child-Producing Unions Is Totally Archaic'
The 'gay gene' hoax
By Ryan Sorba
Posted: June 03, 2010

One of the most common studies homosexual activists cite when they make the absurd claim that people are "born gay" was conducted in 1993 by pro-gay activist Dr. Dean Hamer and his team of geneticists at the National Cancer Institute.
Hamer and his colleagues reported that a "gay gene" seemed to be maternally linked and could be found on the Xq28 stretch of the X chromosome.
Hamer's genetic study played a key role in a massive public-relations campaign designed by Harvard-educated and Madison Avenue-trained homosexual activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. I refer to this campaign as the "born gay hoax." In the late 1980s and early 1990s, this hoax was designed to help homosexual activists legally obtain minority-class status. Historically, courts have awarded minority-class status to groups that:
have demonstrated a long history of discrimination;
have demonstrated that they are powerless as a community to help themselves; and
have demonstrated an immutable characteristic such as race or gender (i.e., are born that way).
In the 1990s, homosexual activists believed that if they could convince the courts that they were "born gay" they would acquire protected-class status and could then legally challenge anti-sodomy laws in the United States.
Dean Hamer played an enormous role in this effort. In fact, on April 3, 1994, the The Washington Times
reported that while Hamer was testifying against Colorado's Amendment 2 – which sought to keep men who have sex with men from winning minority-class status – Sen. Robert C. Smith, R-N.H., knew of Hamer's motives and accused the doctor of "actively pursuing a gay agenda."
Immediately after Hamer's "gay gene" study was published in 1993, a media explosion ensued. Hamer's results, however, were a fraud. The title of an article appearing on page 25 of the July 10, 1995, edition of the pro-gay magazine New York Native explains:
"Gay Gene" Research Doesn't Hold Under Scrutiny, Chicago Tribune's John Crewdson Uncovers Possible Scientific Misconduct by NCI Researcher.
What is at the heart of evil in our world, and how do we lessen its power in our own lives? Check out David

Kupelian's newest book, "How Evil Works: Understanding and Overcoming the Destructive Forces That Are Transforming America"
The article begins:
In addition to the political and social firestorm Hamer's research has ignited, he has also been criticized by numerous scientists for not performing what seems to be an obvious control experiment: examining the genes of heterosexual brothers.
The omission of a control group in a scientific experiment is significant, because it essentially renders the experiment inconclusive. Why would a supposedly professional researcher like Hamer conduct an experiment in such an unacceptable and unprofessional fashion?
According to the article, another researcher who worked on the project claimed that although Hamer conducted the experiment correctly by including a control variable, the results he obtained did not lead to the conclusion he was hoping to find: that some men are "born gay." Hamer therefore did not release the information related to the control group and published pseudo-scientific results. All went well for Hamer until a junior researcher on his team exposed his scheme. The article continues:
Even worse for Hamer, the National Institute of Health's Office of Research Integrity is now investigating his "gay gene" research, according to Crewdson. The inquiry concerns allegations that Hamer was selective about which data he chose to report (i.e., that he ignored data that didn't support his contention that homosexuality is genetically determined). The data manipulation was reported to NIH's integrity office by a junior researcher who performed research crucial to Hamer's claimed discovery, according to Crewdson.

Crewdson's revelations turned out to be true. A November 1995 edition of Scientific American confirmed that Hamer was "being charged with research improprieties and was under investigation by the National Institute of Health's Federal Office of Research Integrity." Although the NIH never released the results of the inquiry, Hamer was shortly thereafter transferred to another section. In addition to lying about his results, he had done his "gay gene" research under a grant to work on Kaposi's sarcoma, a skin cancer that inordinately afflicts men who have sex with men.
Upon learning that Hamer's "gay gene" study was a hoax, one might assume that if other researchers were to attempt to replicate his experiment, including his control group, they would fail to obtain the pseudo-scientific result that there is a "gay gene." This is exactly the case. The New York Native article continues:
... [A]t least one lab that has tried hard to replicate his findings has been unsuccessful.
"Only one independent laboratory has reported attempting such a replication, and it has found no evidence to support Hamer," Crewdson reported. "We can't reproduce Hamer's data," said George Ebers, a neurogeneticist from the University of Western Ontario, who has searched unsuccessfully for a Hamer-style genetic link to homosexuality in more than 50 pairs of gay Canadian brothers. In fact, Ebers found the genetic markers cited by Hamer in "exactly half of his brother pairs" according to Crewdson – precisely what the laws of chance would predict, if the "markers had no significance."
The fact that Hamer's study cannot be replicated confirms reports that Hamer lied about his results. In 1998, another group of researchers (Sanders, et al.) tried to replicate Hamer's study as well; they also failed to find a genetic connection to homosexuality.
Then, in the Aug. 6, 1999, edition of Science, George Rice and George Ebers published a review of Hamer's study to go along with their previous attempts to replicate his findings. The scientists stated that the results of Hamer's study "did not support an X-linked gene underlying male homosexuality." They found that the brothers observed by the Hamer group were no more likely to share the Xq28 markers than would be expected by mere chance.
By this time, Hamer had already conceded that his pseudo-scientific study did not support a genetic cause for homosexuality, in the Jan. 30, 1998, edition of the Washington Blade. He also conceded that homosexuality is "culturally transmitted, not inherited," and that "there is not a single master gene that makes people gay. … I don't think we will ever be able to predict who will be gay," he said.
McDonald's Ad Makes Gay Disorder Seem "Cool"
Henry Makow Ph.D.
June 2, 2010
In case you needed another reason to boycott McDonald's -- "Mac Social Engineering Sandwich"
An Australian website reports on new McDonald's Campaign designed to normalize homosexuality and make it seem cool and edgy:
McDonald's has targeted gay teenagers in a new commercial which local rights advocates say is a refreshing step forward for the fast food giant.
The ad, which will air in France, shows a teenage boy sitting at a table while talking on a mobile phone and looking at a class photograph.
"I was thinking about you too ... I'm looking at your class picture," the boy says in French.
The teenager's father returns to the table with their meal and says: "It's a shame you're in an all-boys college. You would have had all the girls chasing you."
The teen gives his father a sly smile as the tag line "Come as you are" appears on the bottom of the screen.
The advertisement is one of several in the new McDonald's campaign.
Gay advocates have hailed the ad as a "big step forward".
"It depicts a young gay man realistically and without judgment and it includes gay people in an institution that, for many families, is an integral part of their everyday life," Australian Coalition for Equality spokesman Rodney Croome said.
"If McDonalds' aim was to make an ad which says 'everybody is welcome' then it has succeeded and I'd strongly urge McDonalds in Australia to do the same."
But other advocates have slammed the ad, saying it fails to hit the mark.
"What does being gay have to do with eating hamburgers?" gay activist Gary Burns said.
"The ad should have a more inclusive message based around tolerance and understanding for gay men and lesbians in society in general and not just in McDonald's hamburger joints."
McDonald's Australia told ninemsn there were no plans to produce a local version of the ad.
(left. McDonald's CEO Jim Skinner Makes Sign of Satan)
Makow comment:
The story cares only that the ad doesn't do enough to mainstream homosexuality.
For years, I have warned they are re-engineering mankind to be homosexual. This is an explicit example.
It subtly ridicules the father's heterosexual assumptions and makes it socially acceptable for young males to engage in anal sex. It is an insidious government-sanctioned attack on heterosexuals masquerading as tolerance for gays.
The ad fails to recognize that homosexuality is a developmental disorder. The vast majority of homosexuals suffer from gender confusion due to male sexual assault as youths or dysfunctional families (dominant mothers, remote effeminate fathers.)
Homosexuals suffer from an array of physical, psychological and emotional problems not faced by heterosexuals. Essentially, McDonald's is promoting a disorder just as virulent as any virus.
This is part of a long-term Illuminati program to undermine heterosexual marriage and family, and make promiscuous sex our primary vocation whether gay or straight.
It demonstrates that advertising has a social engineering component that often supersedes the commercial one. The Illuminati have unlimited wealth, now they want unlimited power. Thus they are willing to risk annoying McDonald's 98% straight market or even sacrifice their Crown Jewel, British Petroleum. Mentally enslaving mankind seems to be their first priority.
McDonald's is doing a disservice to homosexuals by misrepresenting a very real problem that causes very real suffering.
Why All Porn is Gay (Encore)
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
February 24, 2009
(originally posted in Feb. 2006)
In 2004, a woman revealed details of Hugh Hefner's sex life.
If the Playboy founder is any indication, a life dedicated to porn and promiscuity leads to homosexuality and impotence. The 60's icon of suave masculinity is, in old age, a grotesque self-parody.
Hefner, 82, pays a bevy of whores $2000 a week to be his girlfriends and have sex with him every Wednesday and Friday. He uses Viagra and watches male gay porn to stay erect while as many as ten concubines mount him in succession. The other girls simulate lesbian sex to arouse him.
"He doesn't really do anything," says Jill Anne Spaulding, author of the book "Upstairs." He just lies there with his Viagra erection. It's just a fake erection, and each girl gets on top of him for two minutes while the girls in the background try to keep him excited. They'll yell things like, "F-k her daddy, f-k her daddy!" There's a lot of cheerleader going on!"
No one becomes a playmate without having intercourse with Hefner. The "girl next door" is now a whore; and Hefner's maudlin example of arrested development is a fitting epitaph for his Playboy Philosophy.
Playboy was not a spontaneous phenomenon. It was social engineering designed to foster homosexuality and family breakdown. See my "Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution." This is why Spaulding's revelations got so little publicity.
Defining Homosexual and Heterosexual
The "establishment" agenda is to destabilize and neuter us by encouraging homosexual behavior. This ensures we don't propagate since homosexuals have sex but don't have children.
They redefine "homosexual" as a "sexual preference" or "lifestyle choice" rather than a developmental disorder so as to entrap us. Never mind that the vast majority of homosexuals come from dysfunctional families or suffered sexual abuse as youths. Our reluctance to embrace homosexuality is considered "bigotry."
In response, let's take liberties with these definitions ourselves. Having the right paradigm is the key to healthy behavior.
Forget about what you normally think of gay or straight (same-sex , opposite sex attraction etc.) Think of heterosexuality as monogamous and dedicated to rearing children; homosexuality as promiscuous and concerned with sex for its own sake.
Heterosexuality involves bonding permanently with a member of the opposite sex for love and usually procreation. It is participating in the natural life cycle, in the intrinsic meaning of life. Personal and societal health depend on heterosexuality.
Homosexuality is a form of arrested development caused by an inability to form a heterosexual bond. As a result, homosexuals compensate using sex as a surrogate for love.
In these terms, society has become more homosexual because, due to social engineering (i.e. the "sexual revolution," feminism) many heterosexuals now fail to permanently bond. Normally, happily married heterosexuals can put sex in perspective and move on to more important things.
A perceptive reader recently wrote me: "If heterosexual sex outside of marriage is acceptable, if we eliminate the procreative aspect from sex, are heterosexuals any different from homosexuals in regards to the sexual activity?"
Exactly. I know these definitions are not "politically correct." PC is propaganda, social engineering and mind control. PC is an old Communist Party (i.e. Illuminati) term.
I do not disparage gays. According to my definitions, the vast majority of homosexuals are really "heterosexuals" like Hugh Hefner. And a small minority of homosexuals are monogamous and partake in some heterosexual values.
How Sex Became an Act of Hate
Last year I wrote: "Throughout modern history Illuminati bankers have used "sexual liberation" to subvert
society and establish their subtle tyranny. As Masonic revolutionary Giuseppe Mazzini said, "we corrupt in order to rule."
The Illuminati bankers need to introduce "world government" to translate their unjust monopoly over credit into total world control.
They realized that they couldn't take control until they destroyed the family. This was a main plank of the Communist Manifesto in 1848, along with the creation of a private central bank.
Every major "revolution" in modern history has increased Illuminati banker control and the sexual revolution is no exception.
The Illuminati used Hugh Hefner's "Playboy" to divorce sex from love, marriage and family. They own the major cartels and control the media through advertising.
The movies are very effective in fostering homosexuality. Sex is often something reserved for your enemies. Recently I saw "Dr. No" (1962) again. The fashionable James Bond has sex with a woman even after he realizes she is involved in an attempt to kill him. After they have sex, Bond has her imprisoned.
In the movie Munich (2006), the Israeli assassins confront an attractive woman who killed their colleague. She displays her goods and suggests her death would be "a waste of talent." She thinks they might have sex with a woman they intend to kill.
Human beings are malleable and take their standards from movies. There is nothing so destructive to human society as the separation of sex and love. It reduces men to dogs, and women to fire hydrants.
The Illuminati wishes to harness sex in the interests of hate. Love is the enemy of hate and must be destroyed.
All Porn is Gay

According to our definition of homosexuality, (i.e. promiscuity outside of love and/or procreation), all pornography is gay. The porn consumer is engaged in a promiscuous masturbatory fantasy. He is not focused on his marriage and progeny.
From what I have said, it should be clear that homosexuality is incompatible with heterosexuality, just as promiscuity is incompatible with monogamy. Gay activists admit their goal is to destroy heterosexuality.
Pornography is poisoning heterosexuality. There is a place for tasteful nudity as a stopgap while seeking marriage.
(See my "Managing the Male Sex Drive" ) But as you know, pornography has reached epidemic proportions. "Adult Video News" predicts revenue of $12.6 billion this year. The Internet has literally thousands of porn sites. TV and pop music increasingly are pornographic.
Pornography warps the way a man sees all women and girls. Many sites include girls as young as 14. See "Erototoxins"
Young females think they are useful for one thing only. Thousands in the porn industry display what everyone has instead of cultivating what is rare and valuable: femininity.
I hate to burst the bubble on a billion dollar industry: Young naked women are practically identical. They have identical equipment. Boobs and bush. Symmetrical faces. Do men need to see literally thousands of examples?
There is something addictive here. Why don't men get sick of it? Why don't they suffer from gynecologist's fatigue? The plethora of breasts and splayed legs takes the wonder out of sex and causes contempt for women and impotence. Maybe this is the point: new drugs keep people running on empty. (See "The Porn Pharma Complex")
Sexual attraction is mostly a function of a woman's fertility. Women are designed to marry and procreate
when they are young and most attractive. Marriage ensured that men would have to commit if they wanted sex. By undermining marriage, occult social engineers have turned a critical social and reproductive activity into a lifetime obsession, better to divert, degrade and control the masses.
We were not prepared for the attack on our humanity by "sexual liberation" and porn. We didn't know our leadership had been subverted by the Illuminati.
Marriage and family are the essential building blocks of society. Family ensures that each new generation is properly nurtured and prepared for life.
Most people receive values, purpose, identity and love from their family roles.
Heterosexuality provides life with profound meaning. There is no greater potential for love than marriage and parenthood.
Raising a child is the supreme act of devotion and faith in God and is practiced and tested every day.
Homosexual social engineering is gradually destroying these sources of happiness and health, personal and societal.
Is this Gay Behavior Sick?
Henry Makow Ph.D.
June 19, 2008
Last week California legalized gay marriage. Why do you suppose the bankers wanted to placate the less than one per cent of the population who are marriage-minded gays so badly that they are willing to redefine the central life ritual of 96% of the population who are heterosexual? Marriage is a heterosexual institution, mostly about reproduction. It's like saying Muslims have an "equal right" to celebrate Passover.
The bankers want heterosexuals to suffer from the same gender confusion as homosexuals do, which makes it impossible to bond permanently with the opposite sex. As result, the vast majority of people will substitute promiscuity for love, marriage and family. Eventually the State will take over reproduction and indoctrination of the young. Here is an article I wrote in Nov. 2001 which tears the veil from the "homosexual lifestyle" they pretend is so attractive. (Much more in my book at
Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.
This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and "oppressive." Heterosexual society and family are taking heavy casualties. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don't even know we are at war.
Let's decide whom, in fact, is sick.
Let's look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of
"After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's"(1989).
In Chapter Six, they outline "ten categories of misbehavior," drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the male gay lifestyle, (not gay sexuality mind you), "is the pits." They want gays to improve their image by addressing "what is wrong with a lot of gays." (276)
What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven't caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.
•The authors say "a surprisingly high percentage" of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one's own gayness and its implication.
•They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to "I can do whatever I want and you can go to perdition. (If it feels good, I'll do it!)" If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend's lover, he'll do it, justifying it as an act of "sexual freedom" and the friend be damned.
•They say gays suffer from a "narcissistic" personality disorder and give this clinical description: "pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation."
•As an example of this narcissism, the authors say "a very sizable proportion of gay men" who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.
•They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such "forbidden" aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.
•They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.
•Many gays are "single minded sexual predators" fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are "the real queer bashers." Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
•"Relationships between gay men don't usually last very long." They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The "cheating ratio of 'married' gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%."
•Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.
•The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? Obviously this is not true of all homosexuals. I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don't want it to spread.
Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is "the pits." Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.
The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that "our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights."
The book details "a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:"
"Desensitization": flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the "least offensive manner possible."
"Jamming": Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.
"Conversion": Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. "The image must be the icon of normality."
They say "it makes no difference that the ads are lies" because "we are using them to...counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies."
This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:
"By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] ...We mean conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not." (153)
Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact
healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their overtures whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.
It is a measure of the authors' cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in "People of the Lie" characterizes people who suffer from extreme or "malignant" narcissism simply as "evil."
Evil people, Peck says, have "an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong...Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others." (297)
The publicity surrounding gay marriage doesn't reflect the reality. Gays don't want to marry. In Canada, gay marriage has been legal for more than a year yet only one in one thousand marriages are homosexual. Gays and lesbians make up about 40 out of 1000 population.
Gay marriage is really designed to make heterosexuals see homosexual behavior as the new normal. They could have designated a separate but equal status for the homosexuals who want marriage.
Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us stop. Their behavior is sick. And it's contagious.
Also See:
The Message in Animated Movies!
07 October 2010