Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Obama is NOT Eligible to be President! (Part 2)



Some Questions about the Obama Birth Certificate
Are "we the people" being set up for something?
Jim O'Neill
Friday, April 29, 2011
After researching the new Obama long form COLB (Certificate Of Live Birth), I’m left with three questions: Are they really that stupid? Do they think that “we the people” are that stupid? Are “we the people” being set up for something?
Progressives, besides being cunning, sly, and manipulative, also tend (at least the elites) to be well educated, well versed in Newspeak (political correctness), and intelligent. Consequently, I hesitate to think that they are so dumb as to try to palm off such an obvious patch-work forgery as a legitimate COLB. It is hard to imagine such an obvious fake as being anything but a ploy.
I suspect that they are either (1) desperate, or (2) putting out an obvious forgery in hopes of instigating something. But desperate people often make dumb mistakes, so I’m not ruling out their own stupidity as the answer to my questions.
Watching the way the lapdog press has unquestioningly accepted the new COLB is sickening. They have not only meekly accepted it as being akin to something Moses might have brought down from the mountain, but they are praising it, crowing about it, and lauding it, like some religious zealots with a holy relic—this, after insisting for years that they had all already seen Obama’s birth certificate. How can they have seen it a couple of years ago, and now be wetting their pants over its recent release? Curiouser and curiouser. Obviously these folks suffer from short-term memory loss, and are easily excited (and/or snookered).;
The Republican wastes-of-space who are in on the fix, are not much better than the Demorats, or the media’s Obama sycophants. Recently frightened by Trump’s jump in the polls, Progressive Republicans now feel that they can relax once more back into their lame “business as usual” BS. Wrong. Faux conservative Republicans may be salivating at the thought of having a seat at the NWO banquet feast, but “we the people” are not about to content ourselves with crumbs off their table—let alone allow ourselves to be served up as the main course.
Granted, a large percentage of “we the people” are still deplorably uninformed, misinformed, and apathetic, but the percentage of us who realize that we are in a fight for the survival of the US as a free republic, is ever-growing, and ever-more determined to fight for the American Dream, and our children’s future.
On the legal front, Cmdr. Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo, and others who are using the Vattel argument against Obama should now, (even using the patch-work forgery), have enough ammo to successfully argue their case. “Kenya,” after all, is a much more specific term to work with than “African” (which unless I’m mistaken, is used in reference to a geographic location, and not a racial subset—but you might want to ask one of the millions of Caucasian South Africans about that).
Contrary to Mr. Trump’s opinion, the release next month of LTC Lakin from Ft. Leavenworth prison, the publication of Dr. Jerome Corsi’s book “Where’s the Birth Certificate” in a couple of weeks, and letters sent to the FBI and two Tennessee grand juries, charging Obama with treason, may have had as much to do with the release of Obama’s new bogus COLB, than Trump’s bringing the eligibility issue to the nation’s awareness. Still, kudos to The Donald for bringing national attention to the question of Obama’s fitness to be POTUS.
In any event, the birth certificate is only one of many hidden, missing, or fictitious elements in Obama’s past. Who is this Commander in Chief who allows one of his finest soldiers to go to prison rather than show his long form COLB—bogus or not? Who is this POTUS who bows before the leaders of other countries, praises Islam, and apologizes for the United States? Who is this community organizer who surrounds himself with anti-American globalists, Far Left ideologues, crony-capitalist scum, greedy banking parasites, and union thugs? Who is this guy—really?
Laus Deo.
Do the British really care about the Royal Wedding?
Nuptials of Prince William and Kate Middleton
Anna Grayson
Thursday, April 28, 2011
London, England-I switch on the TV and there’s an image of a huge van with a tarpaulin draped over its side covering a delivery of plants to Westminster Abbey that are intended for the nuptials of Prince William and Kate Middleton. The BBC reporter is animated, expectation peppering his voice as he plays the guessing game of will it or won’t it be the oak trees that have been rumoured to have been ordered to reflect the acorns in the brand new coat of arms that the Middleton’s have been granted by the College of Arms. Someone goes to lift the tarp, no - false alarm, seconds pass, more chatter, the tarp is lifted and halleluiah there are oaks! Welcome to the media madness that is now in full force here in the UK.
On Friday morning every person that has ever shined a shoe, brushed the hair of, or sold a flower to a Middleton or Windsor will be paraded in front of the cameras, filling every second of the 24-hour broadcast news cycle with every imaginable minute detail of life of the couple of the moment.
The famed British tabloid press is also holding their own. In the last couple of weeks, we’ve had everything from the mother of the bride’s supposed tiff over the dress she commissioned from royal dressmaker Lindka Cierach, and then decided to cancel, to the free royal mugs, to Charles’ party planner rubbing palace staff up the wrong way with his high handed management of the evening party at Buckingham Palace. But do the British care? I have polled just about every Brit I have been in contact with over the past couple of weeks and fielded opinion from my not insubstantial email list. I submit there is a disconnect between the excitement portrayed and true level of lack of engagement with your average Brit.
Sure you will see about a half a million people lining the wedding route waving their Union Jacks on the day, but they only represent less than one percent of the population. They are the die-hards with not an insignificant number of tourists and passersby that get caught up in the spectacle of the moment.
For decades we have had the republicans who want to do away with a constitutional monarchy. But that would mean replacing the existing parliamentary system with something like a presidency which is abhorrent to many Brits. A lot of this thinking stems from the class envy that has been historically whipped up by politicians, especially the Labour party and most virulently in their last tenure of government. This may explain some of current British sentiment about the monarchy, but it is not the whole story.
Nor does the bellicose Bill O’Reilly in his semi serious claims that the kings ‘stole it (money and land) from the peasants’ hit the mark. One can argue that American settlers did the same to the native Indians. History is littered with ill-gotten gains, bad deals and shafted peoples. We are where we are. It runs deeper than that. The British are in an identity crisis. Half the people in my straw poll said monarchy was important and the main reason was it gave them a sense of heritage, continuity and identity, and a reason to bond with one another. The other half just don’t care.
Thirteen years of Tony Blair’s New Labour has forced a huge culture shift by promoting ‘diversity’ in the form of an open door immigration policy
Thirteen years of Tony Blair’s New Labour has forced a huge culture shift by promoting ‘diversity’ in the form of an open door immigration policy. His former speech writer, Andrew Neather has even claimed it was done on purpose to ‘rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render the arguments (against large immigration) out of date’ he said, thereby changing the culture forever. Indeed it has, as has the politicization of just about every institution from the House of Lords to the police. Blair even tried to politicise the monarchy when he named Princess Diana the ‘People’s Princess’ hours after her death, and it is believed that his government had a hand in forcing the Queen to respond to the populist sentiment in those days leading up to the funeral. The British have been inundated with an expanded and unfair welfare state and its attendant victim culture, massive national debt and a marked deterioration in every public service from education to the National Health Service – all courtesy of Labour’s leftist ideology. The question of monarchy pales in comparison. It is interesting that both Blair and his successor Gordon Brown have been snubbed from the guest list.
The Queen represents solidity in an uncertain world. My straw poll revealed people in their twenties saw no need for a monarchy, but then the majority wouldn’t know the difference between a republic, a democracy and a constitutional monarchy. They couldn’t name the twelve British prime ministers from Winston Churchill to David Cameron during the Queen’s reign. Nor I bet could many Canadians or Americans name the twelve Prime Ministers (Louis St Laurent to Stephen Harper) or eleven presidents (Eisenhower to Obama) she has seen through and appreciate the witness to history she has been. Like a pupil going up to the headmaster’s office, it is said that more than one prime minster has felt intimidated by their weekly audience where the Queen gets to quiz her PM and express her opinion in her inimitable gently couched way.
In her nearly sixty year reign, the Queen has never put a foot wrong. She has kept her vow of duty to her subjects and as Defender of the Faith, set a moral example by sticking to her marriage vows even though it was speculated the Duke of Edinburgh had an eye for the ladies. She represents continuity, steadfastness, traditional British family values and noble virtue in an age full of self-aggrandizing politicians and an increasingly morally bankrupt celebrity culture. The middle aged group in my poll recognized this. Being in her presence demands you pull up your socks and be on your best behaviour. No wonder the Brits sucked in their collective breath when Michelle Obama had the audacity to put her arm around HM’s waist.
Charles is another matter. The relentless soap opera of the breakdown of the world’s best known marriage left us all exhausted by the time we got to Diana’s tragic death. We will never completely forget the toe curling Camillagate tapes in which Charles fancied being reincarnated as a feminine hygiene product to savour the closeness of his lover. Then there was the sense of perverse spectacle of the blessing after Charles and Camilla’s civil marriage where these two middle aged adulterers, both with grown children, on their knees, promised to remain faithful to one another in the presence of the nation’s chief cleric. They should have cut and run after the civil ceremony and have spared everyone the embarrassment of witnessing that. Many would love to skip over Charles’ inheritance to kingship and give William a go at regaining the confidence of the British people.
The cost of the wedding only bothers people when it affects their business – an estimated GBP 5 billion will be lost by employers being forced to give their staff the day off, although retailers are having a bonanza of discounts ready to profit from the good mood the wedding is expected to generate.
Weddings by their nature inspire hope. It is the culmination of love, the willingness to believe in a bright future, that the rules of life and love are timeless and work. Despite the failures we know in just about every family, we still want to believe in commitment and family. This sentiment epitomizes the emotions this royal wedding is throwing up and the likely reason why half the planet – an estimated 2.6 billion will be tuning in on Friday. While only a third of those I polled are excited by the wedding, they all want the marriage to work. And all of them regardless of age had no qualms of their pre-marital cohabitation, although a few women felt nostalgic for the morals that once made marriage a serious business. Whether the philandering of high profile royals is the chicken or the egg in how bashed Britons feel about their monarchy and its assault on traditional family values is a moot point. Scratch the surface and they still seem to need it and the hope William and Kate symbolize at this point in their history. Plus there’s more than a hint of pride that they have cornered the market in the theatre of ceremony.
Obama provided the ammunition to bring him down
By: Devvy Kidd
April 28, 2011
The display put on yesterday by the putative president was one of the greatest displays of unbridled hubris I have ever seen in my decades of being an activist, watching and studying political figures. It simply was breath taking in scope and so vile, you want to vomit. Backed up by an array of sycophants in the media, that cheap gangster from Chicago actually thought he could foist another forgery on the American people and go about his business of destroying this republic.
There are several excellent articles about what happened yesterday and why those who can still think are outraged by this latest horse and pony show. Many are speculating the usurper suddenly produced a birth certificate because of Donald Trump. Millions have been demanding that birth certificate for almost three years, yet, supposedly, Obama/Soetoro is so afraid of "The Donald" he flies an attorney to Hawaii to pick up
the alleged document. As for Trump, I gagged watching him brag that he forced the president of the U.S. to produce a document no one else could. Donald Trump is nothing more than the modern day version of Elmer Gantry.
Have to ask yourself, why the hurry? It costs a lot of money to fly a lawyer to Hawaii to pick up a piece of paper. I mean, why not express mail? Would a couple more days of "The Donald" ranting have made a difference? After all, Trump had already began moving on to the usurper's college records and the question of just how "smart" is Barry?
I think it more likely Obama's handlers are very worried about Dr. Jerome Corsi's new book, Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President, which comes out May 17, 2011. By trumping Trump, they believe it will take the air out of Corsi's book. It is already a best seller and Barry's bosses should be worried. Dr. Corsi is a meticulous researcher who leaves nothing to chance. His book, Unfit for Command, "swift boated" John Kerry's bid for the White House. I've pre-ordered my copy and if you're interested, Amazon has it at the lowest price I could find. Jerome put out another short rebuttal yesterday about the "new" birth certificate where he again points out the discrepancies regarding the issuance of the birth certificates numbers, who issues them and when.
Is there any basis for believing the document shown around the world is authentic? Not in my book. With Obama/Soetoro already being caught in so many lies, why would anyone believe the piece of paper he's now waving around contains the truth? There's no question Barry has used five different aliases. There's no question in my mind any longer that the Manchurian Candidate has been using a fake social security number. His whole life is just one fabrication after another.
How can anyone, after all the research brought to light proving one discrepancy after another about the life of Obama/Soetoro and all his other known aliases he's used - how could anyone simply take that document as truth?
Well, I can tell you right now, a whole lot of people aren't, including me. We are not intimidated by the continued caterwauling about "the birthers" and other name calling. As I have written before, I know nothing about computer technology or some of the programs available to people who use the Internet. Never used Photoshop or any of the other programs discussed in the videos below. I know how to use my computer and word processor, but I am not a technical person like my web master. Below are three videos by individuals who carefully demonstrate and explain why the "new" birth certificate is a poor forgery.
• The LIES of Obama's Birth Certificate! 4:44 in length you must watch
• This video is 10:13 in length and very detailed
• How Obama's Birth Certificate Is 100% Fake - Watch What I Did In Illustrator


Please note what the narrator says about the Hawaii Health Department declaring on April 26, 2011, that it would no longer release any more long form birth certificates including one for a president of the United States. Obama/Soetoro sent his legal representative to Hawaii on April 25, 2011, to acquire the document. Act surprised - the next day it is now the policy of the Hawaii Health Department not to release the same document ever again. Are people so damn gullible they're going to buy this bilge? Also, please note the "new" birth certificate has "Attendant" and not doctor. The Attendant is someone named Sinclair. When you look at the long form birth certificates for Mrs. Nordyke's twins born the day after Barry at the same hospital -- at the bottom of those two birth certificates is the name and signature of the doctor; see here: At the bottom of the "new" BC released yesterday, that entire section is missing. As you can see, Mrs. Nordyke's copies are black with white ink. The original short form BC released in 2008 was on green paper and so is the "new" one.
I believe one of the most egregious aspects of the big show yesterday is this one thing. Ltc. Terry Lakin, an
18 year decorated member of the U.S. military was tried and convicted because Obama/Soetoro would not release a birth certificate. Lakin is due to be released in three weeks from Fort Leavenworth, a federal prison. Lakin was absolutely shredded by bloggers and "mainstream" media as being a coward and right wing nut. The usurper could have put a stop to all of it last year. Instead, he continued to hold expensive parties at the White House, fly around on Air Force One and take trips around the world while a good, decent American like Terry Lakin was railroaded into a federal prison. I have zero respect for Obama/Soetoro. Do you think a large number of our military and veterans will after they realize Barry could have taken the high road, but instead, continued to play with the American people and sent a fine man to prison?
Think tens of thousands of our active duty soldiers aren't steamed at this point? Think tens of thousands of
veterans aren't PO'd when they think the mojo guy in the White House could have stepped forward last year and said, "Wait a minute. This soldier is asking a question that seems to have grown into an unnecessary controversy. Here is my long form birth certificate." No. Instead, he was on the golf course playing big man.
Obama/Soetoro is suddenly moved to pull a birth certificate out of the hat within a few hours, so how come he has spent so much money fighting lawsuits to keep that document concealed? Have any taxpayer dollars been used in the past three years for him to fight producing a "new" long form birth certificate? Questions not easily answered as covered in this piece about legal fees and lawsuits since the putative president took office. However, we know the cost of concealing his real birth certificate (if one even exists, which I doubt) has cost a ton of money just by virtue of the amount of legal hours billed in fighting all the lawsuits over the past three years.
As a side note, no doubt even more campaign donations will be used to defend against the not talked about enough FEC bombshell dropped a couple of weeks ago: FEC Launches Audit of Obama’s 2008 Campaign
Just a couple of other things people have emailed me that warrant including here. One is the use of the word African for race. There are Caucasians born and living on the continent of Africa. If they immigrate here to the US, you could call them African Americans, but that is not their race nor would be African. I know the 2000 Census, after doing a little research, changed how races were to be listed. Who knows why; perhaps to not be offensive to someone somewhere on this planet. Obama's father was a Negro who lived in a British colony on the continent of Africa. This country has PC'd itself into stupidity. Using the word Negro somehow makes you a racist. I used it once in a column about Obama when discussing race. A man sent me an email saying the use of that word was "incendiary". My jaw dropped. How absurd. I guess the Department of Health, Education and Welfare back in 1961 were also racists for using the word Negro to designate race:
"A 1961 summary of U.S. vital statistics by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (now known as Health and Human Services) indicates:
"Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and “other nonwhite.” The category “white” includes, in addition to persons reported as “white,” those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father."
The emailer provided a link which I brought up and that section is found on page 231. The word African was not used.
Lynn Stuter, who writes for, sent this over:
"On April 23, 2011, Mark Niesse, in his AP article, made this comment, "But those documents are state government property that can't be released to anyone, even the president himself, said Joshua Wisch, special assistant to the state attorney general. Obama would be able to inspect his birth records if he visited the Health Department in person, but original records of live birth are never released," he said.
"And this, from the article below, "A White House attorney traveled to Honolulu this week to pick up the copies, which arrived at the White House yesterday afternoon."
"So, who is lying and who is telling the truth? Further, who has lied consistently to the American people, about anything and everything?"
I went and found the AP article she cites (here). That AP article is dated April 23, 2011 (last Saturday). Obama/Soetoro's legal representative flies to Hawaii and obtains a document which allegedly will not be released to anyone only two days later. The date stamped at the bottom of the "new" birth certificate is April 25, 2011.
I am sickened by supporters of the pimp camped out at the White House as well as multi-millionaire anchors
like Bill O'Reilly, Hannity and others who have ridiculed and attacked anyone who dare ask constitutional questions regarding a presidential candidate who lied and bluffed his way into power. In 1996, I wrote a booklet titled, Blind Loyalty. While it focused on vote fraud, it was also about Americans who will defend their favorite politician regardless of how corrupt, immoral or weak the individual. Nothing has changed except the level of stupidity and "artful" BS such as spewed by Bill O'Reilly when he repeats nightly, "I want to be fair to the president..." For one thing, between known electronic vote fraud, illegals voting and ACORN's illegal activities involving voter fraud in the 2008 election, we have no idea who actually won the primaries or the general election and that is a fact. Second, O'Reilly's nauseous "let's be fair" to the Red in the White House is so phony, it makes you want to puke, yet close to two million people sit glued to his show five nights a week.
This whole sorry mess is about upholding the law of the land won with rivers of blood. How shameful that the issue of whether or not a candidate is constitutionally qualified has become nothing more than bigger ratings for cable TV, "mainstream" [liberal, progressive] print media and talk radio with the "right" and "left" battling it out or defending the pathological liar in the White House.
Fake journalists, reporters and hosts like Chris Matthews are so morally bankrupt, they make Bill Clinton look like a choir boy. They whore for big paychecks. Those anti-truth media lackeys can continue to crow about Obama/Soetoro being born in Hawaii (based on another forgery) and therefore the issue is closed, but it doesn't change the legal fact that he was born with dual citizenship. Those miscreants are no better than old Barry because truth means nothing to them. Race baiters like Al Sharpton will haul out the worn out race card for those who see through this latest fraud paraded before the world, but we the people will not back down.
How shameful the herds of grazing cattle out there will continue to defend a sorry excuse for a man who would allow Terry Lakin go to prison while he hops on his favorite toy, Air Force One, to put on a demeaning display on the Oprah show. Let me quote one of the best writers on the Internet, Jim Schwiesow, in his recent column, A Man of Perdition:
"The media people are practically dancing in the streets and beside themselves with glee. They are in gala form one could say that they are absolutely giddy and like school children that have been provided the promise of an ice cream treat. Folks this one isn't over, not by a long shot. What it has done is open a can of worms that will spill over into an eventual criminal investigation of immense proportions. Someone somewhere is being prepared by unseen forces to spill the beans on the truth of this deceitfulness and cause a nation-wide uproar.
"Any Investigator or interrogator worth his salt would conclude upon watching the guileful demeanor of Obama as he made his announcement of a new found birth certificate - which he had failed to produce over a two year period of time - that he had simply gone from denying the obvious truth that he was foreign born, and was now merging a lie with a serious purposeful criminal action.
"The real tip-off was his attempt to trivialize the matter and make light of the controversy. When he characterized the assertions as “silly” it was definite indicator that he was now in an even deeper cover-up mode that moved him from a mere denial to a criminal conspiracy. In his own mind the fact that he is not American born and therefore not compliant with the Constitution in regard to the assumption of the Office of President is insignificant and immaterial. He thinks that the Constitution and the law in this regard is stupid, and as he termed it, “silly”.
The alleged birth certificate was blown up into a huge back drop behind the usurper as he grinned and yucked it up with Oprah. It was "Take this and shove it" right in your face. Obama is so dishonorable he's not fit to be in the same room with a truly honorable and courageous man like Terry Lakin. Keep laughing, Barry, but you won't have the last laugh. If you think the issue of your dual citizenship when you try to get on the ballot in many states isn't going to be THE issue of the 2012 election, think again.
Fifty birth certificates cannot erase the legal fact that Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president of the U.S. That will be the next phase of ballot and court challenges. Barry thinks he's so clever, but I submit to you that he just provided the rope needed to bring him down and hopefully an indictment for wire fraud, election fraud and a long list of other crimes for which he should go to prison for a long time. Perhaps that's what this whole Trump thing is really all about:
• George Soros Tells Progressive Donors Obama Might Not Be The Best Investment
• Soros Says Obama ‘Has Lost Control’ of U.S. Economic Agenda
Trump was registered as a member of the Reform Party from 1999 - 2000; allegedly he considered a run for president, but didn't. Frank Luntz conducts mini town hall meetings for FOX News; he also wrote a best seller about elections. He is VERY politically savvy. April 26, 2011, I caught a segment with him and Stu Varney filling in for Neil Cavuto on FOX. Luntz bet $10,000 to a charity that Trump will not run in the end. Luntz has his ear to the ground as they say. Ten grand is a lot of money and Luntz has never struck me as the wild type.
Well, we shall see how those big players decide to yank around the American people, again.
Case closed? Not so fast
Obama long form Certificate of Live Birth
Doug Hagmann & Joseph Hagmann
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
That giant whooshing sound you hear of “birther” balloons popping with the purported release of the infamous Obama long form Certificate of Live Birth should be met with the level of skepticism it most definitely deserves. Already, there is well deserved controversy swirling about its authenticity, and legitimate questions are being raised about the timing of the release. You can bet that experts representing both camps pertaining to the certificate’s authenticity will have much to say about this document. Regardless, the newly released document does nothing to address the core constitutional issue of eligibility to hold the office of the President of the United States.
It is unfortunate that the entire debate ultimately evolved into a myopic gaze that became focused on Obama’s long form birth certificate, as that is merely one aspect of the question concerning eligibility. It is equally unfortunate that the corporate media, shills for Obama and those who fail to understand or
deliberately misrepresent the issue will now consider the case “closed.” It is anything but closed.
As we reported in an article titled The unraveling of Barry Soetoro – the sequel, we point out that “[t]he issue is much greater than the birth certificate or where Obama was physically born, as he could have been born in the Lincoln bedroom during the Kennedy administration and still be ineligible to hold the office of president under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. As for the definition of a “Natural Born Citizen” referenced in the constitution, we note that our founders determined that future presidents must be born to two parents who are both U.S. citizens as further defined by the legal reference “The Law of Nations or the Principals of Natural Law.”
The reasoning has to do with allegiance to one country - the United States of America. Given the current state of the U.S. as a world power and the problems we face today, can you not see what our founding fathers were warning against? Obama cannot simultaneously be a “citizen of the world,” an apologist for our great country, and the leader of our great nation.
Something sinister is indeed afoot, and the majority of people are falling for it. Don’t be one of them.
Why NOW, Mr. President?
Certification of Long Form Birth Certificate
Judi McLeod
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
In the end President Barack Obama and Donald Trump have much in common: They both waited a long and painful two and a half years to talk turkey about Obama’s highly questionable eligibility as President of the United States.
But surely Obama being the most undocumented president in the history of the United States of America bears more guilt for the sin of deceiving the people of the country he was elected to serve than the one he only moments ago alluded to as “the carnival barker”.
But the insulting reference to Trump as “carnival barker” paled in comparison to the president’s insult to many ordinary Americans, who still fight for the light of truth on who Barack Hussein Obama really is.
Speaking from a White House microphone within minutes of Donald Trump’s press conference in New Hampshire, Obama made a surprise television appearance, calling the controversy over his birth certificate “silliness”. Defiant in this supposed come-clean confession before we the people, he was much more insulting to those who never let the question of his eligibility die, indicating with grins and smiles that they had only amused him.
“We do not have time for this kind of silliness. I’ve got better stuff to do,” Obama said. “We’re not going to solve our problems if we get distracted by carnival acts and sideshow barkers.”
Obama claims he only addressed the issue of his birth certificate because of distraction: “Normally, I would not comment on something like this,” Obama said, explaining that two weeks ago during the budget debate with Republicans in Congress, he found that the biggest news story was about his birth certificate.
While the media credit Trump for this morning’s surprising disclosure, the talk of the birth certificate was kept alive by American patriots, the same ones Obama claims mostly “amused” and “puzzled” him.
Even the most powerful man on earth must know that keeping his lifetime documents locked away from the public is akin to getting completely rid of a bloodstain left in a crime scene.
On April 27, 2011, some two and a half years on, Obama released what he called “the certification” of his long form birth certificate.
Problem is, in so doing, he left a much bigger question than before for all who care about the American constitution.
Why on April 27, 2011?
Full Text
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
April 27, 2011
Remarks by the President
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
9:48 A.M. PDT
THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. Now, let me just comment, first of all, on the fact that I can’t get the networks to break in on all kinds of other discussions—(laughter.) I was just back there listening to Chuck—he was saying, it’s amazing that he’s not going to be talking about national security. I would not have the networks breaking in if I was talking about that, Chuck, and you know it.
Q Wrong channel. (Laughter.)
THE PRESIDENT: As many of you have been briefed, we provided additional information today about the site of my birth. Now, this issue has been going on for two, two and a half years now. I think it started during the campaign. And I have to say that over the last two and a half years I have watched with bemusement, I’ve been puzzled at the degree to which this thing just kept on going. We’ve had every official in Hawaii, Democrat and Republican, every news outlet that has investigated this, confirm that, yes, in fact, I was born in Hawaii, August 4, 1961, in Kapiolani Hospital.
We’ve posted the certification that is given by the state of Hawaii on the Internet for everybody to see. People have provided affidavits that they, in fact, have seen this birth certificate. And yet this thing just keeps on going.
Now, normally I would not comment on something like this, because obviously there’s a lot of stuff swirling in the press on at any given day and I’ve got other things to do. But two weeks ago, when the Republican House had put forward a budget that will have huge consequences potentially to the country, and when I gave a speech about my budget and how I felt that we needed to invest in education and infrastructure and making sure that we had a strong safety net for our seniors even as we were closing the deficit, during that entire week the dominant news story wasn’t about these huge, monumental choices that we’re going to have to make as a nation. It was about my birth certificate. And that was true on most of the news outlets that were represented here.
And so I just want to make a larger point here. We’ve got some enormous challenges out there. There are a lot of folks out there who are still looking for work. Everybody is still suffering under high gas prices. We’re going to have to make a series of very difficult decisions about how we invest in our future but also get a hold of our deficit and our debt—how do we do that in a balanced way.
And this is going to generate huge and serious debates, important debates. And there are going to be some fierce disagreements—and that’s good. That’s how democracy is supposed to work. And I am confident that the American people and America’s political leaders can come together in a bipartisan way and solve these problems. We always have.
But we’re not going to be able to do it if we are distracted. We’re not going to be able to do it if we spend time vilifying each other. We’re not going to be able to do it if we just make stuff up and pretend that facts are not facts. We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers.
We live in a serious time right now and we have the potential to deal with the issues that we confront in a way that will make our kids and our grandkids and our great grandkids proud. And I have every confidence that America in the 21st century is going to be able to come out on top just like we always have. But we’re going to have to get serious to do it.
I know that there’s going to be a segment of people for which, no matter what we put out, this issue will not be put to rest. But I’m speaking to the vast majority of the American people, as well as to the press. We do not have time for this kind of silliness. We’ve got better stuff to do. I’ve got better stuff to do. We’ve got big problems to solve. And I’m confident we can solve them, but we’re going to have to focus on them—not on this.
Thanks very much, everybody.
9:54 A.M. EDT
‘Hero’ Trump Shuts Door for Obama on Birth Certificate
Carnival Barker, Birthers, Birth Certificate
Judi McLeod
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
President Barack Obama’s televised allusion to real estate developer and Reality TV star Donald Trump as “carnival barker” is dead wrong. Donald Trump is not the “carnival barker”; he’s the quintessential door shutter.
Don’t let the phony in the Oval Office catch you up in a play of words. Don’t let the pop culture icon catch you up in the dirty trick department.
The USS 2012 Obama Presidential Campaign left port on April 14. The Donald Trump Tugboat, which left port direct from The View on March 23, has been plying the way for the campaign ship in a sea of Marxist lies ever since.
Here, when truth is pulled from hype, are the irrevocable words that prove that Donald Trump is shutting the door on the eligibility issue of what the Democratic Convention threw at hysterical masses from phony Greek columns almost three years ago: “I am so proud of myself. I got this guy to release his birth certificate. I’m really, really happy,” Trump told employees before a lunch-time New Hampshire Republican fundraiser in downtown Portsmouth, today.
Give Trump time and he’ll shut the door on Obama’s missing school records and all other missing Obama documents that shed antiseptic sunshine on who he really is.
The so-called “birther” issue was said to be uppermost on Trump’s mind when he touched down in New
Hampshire in a helicopter bearing his name, immediately after claiming credit for “forcing Obama” to release his birth certificate.” (Wall Street Journal, April 27, 2011)
“I am really honored, frankly, to have played such a big role in hopefully, hopefully, getting rid of this issue, Trump told reporters, his helicopter waiting in the background.
We should underline the words, “hopefully, hopefully”.
Nor did Obama come to we the people mea culpa so much as he came on the television screen to once again talk down to what he would term the “silly” masses.
We now live in a world where we must, for the sake of unborn generations, differentiate between what is real and what is not real. The real and the unreal are mingled together in the mainstream media.
It is real that Obama is single-handedly bankrupting America and destroying life as we know it.
And speaking of doors is the harsh reality that once the door slams shut on the freedom of America, the door also slams shut on the Free World.
Without relief or intervention, Obama will leave America in the same state as his own stature, that is a state of absolute nothing.
One sure-footed way to start saving America is if every talking head, radio talk show host, every member of congress and senate were to take a crash course on the treachery of Marxism.
We are being had now, right on daytime television.
When all is said and done, unrepentant domestic terrorist and Obama ghostwriter Billy Ayers will do the book: The Documentation of Obama Two and a Half Years Too Late.
For the sake of America’s future, all who are still being sucked in by the undertow of the Biggest Circus on Earth should take the time, starting now, to bone up on the proven misery and failure of Marxism worldwide.
I have important things to do, like destroy the country
“Silliness and birther diversion”
Dr. Laurie Roth
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Why release the birth certificate nearly 3 years later? I and others have been asking for President Obama to put this growing controversy to rest for ages. It really wasn’t ‘silliness’ as he stated in his press conference on Wednesday the 27th, 2011. It was only what the demanding media and liberals requested and got from John McCain, also running during the last election cycle. Obama was AWOL with his. In fact, instead, he spent nearly 2 million dollars to hide all his records, College, Passport and Birth certificate. Naturally he had to do that simply because of our silliness and endless addiction to diversion and racism.
Assuming this presented ‘long form’ birth certificate is the real one, are there any real issues outside of silliness surrounding a ‘secret’ and unresponsive President the last 2 ½ years? At the very least there is ‘Saul Alinsky’ arrogance, manipulation and game playing that have been the hallmark of Obama’s attitude on this and other issues.
Phil Berg, Democrat attorney, has sued Obama over this issue as have many others and only asked on my show for years now for Obama to come clean and settle the issue by showing his real birth certificate. Wednesday, he has allegedly done that. We shall see how this bold declaration plays.
Regardless of where Obama was born and the truth and lies that surround this drama, we have massive problems that are growing under the Obama administration and progressive left. Our country needs to be more than fixed. We need to be redeemed and lifted back out of the sinking and swirling toilet boil he has put us into. Whether Obama was born in Kansas, Hawaii, Kenya or Mars, he is violating our country and must be stopped. His world view is NOT that of America and our constitution.
Critical issues Obama could do something about but won’t:
Gas prices
Before Obama was ever elected he was talking about how he couldn’t wait until gas prices were $4 and $5 dollars a gallon. He also bragged about trying to bankrupt the coal industry. You know…..those horribly bad, carbon emissions people, evil. Now that America is suffering under these prices we have zero leadership from Obama, only idiotic and manipulative sound bites! I guess it hasn’t been enough that America has suffered under the largest recession and foreclosure rates since the great depression but now we can’t afford to even fill up our gas tanks. Obama must be proud.
Common sense says there should be a bold response with energy, oil and gas. We get 53% of our oil from OPEC countries. We should be vividly talking and campaigning to them now to cut the price of oil per barrel, especially since many of them are there because we protect them and sacrificed for them over the years. We don’t need for them in greed to screw us now!
While bold talks are going on with the OPEC nations, Obama must give permits and approval for over 140 energy projects he has been sitting on, ignoring and not allowing to go forward. Most of these already have investors and represent a variety of energy types, from Nuclear, to oil, to Wind power, solar…you name it, Obama ignores it. This is as he tells us in his glowing teleprompter moments that we all have to work together, we all have serious problems to solve…..blah blah blah.
If Obama really gave a damn about our gas prices, our energy needs and building the wealth and independence of America, why not approve and launch all the energy projects getting rust on them as they wait to launch. Why did Obama give Brazil over 2 billion to drill for oil instead of the US, then say to them he could hardly wait to start importing their oil?
I have screamed about this on my show forever and written about this many times. We MUST become energy independent and if we just focus, release the energy projects waiting to move forward, build up our infrastructure to deliver the tons of natural gas reserves we have and support all the other energy and fuel sources, we would drop our gas prices by over half if not more.
With the right leadership in the White House we could be energy Independent within 3-4 yours and exporting energy. My dream and vision for America is the development and enhancement of new oil refineries, building up our 104 nuclear plants to produce more than 20% of our electricity, building the infrastructures for harvesting the largest natural gas reserves in the world, and other alternative energy. We would be creating hundreds of thousands of jobs, while we bring down our prices and stop making stupid and compromising ‘oil’ decisions overseas.
Our country needs more money to pay down her massive and growing debt, and at the same time, a whole host of other things. I believe I have some real answers for solving our problems, paying our bills, offering major tax relief, fixing our borders, creating energy independence, and building American exceptionalism, manufacturing and business again. Check out my new book coming out in June ‘The People’s President.’ I address all these issues and what can be done.
Other critical priorities for America that are in our face for our next President to deal with:
Immediately repeal the Obama care bill of forced, unconstitutional and rationed health care.
Secure our borders and protect our national security. Stop talking about it and do it.
At the end of the day after all the birth certificate stalls and drama, it matters not. Obama is trashing our country, freedoms, pocket book, national security, reputation and ability to achieve. He must be removed in 2012.
Obama’s ineligibility: Congress is both guilty and gutless
Why does Congress feign ignorance, continue a conspiracy of silence and display blatant cowardice in regard to this issue?
Lawrence Sellin
Monday, April 25, 2011
To the US Congress – Is there not even one among you, who will stand by your oath of office and state unequivocally that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born citizen and is, therefore, ineligible for the office of President of the United States?
It serves no purpose here for me to present arguments supporting a case against Obama’s eligibility or recite the background and intent of the natural born clause of the Constitution. That information is already available, for example, in the brilliant and exhaustive documentation provided by Stephen Tonchen from whom I liberally pilfer.
Why does Congress feign ignorance, continue a conspiracy of silence and display blatant cowardice in regard to this issue? Is it that members of Congress are too politically correct, too complicit in a cover-up and are just stalling in the desperate hope that Obama is not re-elected?
What happens then, if through some tragic mistake of history, Obama is re-elected? Congress could find
themselves, not only in dereliction of their duty, but potentially contributing to the destruction of our republic.
Edwin Vieira, a leading Constitutional scholar, warns that Obama’s questionable eligibility, if left unresolved, could become precedent and justification for both continuing the erosion of the Constitution and abolishing the rights it provides to all Americans:
“If Obama turns out to be nothing more than an usurper who has fraudulently seized control of the Presidency, not only will the Constitution have been egregiously flouted, but also this whole country could be, likely will be, destroyed as a consequence. And if this country is even credibly threatened with destruction, every American will be harmed—irretrievably, should the threat become actuality—including those who voted or intend to vote for Obama, who are also part of We the People. Therefore, in this situation, any and every American must have “standing” to demand—and must demand, both in judicial fora and in the fora of public opinion that Obama immediately and conclusively prove himself eligible for “the Office of President.”
Not anything about Obama’s ineligibility is either a surprise or an accident.
As it turned out, Senator John McCain was the perfect Republican opponent for Obama. Although the argument is now moot, McCain also had questionable eligibility under the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution.
The controversy surrounding McCain’s eligibility was perfectly exploited by Obama’s allies in the main stream media and by liberal legal scholars both of whom feigned sincerity in their quest to interpret correctly the text and the intent of the Constitution.
The charade continued on the floor of the Senate, where Republicans and Democrats colluded by passing the non-binding and phony Senate Resolution 511 declaring John McCain a natural born citizen and, thereby, providing Obama the smokescreen he needed to circumvent the Constitution.
So when SR 511 was passed in a non-recorded vote on April 30, 2008, the fix was in and Congress lowered an iron curtain of silence about Obama’s ineligibility, which has continued to this day.
Every U.S. president who was born after 1787, except Barack Obama and Chester A. Arthur, was born in the United States, of parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth i.e. a natural born citizen.
It seems that Obama is using the same playbook that Chester Arthur did.
In 1880, Chester Arthur was elected Vice President, but voters seemed unaware that, when he was born, his father had not yet become a naturalized U.S. citizen and, therefore, Chester Arthur was not eligible to be Vice President. Arthur assumed the Presidency on September 19, 1881 after the assassination of President James Garfield.
While running for Vice President, Chester Arthur told outright lies and later burned nearly all of his family records thereby obscuring the fact that, when he was born, his father was a British subject and not a U.S. citizen.
Chester Arthur knew he was ineligible and acted accordingly. Likewise, Congress can claim neither ignorance nor honesty.
For the first time in US history, a post-1787-born individual, who was born of a non-U.S.-citizen parent and received, at birth, foreign nationality (British) from that parent, was knowingly elected President.
Perhaps Congress fears the turmoil, which will undoubtedly occur if Obama is removed from office. We cannot, however, expect to rely on the rule of law in the future by violating it today.
That type of threat evokes another historical anecdote. Prior to America’s entry into World War I, a German diplomat warned US Ambassador James Gerard that if America entered the war against Germany, 500,000 German-Americans stood ready to rise up against their adopted country.
In that case, Gerard responded, the U.S. had 500,000 lampposts from which to hang them.
Obama to Seek Second Term
Why Obama should be indicted but won't
By Devvy Kidd
US~Observer Exclusive
April 2011
“It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime.” ~Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
The crisis over Obama/Soetoro's constitutional eligibility has raged on since September 2008. There is a segment of our society that care nothing for the U.S. Constitution and believe it doesn't matter whether the putative president is eligible or not as long as he keeps promising to hand them the largess of the people's bankrupt purse. The "mainstream" media and cable news
anchors like O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity and others have poo-poo'd this serious issue from day one. It's obvious to anyone who has spent the countless hours necessary to understand the "natural born" citizenship issue that none of the aforementioned has done anything but parrot the lies pumped by a prostitute media.
Then along came The Donald. Trump has certainly changed the game with his slew of appearances over the past month by asking the question: Why won't Obama produce his birth certificate? He's spent well over a million dollars hiding it. Why?
Millions of Americans according to the polls don't believe the usurper is constitutionally eligible. There are many who know and are co-conspirators in the fraud and cover up. Obama/Soetoro/Dunham or whatever his real name is has had a lot of help along the way. He is a creation groomed by a known communist in Hawaii, Frank Marshall, Jr. As Trump has remarked, Obama/Soetoro has a very shady past and his facilitators like Nancy Pelosi and others should also be
indicted under the RICO statutes.
In 2004, the impostor president ran for the U.S. Senate. Allegedly, with help from ACORN and the massive vote fraud we see every election, he won a seat in the U.S. Senate under a law that does not exist.
One year later, Sarah Herlihy, an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis gets her paper published in the Kent University Law Review on line. Herlihy claims in her paper that the citizenship requirement of the U.S. Constitution has been called "stupid and discriminating." Of course, she never tells us who makes this claim. Please note that a partner at the same law firm was one Bruce I. Ettelson, who apparently had a working relationship on finance committees for Obama and buffoon, Sen. Richard Durbin. Herlihy's paper, which shows "author approved editing" as November 23, 2005, is titled, "Amending the Natural Born Citizenship Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."
Somewhere along the way, the issue of Obama's father being a Kenyan national and under British rule (British Nationality Act of 1948) surfaced while the new Messiah was being groomed to steal the White House. Obama is a lawyer and has spent a great deal of time around other high power lawyers. Someone along the way said, uh, we have a problem. Beginning not too long after Obama became a U.S. Senator, the thorny problem of the U.S. Constitution had to be dealt with and out comes a paper by his lawyer friend, Herlihy, which opens up the discussion. Next comes the smoke screen legislation which was really to "qualify" Obama. Of course, it didn't work, so with the help of the useful fools in the dominant media and cable news networks like FOX, CNN and MSNBC, the issue was covered up and/or ridiculed as nothing more than sore losers or conspiracy nuts.
Several members of Congress tried to legislate his citizenship last year. It didn't work. In February 2008, Democrats (and one Republican) began pushing legislation on the issue of citizenship:
"...on February 28, 2008, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) introduced a bill to the Senate for consideration. That bill was known as S. 2678: Children of Military Families Natural Born Citizen Act. The bill was co-sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), and Sen. Thomas Coburn (R-OK).
"Bill S. 2678 attempted to change article II, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States with reference to the requirements of being a “natural born citizen” and hence; the entitlement to run for President of the United States. This bill met the same fate that similar attempts to change the Constitution have in the past. Attempts such as The Natural Born Citizen Act were known to have failed and the text scrubbed from the internet, with only a shadow-cached copy left, that only the most curious public can find....
"Within only five short weeks after Senate Bill 2678 faded from the floor, we find Sen. Claire McCaskill
back again, making another attempt with Senate Resolution 511. On April 10, 2008, she introduced a secondary proposal in the form of a non-binding resolution, recognizing John McCain as a “natural born citizen” in defiance of the Constitution. Curiously, it contained the same identical co-sponsors, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
"One has to wonder — what dire urgency could there possibly have been in persisting with trying to legislate a candidate into being a “natural born citizen”? Certainly providing a birth certificate and reading the Constitution would be more than sufficient. Why did these candidates and their wishful nominees go to such lengths in the Senate when obviously, they had more pressing matters to attend to? And why were there two Senators co-sponsoring such an issue, twice, who were in direct competition with John McCain in the 2008 election?"
Even if Obama were born in Hawaii and there is no proof he was, that still does not make him constitutionally eligible. His father's citizenship is the legal reason why Obama can never be constitutionally eligible. His father was a foreign national visiting the U.S. (Hawaii) at the time of his birth. Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama/Soetoro's citizenship was unequivocally based on his father's status at the time. Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship and no amount of clever word smithing or name calling can change that legal fact.
Do you know the State of Illinois Election Board says they have no paperwork on Obama when he ran for the Illinois State Senate? How can that be? I know this to be a fact because I filed State Record Act requests and was astonished by the lack of any paperwork to determine if Obama/Soetoro was even eligible for office under Illinois Election laws.
Why did Obama aka Soetoro lie on his Illinois Bar Application when he said he has never used any other name but Barack Hussein Obama when public records show he used several aliases? Obama used Barry Soetoro as his legal name while attending Occidental College.
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro and so forth has always known he was not eligible to run and he did anyway. He committed wire fraud by using his campaign to illegally raise over $600 million dollars both on radio, television and the Internet; some $200 million illegally from foreign sources. The Federal Election Commission refuses to investigate.
If we had a real U.S. Department of Justice, a federal grand jury would be convened. There's no doubt in my mind Obama/Soetoro would be indicted and convicted for carrying out a "scheme to defraud" the public via their "dishonest services." See, as an example, United States v. Frega, 179 F.3d 793 (9th Cir. 1999). The wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. §1343, provides as follows:
“Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.”
This is not idle speculation. The impostor president is clearly in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and must be held accountable or none of us should be required to obey any laws.
Of course, the biggest hurdle is the U.S. Attorney General, Eric Holder who worships Obama/Soetoro and would never uphold the law if it meant putting his boss in prison. Holder is not only a racist, but another corrupt individual who should have been indicted and charged with obstruction of justice in the Michael Trentadue murder investigation. Even though leaky Leahy (Sen. Patrick) knew at the time of Holder's obstruction, he pushed through Holder's confirmation anyway.
On top of the crime of wire fraud, Obama/Soetoro has been using a fake social security number. He used his fake number on his selective service registration. The individuals who have spent hundreds of hours investigating are not some flaky "right wing nut jobs." Susan Daniels is a private investigator with 15 years experience in tracking down fraudulent documents. Neil Sankey is a retired Scotland Yard Elite Officer and is a licensed investigator. They know fraud when they see it, but wait! Do you know that in November 2010, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that a man who used his real name but someone else's Social Security number to obtain a car loan was not guilty of "criminal impersonation," overturning convictions by lower courts! In 2008, U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice ruled using a fake SSN might not qualify as breaking the law.
With theft identity ruining the lives of millions, Colorado's high court and a federal judge have said it's okay to use someone else's SSN to obtain a car loan or employment! Obama/Soetoro used a fake SSN for college admission, bar admission and along every step of his life littered with rot and corruption to the White House. Does anyone give a damn anymore for the law?
None of this trail of lies, deceit and violating federal law matters to his supporters and the lackeys in both electronic and print media who purport to be "fair and balanced" or the "most trusted name in news". How shameful.
How my beloved country has gone so far into the sewer that truth no longer matters. Where we have a Department of Justice headed up by a corrupt racist political animal while the Outlaw Congress sits on their
hands. Where millions upon millions of Americans care only about the next elimination round of Dancing with the Stars, American Idol, who will win the college basketball tournament, the latest filth coming from "Lady" Gaga, NASCAR racing or playing every weekend instead of demanding justice because no one is above the law - least of all an individual who has lied and hustled his way into the White House. How shameful.
Where is honor and decency anymore in this country? Where are any men or women who will refuse to be cowed or intimidated by the race card in pursuing charges against Obama/Soetoro? Nowhere to be found, I can assure you. Remember the Ten Commandments and something about lying, cheating and stealing? Sadly for our constitutional republic, those three sins are now normal as well as cowardice in the halls of Congress and the two main political parties. It's all about power and how much more of your hard earned paycheck they can steal outside the limitations placed upon them by Art. 1, Sec. 8 of the U.S. Constitution.
For the Republicans, Obama/Soetoro is good political currency for 2012 --- even though he's not going to be able to get ballot qualified in many states. For the Democrats, the biggest mouthpieces will continue to upchuck their favorite buzz words like "conspiracy nuts" and extremists. In the end, both corrupt parties are promoting lawlessness with the Impostor in Chief rubber stamping the whole ugly mess. How shameful the American people by the tens of millions have sat back and allowed our country, our honor, integrity and decency to become nothing more than dust in the wind.
Obama’s ineligibility and Republican eunuchs
The political elite and the MSM are doing everything possible to suppress discussion of Obama’s ineligibility, pretend that we are not in a Constitutional crisis and allow him to contest the 2012 election
Lawrence Sellin
Friday, April 15, 2011
It is difficult to imagine a more obvious scam and a more pliable group of suckers.
Of course, Republicans have always known that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible to be President.
Unfortunately, many Republicans have spent so much time in the hallways of power and in TV studios; they now mistake cowardice for statesmanship. The love for their lifestyle has outgrown their respect for the oath of office, to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
The explanation of Obama’s ineligibility is so simple that even a liberal could understand it.
Oddly enough, liberals appreciated the benefits of their complicity far better than the Republicans grasped the shame of their acquiescence.
In September 2008, during the controversy regarding Senator John McCain’s eligibility to be President, Lawrence B. Solum, the John E. Cribbet Professor of Law at the University of Illinois College of Law, published an article in the Michigan Law Review entitled “Originalism and the Natural Born Citizen Clause”
Solum wrote:
“What was the original public meaning of the phrase that establishes the eligibility for the office of President of the United States? There is general agreement on the core of its meaning. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a natural born citizen.”
Solum concluded that there was no clear answer as to whether McCain was eligible to be President. I will return to that conclusion later.
The Constitution does not say “citizen”, but specifically combines the legal concepts of jus soli (right of the soil) and of citizen parents, jus sanguinis (right of blood). It was intentionally designed by the Framers to prevent a President from having dual allegiance.
The narrative of the 14th Amendment is consistent with the Framers intent.
Representative John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment, while commenting on Sec. 1992, unequivocally stated the difference between ‘natural born” and ‘born” citizenships:
“It means every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of “parents” not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of our Constitution itself, a “natural born” citizen.”
According to the 14th Amendment, Obama is a citizen of the United States, but unambiguously not a natural born citizen.
It is interesting to note that the natural born requirement became the basis of the 2008 challenge, not to Obama’s candidacy, but to John McCain’s. The issue was taken so seriously, it required Senate resolution 511:
“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a ‘‘natural born Citizen’’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Barack Obama voted in favor of that resolution. One can assume that he fully understood the meaning and
intent of the Constitution. After all, was he not once a Professor of Constitutional Law?
For the moment, let’s forget the birth certificate debate. Let’s accept Obama’s own published story of his life. That is, his father was Kenyan, a British subject and bound by allegiance to the British sovereign at the time of Obama’s birth.
It is the simplest and most irrefutable argument to make regarding Obama’s ineligibility.
Contrary to statements made by politicians and the main stream media (MSM), there is no issue we presently face that is more important than the integrity of the Constitution. It is the foundation of our republic and the basis for the rule of law in our country.
Contravention of the Constitution is not a “technicality”. Fortunately, the solution resides in the Constitution itself.
No articles of impeachment need to be drawn up. No voters need to be disenfranchised. Simply invoke Section 3 of the 20th Amendment, which provides a remedy if a President is deemed unqualified.
Now permit me to return to the esteemed Professor Solum.
In April 2010, as the controversy surrounding Obama’s eligibility gained momentum, Solum strangely republished his original article, but substituted the word “parent” for “parents”, changing the interpretation in a way that could benefit Obama.
Quite a coincidence, wouldn’t you say? There appears to be a good deal of legal reinterpretation going on.
The political elite and the MSM are doing everything possible to suppress discussion of Obama’s ineligibility, pretend that we are not in a Constitutional crisis and allow him to contest the 2012 election.
I ask them: after this, are there any other parts of the Constitution do you intend to ignore? It would be good to know.
Clearly the Democrats and the MSM will continue to shield Obama and, presumably, the Republicans are too frightened to oppose them.
Perhaps it is time to vote with our feet and walk away from the Republican Party.
Stink-a-roos on the Obama eligibility front
Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Piers Morgan
Judi McLeod
Friday, April 15, 2011
Barry Soetoro Obama’s 2012 campaign swung into high gear yesterday with blazing guns all aimed at killing off the eligibility debate.
Within one 24-hour period, there was Bill O’Reilly slamming those who question Obama eligibility on Fox News; Glenn Beck conspicuously off Fox and on radio shouting a loud demand for citizens to “stop with the damn birth certificate…stop”.
Neither boob-tube celebrity seemed the least rattled for appearing to be unleashed in the Shut Down the Eligibility Argument at about the same
time as Obama’s sister Maya Soetoro-Ng, was being treated to a Susan Boyle Britain’s Got Talent type love-in by Piers Morgan over at CNN.
And just as so-called birthers were showering blessings on real estate mogul, reality TV star, hair-challenged Donald Trump with White Knight in Shining Armor status, The Donald was about to ride in “Trump Praises Obama; Bush Evil” Drudge headlines this morning.
The Drudge ghost was raised from an 10/11 /08 Trump exclusive interview with NY1 in his Fifth Avenue Midtown office where he was roundly slamming the foreign policies of George W. Bush.
Just the one-month-before-2008-election timing of this Trump bailout should make all those trying to bring the antiseptic of sunshine on Obama eligibility to climb out of the trenches so long as The Donald is still there.
Fox News should be blushing down to its “Fair and Balanced” roots to have two of its top guns trotted out at the same time as Bamster dutiful little Sis Maya Soetoro-Ng.
Bombastic Bill O’Reilly has been soft on Obama even before his pre Superbowl interview.
Beck, who announced only last week that his contract with the network would be ending later this year, went directly off the 5 o’clock Fox slot over to his radio show bunker right after last week’s shock announcement.
Trading camps from Spooky Dude tormentor to Obama protector in this time period is reminding folk that his advice to “question boldly” may have only covered the czars but never the czar master.
“The Birthers”, who as someone recently suggested should more accurately be called “The Verifiers”, are already dusting off the dust from being in the trenches with Trump, and watching delightedly as Google brings the eligibility issue back to new life in the news.
Losing their celebrity heroes to Obama campaign propaganda is really no loss to people who have lived three years or longer in the “When things get tough, the tough get going”, Who is Obama category.
They have their own heroes whose Realty TV is the worldwide Internet.
Keeping Eligibility Alive champions like Douglas Hagmann, Lawrence Sellin, Kelly O’Connell, Jim O’Neill, Jerry O’Connell, Sher Zieve and so many others may not have the status of a Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck or even a Donald Trump, but you could have fooled Canada Free Press (CFP), which gets more letters on this topic than any other.
Meanwhile if Donald Trump wants to be taken seriously he should call in to the great Mark Levin, one of the few holdouts on talk radio, who insists on asking The Donald: “Why were you so high on Obama before?”
Felina G., who posted this comment for Glenn Beck last night may be right: “Trump is a Perot Stink-a-roo”.
Obama deception indicators “off the charts” during Stephanopoulos interview
Verbal deception indicators, Non-verbal deception indicators
Doug Hagmann
Friday, April 15, 2011
If you watch and listen carefully to the 20-minute, 14 April 2011 interview of Barack Hussein Obama by George Stephanopoulos, you will notice something very telling that takes place during that interview when the discussion shifts to the issue of Donald Trump and ultimately, the “birther conspiracy.” Veteran investigators who are experienced in interviewing and interrogating suspects, witnesses, criminals and non-criminals have undoubtedly identified numerous big red flags of deception precisely when expected, and in textbook fashion. To observe this in action, begin watching the video at about the 13:25 minute mark, when Stephanopoulos lobs the following softball, leading question to Obama and receives his answer[ii]:
George Stephanopoulos: I wonder how you size up your potential opponents? I mean all of us have been struck by Donald Trump rising to the top of the Republican field by feeding fantasies about your background.
What do you make of that?
First, note that Stephanopoulos sets an amicable tone for easy rebuttal by Obama to anyone believing that anything might be amiss with regard to Obama’s eligibility. He asks a leading question that automatically suggests that any reference to the “birther issue” as raised by Donald Trump is “fantasy.” Accordingly, Obama should be able to handle the question without any obvious stress or difficulty. But here’s exactly where the difficult-to-control verbal and non-verbal clues of deception take over. First, read his response:
President Obama: Well you know, I think that over the last two and a half years there’s been an effort to go at me in a way that is politically expedient in the short-term for Republicans. But creates, I think a problem for them when they want to actually run in a general election where most people feel pretty confident the President was born where he says he was, in Hawaii. (LAUGHS) He—he doesn’t have horns. We may disagree with him on some issues and we may wish that you know, the unemployment rate was coming down faster and we want him to know his plan on gas prices. But we’re not really worrying about conspiracy theories or—or birth certificates. And so—I—I think it presents a problem for them. But, look I right now have such a big day job that I am not yet focused on what’s happening on the other side. There’ll be a time where I’m—I’m very focused on it. [emphasis added]
Verbal deception indicator 1
In this answer alone, notice how Obama shifts from speaking in the first person to suddenly referring to himself in the third person, or as “the President.” Naysayers, apologists and supporters of all types will undoubtedly refute or even mock this investigator’s observations and premise that switching from talking in the first person (i.e. using “I”) to the third person is meaningless. Alone, it might very well be, but now watch the entire interview or consult the transcript, and note the number of times Obama answers a question by referring to himself in the first person. Now compare your findings with the above paragraph.
Recently, pundits at Fox News actually counted the number of times Barack Obama used the word “I” in a recent speech about Libya. It was excessive, they opined, and typical of Obama. The number of times Obama referred to himself in the first person in this interview appeared consistent with the subject matter and the questions asked, until the issue of his birth certificate was raised.
Verbal deception indicator 2
One of the best indicators of deception is one’s evasiveness of answers, or to simply not fully address the crux of the matter or answer the question posed. Obama knows very well that the issue in this instance, “bracketed” by this question, is his refusal to release his long form birth certificate for which Trump is known for demanding. Admittedly, Stephanopoulos did not directly ask Obama about his birth certificate and used the general term “background” instead.
Nonetheless, instead of addressing that issue head-on, even in this friendly environment, Obama reverts to the use of a non-sequitur by adding that “...he doesn’t have horns.” He then reverts back to addressing the entire issue as a “conspiracy theory,” specifically mentioning his birth certificate out of the context of the question. His evasiveness is smooth but obvious. Now note that Obama continues to refer to himself as “he” or in the third person for the remainder of the question.
Non-verbal deception indicators
Notice when Obama answers the above question, there is excessive eye blinking, which is an involuntary stress indicator. When answering this question, one is able to count over sixty-(60) eye blinks during his short answer on this specific topic.
Additionally, note that Obama laughs directly in the middle of his answer and at a very critical point in delivering his response, which is also a non-verbal sign of deception. Further analysis of his facial expression, including micro-expressions, indicate a false or forced laugh, or one that is not genuine and does not involve all of his facial muscles.
What it means
As I’ve previously indicated in various CFP radio segments[iii] and on the nationally syndicated “The Roth Show,” I’ve interviewed a wide range of individuals, from prisoners in Attica State Penitentiary to the residents of some of the most expensive homes in the country during my 26-year career as a professional investigator. I also hold multiple law-enforcement related certifications, including those involving interviewing and interrogation techniques, the identification of verbal and non-verbal deception, and certifications in numerous other related subjects related to behavioral analysis and the identification of micro-expressions in lie and stress detection.
As the title of this article indicates, it is my professional analysis that the verbal and non-verbal indicators of deception are not only present in this interview, but are “off the charts” and offer a classic textbook example of the same. Obviously, Obama did not take this opportunity to clear up this matter when provided the opportunity, even in this non-hostile venue. Clearly then, we should expect nothing different should he ever be compelled to prove his constitutional eligibility in a not-so-friendly venue.
Note to the reader: The basis of my conclusions arise from a complete review of the entire 19-minute, 25-second video, isolating the clips where the camera was pointed directly at Obama and not at the interviewer. Additionally, various clips from Obama’s campaign speeches and candid interviews about general matters were used as a baseline for this analysis.
[ii] Transcript credit ABC News, “George’s Bottom Line”, page two
[iii] CFP Radio, The Hagmann & Hagmann Report,
Thank You, Mr. Trump
White House senior adviser to Obama, David Plouffe, Birth certificate
Dr. Gerald Stephens
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
White House senior adviser to Obama, David Plouffe, stated two fascinating political mumblings today. First, that the American public would never hire Donald Trump to the job [President]. And that Mr. Trump’s use of the birth certificate issue is a ‘sideshow’. GAME ON!
I can not think of a dumber way to respond to the possible (hopefully probable) entry of Donald Trump as a candidate for President of the United States of America. This guy, Plouffe, was just recently brought onto the Obama’s staff with the greatest fanfare as a ‘political killer’. I guess they were correct in the assessment. With a single blast of his mouth he has belittled a deadly earnest person, and again spit in the face of the American public on behalf of the ‘Fraudulent One’. Had Obama hired this guy a year ago I doubt the ‘Gangster’ would still be around.
It recalls to mind the vicious attacks and slanders heaped upon then candidate Ronald Reagan. We all know how that one worked out.
Chatting on line with a friend I remarked that at times of national gloom I fall back on that which appears to me to be the hand of Providence bringing forth leaders ‘made in America’. I posed the rhetorical, isn’t it remarkable that at this time of national crisis Donald Trump steps forward to assure us that he believes enough is too much?
Not a days passes without new information surfacing in the matter of America and the world being scammed by a crew of Marxist gangsters, and the severe damage they have and continue to inflict on the nation. Equally unsettling is the incredulous and unrelenting cowardly conduct of our elected representatives. NOT one in the entire saga of the gangster president has put his face to the task of protecting and defending the Constitution against its rape. Not one!
Regardless of what vile avalanche of invective the animals spew you can take to the bank that Donald Trump is as American as Yankee Doodle Dandy. My Dad would get teary eyed when hearing Cagney sing it. And as a Marine on parade I had the same eye affliction when the band played Sousa. Then, too, when reading the citations of courage and valor issued with every Medal of Honor, I can not help but believe that Mr. Trump’s charge against the enemies within is anything less glorious.
Stand at his back and flanks, shoulder to shoulder, and America will be returned to our people and rightful place among the nations of the world.
God Bless America! God Bless Donald Trump!
The Importance of Supporting Trump
One of the greatest scams in the history of politics and...history, period
Jim O'Neill
Saturday, April 9, 2011
“...if it were not an issue, why wouldn’t he just solve it? I wish he would, because if he doesn’t, it’s one of the greatest scams in the history of politics and…history, period.” Donald Trump regarding Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS.
In his book “Deconstructing Obama,” Jack Cashill concludes that Obama was likely born in Hawaii, but that his parents were probably either communist pornographer, and pedophile, Frank Marshall Davis, and Stanley Ann Dunham—or Obama’s “grandfather” Stanley Dunham, and an unknown black woman. Either case gives plenty of reason to hide Obama’s birth certificate.
If either scenario is true, then the British citizenship of Obama’s purported father, Kenyan native Barak Obama “senior,” becomes something of a moot point. In any event, those who know the truth are not talking—yet.
The bottom line is, nobody who is talking knows for sure who Obama’s parents are. Cashill’s hypothesis seems to me to be about as airtight as a circumstantial evidence case can get, but the truth still remains unknown. And please don’t throw Obama’s COLB in my face, as it has all the value and legal gravitas as something you might pull out of a “Cracker Jack” box (no offense meant to the good people at “Cracker Jack”).
Besides Cashill, there have been a host of other folks heroically trying to uncover the truth regarding
Obama’s past: LTC Terry Lakin, Dr. Jerome Corsi, Gen. Paul Vallely, Orly Taitz, Cmdr. Charles Kerchner, Mario Apuzzo, Gen. Carroll Childers, Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick, and on, and on, and on. They can be forgiven for thinking to themselves “Welcome aboard, Mr. Trump—where the h—l you been?” Well, better late than never, as they say.
Say what you will about his timing, the importance of what Trump is doing cannot be overstated—it is HUGE. Because of Trump’s stand vis a vis Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS, all future conservative candidates for political office will be required to face the issue head on. No more “bobin’ ‘n’ weavin’” around the “birther” issue. Those candidates who try to avoid the eligibility issue, or worse, deny its importance, will be left in the dust. “We the people” will see to it.
Because of his national recognition-factor, his money, and his chutzpah, Trump has the ability to shed light on the eligibility issue as no one else has been able to. The glare of publicity is making the “traitorous americanus” roaches scurry for cover, and the liberal propaganda outlets are blowing fuses as they try to keep their media blackout in place. Look for them to become ever more garrulous, strident, and illogical, as is their wonk wont whenever they feel threatened.
As Trump points out, we are talking about one of the biggest scams in history. And scams don’t call for impeachment, they call for jail time. Obama himself may be off-limits, because of the social repercussions that would stem from his arrest, but there are a host of other people who are certainly fair game. Their knowing collusion with the scam (misprision of felony) is crime enough to land them in prison.
“We the people” may need to build a new prison just to hold them all (I say that only half in jest). Although the silence from our political elites regarding Obama’s eligibility has been deafening, once the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” party apparatchiks realize what the score is, you won’t be able to shut them up, as they turn on one another in order to save their own sorry butts.
There are a number of reasons why people may dislike the idea of Trump as President—ranging from his politics to his hair style—but no other viable Presidential candidate (or possible candidate) has openly voiced any concern over Obama’s eligibility to be POTUS. That bears repeating, loudly, NO OTHER CANDIDATE HAS OPENLY VOICED CONCERN OVER OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY TO BE POTUS.
In my opinion, “The Donald’s” position regarding Obama’s eligibility trumps all other concerns (pun noted). If Obama is shown to be ineligible, then all of the laws passed during his usurpation, and any political appointments made (such as ones to the Supreme Court) become null and void. I would say that is a pretty darn important consideration—more important than any of Trump’s drawbacks, real or imagined.
This isn’t play-time kiddies. While the neo-communists and neo-fascists play footsie with the Islamists, Soros and the rest of the NWO “Billionaire Boy’s Club” are preparing to shift the global economic base from the United States to Communist China. This is for real, and the stakes could not be any higher, nor the results of our failure to defend America from external and internal enemies more grim.
It is America’s internal enemies that are of immediate concern, and while the Pentagon putzes around with the queering of the US military, and Congress puts on their dog and pony show for our “entertainment,” it’s up to “we the people” to demand some answers—NOW!
The political elites currently holding the reins of power in Washington do not want the truth about Obama to come out. I cannot think of any better way to force their hand then to back Trump with all we’ve got. So far he’s the only game in town, folks, and if we do not support him wholeheartedly, then the whole eligibility issue may well fizzle out and die, and our hopes for saving America fizzle out and die with it.
As things stand, Trump forcing the eligibility issue out into the open now, is the best chance America has to extricate itself from its current predicament without suffering widespread violence.
Supporting Trump at this time is that important. Say that I am dealing in hyperbole if you like, but don’t come crying to me when the bullets start flying. Don’t come crying to me, and I won’t say “I told you so”—deal?
Laus Deo.
The unraveling of Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama II
Trumping up the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama
Doug Hagmann & Joseph Hagmann
Friday, April 8, 2011
To those who are now speaking out about the Obama eligibility matter, I can think of no better statement than the one uttered by a very frustrated Officer John McClane, played by Bruce Willis in the movie “Die Hard.” In order to get the attention of a police officer oblivious to the carnage taking place inside of the Nakatomi Plaza building after making a very cursory inspection and finding nothing amiss, McClane tosses the body of a terrorist from an office window window onto the windshield of the police cruiser and fires at the police car, yelling “welcome to the party, pal.”
I suspect that this statement accurately reflects the sentiment of numerous individuals and groups who have been fighting in the real world trenches for full disclosure of all of Barack Hussein Obama’s records, including his birth certificate, for the last three years. People such as Commander Charles Kerchner (retired) and Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Pennsylvania Attorney Philip Berg, Reverend David Manning of Atlah Ministries, and numerous others who have spoken out and taken their valiant fight for full disclosure of Obama’s records to the nation’s courts, only to be struck down for lack of standing or other arbitrary judicial opinions.
Due to the recent public statements by billionaire businessman turned reality television star about the birth certificate issue, the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has
gained equal amounts of renewed interest and contempt by the American media and a vocal segment of the American public. The latter display of contempt is nicely displayed by some recent interview clips, including the priceless Meredith Viera interview of Donald Trump where she can hardly hold back her disdain of Mr. Trump and the entire eligibility matter, and Donald Trump’s appearance on “The View” last month.
On “The View,” Mr. Trump wreaked havoc among the cadre of women co-hosts when he merely mentioned the lack of a legitimate birth certificate provided by Obama. Lacking any coherent or intellectual rebuttals to Trump’s claims, a not-so veiled accusation of racism was leveled against Trump by “The View” co-host Whoppi Goldberg, while Barbara Walters expressed discomfort with the matter by simply wanting to change the topic.
“Welcome to the party, pal”
During the last three years, there have been numerous individuals, authors, investigative journalists, and others (and I consider myself among them) who have been mocked, ridiculed, belittled or ignored by Obama supporters, the liberal media, and the political left for even suggesting that this issue has any merit whatsoever.
Perhaps even worse, conservatives on the right, including some high profile media personalities, have joined with the left in the same vitriolic ridicule of us so-called “Birthers,” a pejorative term ascribed to those who are merely asking for yet-unfurnished proof that Barack Hussein Obama is constitutionally eligible to occupy the office of the President of the United States.
It has been only after Donald Trump began to ask the same questions others have been asking for the last three years that the matter appears to have morphed from a fringe topic into legitimacy. For example, Rush Limbaugh, who has kept this topic at arm’s length, has taken delight of the Viera interview, although it’s difficult to discern whether Mr. Limbaugh is more delighted at Mr. Trump’s steam roller approach and Viera’s reaction, or that the issue is being finally exposed in such an unlikely venue. Because Mr. Limbaugh has the ear of millions every day, I tend to gravitate to the former.
To those who are now beginning to pick up the topic because of the exposure by Donald Trump, I can only say “welcome to the party, pal.”
With all due respect to Donald Trump, he has not “legitimized” the eligibility issue, as the matter far exceeds the existence of the birth certificate and has adversely affected the lives of many patriotic Americans who have long fought for full disclosure of all of Obama’s records. Promising to be the “most transparent” president in history, Barack Hussein Obama is the most deliberately opaque president who has withheld many more records than his birth certificate. Not only has he withheld his records, he has fought to keep them hidden from public view, amassing legal fees that some claim to exceed a million dollars of his own money, and perhaps twice that amount if pro-bono and other legal work is counted.
Also as a result of his refusal to disclose his records, a respected military physician is presently serving time in
Leavenworth for refusing to obey deployment orders until he was satisfied that the orders he was given were constitutionally legal. LTC. Terry Lakin, an honored veteran with 18 unblemished and distinguished years of service, lost his legal battle and remains behind bars as Obama’s first political prisoner in the war for truth. While many may question the methods and venue in which LTC Lakin chose to take up his battle, no one can question his motives.
“The biggest scam ever”
Both Messrs Trump and Limbaugh have stated that if Obama is determined to be ineligible to hold office, it is the “biggest scam ever” perpetrated. Indeed, and that statement itself might be an understatement.
I urge those reading this and those who are pursuing the truth to avoid “battlefield myopia” and not merely cling to the existence or lack thereof of the long form, authenticated birth certificate. The issue is much greater than the birth certificate or where Obama was physically born, as he could have been born in the Lincoln bedroom during the Kennedy administration and still be ineligible to hold the office of president under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. Our founders determined that future presidents must be born to two parents who are both U.S. citizens. Clearly then, the place of Obama’s birth is merely one concern, while the citizen aspect of his parents remains another.
But the scam goes much deeper. Reviewing only the admissions of Barack Obama, we are told that Obama was born to U.S. citizen Stanley Ann Dunham, legally adopted by a foreign national named Lolo Soetoro, had taken the name Barry SOETORO, and was given Indonesian citizenship. He was raised as a Muslim in Indonesia, and attended a school there that accepted all faiths. At one point, Barry SOETORO moved to Hawaii to reside with his grandparents after Lolo SOETORO and Stanley Ann DUNHAM divorced. Obama completed high school as Barry SOETORO Much is missing from his early years, including a legal name change from Barry SOETORO to Barack Hussein Obama II. Absent of any document to show the legal process of a name change within the U.S., it is likely that the man sitting in the Oval Office is, in fact, Barry SOETORO.
The above would also serve to explain the discrepancies with his social security number and region of
issuance, a matter we are very familiar with in our capacity as licensed investigators. The reasons we have seen published concerning the allegations of the association of multiple social security numbers with Barry SOETORO and Barack Hussein OBAMA has always bothered us, but not necessarily for the reasons often published. After careful and extensive analysis, it appears that many of the numbers and name variations associated with Obama are what we would describe as “database chaff.” It is not uncommon for database repositories to erroneously associate different numbers, addresses and sometimes names to an individual. The reasons for this are many and beyond the scope of this article, but it happens.
Accordingly, an investigator is well advised not to take the information obtained from a proprietary database
at face value without first analyzing the information, tossing out the chaff and concentrating on the rest, which we have done. Additionally, we have found and concur with others on this matter that the social security number associated with Obama that was issued from the SSA region in Connecticut is troublesome, but again, not necessarily for the reasons as publicly stated by others.
As we have been investigating this matter for some time (see our investigative report 1 and report 2 in PDF format for important background information), it has become apparent that at some point, the individual known as Barry SOETORO began using the name Barack Hussein Obama II. Based on our investigative findings, it was at about this same time period that the Connecticut issuance of the social security number appeared and became “attached” to the name Barack Hussein Obama. It can then be reasonably reconciled that Barry SOETORO became Barack Hussein Obama while he was a young man in New York following his mysterious trip to Pakistan on a passport that was likely not issued by the U.S.
Trump’s curious statements
As long-time investigators dealing with large corporations, we have the distinct advantage of knowing other
professionals in the industry. Although we have had no contact with Mr. Trump’s investigators nor are we connected in any manner to Mr. Trump’s organization, team or efforts, we are aware of the identity of at least one who is actively working on the Obama birth certificate mystery. We are also familiar with that investigator’s associates and their areas of inquiry, so we have a fairly good understanding of what is taking place behind the scenes - and there is plenty taking place behind the scenes.
NOTE: We will be talking about this in depth on the upcoming episode of CFP Radio’s “The Hagmann & Hagmann Report” on 8-10pm EST, Saturday, 9 April 2011. Program details follow this report.
In advance of that show, however, we should address two rather curious statements made by Mr. Trump during one recent interview. When talking about his investigators in Hawaii who are looking into Obama’s birth certificate issue, he stated that “you wouldn’t believe what they’re finding.” Mr. Trump also stated that in his experience on Wall Street, he is familiar with frauds of all types, and has seen some very sophisticated frauds over the years. Well, we do have a very good idea of what is being found or verified as having been scrubbed from the records.
In our investigation, we found that the scrubbing and altering of records pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in the 1996 election cycle. The “scrubbing” or alteration of records did not begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other associates as well. In fact, a very large and extremely relevant part of the investigation of Barry SOETORO, or Barack Hussein Obama II as he is known, revolves around his parents, step father, and grandparents. and extends from the U.S. mainland to Hawaii and other points across the globe.
Meteoric rise to power was well planned
To understand how a virtually unknown politician from Illinois could rise to occupy the most powerful position in the free world in less than a decade after he became a state senator, one must take a few steps backward to understand the complete picture, and that Obama was selected long before he was elected to become president. Problems with his background were numerous, however, including but not limited to his parental lineage and place of birth. These problems became apparent through a private vetting process by his own handlers, or those who are known as the “power elite” in the latter half of the last century. His handlers were and are globalists of the highest order, extending from George Soros to those above him on the proverbial pyramid capstone of globalists.
The globalists had direct and indirect ties to the Dunham family and in particular, Obama’s mother. Consider, for example, that Peter F. Geithner (father of Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner), worked for the Ford Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama‚Äôs mother, Ann Dunham, while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia. In brief, Obama’s mother set up a large loan system in Indonesia akin to the savings and loan structure of the 1970s and 1980s. To gain a better understanding of her activities in finance, despite her background in anthropology, recall the BCCI scandal of the late 1970s. In fact, some of the same “players” who existed then continue to exist in Obama’s circles.
Our investigation into her activities and those close to Obama are continuing and will be the subject of a separate article, including how Obama as president fits into the communist China agenda in terms of global finance. Meanwhile, it’s important to take a few more steps backward in history to understand that the scrubbing of inconvenient records is not new.
Fast Rewind: Senator Joe McCarthy & the relevance to today
The majority of Americans alive today do not recall the WW II postwar era beyond the revised history
contained in textbooks that rarely reflect the truth of that time. Today’s well-coiffed but intellectually deficient anchors who deliver the news to ordinary Americans know little to nothing of the gritty reality of the origins of the “cold war” between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union, and the infiltration of communist agents into American government. It is that very infiltration that has paved the way for Obama.
Mention, however, the name of former Senator Joe McCarthy and watch as they recoil in disgust, having been taught that the inquiries of Senator Joe McCarthy is a black chapter in the history books of America. Since the 9/11 attacks, some of these news anchors and pundits have actually described the vetting of Muslims for sensitive positions in the U.S. as a throwback to “McCarthyism,” while few actually using that term know the true history of communist infiltration in key government positions in the postwar era.
The truth is that communist infiltration of and through the U.S. government, particularly the State Department, was and remains a legitimate threat to America. A 106-page confidential memo dated 3 August 1946, written by State Department official Samuel Klaus, detailed the alarming levels of communist infiltration into American government. It was that memo that served as the basis of Senator Joe McCarthy launching an investigation into the threat to America from within. It was through the efforts of McCarthy that a Senate subcommittee chaired by Senator Millard Tydings requested and eventually received a copy of that memo.
As noted by M. Stanton Evans, author of Blacklisted by History, that memo would mysteriously vanish from our nation’s records. Mr. Evans notes that this historic memo is not in the legislative panel file of the Tydings panel, located in the National Archives of the U.S., and was also removed from the files of Samuel Klaus, the author of the memo, from the National Archives in March of 1993, nearly a half century after it was issued.
As painstakingly revealed by M. Stanton Evans in his extensive work Blacklisted by History, important
documentation well beyond the Klaus memo relevant to exposing the level of communist infiltration into the U.S. government is not limited to government sources such as the National Archive, but also to private data sources and repositories. He lists a number of instances where records were scrubbed and consequently, created a much different and much less accurate picture of that era of U.S. history.
This topic is as relevant today as it was during the time of Senator Joe McCarty, if not even more relevant. One only has to look at the reported communist, Marxist and socialist ties in Obama’s lineage and inner circle to understand the impact of missing records.
One would do well to use the voluminous work of M. Stanton Evans as a template to understand how Americans have been deliberately misled by the media and some members of our own government into believing that the communist and socialist objectives, launched in the postwar era, have led to where we find ourselves today.
The removal of the Klaus memo from his file in March of 1993 was as deliberate as the refusal of government officials, complicit with the media moguls of today to address the lack of bona fides of Barack Hussein Obama. In fact, one could consider them an extension of the same.
What it all means
Based on investigative findings that are not discussed in the media, it would appear that the selection and election of Barack Hussein Obama was indeed the greatest scam ever pulled off against the American people. The above provides just a small portion of the critical issues surrounding Obama’s eligibility, identity and his place in U.S. and world history. The story is much larger than a single piece of paper, but that paper, if properly authenticated, will serve as the thread that will unravel the larger tangled web of the Obama legend.
To those who have just awakened to the constitutional crisis we are facing at the hands of this president, we’d like to say once again, “welcome to the party, pal.”
Douglas J. Hagmann & his son, Joseph Hagmann, both investigators, researchers and contributors to Canada Free Press, host a weekly radio program on CFP Radio called The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, broadcast live every Saturday from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. In it’s fifth week, the program has gained in popularity, and has become one of the ten most popular radio shows on the BlogTalk Radio platform. This week’s program will be providing additional details about the problems with Obama’s eligibility to occupy the White House.

The coming meltdown of Barack Obama
Will the rule of law be dictated by the whims of the political elite and the MSM or by the Constitution?
Lawrence Sellin
Friday, April 8, 2011
Politics has recently replaced the Constitution as the basis for the rule of law in the United States. It is a recipe for chaos, if permitted to continue.
More and more Americans are beginning to realize that Barack Obama is an illegal President and/or has a potentially damaging personal history.
The desperation now being displayed by Obama sycophants is proof positive.
The race card is increasingly being played. Expect much more of it.
Donald Trump is the earthquake. A tsunami of revelations will soon follow, which will have a yet unforeseen impact on the legitimacy of our political system and the integrity of the main stream media (MSM).
Having largely dismissed Constitutional considerations since 2008, the political elite and the MSM, perhaps not now, but ultimately will find politics a poor substitute as the final arbitrator of our national discourse.
I will provide a libretto for the political comic opera now underway.
The Democratic left-wing will continue to support Obama. Moderate Democrats, behind the scenes, are already seeking an alternative. The Clinton machine is waiting for an opportunity to make its move.
The Republicans smell electoral blood and consider Obama the most vulnerable of the probable Democratic Presidential candidates. For that reason, they would prefer revelations about a damaging personal history
rather than an illegal Presidency.
The MSM are in a win-win situation. They will continue to back Obama until he is replaced by a potentially stronger Democratic candidate. If that happens, expect a ruthless assault describing Republicans as racists and haters, who hounded poor Barack Obama out of office. In that case, the MSM will also help re-energize the Democratic faithful for the new standard-bearer.
The Constitutional questions raised by the election of Barack Obama will be ignored, either forever or as long as possible, because the political elite and the MSM were likely either complicit in or acquiesced to its infringement.
The breach created in the Constitution sets a precedent for its further erosion. Regrettably, many of our political elite favor a situation, where the Constitutional rights guaranteed to Americans become negotiable according to the political caprice of party leaders.
The debate about Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as President is over. It is his responsibility to establish his eligibility for office, not the task of ordinary Americans to prove that he is not.
The content and intent of the Constitution are clear. The Founders did not use the word “citizen” but the term “natural born citizen” to describe eligibility for the Presidency.
The authors of the Constitution no doubt based their understanding of the term “natural born citizen,” on the 1758 book “The Law of Nations” written by Swiss philosopher and diplomat Emerich de Vattel, who wrote:
“… natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. … children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. … The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children…”
That is, someone who is born in the US of citizen parents at the time of birth is a natural born citizen.
In the early days of our country, it was specifically designed to prevent a British usurper from gaining office and undermining American independence.
Accordingly, Barack Obama is a priori ineligible. In that regard, it does not matter where he was born or if we ever see a real birth certificate.
It does not mean, however, that Obama should not show his birth certificate to prove that he was born in Hawaii as he claims. Unfortunately for him, the Certification of Live Birth, which has been posted on the internet, is not sufficient proof. In addition, it has never been legally validated by the State of Hawaii and may even be a forgery.
Another shibboleth used by Obama defenders is the newspaper clipping announcing his birth. Seriously? Just try using a newspaper clipping to get a driver’s license. What’s next, Monopoly money to pay down the national debt?
Barack Obama should step down or be Constitutionally removed from office.
The American people are now faced with an urgent and critical choice.
Will the rule of law be dictated by the whims of the political elite and the MSM or by the Constitution?
I choose the latter.

Patriots: Time for Major Push on Usurper's Citizenship Issue
By: Devvy Kidd
September 15, 2009
© 2009 -
On September 12, 2009, Americans descended on Washington, DC., in one of the largest displays of citizen disgust towards government in the history of this republic. While this patriotic day of fed up Americans was happening, the usurper (Obama/Soetoro) made sure he was out of town. As usual. Obama aka Soetoro has taken a real fondness to flying around on Air Force One with his inventory of teleprompters and stable of fawning sycophants.
Let's back up one day to September 11, 2009. The flim flam man was at the Pentagon with his militant, Marxist wife and bag lady of fashion, Michelle. The annual ceremony for those murdered on 9/11. At the same time in a court room in Georgia, Obama's lackeys were playing more games in an important case. Americans keeping up on current events know there have been dozens of lawsuits challenging the citizenship eligibility of this guy in the White House who has used five different names (Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham) and concealed every single record of his life except what he wants you to see.
The ignorant, biased media continues to ridicule those of us who believe the Constitution matters. Know what? I could care less. They don't pay my mortgage and I understand how the game is played. I say those who will not stand up for the truth are cowards. These useful fools who call any American vile labels for challenging the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro are either intellectually lazy and refuse to do the real research, their paychecks mean more to them than the truth, or they believe in Obama/Soetoro's Marxist agenda. This usurper must be removed from office. Not because Obama/Soetoro is a communist and is destroying this country (true), but because he never had the legal right to run for the presidency or take the oath of office on January 20, 2009.
Let's get caught up on recent events which seem to be causing 'The One' some stress. If you'll notice, the
usurper doesn't seem to be walking to our helicopter with his usual jaunty stride. There is a tension there that is palpable. Stress from trying to sell his unconstitutional health care "reform" mess? I don't think so. On September 8, 2009, there was another hearing in the Barnett v Obama case in a federal court house in Santa Ana, California. I was most disturbed about what I have learned went by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation. As this can get a little confusing, I'll try to summarize here as clearly as I can.
That hearing (Barnett v Obama) was scheduled for weeks. The attorney's for the defendants, that would be the usurper and his minions, filed an eleventh hour motion on Friday, September 4, 2009. Monday the 7th was a holiday. The hearing was Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009. How coincidental that Obama/Soetoro decided to pump some more of his propaganda to America's school children at the same time a hearing was underway that could eventually remove his lying backside from office.
There are a number of plaintiffs, but from what I can determine, things got nasty during the hearing. Here are two posts from actual plaintiffs in the case for you to read:
Plaintiff MSgt USMC Jeff Schwilk (
Plaintiff Pamela Barnett (
Orly has filed a notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest.
This uphill battle should not be a damn bully contest, but that's exactly what it appears to me by Kreep. Now, all that aside, Judge Carter has set October 5, 2009, as the next hearing to consider the motion by the Defendants; they want this to go away. A trial date, should this matter move forward, is set for January. Too far away because everyday the usurper remains office, the more complicated this constitutional crisis gets because of bills Obama/Soetoro is signing into law. Not to mention deploying soldiers as Commander-in-Chief. Although I've been told Judge Carter has further issued an expedited hearing, I am not certain as I write this. However, you can read this explanation of the judge's order here:
Judge Carter orders Motion for Rogatory Discovery to be heard
September 11, 2009 by John Charlton
Referral Order gives rise to speculation that expedited discovery is to commence
(Sept. 11, 2009) — "Yesterday U.S. Federal District Judge David Carter (Central District of California, Souther Division) ordered the Amended Motion for expedited Rogatory Discovery, filed by Attorney Taitz in the action Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al. referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. This order followed Carter's denial of Taitz’ request to remove Judge Nakazato from his role overseeing admission of evidence to the case, which duty he has according to Federal Court rules of procedure. Judge Nakazato is now to review the first Kenyan Birth Certificate.
"Attorney Taitz had submitted in July a Kenyan Birth Certificate (hereafter the Lavendar Document) to be authenticated by means of a mandamus to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to move her to formally request the Kenyan Government to authenticate the document. This motion was denied by Judge Nakazato, whereupon Taitz filed a motion refusing to proceed before him, and a subsequent amendment to the initial Rogatory motion, on Aug. 20th.
"Attorney's for Barack Hussein Obama, led by Mr. George S. Cardona, acting U.S. Attorney, almost immediately replied to Carter's order, with an ex-parte Application (accompanied by a proposed order), requesting immediate halt to any discovery which might be granted by the Magistrate Judge."
One other comment here about the Defendant's motion to dismiss and I cover this in my letter to Judge Carter: Their entire argument is based after the barn door was left open. There was zero vetting at the state level to ensure Obama aka and so forth, was constitutionally eligible. That glaring error (or cover up) caused everything to snow ball from there into the mess underway.
Meanwhile, Orly was in Georgia (September 11, 2009) on another eligibility case, Rhodes v McDonald, et al. Orly was notified by the clerk that an expedited hearing had been granted, so she caught a red eye flight to Georgia for a hearing last Friday. Here is the antics of our government that should make everyone sick; posted by Orly:
"We had a hearing on 11th. Defendants were represented by 3 attorneys: US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney. they claimed that my client, flight surgeon Cpt Rhodes MD didn't show up for no
reason, she just didn't feel like coming.
"I presented to the judge a notarized statement, showing that Col Jeffrey Johnson, her commander from Fort Riley, KS has forbidden Connie from leaving Fort Riley a day early and she was threatened that if she does, she will be court martialed and can be thrown into military prison. In this fashion the gov. prevented Connie from being at her own hearing and 5 minutes before the hearing they served me with the motion to dismiss.
"Judge Land did not appreciate this strong hand tactic of the government and he ordered the government to make sure Connie is able to leave the base to be at her hearing, which was scheduled for Monday at 12 noon. This time it is their responsibility to do whatever is necessary for Connie to be in court. It is a tough week for me as in 5 days I am making 5 red eye flights and long trips between OC, LA, Atlanta, Columbus and WA DC."
Here is the Notarized statement from Plaintiff, (, Cpt Connie Rhodes MD, attesting to the fact that she was forbidden to leave the base and appear in court. Because of the shenanigans by these lawyers, a US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney, another hearing was scheduled for Monday, September 14, 2009, at noon. I spoke with Orly by phone at about 5:45 pm EST (Sept. 14, 2009). She sounded exhausted, but said the hearing was concluded; she was able to speak for about two hours. Judge Land will issue a decision tomorrow.
While all this is going on, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and CNN have remained silent. Not a single minute of coverage. Yo! That includes the 'fair and balanced' FOX News Network.
On September 10, 2009, an exposure of documents hit the Internet courtesy of JB Williams. Two different
Official Certification of Nomination letters submitted by Nancy Pelosi and a woman named Alice Travis Germond. Read the posting and copy of the documents here. (
This now brings me to my work over the weekend because time is of the essence.
This is a letter I sent to Judge David O. Carter in the Barnett case. ( It is permissible for citizens to send polite correspondence to judges regarding a case he/she is presiding over. If you will notice, no where in my letter do I refer to the usurper's party, politics or policies. Judge Carter is ruling on the law and that must be the only point you bring out if you decide to send him a letter. I hope everyone can take a few minutes (especially vets and active duty military) to pen a polite letter to Judge Carter asap.
Next, this is a request to my Secretary of State for a copy of the Official Certification of Nomination sent for Obama/Biden by Pelosi. ( I want to see what was submitted as a result of the revelations mentioned above by JB Williams.
Next, another letter to two U.S. Attorneys requesting a full investigation into those documents. (
Next, no not fun in the sun. One of Orly's plaintiffs is New Hampshire State Representative Laurence M. Rappaport. According to his post (, Mr. Rappaport had a meeting with his Secretary of State (SOS), William Gardner, on September 11, 2009. I am quite familiar with Gardner from the recount last year over the vote fraud in NH during the primaries. I am not impressed with Gardner or his staff. However, since Rappaport is a member of the New Hampshire General Court, an elected official, he does have some clout.
I have sent a letter and the following documents in a nice, neat folder to Rep. Rappaport:
Letters to Janet Brown, Committees on Presidential Debates (
Dr. Edwin Vieira on Standing
(Due to length, I put on a CD) (
Letters to the Secretary of State and Elections Board - State of Illinois (
Due to the length of these, I put them on the CD: Leo Donofrio's legal and historical research on the issue of natural born citizen at birth (; another legal analysis on McCain's ineligibility 
( ; a document on how certain members of Congress tried to legislate Obama/Soetoro's citizenship by trying to sneak in McCain's and my letter to two U.S. Attorneys. (
I think that about covers things for now on Orly's cases. Let me go over to Leo Donofrio's web site. For those who have been following this the past almost one year, Leo's was the first case to the U.S. Supreme Court and kicked without a hearing. Leo has been posting more of his research; hopefully you can book mark and read when you can because it's important. ( Be sure to visit Leo's site and scroll down for this: FACTCHECK.ORG CAPITULATES – Admits Error In Obama Kenyan Citizenship Analysis. Why is this important? Because that web site has been the water carrier for the usurper from day one.
Next, is another very important case, Kerchner v Obama ( I have interviewed both Charles Kerchner and his attorney, Mario Apuzzo. The issue of these certifications filed with the SOS and the one Pelosi signed from the convention is already part of that lawsuit. Please see this link (; scroll down to Item 89 - 91. The docket for Charles' case is here (; you can follow the progress of that case.
For almost a year, those who care absolutely nothing for the U.S. Constitution, Obama/Soetoro's supporters, newspaper pundits and popular cable news network anchors, have been screeching, calling people like you and me "wing nuts," Kool Aid drinkers, racists and conspiracy wackos. Ignore them. Don't let them sap your strength and energy. Stay focused. Below is a list of state legislators (there may be more at this time, but I don't have the full list) who are Orly's plaintiffs. Ask them to do the same as Rep. Rappaport. Now, that he has taken this first step with his Secretary of State, I believe these other stand up Americans will follow.
Mr. Eric Swafford, in his capacity of the State representative from the State of Tennessee; Mr. Timothy Jones, ESQ, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Timothy Comerford, in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Frank Niceley in his capacity of the state representative from the state of Tennessee; Ms. Cynthia Davis, in her capacity of a State representative from the State of Missouri; Mr. Larry Rappaport in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Stacey Campfield in his capacity of a State representative from the state of Tennessee; Mr. Casey Guernsey in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Glen Casada, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Tennessee
Please feel free to send this column or any of the material in it to your state rep or senator with a polite snail mail letter asking for them to come forward as has Rep. Rappaport. If one of the above is your rep, be sure to thank them in a polite letter for already being plaintiffs in Orly's legal challenges and ask them to join Rep. Rappaport by petitioning your SOS. They need to know you will stand with them.
Let us keep the momentum going and show both Washington, DC and our state legislatures that we the people will no longer be ignored and we will not stop until the whole truth about the usurper is exposed and he is removed from office. Yes, Obama, we can and we will.
"But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations...This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution." -- John Adams, letter to H. Niles, February 13, 1818
Also See:
Obama is NOT Eligible to be President! (Part 1)
01 April 2010
Where is Obama's Birth Certificate? (Part 1)
12 June 2009
Where is Obama's Birth Certificate? (Part 2)
08 August 2009