Thursday, April 19, 2012

God or Science? (Part 2)

*******
*******
Why Science Wants Us to be Chimps
by J.P. Tomkins
(henrymakow.com)
April 18, 2012
http://www.henrymakow.com/why_science_wants_us_to_be_chi.html
Independent scientists are challenging the dogma that humans are just a few DNA base pairs away from being monkeys.
This undermines the Illuminati plan to take human evolution away from God.
"A scenario involving state-mandated and guided evolution by any trans-humanist technology is being devised with the promise that the "experts" will fix all our evolutionary problems."
Scientific research regarding human origins has been skewed to promote and justify an amoral vision of man as simply an evolved animal without a soul connection to God.
By dehumanizing us, the Illuminati can justify many malicious inventions aimed at societal control and population reduction.
One of the goals of the technocratic elite has been to prove that humans share a common ancestry with chimpanzees. This will allow the elite to re-engineer humanity according to their specifications.
Indeed, many scientific claims state that the DNA of humans and chimps is nearly identical (98%-99%).
However, several recent publications show that these estimates are based on highly filtered and cherry-picked data.
DNA that was too dissimilar to be conveniently aligned was typically omitted, masked or not reported.
Based on the analysis of data provided in various publications, including the often cited 2005 chimpanzee genome report, human-chimp genome similarity is not more than ~87% identical, and possibly not higher than 81%. Indeed, a detailed comparison of the chimp and human Y-chromosomes by a secular research group in 2010 showed 70% or less DNA sequence similarity.
Unfortunately, human genomes are not evolving but decaying. The accumulation of harmful mutations indicate a creation-based start point that was more pristine.
In the opinion of this author, DNA findings by independent researchers are clearly in line with the Book of Genesis where mankind was created uniquely in the image of God. For a listing of publications and articles that support these conclusions go to this web site.
Trans-Humanism
The possibility of humans evolving to a new level with the help of "experts" has been proposed by Illuminati technocrats. This is called 'trans-humanism'.
This trans-humanist agenda involves technologies such as the bio-engineering of the human genome, implantable micro-chips, exotic new drugs/vaccines, and other biological enhancements.
The idea is that these technologies will help us fix the mistakes of evolution and move us to the next level - even a new species.
However, the reality is that anything that will actually improve the quality of life will be most likely be reserved for the elite.
Those allowed to live in a depopulated world will be sold Trojan horses that will simply further enslave us - all in the name of guided and state-mandated evolution.
Supposed human evolution is actually a repackaged ancient esoteric philosophy whereby man "evolves" into a god. However, for the Illuminati being a "god" doesn't require moral improvement.
In fact, Charles Darwin used the term "becoming" and "evolution" interchangeably in his tome on human evolution "The Descent of Man...".
This was a new version of the ancient pagan "chain of being" or "chain of life" dogma.
Today, Trans-humanism is being packaged as a "kindler gentler" social Darwinism to the academic community and the general public.
J.P. Tomkins was a Professor of Genetics and Biochemistry for 19 years, ran a genome center for seven years, and now work for a small non-profit research center.
*******
"Civilization, a Form of Slavery," said Darwin Grandson
(Originally Posted as 'Darwin was an Illuminati Shill' in March, 2010)
by Cornelius B
for henrymakow.com
January 2, 2011
"Think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche-ism. To us Jews, at any rate, it should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim."
(Protocols of the Elders of Zion 2-3. "Us Jews" refers to Cabalist i.e. Illuminati Jews)
Darwinism, the theory of the "natural selection and survival of the fittest", is of major importance to the Illuminati. We know this because, as Richard Milton explains in his article, "Darwinism - The Forbidden Subject", public debate of Darwinism is forbidden.
"Most educated, rational people will find it almost impossible to believe that the debate of Darwinism through mainstream news papers and the principal TV channels is forbidden. I still find it hard to believe myself," Milton writes.
While there is no evidence that Darwin was a Mason, the males in his family were Freemasons, and so were his close colleagues and friends.
Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Erasmus Darwin (1731-1802), physician and biologist, grandfather of Charles, became a Mason in the Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning, No. 2, of Scotland.
Sir Francis Darwin, (1786-1859), physician and traveler, brother of Charles Darwin's father, became a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807. The name of Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is very possible that he also was a Mason.
Charles Darwin was well into eugenics and bloodline breeding. The Darwins and Wedgwoods intermarried for several generations. That's the top Freemason way (the Rothschilds even married their sisters). Thus, Charles Darwin chose to marry his cousin, Emma Wedgwood.
The Next Million Years
A book, "The Next Million Years" by Darwin's grandson, Charles Galton Darwin (1887-1962) is supposed to be a NWO blueprint. You can download it from scribd (http://www.scribd.com/doc/23619812/The-Next-Million-Years-by-Charles-Galton-Darwin-1953).
Charles Galton Darwin says that "every civilization has really been a form of slavery for the people."
In his view, this is the "natural order", and of course " the leaders" are trained in the technique of enslaving people since birth.
They're brought up listening to a different version of reality than the rest of the population. They're told that in the realities of life, the predators should be at the top of the "natural order". They're predators, of course, because they're such hypocrites, liars, deceivers, and unscrupulous cheats. As good predators, they can't tell the people how they're really feeding off them, or manipulating them for different ends, "because those with the low IQ's, you know the little people at the bottom of the pile, have to be kept in the dark."
The arms of the Darwin family are very suggestive of their belonging also, just as their motto - "Cave et aude" (Beware and Dare). How about those Satanic red stars, identical to the Soviet symbol?
Because Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, and his ideology didn't spread, something was necessary to make the masses more receptive... and this something was Darwinism. Darwin's theory eliminated God and presented life as a struggle for survival of the fittest. It was the necessary ingredient for the acceptance of a slave state, and of a cycle of crime, violence, destruction, anarchy, revolutions and wars.
Adam Smith
In his essay, "The Structure of Evolutionary Theory" (2004), Stephen Jay Gould finds a strong kinship between Darwin's "natural selection" and "the invisible hand of the market" of Adam Smith in "The Wealth of Nations." (1776) According to Smith, each individual is in constant search to satisfy his own interests, to best employ his capital and to better sell his work.
The establishment of the relationship of "genuine competition" of all private interests in a "free market" would result in "the greatest wealth and happiness for all".
Adam Smiths' economic liberalism, just as Darwin's theory, is pure ideology because at that time, nothing similar existed in the real world. Alas, shortly after this publication, under the effect of particularly ferocious laws and policy promoted by the dominant social classes (enclosure, bloody repression of the Luddites in 1812, abolition of the law of assistance to the poor in 1834, etc.) Smith justified a kind of enslavement.
With his vision of the economy, Smith introduced the destruction of the social bonds - of neighborhood, of trade corporations with their ancient solidarity, of inter-help and reciprocity, and this ideology undermined the traditional mutual help and assistance between the members of a same family. All these relations that enriched the social fabric, and the quality of life, were reduced to the notions of cold personal interest, selfishness and to the quest of money.
The poor literally became slaves, and for the slightest mischief, such as the cut of a tree, or poaching, could send a man to gallows, or be sent to the colonies -- America, and later Australia and New Zealand, South Africa, etc. -- to work as a slave (see "They were White and they were Slaves", by Michael Hoffman II -- http://www.revisionisthistory.org/forgottenslaves.html. You also view an interview of M. Hoffman by Ernst Zundel on the same topic -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ugo1YxZWWJ8).
Smith's free market coompetition corresponds to Darwin's survival of the fittest. The rest of the population becomes disposable, therefore eventually must disappear, or may be disposed of as pleased. This concept opened large the gates to the "demons" of Eugenics, Fascism, Nazism, Communism, Feminism, and lately of Neo-conservatism, all of them of Luciferian or satanic inspiration (see also "Jewish Convert, Rev. Richard Wurmbrand Defined "The Spiritual War"" on http://www.henrymakow.com/_richard_wurmbrand_leftthe_spi.html) as tools for total control of the human society.
Thus, with the concept of the "survival of the fittest", Darwinism became the central pillar for new theories such as "Marxist-Leninist dialectical materialism" theory which introduces class war; Freud which posits sexuality as the central motivation of the "human machine" and all the perversions this entails; Fascism, Nazism and Zionism as forms of absolute totalitarianism and criminal behavior; Feminism as gender war with destruction of the familial entity, depopulation, and control over the education of children who are educated by brainwashed individuals under the control of governments, in turn infiltrated and controlled by secret societies.
This is in accordance with the agenda of the Illuminati, who pursue the destruction of Christian civilization and the enslavement of humanity. Thus, Darwinism, the central pillar of the "modern theories" which alters minds, attitudes and actions of the people, is still necessary to these Illuminati predators. This is the only plausible explanation for why the public debate of Darwin's scientific findings is forbidden.
Was Darwin a front man for the Illuminati agenda? What do you think?
*******
Intelligent Scientists "Expelled" by Illuminati
by Henry Makow, Ph.D.
September 14, 2010
If you needed confirmation that humanity is satanically possessed, rent Ben Stein's 2008 documentary, "Expelled - No Intelligence Allowed."
It documents how scientists who see an intelligent force at work in nature are being fired from their jobs.
They are being slandered as "Creationists" and religious fundamentalists. Any mention of "Intelligent Design" is forbidden.
Isn't this appalling? Science is supposed to explain the complex intelligence manifest in the natural world, not deny that it exists.
The offending scientists are not "religious." They simply know that a single cell is more complex than an atom bomb. Obviously, an amazing intelligence is at work. Call it God or Intelligent Design. Call it "John Doe" - but you can't deny it!
Some people think I'm a Christian or a religious Jew. I am neither. Like these scientists, I can see the obvious. Creation is a miracle which didn't happen by accident. It's governed by laws which scientists and metaphysicians are supposed to discern.
But mention "intelligent design" today and your career is over. Why are "secularists" so afraid of intelligent design?
Because they're funded by the Illuminati, (Rockefellers, Rothschilds etc.) who are Satanists. Satanists fear that acceptance of this "intelligence" will interfere with the makeover they're giving humanity. They think they are God.
Secularism pretends to be about freedom and tolerance but that's a ruse. It is Satanism in disguise and nothing freaks a Satanist more than the rumor of God or anything resembling Him.
Watch the trailer! The secularists are more fanatical than any religious cult. They are a satanic cult. They deny the obvious! They have to expel scientists! They have to stop free inquiry and debate!
Darwinian Model
"Is man an angel or an ape?"
The Illuminati use Darwinism to reduce man from a potential angel (the religious view) to an ape. They created Darwin to replace the Divine Presence with a cruel and random universe governed by survival of the fittest. Darwinism empowered the Illuminati. They imposed it on us.
Intelligent Design empowers humanity. We're not talking about the "God of the Old Testament," the straw-man that pathetic atheists easily debunk. We're talking about something most of us both intuit and desire, a method and purpose to creation, a way of living conducive to health and happiness, a Moral Order.
This is anathema to our Illuminutty guardians who are busily taking God's place, enthroning their little mascot Lucifer.
If you doubt me, watch this documentary. It shows very clearly that this leads to Eugenics and the view people are "useless" eaters who can be bred, trained or killed with impunity. It is the end of free will and morality.
You will also see we have been overtaken by Communism. "Truth" is no longer objective, but is instead defined by political diktat.
Conclusion
God must feel like a loving parent whose favorite child has chosen to deny Him.
The Creator has given us everything we need to flourish so long as we follow the instruction manual.
But devil worshipers who wish to turn Creation on its head have made us their mental prisoner. They are responsible for the slaughter of millions. They still control the world.
Ultimately, there are only two parties. God's party and Satan's. The Party of God believes in inherent salutary natural and spiritual laws. The Party of Satan believes in denying and defying these laws; and perverting and destroying human life.
Yes Virginia, there is no Satan. But there are legions of his disciples ready to betray truth for transitory profit. They're in academia, the mass media, government and the National Academy of "Sciences."
They serve the Prince of Lies. They make evil seem good, lies seem true. They want humanity to be an accomplice in its own demise. This is why Satanists "reveal the method." They want our moral complicity.
They want our souls.
Modern Western history is the record of the overthrow of Christianity by Satanism disguised as secularism. Satanism has pervaded every aspect of our cultural and intellectual life but we hoped that science would be spared. Apparently, this is not to be.
*******
*******
Archeological Finds Debunk Darwinism
by Cornelius B
(for henrymakow.com)
March 10, 2010
Humans Inhabited Earth for Millions of Years
Masons Try to Suppress Evidence
"Anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods."
The model of human prehistory built-up by scholars over the past two centuries is sadly and completely wrong, and a deliberate tool of disinformation and mind control.
This is the thesis of the book, "Forbidden Archaeology" by Michael Cremo and Richard L. Thompson.
The authors begin with the assumption that archeologists are fundamentally of good faith. Nevertheless, little by little, they demonstrate a systematic destruction of proofs that show another reality than that the official story. Falsifications and even destruction of such proofs has been common for more than two hundred years.
In their first essay "The Hidden History of the Human Race", Cremo and Thompson push back our horizons not just thousand years, but millions of years into the past, and show that almost everything we have been taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests on a highly selective sampling of research.
The two authors then set the record straight by showing all the other research results that have been edited out, not because there was anything wrong about them, but simply because "they did not fit with prevailing academic opinion."
Anomalous and out-of-place discoveries reported by Cremo and Thompson in "The Hidden History of the Human Race" include convincing evidence that anatomically modern humans have been present on the Earth not just for 100,000 years or less (the orthodox version), but for millions of years, and that metal objects of advanced design have been in use at equally early periods.
Scientific Censorship
The authors describe an ongoing social process of knowledge filtration that at first sight appears quite innocuous, but has a substantial cumulative effect. Certain categories of evidence simply disappear from view.
This pattern of data suppression has been going on for a long time. For instance, in 1880, J. D. Whitney, the state geologist of California, published a lengthy review of advanced stone tools found in California gold mines. The implements, including spear points and stone mortars and pestles, were found deep in mine shafts, underneath thick, undisturbed layers of lava, in formations ranging from 9 million to over 55 million years old.
W. H. Holmes of the Smithsonian Institution, one of the most vocal critics of these California finds, wrote:
"Perhaps if Professor Whitney had fully appreciated the story of human evolution as it is understood today, he would have hesitated to announce the conclusions formulated (that humans existed in very ancient times in North America), notwithstanding the imposing array of testimony with which he was confronted."
In other words, if the facts do not agree with the favored theory, then such facts, even an imposing array of them, must be discarded.
I shall give here some examples of these discarded paleo-archaeological elements:
In a report delivered to the British Association for the Advancement of Science in 1881, H. Slopes, F.G.S. (Fellow of the Geological Society), described a shell, the surface of which bore a carving of a crude but unmistakably human face. The carved shell was found in the stratified deposits of the Red Crag, which is between 2.0 and 2.5 million years old.
One should keep in mind that in terms of conventional paleontological opinion, one does not encounter such works of art until the time of fully modern Cro-Magnon man in the Late Pleistocene, about 30,000 years ago.
On August 2, 1890, J. H. Neale signed the following statement about discoveries made by him:
"In 1877 Mr. J. H. Neale was superintendent of the Montezuma Tunnel Company, and ran the Montezuma tunnel into the gravel underlying the lava of Table Mountain, Tuolumne County. . . . At a distance of between 1400 and 1500 feet from the mouth of the tunnel, or of between 200 and 300 feet beyond the edge of the solid lava, Mr. Neale saw several spear-heads, of some dark rock and nearly one foot in length.
On exploring further, he himself found a small mortar three or four inches in diameter and of irregular shape. This was discovered within a foot or two of the spear-heads. He then found a large well formed pestle, now the property of Dr. R. I. Bromley, and near by a large and very regular mortar, also at present the property of Dr. Bromley."
Neale's affidavit continued:
"All of these relics were found. . . . close to the bed-rock, perhaps within a foot of it. Mr. Neale declares that it is utterly impossible that these relics can have reached the position in which they were found excepting at the time the gravel was deposited, and before the lava cap formed. There was not the slightest trace of any disturbance of the mass or of any natural fissure into it by which access could have been obtained either there or in the neighborhood."
The position of the artifacts in gravel close to the bedrock at Tuolumne Table Mountain indicates they were 33-55 million years old.
In 1844, Sir David Brewster reported that a nail had been discovered firmly embedded in a block of sandstone from the Kingoodie (Mylnfield) Quarry in Scotland. Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this sandstone is of "Lower Old Red Sandstone age" (Devonian, between 360 and 408 million years old). Brewster was a famous Scottish physicist. He was a founder of the British Association for the Advancement of Science and made important discoveries in the field of optics.
In his report to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Brewster stated:
"The stone in Kingoodie quarry consists of alternate layers of hard stone and a soft clayey substance called 'till'; the courses of stone vary from six inches to upwards of six feet in thickness. The particular block in which the nail was found, was nine inches thick, and in proceeding to clear the rough block for dressing, the point of the nail was found projecting about half an inch (quite eaten with rust) into the 'till,' the rest of the nail lying along the surface of the stone to within an inch of the head, which went right down into the body of the stone."
The fact that the head of the nail was buried in the sandstone block would seem to rule out the possibility the nail had been pounded into the block after it was quarried.
On June 22, 1844, this curious report appeared in the London Times:
"A few days ago, as some workmen were employed in quarrying a rock close to the Tweed about a quarter of a mile below Rutherford-mill, a gold thread was discovered embedded in the stone at a depth of eight feet."
Dr. A. W. Medd of the British Geological Survey wrote to the authors in 1985 that this stone is of Early Carboniferous age (between 320 and 360 million years old).
(Ed. Note: Cornelius B cites many more examples which I excised in the interest of brevity.)
Disinformation and Mind Control
"Forbidden Archeology" was first released in 1993 and quickly became an underground classic. Today it is a bestseller, with foreign editions in over a dozen languages, presenting both accepted and anomalous scientific evidence defying the traditional view of human evolution. This is a fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge.
I'll let you judge their proofs sustaining the human evolution. What is the purpose behind this disinformation if not mind control, and therefore social engineering?
Science is a method that anyone can learn and apply. In a free and open society, science has to be a democratic process. Instead, we observe a behavior similar to the totalitarian attitude of the ancient priesthood clique in Egypt. To better illustrate this affirmation, I present the case of a science journalist, Richard Milton, initially an ardent believer in Darwinian doctrine until his investigative instincts kicked in one day.
After 20 years of studying and writing about evolution, he suddenly realized that there were many disconcerting elements in the theory. He decided to put every main classic proof of Darwinism to the test. The results were hard to believe -- he found that the theory could not even stand up to the rigors of routine investigative journalism. Next, he published a book titled "The Facts of Life: Shattering the Myths of Darwinism".
Milton says:
"I experienced the witch-hunting activity of the Darwinist police at first hand - it was deeply disappointing to find myself being described by a prominent Oxford zoologist, Richard Dawkins, as "loony", "stupid" and "in need of psychiatric help" in response to purely scientific reporting."
Does this sound like stories that came out of the Soviet Union 25 years ago when dissident scientists there started speaking out?
Without a doubt Dawkins is part of the "secret societies brotherhood" invested with high power. Richard Dawkins has been appointed to the position of Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. This advocate of aetheism is a classic "Brain Police" storm-trooper, patrolling the neurological front lines.
According to Milton, the process came to a head when the London Times Higher Education Supplement commissioned him to write a critique of Darwinism. The publication foreshadowed his coming piece: "Next Week: Darwinism - Richard Milton goes on the attack". Dawkins caught wind of this and wasted no time in nipping this heresy in the bud. He contacted the editor, Auriol Stevens, and accused Milton of being a "creationist", and prevailed upon Stevens to pull the plug on the article. Milton learned of this behind-the-scenes backstabbing and wrote a letter of appeal to Stevens. In the end, she caved in to Dawkins and scratched the piece.
*******
*******
Darwinism as Mind Control
The Western scientific establishment and mass media pride themselves on being open public forums devoid of prejudice or censorship. However, no television program examining the flaws and weaknesses of Darwinism has ever been aired in Darwin's home country or in America. A scientist who opposes the theory cannot get a paper published.
Darwin's theory of evolution is the only theory routinely taught in our public school system that has never been subjected to rigorous scrutiny; nor have any of the criticisms been allowed into the curriculum. This is an interesting fact, because a recent poll showed that "71% of the American public say biology teachers should teach both Darwinism and scientific evidence against Darwinian theory." Nevertheless, there are no plans to implement this balanced approach.
Then there is the high-profile case of Dr Virginia Steen-McIntyre, a geologist working for the US Geological Survey (USGS), who was dispatched to an archaeological site in Mexico to date a group of artifacts in the 1970s. This travesty also illustrates how far the « brothers scientists" will go to guard orthodox tenets.
McIntyre used state-of-the-art equipment and backed up her results by using four different methods, but her results were off the chart. The lead archaeologist expected a date of 25,000 years or less, and the geologist's finding was 250,000 years or more.
The figure of 25,000 years or less was critical to the Bering Strait "crossing" theory, and it was the motivation behind the head archaeologist's tossing Steen-McIntyre's results in the circular file and asking for a new series of dating tests. This sort of reaction does not occur when dates match the expected chronological model that supports accepted theories.
Steen-McIntyre was given a chance to retract her conclusions, but because this woman was intellectually honest, she refused. She found it hard thereafter to get her papers published and she lost a teaching job at an American university.
Conclusion
Thus, as we may conclude from the information provided here, Darwinism, the theory of the survival of the fittest and its twin sister, the theory of human evolution, together with the official version of the Paleontology and Archaeology such as they are practiced, are pseudo-sciences.
In fact, they are tools for mind control of the masses. Their main purpose is to cut off the roots of the true history of humanity, and promote a naturalistic and mechanistic view of life as "survival of the fittest." They promote atheism as a means of destroying Christian civilization.
We find the same hate of God and of Christianity in Marxism and Freudianism.
A very interesting read is the book of Richard Wurmbrand "Marx & Satan" where we discover that Marx was a Satanist priest with a deep hate of God and desire for the ruin and annihilation of the human society. How can we explain this deep hated nourished in the hearts of these men? Was it satanic possession?
I will close with this fact -- at the funerals of Karl Marx, in his speech Frederich Engels compared Marx to Darwin as titans of the human mind, and this suggests the high probability that Darwin was Karl Marx's "Luciferian brother".
*******
God or Science?
(Part 1)
09 December 2010
*******