Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Who Controls the Media!


Where do trolls come from?
   They are paid government contractors!
Robot Journalism and the Virtual Reality News Game
By Paul McGuire
March 3, 2014
I was watching a large cable news network where a female host asked two ethnically diverse news commentators to offer their different opinions on the crisis in the Ukraine. What was interesting was that both of the commentators were reading their “opinions” from teleprompters. They were having an artificial debate where their talking points were carefully scripted from some unseen team of “experts.” The ethnicity of the news commentators is not the issue; they just happened to be the taking heads on at the moment. In the new and improved television news there is no longer a past, present or future, just the moment you are in when you are watching. In the next moment, there was some middle-aged White news commentator in a fancy suit also reading from a teleprompter and basically talking about nothing.
As usual I was channel surfing like crazy because of the incredible barrage of boredom coming from the “news” networks, with all the journalists looking like television hosts on some kind of virtual reality game show. Actual news content and objective reporting of facts has been reduced to about 2% of the broadcast segment, and each segment is dominated by the obligatory long-shot of the female journalist’s legs and high heels, depending upon which network you are watching. There is also the new obligatory medium close-up shot of the handsome male journalist that features his hair style and tie or the obligatory close up of the female journalist that reveals her attractiveness, shapely figure and that strategic hint of underplayed sexuality.
Below their faces, a “lower third” graphic is placed in the title-safe lower area of the screen giving a steady stream of news flashes. Finally, there is the “news footage” like Russian soldiers streaming into the Ukraine. Television news is entertainment with a very narrow band width of content and examination; it is like a global virtual reality video game targeting specific demographics. One news channel has hosts and topics designed to appeal to viewers who have traditional religious values and are conservative and another news channel targets less religious and more liberal viewers. Like the Republican and Democrat parties, both networks are controlled by the same elites and neither will broadcast anything their masters don’t want us to hear. Like our supposedly separate political parties, they exist to give us the illusion of a choice.
The most disturbing thing about this virtual world of television news is not the subjects, questions and topics that it covers; it is the subjects, questions and topics that it deliberately ignores. By creating a subconscious “out of bounds” series of important topics and questions, the message is communicated to the viewer that these types of questions and topics are not that important. But the secondary message that is communicated is that there is something wrong with you if you have interest in these “out of bounds” topics and questions…you are not “normal” and even worse, maybe you are a “conspiracy theorist.”
To put it simply, this is a form of social engineering that uses the dynamics of high school peer pressure to force people to think and behave in certain ways in order to be accepted by their peers. If they deviate from the artificially created “norm” then they will be perceived on a subconscious level as “losers.” As simple as this form of social control is, it is very powerful because it works!
The viewer who enters this virtual reality of television news is programmed into conformity. He is bathed in a steady stream of Alpha brainwaves that are being emitted from the digital television screen, putting him in a relaxed, compliant, and receptive state of mind. On one level he is watching this virtual world of news with the attractive male and female journalists, but, subconsciously he is (in effect) lying down on a soft bed of green grass by a gently rolling and bubbling stream that carries each thought away like a bubble while a soothing voice quietly says “just let go and go with the flow…just go with the flow.”
It may seem like only moments have passed when something like a cell phone ringing, the doorbell, or a person’s voice seems to wake him up. An hour has gently slipped by, and without realizing it the viewer has entered an entirely new virtual world. He has been gently transformed, calmed, and reassured that everything is okay. The viewer now seeks out activities, friendships and even new kinds of churches that reinforce what he or she has learned in that virtual world.
Without even knowing it the viewer has turned the control over his mind and thoughts to the subliminal suggestions or affirmations of the virtual world. Before you know it the viewer has chosen to leave the world he was born in and used to struggle in for the comfort of this welcoming virtual world.
Now the process is complete. The great conflict is over. There is no more struggle between reality and ones internal thoughts and questions. There is no more sense of isolation, alienation, or rejection. You have left the cold brutal world of the empty self for a divine communion with the virtual world. You have finally been accepted and you are part of the team. Tears of joy stream down your face and you begin to sob as you look down at your emaciated body, stationed on an assembly line in a dimly lit manufacturing plant where you toil fourteen hours a day making some technological component. Your heart sings because you are no longer alone! You are one single cell that has now joined all the other cells for the great Purpose!
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
© 2014 Paul McGuire - All Rights Reserved
Paul McGuire: radio talk show host, author, feature film producer and television commentator.
Paul McGuire is the author of 22 books, such as the best-selling, The Day the Dollar Died and Are You Ready for the Microchip? Paul is the host of the syndicated television show, The Paul McGuire Report. Paul McGuire hosted the nationally syndicated talk radio show, "The Paul McGuire Show" for 10 years. Paul McGuire is a television commentator and has been a frequent guest on the Fox News Network and CNN.
Paul is the producer of two science fiction films in Hollywood. The History Channel did a 2-hour special with Paul McGuire entitled Seven Signs of the Apocalypse. Paul has interviewed numerous world leaders, Presidents and Prime Ministers. Paul lives in Los Angeles, California.
At fifteen years old, Paul was demonstrating with radical activist Abbie Hoffman and made an honorary member of the Black Panther Party. However, while studying Altered States of Consciousness at the University of Missouri, Paul had a miraculous experience hitchhiking in a remote area similar to the movie Field of Dreams. Paul re-thought his socialist and humanist world view and rejected it as completely false. Paul has devoted his life to communicating truth to people.
Website: PaulMcGuire.org
6 Examples of Media Manipulation
Is Everything in the Mainstream Media Fake?
Sigmund Fraud
Activist Post
Saturday, March 1, 2014
The world of television and modern media has become a tool of de-evolution, propaganda and social control. Since the reign of Edward Bernays and the rise of the Tavistock Institute in the early 20th century, nearly unlimited resources have been applied to understanding how to manipulate the human psyche through television and other forms of mass media.
What we have today is an increasingly sophisticated full-spectrum assault on free will and psychological well-being, and we have come to a point where it is no longer even necessary for media institutions to attempt to hide their blatant work of manipulating public opinion, manufacturing consent, and creating winners and losers in the minds of the already
brain-washed public.
Here are 6 examples where truth reveals that the impression the media is conveying to a
dumbed-down, unsuspecting public differs greatly from what is actually happening behind the scenes. By looking at these examples in a single location, it is easy to see how the mainstream media pushes ulterior motives on the public, and how important it is to be vigilant when consuming their info.
News Media Lies, Scripting, Omissions and Obfuscations
1. Time Magazine sanitizes their covers for American consumption – Time Magazine is considered a leader in national news, yet they consistently portray a dumbed-down, frivolous image of life in America while presenting an entirely different message to the rest of the world. In the two examples below, their magazine covers feature a different cover story for Americans while sending different messages to the rest of the world.

Source: Buzzfeed
2. CNN is the leader in fake war new coverage - Here are just 2 examples of how CNN has scripted and staged live war coverage to create a sense of drama and danger around people who were not in harm’s way.
Anderson Cooper fakes Syria war footage by dubbing in sound effects and playing chaotic video next to a Syrian correspondent. In the video you can see how in one tape the correspondent is in a safe environment, then you see the footage aired by CNN with dubbed in theatrical effects:
CNN Caught Staging News Segments on Syria With Actors
In this CNN clip of coverage of the first Gulf War in the 1990s, anchorman Charles Jaco makes a joke of war coverage in Saudia Arabia and demonstrates how the news is overly sensationalized for American audiences, and how hosts pretend to be in danger when they are not. At 7:00 in this clip Jaco quickly puts on a ridiculous gas mask for obvious theatrics while talking to a guest:
Manufactured ‘Reality’ TV
3. The Biggest Loser – Americans should by now already know that ‘reality shows’ are staged. The popular TV show, Biggest Loser, where overweight people compete to lose the most weight for the entertainment benefit of the rest of the world, lies about the circumstances of the training and weighing regimen of their contestants while using underhanded methods to generate phony emotional responses from their contestants.
They want the drama, the tears, the fights, the tears, the triumphs and the tears. Producers would push you to cry because that’s what makes good TV. They continually asked questions like “Do you miss your kids?” Needless to say, I broke down more than once…
Have you ever wondered how the contestants manage to lose a staggering 12 kilos in a single week? We don’t. In my series a weekly weigh-in was NEVER filmed after just one week of working out. In fact the longest gap from one weigh-in to the next was three and a half weeks. That’s 25 days between weigh-ins, not seven. -Andrew ’Cosi’ Costello, former contestant
Source: Courier Mail
It turns out that many of the so-called ‘reality’ shows are actually scripted theatrical presentations that count on the viewer’s suspension of disbelief to garner ratings. More info on the many fake ‘reality’ shows can be found here, and here.
4. Nationally scripted local ‘news’ – The comedian and talk show host Conan O’Brien has done a service for America by compiling overtly ridiculous cases of local ‘news’ broadcasts that were simultaneously repeated verbatim in dozens of markets nationwide. This is proof that you simply cannot trust the authenticity of what you are seeing on news broadcasts. Watch these stunning and blatant examples of this in the following videos:
Digital Image Manipulation is Ubiquitous in the Media
5. Manipulating Images as War Propaganda - There are many examples of how newspapers around the world photoshop images of war in order to influence public opinion. All sides in a conflict will do this as propaganda, so it is important to remember this when consuming news on international conflicts and to be alert for phonies. The images below of the recent conflict in Syria show how easily images are manipulated for the purposes of propaganda:
6. Advertising Industry ‘Touches Up’ Images of People – The practice of digitally ‘touching up’ actors and models in images and videos is an overt industry standard. Yet most people, whether they’re aware of image manipulation or not, still process television and print images on the sub-conscious level as if they were, primarily because everyone is doing it, and our bias for ‘normal’ has been socially reconstructed to adopt advertising lies as normal.
This process is demonstrated in the following video where an ordinary looking woman is transformed into a lusty beauty queen for the purposes of selling more products to consumers.
Whether for marketing or for manufacturing consent, the media industry is guilty of using subtle and not-so-subtle tactics to influence our conscious and subconscious minds to influence our opinions and behavior. There are countless other examples of these practices; and discerning, awake people would be well served to be vigilant of this when consuming modern media in any form.
You don’t have to be paranoid these days to acknowledge that you’re being lied to and that the institutions we should be able to depend on for bringing us an objective view of world are anything but objective.
Sigmund Fraud is a survivor of modern psychiatry and a dedicated mental activist. He is a staff writer for WakingTimes.com, where this first appeared. Sigmund indulges in the possibility of a massive shift towards a more psychologically aware future for mankind.
Global Ministries of Disinformation confirmed

Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project
By Doug Hagmann
Friday, February 28, 2014
It was a year ago this month that I reported information revealed by my source within the Department of Homeland Security about the existence of “cyber warriors” working for the regime of Barack Hussein Obama. The initial report was published on 6 February 2013 titled DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber warriors & preparing for collapse and detailed, according to this source, government operatives working on behalf of Obama.
According to this source, paid operatives began targeting websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts at exactly 7:00 a.m. on January 23, [2013] under an operation called “the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project.” That report, which was met with a firestorm of skepticism despite the level of detail provided, noted the activation of government shills infiltrating and attacking “problem” web sites and forums, particularly Christian, conservative, “birther” and other similar sites. In one particularly disturbing characterization ostensibly included for motivational purposes, Obama was referred to as the “Pharaoh of the internet.”
Now, over a year later, documents leaked by Edward Snowden and reported by Glenn Greenwald provide hard evidence that “Western governments” are indeed engaged in such activity. In his report dated 24 February 2014, Mr. Greenwald discloses the role of GCHQ, or Government Communication Headquarters based in the UK, from top secret, classified government documents. These documents describe the methods employed by Western intelligence agencies to “manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction.”¬† In his revealing report based on the Snowden disclosures, Mr. Greenwald explains that the targets of such marginalization are not at the nation-state level, but those who post material online that is contrary to the political interests and agendas of government.
While the revelations focus on the tactics of the UK based GCHQ, it is important to understand that intelligence between the UK and the U.S. is commonly shared to circumvent the laws that restrict U.S. intelligence agencies such as the CIA from operating domestically. The recently released authenticated documentation leaked by Snowden outlines very disturbing and controversial techniques to disseminate deception online, exactly as detailed in my report from a year ago.
These recent revelations should provide a level of verification that this activity is not merely restricted to GCHQ, but also involves a “virtual army” deployed domestically for the advancement of certain political agendas. The objectives are as numerous as they are nefarious. As the classified documents outline, government operatives are systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse.” The larger agenda is to control free speech online and to ultimately destroy any political dissent by vilifying the messengers and nullifying their messages in an Orwellian fashion.
The recent verifications that paid government operatives are actively working to provide cover to the unlawful activities of the criminal elements within rogue governments as well as the globalists should concern everyone, if not cause righteous outrage. Not only are we are being lied to about the most serious issues, past and present, but those of us who are engaged in reporting the truth are the targets of a very sophisticated, highly organized, government backed campaign of nullification and vilification.
Is it any wonder, then, why the issue of the background and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has been such a magnet for marginalization? What about the numerous “conspiracy theories” that seem to attract the most aggressive and vocal opponents when various topics are presented for intellectual discussion?
We are engaged in an information war. The truth and those who seek it exist on one side. Those who want to bury the truth, or those who are otherwise known as paid operatives employed by the intelligence communities of various Western countries, exist on the other side. The globalists have already captured and control the corporate media. Today, the battle is being waged on the internet, just as I reported one year ago this month.
Perhaps now, a year after my report, people will begin to understand the monstrous scope of the battle in which we are engaged, and the enormity of the lies that are being thrust upon us. The battle transcends any adherence to partisan politics, as it involves the common theme of a global agenda to which each party is beholden.
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
US Government Moves To Control News
Gross violation of constitutional rights
By J.D. Longstreet
First, allow me to offer this warning: Do not, for one moment, believe the FCC has backed off its CIN (Critical Information Needs) initiative. It WILL be back, in another guise, most likely as a study to determine if minority ownership of broadcast stations is at a satisfactory level. Of course, it is not—at least not in the eyes of the Democratic Party.
It has been a while in coming but, as an old retired broadcaster, I have been expecting this move by the government for a very long time. Once “The Dictator,” Obama, moved into the White House it was but a matter of time.
Ajit Pai, a commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission, was so upset about this move by the government to filter the news we get daily from the broadcast—AND—print media that he wrote an article about it for the Wall Street Journal Online. Here are HIS words:
”... The government has no place pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories.”
Commissioner Pai continues: “Last May the FCC proposed an initiative to thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country. With its “Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs,” or CIN, the agency plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run. A field test in Columbia, S.C., is scheduled to begin this spring.

How does the FCC plan to dig up all that information? First, the agency selected eight categories of “critical information” such as the “environment” and “economic opportunities,” that it believes local newscasters should cover. It plans to ask station managers, news directors, journalists, television anchors and on-air reporters to tell the government about their “news philosophy” and how the station ensures that the community gets critical information.” 

Before we go on, allow me to explain for those of you who have never been involved in the broadcast business— the FCC is basically the same to broadcasters as the IRS is to all taxpayers. Only worse. The FCC holds the life of a broadcast station in it’s hands. They can revoke the station’s license when they choose and that station, that business, is kaput!
So. Understand this: When the FCC makes a “suggestion” it is taken as a commandment from on high. If they say: Jump.” The station licensee says: “How high?” Then, without waiting for a reply, jumps as high as he can.
I was in broadcasting in one of the training areas of the FCC for nearly two decades. I had far more dealings with FCC inspectors than I ever—- ever—- wanted. Working in pairs they’d hit a station in the early morning and spend most of the day going over that station’s logs—transmitter logs, program logs, and such. The entire building became a pressure cooker during those hours.
In a training area, as we were, we knew the “new guy” was going to attempt to impress his trainer, so, we expected, and got, everything short of a body cavity search by the trainee. It was brutal.
So when the FCC says they are going to ask the station personnel to “tell the government about their news philosophy and how the station ensures that the community gets critical information.” That’s not EXACTLY how it will work. Allow me to translate that for you into the language every broadcaster knows: It means the FCC is going to tell the broadcaster that these are eight categories of critical information the licensee WILL begin covering immediately, and, I am sure, make reports to the FCC as to what was aired, when it was aired , the name of the person broadcasting the coverage, etc.. As I said above—a suggestion from the FCC is understood to be a commandment.
Commissioner Pai goes on: “Participation in the Critical Information Needs study is voluntary—in theory. Unlike the opinion surveys that Americans see on a daily basis and either answer or not, as they wish, the FCC’s queries may be hard for the broadcasters to ignore. They would be out of business without an FCC license, which must be renewed every eight years.”
The democrats have been trying to reestablish the old Fairness Doctrine which shackled broadcasters for decades—dating back to 1949. The FCC stopped enforcing the policy in 1987 and finally took it off the books in 2011. There had been scads of lawsuits filed by broadcasters and broadcasting associations pleading that the Fairness Doctrine did not serve the public interest and did, indeed, infringe upon freedom of the press. What it DID do was cause a lot of dial turning as people switched stations to get away from the dry public affairs topics and banal discussions of topics they hadn’t the slightest interest in.
You may remember that near the beginning of this piece, I noted that this policy would affect both the broadcast and the PRINT media. Note please: the PRINT media. The FCC has no control over the print media, only the broadcast media. So, if this is just a fact finding incursion into the broadcast newsrooms, then what, pray tell, is a broadcast regulation agency doing in a newspaper newsroom?
No. There is more here, dear reader, than meets the eye. It is, I believe, the first step in the government take over of the news organizations in America. The government bureaucrat dreams of control of the press. THAT’S where this is all headed.
This is, in my opinion, a violation of the First Amendment. But it doesn’t matter. The Obama Regime has already completely trashed the constitution.
If the FCC is allowed to carry through with this plan, it will not be long before government monitors will take up residence in newsrooms all across America and every piece of script, every article of news for print, will be approved or disapproved by them! America’s free press will be dead. 
I would hope this would be a wake-up call for the liberal media in America. We have warned for many, many, decades that the progressive Marxists they (the liberal media) run interference for, for which they shuck and jive on a daily basis, once in control of the government would come after them—FIRST! They didn’t believe us. I suspect they will not believe it when those government “minders” take up positions in their newsrooms and dictate to them the news they will—and will not—broadcast or print.
This is another glaring reason we need to clean out the US Senate in November and put a conservative in the Oval Office in 2016. As long as a Democrat occupies the Oval Office, the Democratic Party will have control of the FCC. That’s the way it works. Control changes with the party in the Oval office.
In the meantime, I intend to speak with my Congressman and insist that he do what he can to stop this government takeover of America’s newsrooms.
I think Byron York of the Washington Examiner summed it up best. He said: “If the FCC goes forward, it’s not clear what will happen to news organizations that fall short of the new government standards. Perhaps they will be disciplined. Or perhaps the very threat of investigating their methods will nudge them into compliance with the administration’s journalistic agenda. What is sure is that it will be a gross violation of constitutional rights.”
Longstreet is a conservative Southern American (A native sandlapper and an adopted Tar Heel) with a deep passion for the history, heritage, and culture of the southern states of America. At the same time he is a deeply loyal American believing strongly in “America First”.
He is a thirty-year veteran of the broadcasting business, as an “in the field” and “on-air” news reporter (contributing to radio, TV, and newspapers) and a conservative broadcast commentator.
Longstreet is a veteran of the US Army and US Army Reserve. He is a member of the American Legion and the Sons of Confederate Veterans. A lifelong Christian, Longstreet subscribes to “old Lutheranism” to express and exercise his faith.
Other articles by Longstreet are posted at “Omega Dispatch
What Facebook is really all about!
CIA's 'Facebook' Program Dramatically Cut Agency's Costs
Truth About Facebook!  
The financial history of Facebook
Thoughts On Piers Morgan, Alec Baldwin, Jay Leno, Mel Gibson, the National Media and Political Correctness

By Chuck Baldwin
February 27, 2014
It is being widely reported that CNN is ending Piers Morgan’s prime time television program. Here is how the story is covered in The New York Times:
“There have been times when the CNN host Piers Morgan didn’t seem to like America very much--and American audiences have been more than willing to return the favor. Three years after taking over for Larry King, Mr. Morgan has seen the ratings for ‘Piers Morgan Live’ hit some new lows, drawing a fraction of viewers compared with competitors at Fox News and MSNBC.
“It’s been an unhappy collision between a British television personality who refuses to assimilate--the only football he cares about is round and his lectures on guns were rife with contempt--and a CNN audience that is intrinsically provincial. After all, the people who tune into a cable news network are, by their nature, deeply interested in America.
“CNN’s president, Jeffrey Zucker, has other problems, but none bigger than Mr. Morgan and his plum 9 p.m. time slot. Mr. Morgan said last week that he and Mr. Zucker had been talking about the show’s failure to connect and had decided to pull the plug, probably in March.”

See the Times report: Piers Morgan And CNN Plan End To His Prime-Time ShowWhat I am about to say, I rarely, if ever, say about anyone--even those folks with whom I vehemently disagree. I’ve never allowed myself to let my portion of the public debate get personal. But in the case of Piers Morgan, I am willfully backsliding.
Piers Morgan is an oaf of the highest order. He is a boorish braggart, a wanna-be tyrant, and an overall pompous ass. It was British snobs like Piers Morgan that incited the Colonists to revolt. Just looking at Morgan--as he smugly peered down his nose at us freedom-loving Americans--made me want to go to war with Great Britain all over again.
Now it appears that Piers Morgan will be off the airwaves soon--at least during primetime on CNN. All I can say is GOOD RIDDANCE. I also find it amusing that while Piers Morgan is riding off into the sunset, Alex Jones continues to broadcast all over the place. The Colonists won again. Oohrah!
My comments on Alec Baldwin are going to be much softer (to the surprise of some folks). But if
regular readers will think about it, they have not seen me say a whole lot--one way or another--about entertainers--although I did inform my Facebook followers that I am going to miss Jay Leno.
To read my frequent posts, just “Like” my Facebook page
In my opinion, Jay Leno was a cut above the rest of the late night television talk show hosts. For one thing, Jay and his wife have been married for over thirty years--and there has been no hint of a sexual dalliance. What a rarity that is among celebrities. Jay doesn’t drink alcohol or smoke. While his jokes were sometimes crude, I never heard one that was irreverent to the things of Christianity or faith in general--unlike his CBS counterpart, David Letterman, whose personal and stage life are both filled with filth.
Leno was also the most fair and balanced comedian on late night television. He dished it out to Barack Obama and liberal Democrats as much as he did to G.W. Bush and conservative Republicans. He even dished it out to his host network, NBC. Plus, he seemed to genuinely respect Congressman Ron Paul; and Ron was a guest on Jay’s “Tonight Show” more than once.

See this Breitbart.com report on Jay Leno: Goodnight, Jay: Leno Last Fair, Balanced Late Night Host
It seems that NBC executives have had it in their minds to get rid of Leno for quite a while. As you recall, they tried once before, replacing Leno with Conan O’Brien--which was a miserable failure. Now, NBC has truly pulled the trigger and replaced Jay with the likeable and funny (albeit a man who possesses a patented liberal bias, which will reveal itself more and more as he continues hosting “The Tonight Show”) Jimmy Fallon. I can’t help but believe that Leno truly incensed the network brass at NBC with his objectivity and balanced joke-telling. The media and entertainment industry leaders in this country are as about as close to a jihad mentality as you will find in America.
Normally, I don’t spend much time discussing the entertainment industry, because entertainers are--well, entertainers. It has been a long, long time since the American people expected much of anything in terms of honor and character from its movie stars. In fact, most of today’s movie star groupies don’t even know the names of such movie giants as Roy Rogers, Gene Autry, and Clayton Moore. And while there are still several clean and wholesome men and women in the movie and entertainment industries, the media would far rather keep us up-to-date on the morally shipwrecked Justin Bieber and Miley Cyrus than point the spotlight on those talents that might actually provide the American people with a role model.
Yes, everyone knows Alec Baldwin is a liberal; everyone knows he had a loud and angry shouting match over the phone with his daughter during which he said some very cruel and hurtful things; and everyone knows he has been a strong supporter, financially and otherwise, of the Democrat Party. But is there anything in the above that wouldn’t apply to the vast majority of Hollywood entertainers? For that matter, I know of a lot of professing Christians who have a host of personal and family issues, not to mention being supporters of a plethora of organizations that are equally sinister and problematic. The only difference is, they are not
famous and, therefore, nobody knows or cares about it.
Alec Baldwin (no relation to this writer) recently wrote a column that initially appeared in the February 24, 2014, edition of New York Magazine. In his remarks, he gave a very honest and trenchant analysis of the corrupt and ethically-bankrupt national media.
Remember, Alec Baldwin wrote as an entertainment insider. He is one of the most successful movie stars in the world. He is a liberal. He knows the media and entertainment worlds as well as anyone. No matter. The media and entertainment elite are treating Alec Baldwin like he is public enemy number one. And to many of these folks, he is.
MSNBC dumped him; friends abandoned him; and reporters and photographers have done their best to destroy him. Why? What did Alec Baldwin do to incur the wrath of all of these folks--people who have readily recognized him to be one of the outstanding talents in the industry? Why did they turn on him? Because Alec Baldwin didn’t bow down to the god of political-correctness.
In the politically-correct temple, in which the media and entertainment elite worship, one does not dare say anything--even of a personal nature--that could be construed as being uncomplimentary of certain people who are considered untouchable. In the politically-correct world of the media and entertainment elite, anyone who is an African-American, Jew, or homosexual is absolutely out-of-bounds and may not be touched. Anyone else is fair game. To criticize or condemn a white guy, a Christian, or a heterosexual is not only admissible, but to do so only enhances one’s credibility and popularity with these worshippers of political correctness. It seems that the media elite have forgotten the words of their hero, Martin Luther King, Jr., who said, “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” If the media elite truly believe that people are to be judged as individuals--regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation--how is it that political correctness can even exist? How is it that certain entertainers are singled out to be pilloried and ostracized?
For example, take a look at Mel Gibson. Without a doubt, Mel Gibson is one of the most successful Hollywood actors of all time. His accomplishments on the silver screen are legendary. But the media and entertainment elite now consider Gibson to be damaged goods. For the most part, they won’t touch him. What he has done of late, he has produced himself. Fortunately, for him, he has the resources to do this. Few in Hollywood have his resources.
Gibson’s troubles began when he refused to apologize to a group of homosexuals who were offended at a scene in his blockbuster movie, “Braveheart.” Then there was Mel Gibson’s production of the most politically-incorrect movie of all, “The Passion of The Christ,” which was very much a reverent and respectful (and, yes, graphic) portrayal of Christ’s death on the cross. (I suppose the only other film that could be regarded as more politically-incorrect than “The Passion of The Christ” would be Ron Maxwell’s masterpiece, “Gods and Generals,” starring Stephen Lang as General Thomas Jonathan “Stonewall” Jackson. In my opinion, Lang should have received an Oscar for his performance. It was outstanding!) And the nail in the coffin (proverbially speaking) was when Gibson was supposedly drunk and, when in the custody of a police officer, went into an anti-Jewish rant. That was it. Mel Gibson had touched the “third rail.” Of course, had Mel gone into an anti-Christian rant, no one within the media or entertainment elite would have thought one thing about it.
For sure, Alec Baldwin always spoke his mind--and many times Alec was his own worst enemy. No doubt about it. But when Alec tore into a tirade in which what he said could be interpreted (wrongly) as being anti-gay, Alec had also touched the “third rail.” That was it. Alec Baldwin is now being compared to Mel Gibson; and the media elite are doing everything they can to ruin the man.
Baldwin’s column shines the light of day on the sinister, shadowy world of America’s national media. The national media is more than biased; it is more than liberal; it is more than Big Government. The national media is obsessed with political correctness. At the highest levels, they are evangelists of the ministry of propaganda, and they relish their role as Grand Inquisitors.
I caution readers: Alec Baldwin’s column contains no small usage of profanity. But it also reveals an even greater vulgarity: the blatant wickedness of a dishonest and dastardly national media. And, unfortunately, there is not a major network or major media outlet (including the so-called “conservative” FOX News) that is exempt from the dark side of this dragon.
Yes, in typical liberal fashion, Baldwin rants against conservative outlets such as Breitbart.com, but he also torches liberal icons such as Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper along with media opportunists such as Joe Scarborough.
Alec Baldwin has gotten a taste of the harsh realities of political correctness. He has, no doubt, grown up in liberalism and knows little else. However, it would appear that Alec Baldwin has a degree of honesty about him and is willing to call a spade a spade (as he understands it) even when his fellow liberals are in the crosshairs. I think he is reachable with the truth. I am praying for him.
Read Alec Baldwin’s column: Alec Baldwin: Good-Bye, Public Life
Piers Morgan deserved to get sacked. No one wants someone from a foreign country looking down their nose at them and telling them how stupid they are. My personal opinion is Jay Leno was not, and will not be, equaled as a late night television comic. I believe he is genuine--a rarity in entertainment. Mel Gibson is one of my all-time favorite actors. His movies, “Braveheart,” “The Patriot,” and “Conspiracy Theory” are especially outstanding. I believe Mel is among a small handful in Hollywood who truly understands the New World Order and is vehemently opposed to it. Alec Baldwin has never been one of my favorite actors, although I do honestly acknowledge his extraordinary talent. Obviously, I do not share hardly any of his political views. However, Alec Baldwin, like Mel Gibson, is the victim of an out-of-control media jihad that intends to cut the head off of anyone who will not bow the knee to their god of political correctness.
If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
© 2014 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved
Chuck Baldwin is a syndicated columnist, radio broadcaster, author, and pastor dedicated to preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded. He was the 2008 Presidential candidate for the Constitution Party. He and his wife, Connie, have 3 children and 8 grandchildren. Chuck and his family reside in the Flathead Valley of Montana. See Chuck's complete bio here.
Yes, There Are Paid Government Trolls On Social Media, Blogs, Forums And Websites
By Michael Snyder
February 26th, 2014
Do you want solid proof that paid government shills are targeting websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts? For years, many have suspected that government trolls have been systematically causing havoc all over the Internet, but proving it has been difficult. But now thanks to documents leaked by Edward Snowden and revealed by Glenn Greenwald, we finally have hard evidence that western governments have been doing this. As you will see below, a UK intelligence outfit known as the Government Communications Headquarters, through a previously secret unit known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group, has been systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse”. This should be deeply disturbing to anyone that values free speech on the Internet.
It isn’t just that the British government is trying to influence what people are thinking. The reality is that this is far bigger than a mere propaganda campaign. As Greenwald recently noted on his new website, the “integrity of the Internet itself” is at stake…
By publishing these stories one by one, our NBC reporting highlighted some of the key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses. But, here, I want to focus and elaborate on the overarching point revealed by all of these documents: namely, that these agencies are attempting to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse, and in doing so, are compromising the integrity of the internet itself.
So what techniques are the British using to control and manipulate discourse on the Internet? According to Greenwald, the documents that Snowden has uncovered show that they are willing to sink to despicable lows in order to get the results that they desire…
Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.
The following is a list of Internet infiltration techniques that were listed on one particular slide that Snowden leaked…
-Infiltration Operation
-Ruse Operation
-Set Piece Operation
-False Flag Operation
-False Rescue Operation
-Disruption Operation
-Sting Operation
You can check out this slide for yourself right here.
There is also evidence that the Canadian government has been involved in this sort of thing as well. The following comes from Natural News
You’ve probably run into them before — those seemingly random antagonizers who always end up diverting the conversation in an online chat room or article comment section away from the issue at hand, and towards a much different agenda. Hot-button issues like illegal immigration, the two-party political system, the “war on terror” and even alternative medicine are among the most common targets of such attackers, known as internet “trolls” or “shills,” who in many cases are nothing more than paid lackeys hired by the federal government and other international organizations to sway and ultimately control public opinion.
Several years ago, Canada’s CTV News aired a short segment about how its own government had been exposed for hiring secret agents to monitor social media and track online conversations, as well as the activities of certain dissenting individuals. This report, which in obvious whitewashing language referred to such activities as the government simply “weighing in and correcting” allegedly false information posted online, basically admitted that the Canadian government had assumed the role of secret online police.
You can see a video news report about this activity up in Canada right here.
Are you disturbed yet?
You should be.
So what kind of people are the governments of the western world targeting online?
Well, when it comes to the U.S. government, all you have to do is to look at their official documents to see who they consider the “problems” to be. For much more on this, please see my previous article entitled “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“.
Sadly, the reality of the matter is that the days of the free and open Internet are numbered. The governments of the world are increasing their control over the Internet with each passing day, and eventually a time will likely come when we will not be able to communicate openly like this any longer.
Sadly, the reality of the matter is that the days of the free and open Internet are numbered. The governments of the world are increasing their control over the Internet with each passing day, and eventually a time will likely come when we will not be able to communicate openly like this any longer.
Things have gotten so bad in the U.S. already that even Google is spooked
A recent court decision that endorsed a broad view of the Federal Communications Commission’s authority over the Internet has Google and other Web companies nervous.
In closed-door meetings with regulators and Capitol Hill staff, Google’s lawyers have said they’re worried how the FCC may use its newfound powers, according to multiple people familiar with the meetings.
The extent of the FCC’s authority over Google and other Web services remains unclear, and the current FCC has given no indication that it is interested in pushing aggressive new regulations. But the possibility that the commission could begin telling Google how to organize its search results or handle its users’ data is enough to spook the company’s army of Washington lobbyists.
And this is just the beginning.
If you think that the control freaks that are running things now are bad, just wait until you see the next generation of control freaks.
For example, there is one prominent student writer at Harvard that apparently believes that free speech at her university should be abolished and that any professor that does not advocate for her politically-correct version of “justice” should be fired
A student writer at Harvard University is raising eyebrows after publishing her belief that free speech on campus should be abolished and professors with opposing views be fired.
Sandra Korn, a senior who writes a column for the Harvard Crimson newspaper, thinks radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy, and the First Amendment only hinders colleges from brainwashing students with her viewpoint.
“Let’s give up on academic freedom in favor of justice,” states the subtitle of her Feb. 18 column, in which she insists Harvard stop guaranteeing students and professors the right to hold controversial views and conduct research putting liberalism in a negative light.
“If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals?” Korn asks.
This is what control freaks always want.
They always want to shut down those that are presenting opposing views.
They don’t believe in free speech and a “marketplace of ideas”. Rather, they believe in shoving what they believe down the rest of our throats.
And now we have solid proof that the governments of the western world are paying people to manipulate discourse on social media, blogs, forums and websites.
So will there be great outrage over this, or will the apathetic public just roll over and ignore this like they have so many other times the past few years?
The Rise of Robot Journalists and the World Brain: Beware of the Media Industrial Complex
By Paul McGuire
February 25, 2014
Much of the news we hear is totally Orwellian in its content. It is delivered by “robot journalists,” both conservative and liberal, who deliver the official party line or propaganda, like the “newspeak” in George Orwell’s Big Brother state.
Although there are still a few free thinking and independent journalists, most of the others could be human-like robots resembling the technology portrayed in the movie Her. In an Independent article dated February 24, 2014, “Robots will be smarter than us all by 2029,” Google Artificial Intelligence expert Ray Kurzweil comments:
By 2029, computers will be able to understand our language, learn from experience and outsmart even the most intelligent humans.
The article goes on to say:
One of the world’s leading futurologists and artificial intelligence (AI) developers, 66-year-old Kurzweil has previous form in making accurate predictions about the way technology is heading.
Since many radio and television personalities do little more than read from an approved script via teleprompter, eventually they will be replaced by computer generated and artificially intelligent human looking Androids or clones like a robot version of Google’s Siri or Microsoft’s Cortana.
Since these “journalists” already have synthetic or programmed personalities the next step, replacing them with human-like robots is simply evolutionary, and they will require no pay or benefits. Most of media today is controlled not in an overt sense, but a covert one.
The most important thing in understanding the covert nature of the Orwellian mass media is not the news that they cover; it’s understanding the news they do not cover. In America today the concern about “Freedom of the Press” is quickly becoming irrelevant. While public concern is focused on the Constitutional right of “Freedom of the Press” the greater danger comes from how the media has been covertly controlled through managing the free flow of information. Certainly, “Freedom of the Press” is a key concern, but the real threat to that freedom is about who controls the content and decides what is newsworthy and what is not.

The very fact that major news organizations and media personalities choose to ignore or downplay serious news stories creates the greatest form of censorship. Perhaps the most important case in point would be the elephant in the living room, the complete media blackout of reporting regarding the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve Act, signed by President Woodrow Wilson in 1913, essentially turned our entire monetary system over to an independent cartel of international banking families. Yet you will never hear, see, or read an in-depth and detailed news media coverage of the most important financial institution in our nation. It is impossible to understand anything that has to do with our economy, debt, budgets, inflation, recession, global finance, jobs, outsourcing, and the U.S. dollar without a thorough understanding of the Federal Reserve System.
I have been on countless major cable television news programs where I have been in debates with the editors of the leading financial publications, economists and politicians. Although I have heard quick references to the nature of the “Fed,” explained in almost coded language, the topic is simply off-limits and the vast majority of Americans have no idea what the Federal Reserve System is. In fact, most believe it is part of our federal government because it uses the term “federal.”In researching this article, I visited the New York Times’ “Topics” page on the Federal Reserve, dated Sunday February 23, 2014. Feel free to review it for yourself.
After reviewing the various articles, I could find no clear and historically based reporting that would even minimally explain what the Federal Reserve is and what its function is. The New York Times linked to the Federal Reserve website, which appeared to be a hallmark to non-disclosure! After all if there is nothing to hide, then why the glaring lack of simple, honest and straight forward explanation about what the Federal Reserve is?
All you have to do is visit the Federal Reserve website for yourself and read classic Orwellian “Doublespeak.”
On the Federal Reserve website is a link to a page entitled “The Structure of the Federal Reserve System.” The information printed on these pages does provide legal information and some history on the Federal Reserve System. But in my opinion is it very disingenuous and lacks real transparency. On the right hand side of the page it states “On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve System which serves as the nation’s central bank, was created by an act of Congress.” This is a partial truth which implies that our elected representatives actually did their job and voted for something the people wanted. In reality, our elected representatives, both Republican and Democrat, were serving their corporate masters, as the Federal Reserve Act was pushed by both parties using different names and voted on late at night right before Christmas while the nation was not paying attention.
The information that is given on the Federal Reserve website and the reporting of the New York Times is something out of H.G. Wells’ “World Brain,” which has evolved into a global computer using Super Artificial Intelligence and tells us what to think in a top down manner in what some have called the American Matrix. The next step in this technology is a computer-brain interface using some kind of microchip implant that will become mandatory. This new “World Brain” controlled by the Thought Police has redefined the reality of the Federal Reserve, using a linguistic Artificial Reality. The Orwellian media completely omits that the Federal Reserve System is precisely the kind of central bank that our Founding Fathers like Thomas Jefferson and
numerous U.S. Presidents and political leaders opposed. In fact, President Woodrow Wilson who signed the Federal Reserve Act into law, said this after signing it,
“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men… We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world, no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government of conviction, and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
Through “World Brain” historical revisionism the truth of what Woodrow Wilson said has been erased and replaced with a new artificial reality about history.Whoever controls the money controls the nation! James Rothschild of the Rothschild banking family, which used its enormous power to push forward the Federal Reserve System, said: “The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class. The great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending its tremendous advantages, will bear its burden without complaint, and perhaps without even understanding the system is inimical to their own interests.” -Rothschild Brothers of London 1863.
Once you grasp what James Rothschild was saying you will understand everything that is going on. It is all one giant masquerade ball and occult orgy like the one depicted in director Stanley Kubrick’s Eye Wide Shut before he mysteriously died. There is practically no such thing as conservative or liberal political candidates. There is almost no difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. There is only one “Party” and that is the Party of George Orwell. Almost all the conservative media pundits, radio talk show hosts and television personalities are bought men and women! With few exceptions there is almost no difference between your favorite conservative media personality and Michael Moore. These robot journalists either know the truth and choose to conceal it or they are under a form of scientific mind control where they have been given a certain amount of compartmentalized information. I deal with this in my book A Prophecy of the Future of America with full documentation.
There are notable exceptions to be sure, men and women who work within this system and are doing what they can to communicate the truth and the same goes for the political parties, both Democratic and Republican. But don’t kid yourself… there is a reason why no matter who the President is, Democrat or Republican, they all follow many of the same marching orders.
This is the reason why! Just ten mega corporations control everything you buy and think. During the last few decades 90% of the media has been controlled by just six major corporations! In 1983, the media was controlled by around 50 corporations.
But where it gets really nasty is that 37 banks have now merged to become just four banks: JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citi Group.
The interlocking directorates and financial interests which control the money control all the flow of information in our society, constituting a media industrial complex. With the exception of a small number of independently owned media organizations and the Internet we no longer have a free media and the free flow of news information, ideas, and truly divergent points of view. We have a corporate controlled media whose primary job is to perpetuate the illusion of America vs. the reality of America.
There are millions of people who believe that we have conservative radio talk show hosts, libertarian hosts, and liberal talk show hosts. This belief is a complete illusion. In addition, the Orwellian media industrial complex is now fully diversified; they own some of your favorite alternative media people and Internet-based news sources.
#The ordinary American has become programmed, and most Americans, to varying degrees, are in a trance state. As such they cannot see the obvious. However, people who have made the conscious effort to become aware have trained their perceptive abilities to see through the American matrix. Although there are many religious people in America, they no longer read their Bibles and therefore they are cut off from the source of truth. People who are easily programmed are people who do not possess an internal belief system built on truth. Truth is never just theological or spiritual. There is economic truth, social truth, scientific truth, and historical truth. What separates robots from free human beings is their love for and commitment to the truth.
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
© 2014 Paul McGuire - All Rights Reserved
Paul McGuire: radio talk show host, author, feature film producer and television commentator.
Paul McGuire is the author of 22 books, such as the best-selling, The Day the Dollar Died and Are You Ready for the Microchip? Paul is the host of the syndicated television show, The Paul McGuire Report. Paul McGuire hosted the nationally syndicated talk radio show, "The Paul McGuire Show" for 10 years. Paul McGuire is a television commentator and has been a frequent guest on the Fox News Network and CNN.
Paul is the producer of two science fiction films in Hollywood. The History Channel did a 2-hour special with Paul McGuire entitled Seven Signs of the Apocalypse. Paul has interviewed numerous world leaders, Presidents and Prime Ministers. Paul lives in Los Angeles, California.
At fifteen years old, Paul was demonstrating with radical activist Abbie Hoffman and made an honorary member of the Black Panther Party. However, while studying Altered States of Consciousness at the University of Missouri, Paul had a miraculous experience hitchhiking in a remote area similar to the movie Field of Dreams. Paul re-thought his socialist and humanist world view and rejected it as completely false. Paul has devoted his life to communicating truth to people.Website: PaulMcGuire.org
E-Mail: newmediavoice@aol.com
America’s Trojan Horse
By Betty Freauf
February 25, 2014
On 2/13/2014 Glenn Beck radio show he was telling about how the highest ranking official who ever defected from the Soviet Union landed in the U.S. It was on July 20, 1978 when the U.S. Military Plane landed at Andrew Air Force Base with this gentleman on board. He fell down on his knees and prayed out loud for the first time in more than a quarter of century and expressed great joy and gave thanks to the good Lord for this country. His book DISINFORMATION, co-authored with Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa tells what it was like to live under Communism. Fearing he’ll be killed, the man is still in hiding.
A short time before this Beck radio program, I’d been sent a transcript from 1948 called “Confessions of Stalin’s Agents” by Kenneth Goff. At the end it noted that Goff was assassinated.
Typographical and other obvious errors suggests the transcript was perhaps taken from an audio tape. However, the information seems credible as he explains how the Soviets have planned its revolution against Christianity and Capitalism and constant class warfare. On page 21 he explains how for years the Communist Party had concentrated their propaganda on the Negro population of the U.S. and robbing them of their religion. This helps to explain the Civil Rights Movement and how Martin Luther King was used. The homosexual movement has since hijacked the Civil Rights movement.


In fact, the Trojan Horse chapter says every Communist rides the Trojan Horse and the Kremlin expects to eventually gain control of the world by infiltrating, intimidating and taking over important organizations in every country to assist in WORLDWIDE GLOBAL unrest. Now we learn the FCC will be sending contractors into all communication outlets to check to see if journalists are reporting only the government propaganda. It sounds like they are after FOX news and other conservative radio talk shows and Rush Limbaugh on 2/21/2014 reported it is the Annenberg School of Journalism and the University of Wisconsin School of Journalism requesting this. Please go to p. 24 of the Confessions of Stalin’s Agents” where it says, Joe Stalin… with instructions to send… reports directly to the Kremlin. This instantly elevated our Wisconsin leader to a place of supreme importance in the thinking of all American comrades.
The Democrat administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt elected in 1932 was extremely beneficial. Our nation was being propagandized in favor of Communism from the White House down.
Mrs. Roosevelt, with whom Hillary Clinton communicates spiritually, was entertaining officials of the Young Communist League in the White House and Party members were being given posts in the Army, the Navy, the State Department and other branches of the national government. The Committee on Un-American Activities investigating the Communist movement in America was under bitter attacks. In the early 1950 Senator Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis) whipped fear into frenzy, charging that Communists occupied high-ranking positions in the State Department and other government agencies.
Then there is another book, THE ENEMIES WITHIN; COMMUNISTS, SOCIALISTS AND PROGRESSIVES IN THE U.S. CONGRESS by Trevor Loudon, who I met when I was asked to be one of a number of proof readers for his other book: BARACK OBAMA AND THE ENEMIES WITHIN.
On April 11, 2012, Representative Allen west (R-Fla) was asked by a man at a town hall meeting in Palm City, Florida, “What percentage of the American legislature do you think are card carrying Marxists or International Socialists?” West emphatically responded, “There’s about 78 or 81 members of the Democrat Party that are members of the Communist Party.” When pressed for names, West replied, “It’s called the Congressional Progressive Caucus.” In a usual well-trained response, leftist forces promulgated by the media took considerable derision to the congressman’s initial remarks, labeling him an “extremist” and accusing him of McCarthyism. The Left’s witch-hunt and constant smearing ultimately left West without a job, losing in that year’s election to a Democrat. Media pandemonium aside, a thorough investigation into Congressman West’s stunning accusations remained lacking, until now when Loudon’s book, ENEMIES WITHIN was published.
His 688-page book reads like a who’s who of the radical Marxist Left in Congress. Loudon identifies who the players are, the groups they are associated with and how they wield influence, including how they penetrated labor unions and the Democrat Party. Loudon reveals the connections between those in Congress who sponsored socialist-inspired legislation and the various Marxist or Marxist-led organizations who guide them.[1]


Like decades before Congressman West, Senator Joseph McCarthy eventually was stripped of his power and influence. Nationally televised hearings, during which he accused the U.S. Army of being soft on Communism, exposed his tactics and wrecked his image. Media coverage of anti-war demonstrations was overall deficient because of the failure to emphasize the central role played in the Washington protests by an openly Communist group, the Workers World Party. Key Party leaders were strategically placed in Hollywood, the media and education where the youth could be indoctrinated at an early age.


A great article in the 2/3/2014 NEW AMERICAN said if we don’t control the culture, the culture will control us. The Left understands this. This is why Hunter Madsen and Marshall Kirk, authors of AFTER THE BALL: HOW AMERICA WILL CONQUER ITS FEAR AND HATRED OF GAYS IN THE 90’s called for a desensitization of Americans to homosexuality via a “continuous flood of gay-related advertising, “ a “conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.” It is why the Left continuously pushes its various agendas via the media, popular culture and academia.
Conservatives should not gloat over the Duck Dynasty victory and A&E network backing down, because the battle isn’t over. And it is because the Left understands this that it seems to take conservatives out of the culture-marketing game with ploys such as “tolerance” a “concept whose proper appreciation is rarely understood. For awhile tolerance is viewed as ever and always a virtue but more often today it is a vice. The late Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen wrote in 1931, “an attitude of reasoned patience toward evil, and a forbearance that restrains us from showing anger or inflicting punishment. He who tolerates evil when he could terminate it becomes an accomplice”[1]


While well orchestrated, within days after the Duck Dynasty story, 19-year old freshman kicker for once Christian Willamette University, Salem, Oregon came out as bisexual. Instead of ignoring it completely or putting it on the Sports Page, it was front page coverage and drew many criticism Letters to the Editor. Shortly thereafter some NFL player came out of the closet. Even an ”Everybody Loves Raymond” T.V. rerun had an episode about whether Ray’s policeman brother was gay because he had trouble keeping girlfriends. At this point, it should be noted that #26 of the 45 goals for the communist takeover of America is to present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”


The pagan Romans viewed their festivals as good and thus labeled the early Christians, who would not participate in them, as “haters of humanity.” And what are those who espouse Christian morality often called today?” “Haters![1] This results in more class struggles causing a dilemma and placing parents between a rock and hard place when rebellious children step out of the will of God and while they want to love and support their children at the same time they know that “normal, natural and healthy (AIDs)” is wrong. Goal #40 of the Communist goals is to discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. A Feb. 20, 2014 USA Today article entitled “Secret Sites Fuel ‘Alarming’ Increase in Child Porn” in the last five years. Last year was a record for arrests of sex exploitation suspects: 7,286 but that is only the tip of the iceberg. Later in the article it says that number is dwarfed by an estimated 50,000 people in the U.S. who are believed to be “consistently trading illegal images” involving children at any time, says Brad Russ, who oversees federally funded training programs for hundreds of investigators assigned to the national task forces.
Isa. 28:13 says as the people lapse into apostasy in any age, it becomes increasingly difficult to impart spiritual truth. Let’s look at the states that are selling their souls to the Devil by approving the marijuana industry. This “revenue” helps the depleted budgets. This agenda started out as a “medical” need but has morphed to attract a bunch of lazy and lethargic souls using pot ready to be conquered by the enemy on any given day. Maybe the “crock” is winding down. Goal #41 emphasizes the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children as suppressive influence of parents.


It says there is nothing mysterious about the way Communists operate. They have an international program which is applied with minimum variation in each country. Christianity and democratic governments are their natural foes. (We have a Constitutional Republic) Mainline newspapers and Hollywood likewise contribute.
The Communist formula for the conquest of the U.S.A. during the hegemony of the Soviet Union was, “Eternal Encirclement plus internal demoralization, plus thermonuclear blackmail, lead to progressive surrender.” The exact orders given in 1935 by the head of the Comintern (Communist International) was they would not tolerate double-crossing. Those who learn its secrets and turn against the leaders are usually “liquidated.” Of course, the legend of the Trojan Horse takes us back to ancient Greece to the powerful city called Troy that was destroyed from the inside. Think America!
V.I. Lenin, first ruthless dictator of Communism, laid down a plan in 1921 that is the final program to conquer America for world government. First, he said, “We will take E. Europe. Second we will take the masses of Asia; then we will surround the U.S. and it will fall like a ripe fruit into our hands.” Mexico has been Socialist for years. All of the Central & South Americans now have Socialist presidents or leaders. Fidel Castro and his brother worked with the KGB spy agency five years before taking power in the 1959 revolution in Cuba.
After eight years of the FDR administration and his New Deal boondoggle, unemployment was running rampant and enormous debt as well so FDR decided if he could figure out a way for America to enter the war, the unemployment picture would improve; however, he completely forgot wars cost money and the debt goes up. After all Soviet agent Henry Kissinger said
military men are “dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy?”
When Roosevelt failed to provoke Hitler into committing overt acts of war against American vessels, Roosevelt turned his efforts to the Pacific and the Japanese, to bait them into attacking the United States. Provoking a Japanese attack also provided a back-door strategy to U.S. entry into the war in Europe because of Japan’s alliance with Hitler. Charles Lindbergh who was widely christened “The Lone Eagle” following his pioneer 1927 transatlantic solo flight in the “Spirit of St. Louis” discerning the gathering dangers to the nation began a series of radio broadcasts and public speeches in September 1939 against America’s involvement in yet another European war. However, once again in response to Lindbergh’s opposition to the president’s unconstitutional aggressive policies, Roosevelt loosed all but the hounds of hell on him and the media accused him of being an “isolationist.”[2]
So Roosevelt once again without the consent of Congress, placed the U.S. Pacific Fleet in Hawaii, an isolated outpost thousands of miles toward Japan from the American mainland. Admiral James O. Richardson, commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, immediately recognized the jeopardy in which this move placed the fleet and protested so strongly to Roosevelt that the president fired him. In October 16, 1941 Republican Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, a staunch internationalist and member of the world-government promoting Council on Foreign Relations, wrote in his diary: “We face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move – overt move.” Translation: how to maneuver the Japanese into firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves.
The latest war in Afghanistan finds after 10 years and $500 billion nation-building in a land of tribes and warlords with no cultural tradition of central authority was a mistake. The Soviets have never relinquished the idea of establishing a Communist dictatorship throughout the world. We must hope and pray Obama doesn’t use our unemployment to find an excuse to enter another war which will be, no doubt, World War III.
1. 2/3/2014 New American magazine
2. 1/20/2014 New American magazine FDR vs. Linbergh: Setting the Record Straight
© 2014 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved
Betty is a former Oregon Republican party activist having served as state party secretary, county chairman, 5th congressional vice chairman and then elected chairman, and a precinct worker for many years but Betty gave up on the two-party system in 2004.
Betty is a researcher specializing in education, a freelance journalist and a regular contributor to www.NewsWithViews.com
Let's Recognize Aaron Swartz's Martyrdom
By Richard Evans
February 24, 2014
The Death of Aaron Swartz & the Information Age
Aaron Swartz's murder will prove in vain as long as it's ruled a suicide.
Suicides can't be martyrs, that's common sense.
"The world is divided into three kinds of people: A very small group that makes things happen; a somewhat larger group that watches things happen; and a great multitude that never knows what has happened." -- Nicholas Murray Butler
Aaron was among the first small group. The people who make things happen.
Aaron Swartz was one of the very few prime movers in the field of internet information. He'd just started high school when he co-authored "RSS" ("really simple syndication") feed format that everybody uses to be notified of information of interest to them.
When you see give a moment of silence for Aaron Swartz.
Born in 1986, he grew up on the internet. His dad, Robert was a MIT Internet guru. " My main reaction was being excited about it. Part of what made it magical was finding other people to connect with and the more people there were the more interesting pages there were to find. I mean, you would search for stuff and most of the time nothing would come back 'cause there were only a handful people writing stuff for the internet. I remember having to open the phone book and having to dial a place up and saying 'how late are you open'? Then suddenly you just type in their domain name and it tells you everything you need to know".
Compare his way of thinking with the sleazy Mark Zuckerberg in 2010 when asked to explain why Facebook suddenly unlocked millions of members privacy settings without warning them. "We decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it."
Facebook is largely a rip-off (or at least knockoff) of the good social networking features developed by Swartz for Reddit, such as the thumb's up feature for ranking viewer response to open posts - except Reddit has a thumb's down feature, not just an 'unlike'.
More importantly, Reddit didn't mine your data to make NSA profiles of you, your relatives and friends.
Aaron Swartz said, "Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves. The world's entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? You'll need to pay enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier."
What we really mean by Information Age is the recent period in history during which all the information accumulated on all previous media has suddenly become available to everyone. Aaron recognized the fact that instant communication with unlimited numbers of people over infinite distance has an exponential effect on human creativity. He also knew it only works if it's free. Richard Stallman said it best, "think of free speech, not free beer".
Aaron's argument was that you can't apply intellectual property rights to digital information, because it flows like speech. If we have a conversation and we can't repeat something we read or heard on television without being arrested, then conversation itself would be impossible. It's not the same thing as printing pirated copies of a book that's under copyright and for sale. He wasn't defending privacy. SOPA used 'piracy' as an excuse to hold bloggers liable for things like quoting the New York Times, etc.
In an industry where real activism has been considered dead since 2008, Aaron was just getting started.
F**K THE GUARDIAN CLASS Lord Bertrand Russell described the New World Order in which the 'white coat priesthood' would be Plato's Guardian class:
"On those rare occasions when a boy or girl who has passed the age at which it is usual to determine social status shows such marked ability as to seem the intellectual equal of the rulers, a difficult situation will arise, requiring serious consideration. If the youth is content to abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers, he may, after suitable tests, be promoted, but if he shows any regrettable solidarity with his previous associates, the rulers will reluctantly conclude that there is nothing to be done with him except to send him to the lethal chamber before his ill-disciplined intelligence has had time to spread revolt. This will be a painful duty to the rulers, but I think they will not shrink from performing it." The Scientific Outlook, Chapter XV, 'Education in a Scientific Society'

Aaron Swartz was one of those "rare occasions" that Lord Russell and "the rulers" dread. He was supposed to become distracted by the wealth his innovations gained and forget about the "cultural heritage of centuries" and everybody else. He was supposed to "abandon his previous associates and to throw in his lot whole-heartedly with the rulers". He didn't. He found his calling in organizing the first real grass roots campaign to defeat a "must be" bill on Capitol Hill. That wasn't supposed to happen.
It was Aaron's girlfriend Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman who first found him dead in their Brooklyn apartment. Her first blog on Tumblr said he "was not showing by symptoms of depression. At Aaron's funeral, his father, Robert Swartz, told mourners Aaron was "killed by the government."
Robert Swartz works for MIT and therefore had to retract his "conspiracy theories" about his son's death. As a practical matter, knowing his son was murdered probably intimidated Robert even more than losing his position at MIT. Taren's later statements show the process of trying to make sense of what happened. She went from saying "I don't know exactly why Aaron killed himself" to rationalizing. Maybe it was "a persecution and a prosecution that had already drained all of his financial resources."
And finally she believed he was pushed to suicide by "a system where incentives and power structures align for prosecutors to destroy the life of an innovator like Aaron in the pursuit of their own ambitions."
Aaron, "It's not over yet. It's up to you."
WAS AARON THE SORT WHO WOULD HANG HIMSELF IN 'DESPERATION'? We need to start a controversy about whether people believe it or not. That's what Aaron would do.
(Left: Aaron with Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman) Because his death will prove in vain as long as he's ruled a suicide. Suicides can't be martyrs, that's common sense. Our manipulators always turn movements into a private joke to mock the victims.
If a controversy on the matter got going maybe people who knew him would start to question it too. Lies are self-reinforcing like 911 - the more people invest into believing the lie, the harder it gets to see through it.
In June 2013, Aaron Swartz was inducted posthumously into the 'Internet Hall of Fame' in the category of "innovators", alongside GNU founder Richard Stillman, and Wikipedia front man Jimmy Wales. Such awards say a lot about the 'Hollywood-ization' of Silicon Valley. While Richard Stillman and Aaron Swartz are actual innovators, Wales is a front man - like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates.
From the Documentary "War for the Web" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OhyBJxg9RA#t=7
REMEMBER AARON SWARTZ official website
Also by Richard Evans- Was Aaron Swartz Murdered?
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com
Also See:
The Media is Controled by Mega-Corporations!
(Part 1)
31 July 2013
(Part 2)
19 December 2013
Manchurian Candidate - Is It for Real?
20 September 2011
Social Engineering - Really?
28 May 2011
Are You a Victim of Mind Control?
(Part 1)
21 September 2007
(Part 2)
03 June 2013
What Really Happened at the Boston Marathon?
22 April 2013
Silenced by Execution, FBI Responsible!
31 May 2013
What's Not Being Told About Newtown, Sandy Hook Elementary School?
(Part 1)
19 December 2012
(Part 2)