Wednesday, February 05, 2014

Will Obama Be Impeached? (Part 2)

Impeachment: The obvious answer to Obama dictatorship
Exclusive: Tom Tancredo on how BHO's executive orders differ from previous presidents'
Tom Tancredo
14 February 2014
The case for impeaching and removing President Obama grows stronger each week, as the president continues to violate the constitutional limits on his executive powers. His latest move in delaying the enforcement of yet another part of Obamacare should be article 20 in a bill of indictable offenses against the Constitution.
Citizens of all persuasions and parties should take encouragement in the fact that impeachment is fast becoming a respectable topic of debate even in the mainstream media. Of course, it is usually discussed with the disclaimer that it is a practical impossibility with Democrats in control of the Senate.
That Beltway conventional wisdom will soon change as Republican control of the Senate in 2015 becomes increasingly likely. But what Republicans do not yet understand is that the call for impeachment can be a winning issue in gaining control of the Senate in the November elections.
The rising tide of public opposition to Obamacare may soon be reinforced by a rising tide of demand for Obama’s removal before he can do any more damage to our liberties and our national security. In fact, the steady decline in Obama’s approval rating – now at about 39 percent – is due as much to the growing public awareness of his arrogant disregard for the Constitution as it is to disillusionment with Obamacare.
His actions in defiance of constitutional limits have become so numerous and brazen that chronicling them has become a cottage industry. The use of executive orders to circumvent Congress can no longer be called an occasional breach of faith. His abuse of power has become so frequent and brazen that it is becoming recognized as the trademark of his presidency.
And that is why it must not be tolerated. How often do we hear from the left that Americans must not be “good Germans” and remain silent in the face of oppressive laws? What about obedience to dictatorial edicts?
Allowing such unconstitutional acts to be accepted as routine, as “just part of the Obama landscape,” is tantamount to accepting the inevitability of dictatorship in America. Citizens must oppose those actions vigorously and persistently, and that begins with a call for impeachment.
The defense we hear for Obama’s actions is that “all presidents have used executive orders to advance their policies,” and that Obama has issued fewer executive orders in his first five years than Reagan did. That argument is a straw man distraction from the real issue.
Executive orders are legitimate when confined to legitimate areas of executive discretion and administrative implementation of the law. They are NOT legitimate as a way of making new laws, and that is where Obama is radically different from other presidents.
Obama uses executive orders – and sometimes administrative decrees issued by his Cabinet officers or their subordinates – not to implement laws but to create new law, which is a power given to Congress by the Constitution. Allowing Obama to continue doing this with impunity is an invitation to disaster for our constitutional democracy.
Obama has engaged in this dictatorial behavior not two or three times but at least 18 times. It is a pattern, not an occasional thing.
The two most outrageous examples are his unilateral – and ongoing – rewriting of the Affordable Care Act, which everyone knows as Obamacare, and his order to the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency in June of 2012 to implement the “Deferred Action on deportations” program for illegal aliens.
What makes the “Deferred Action” program so brazen an act outside his constitutional powers is that Congress had in December of 2011 voted to reject the so-called “Dream Act.” Thus, in this case, Obama did not act in the absence of congressional action, he acted in defiance of congressional action. Obama simply declared it the law of the land by unilateral, administrative decree. Contrary to media reports, he did not sign an executive order; he merely ordered it done by a junior appointee in the Department of Homeland Security.
Obama has also acted in defiance of Congress in several instances on national security matters, such as his refusal to halt military aid to Egypt despite a congressional resolution to suspend that aid. Those actions can legitimately be added to a bill of indictment, but his many illegal actions on domestic policy are more easily understood by the public.
It is quite possible, even likely, that when all the facts are known, Obama or persons acting on his orders will be shown to have committed criminal offenses in covering up two scandals – the IRS harassment of conservative nonprofit organizations and the coverup of his own role in the Benghazi fiasco.
It is time for the Republican leadership to conduct an “intervention” for a president who has become addicted to dictatorial behavior. Let’s stop being the enablers through silence for unconstitutional acts.
Media wishing to interview Tom Tancredo, please contact
Impeachment is Appropriate: Open Letter to Congress
By Attorney Michael Peroutka
February 5, 2014
Leading up to the January 28th State of the Union Speech, Barack Obama and his spokesmen made statements to the effect that he plans to use his pen to sign executive orders to enact law on his own authority. He says he will do this because, in his view, Congress has not, or will not, pass certain legislation that he desires.

Based on this bald assertion of prerogative by Obama, articles of impeachment should be filed against him immediately. And I am calling on my Congressman, Representative Andy Harris of Maryland, to do just that. I urge you to do the same with regard to your own representative in Congress. In fact, you might send this short video to your Congressman along with your request that he impeach Barack Obama.
Let’s talk about the legal reasoning for this?
The very first sentence of the Constitution (after the preamble) begins with the word “all.”
Before we go any further, let’s just define this term. Can we agree that the word “all” means, well…“all”?
Now, the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land, and here’s what that first sentence says in its entirety:
“All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
With this sentence in mind let me ask a question.
If all law making authority is vested in Congress, then how much is left over for the executive branch?
Asked another way: How can a president make law when only the legislative branch has that power?
The fact is he cannot.
And when an elected official threatens to act outside his constitutional authority, he is inviting and deserving of impeachment and removal from office.
So I am asking Representative Harris, along with all other members of Congress, who, of course, have sworn an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, to impeach Barack Obama. 
Barack Obama has identified himself as an enemy of the Constitution by declaring his intention to violate it.
Learn more about your Constitution with Michael Anthony Peroutka and his “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.
© 2014 Michael Peroutka - All Rights Reserved
Michael Anthony Peroutka Esq. is a former Presidential candidate and co-founder of Institute on the Constitution (IOTC) an educational outreach of his law firm that presents the founders “American View” of law and government. IOTC has produced thousands of graduates in all 50 states with a full understanding of the Biblical principles on which those founding documents are based.
Michael is a graduate of Loyola College and the University of Baltimore School of Law.
"Email ":
Twitter: @theamericanview
Website: Constitution IOTC

Mainstream Liberals Now Calling for Obama Impeachment
Obama Pushes and the People Punt
By Ron Ewart
February 5, 2014
"To sin by silence when they should protest, makes cowards of men." —Ella Wheeler Wilcox, American Author and Poet, 1850 - 1919
What in the Hell is the matter with Americans? Are they so docile and compliant that they would let an oversized bully push them around? Americans didn't used to be that way. The bully didn't push us around years ago. When someone pushed, we pushed back because that is the natural instinct of all life, except maybe in humans who have been conditioned to be pushovers by their government. Why do we let government push as around now?
What has changed?
We don't let nations push us around, so why do the people let their own government push them around? And boy has the government been pushing us around lately, especially since a glib Chicago con man showed up on the scene and started pushing the American people around as if he were King. A man professing to be King in America should be impeached, or run out of town on a rail. Did you see that disgusting "I am King - Bow To Me" speech a week ago?
What has happened to us? The IRS tramples all over the American Citizen's constitutional rights of due process with questionable law to back them up and the people have capitulated for 100 years. Obama and the Democrats shove Obama Care down the people's throats, strip them of their insurance, raise their insurance premiums and deductibles and the people, like little bo peep, roll over and sign up on Health The government wastes billions upon billions of our tax dollars due to fraud, abuse, corruption and criminal negligence and the people punt! Why!
Obama, his administration and the Democrats are complicit in the scandals of Obama Care, Benghazi, the IRS and NSA snooping and the people are glued to their television sets, or texting worthless trivia on their Iphones, all across the fruited plain, oblivious to the camouflaged slavery trap that has been laid for them by their government.
Obama says in so many words that he is King and he is going to use his pen to make law, in direct violation of Article I, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution. No one challenges him, not even the Congress, much less the people. Where are the American people in the face of this blatant drive to absolute power by the man who wants to be King?
Ladies and gentlemen, in its history there is evidence all over America of people saying enough is enough and pushing back against government tyranny, corruption and little tin Gods. One such push back occurred in a little town in Tennessee in 1946. Another took place a little more recently on Independence Day 2000 in a little town near Elko, Nevada on the Jarbidge River. The first push back was called the Battle of Athens. The second was called the Jarbidge Shovel Brigade. In the first case, a bunch of returning Veterans from World War II pushed back and corruption was silenced, at least for a while. The federal government was told to shove off in the second. In the first case, the town's people had to resort to violence because the corruption had gotten so bad. In the second case, the town's people showed up in large numbers from all over America with shovels raised at the ready, forcing the government to retreat. That's right! A bunch of Americans with shovels sent the federal government packing. Perhaps we are using the wrong weapons against government tyranny and should take a page out of the Jarbidge Shovel Brigade playbook.
Corruption in Tennessee is nothing new and it is still going on. Just ask Navy Lt. Cmdr. Walter Fitzpatrick. He'll tell you a story of corruption in Monroe County, TN, that will curl your hair and he had to go to jail to prove it. Even today he's still fighting to restore his reputation from those that smeared and trashed him with the sole purpose of silencing him by fear, intimidation and yes, illegal incarceration because he dared to expose them.
But our story of the people pushing back goes back to a time right after the end of World War II when 15,000,000 soldiers were repatriated in their own country, a country for which they fought so bravely and paid so much. When they came home, they were greeted with accolades and parades in every small and large town and county in America. But in one small town in Tennessee, their welcome home was far from what they had expected. Although this story has been told many times, it bears repeating in light of where America finds herself today and the tyranny and corruption that has infected most of her institutions, including government at all levels, her courts, academia, her public schools and the news media.
In the late 1930's and early 40's, McMinn County, Tennessee was notorious for its corruption and voter fraud. The local sheriff at the time, one Paul Cantrell, having been elected three times by the people, decided he would be King of the County and started a racket where he and his deputies would be paid a fee for every arrest they made. They sometimes would stop a bus going through town and charge some of the passengers with public drunkeness and arrest them. They lined their pockets for a fair the well and manipulated the vote to stay in power. The people in the town lived in fear of Cantrell and his henchmen.
Corruption and voter fraud were well known by the FEDS at the time and the Justice Department, you know the one that corrupt Eric Holder runs now, investigated McMinn County, but no charges were ever filed against Cantrell or his deputies.
Returning veterans were also aware of Cantrell's racket and corruption and ran 5 candidates at the local election in August of 1946. The Vet's campaign slogan was a "fraud-free election." Needless to say Cantrell and his men were not about to go down without a fight and a fight they got. On the other hand these returning vets were returning from war, where high adrenaline and violence were a daily part of their lives. They weren't about to be pushed around by some pot-bellied sheriff who thought he owned the town.
The vote was August 1, 1946. Over 200 armed guards were placed around the polling places. With only 15 deputies under sheriff Cantrell, he had to bring guards in from surrounding counties. A black man was assaulted and then shot at one of the polling places by one of the deputies. The deputy ultimately went to jail for 3 years.
When the polls closed the deputies seized the ballots and took them to the jail. The jailhouse was barricaded and defended by 55 deputies. The veterans, very familiar with guns from the war, armed themselves from the local armory and descended on the jailhouse. Estimates of the number of armed veterans besieging the jailhouse ranged from 200 to 2,000. The veterans demanded the ballot boxes but sheriff Cantrell refused. Riots broke out across the town with most of the damage being inflicted on police cars. The veterans opened fire on the jailhouse and ultimately dynamited the jailhouse door. In any event, the veterans recovered the ballot boxes and after a "fraud free" count, 5 veteran candidates replaced the corrupt ones. The gambling and liquor houses, owned and operated by the sheriff and his deputies, were raided and closed down. (source: Battle of Athens (1946))
Please take note that the corruption in Athens, Tennessee would have never been stopped with nice words. In almost every case, the only thing that will stop corruption and vice, which is violence by its very nature, is violence challenging violence. Corruption in the hands of those that carry the guns is violence on the people. Government, by definition is force. Force, or the threat of force against the people, is violence. We are not advocating violence at this point in America's history because there are still peaceful ways to root out the corruption, that is if enough Americans are up to the task.
Jarbidge is a little town of about 50 people, some 100 miles northeast of the town of Elko, Nevada and is nestled deep in the Humbolt National Forest, near the Nevada's northern border with Idaho. The Jarbidge river flows by the little town. The town is serviced by a long narrow road and is accessed off of Nevada State Route 51 from Elko. The people of Jarbidge weren't bothering anybody but they were about to be "bothered" by the federal government and an environmental group, Trouts Unlimited. You see the Jarbidge River contains bull trout and the environmentalists and the government decided that the bull trout were endangered and needed to be protected. One way to protect them was to declare the river a protected habitat and to close off the access road to the river. Now the county owned the road, but granted a right to the forest service to maintain it as needed. The forest service intentionally closed the road by dumping tons of rock and debris on it. Part of the rock and debris was one giant bolder in the middle of the road. The forest service refused to remove the rock and the bolder and open the road. Enter the people of Jarbidge, Nevada.
On July 4, 2000 the people of Jarbidge and a whole host of other citizens from all around America, numbering around 5,000, took on the forest service and joined the town of Jarbidge to open the road with their shovels. Most of the 5,000 or so were from Nevada and adjoining states, but some came in caravans from as far away as New York, Maine, Florida and the Carolinas. With their shovels and even their bare hands they cleared the road of all of the rock, debris and the giant bolder. The forest service and Trouts Unlimited, even though trying to stop the people of Jarbidge from opening the road, had to capitulate to the town's people and went away. (source: WND)
Once again, the people rose up and the people won. They were not about to be pushed around by a bunch of high-paid bureaucrats in Washington DC and a wealthy environmental group that thought they could throw their weight around and con some "ignorant" rural landowners into giving up their land. How wrong they were.
Ladies and gentlemen, progressives, liberals, or Democrats, whatever you choose to call them and those that follow their radical socialist and environmental ideology, are running scared. They have been exposed for what they are; anti-American, anti-freedom, anti-free markets, anti-property rights and anti-constitution. Obama, Obama Care and the Democrats in Congress exposed themselves. They are vulnerable. Quit punting and go get 'em! Being nice won't eliminate corruption or socialism, as the people of Athens TN found out.
If the Republicans won't do the job, "esplain" it to them in no uncertain terms so that they will. If the Republicans take the House and the Senate in 2014, lobby both Houses of Congress to impeach the President. This lawless president needs to be impeached before he can do any more damage. It's your free America ladies and gentlemen that is if you care to keep it free.
This author has come to the conclusion that big events, like civil unrest, massive uprisings, revolutions, or civil war tend to come in their own time. It takes a catalyst or a great leader to trigger an uprising. So far the catalyst or the leader haven't happened ….. yet! But it will. The pot is warming rapidly and it's getting hotter by the day ..... thanks to Obama and the Democrats. Those that cherish freedom and there are millions of us, are not about to go quietly into the night, or "punt when Obama or the government pushes." Do you need a platform on which to stand, then read our "18 Basic Principles for America". Are you with us, or are you just kicking the tires?
Are you fighting the IRS? Check out our information-rich website HERE. Who knows, you might just find what you need.
© 2014 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved
Ron Ewart, a nationally known author and speaker on freedom and property issues and author of his weekly column, "In Defense of Rural America", is the President of the National Association of Rural Landowners, (NARLO) a non-profit corporation headquartered in Washington State and dedicated to restoring, maintaining and defending property rights for urban and rural landowners. Mr. Ewart can be reached by e-mail.
Fox News Makes Up for State of the Union Disaster
Bloviating with ‘O-Blame-A’:
By Judi McLeod
Monday, February 3, 2014
Fox News Corp. and President Barack Obama have something in common: Both believe their popularity allows them to continue to con their audience.
In the lucrative pretend world that politics and cable television networks play to, the world becomes their oyster.
Last night’s well-touted spar between garrulous O’Reilly and Obama had all the makings of a wrestling match with both wrestlers bouncing rubber-like off the ropes—all show but no headlocks.
If anything, Fox viewers should now seriously consider what Fox is presenting as ‘real news’.
“Prior to the interview, O’Reilly told Fox’s Megyn Kelly that he was “not nervous”.
With presumed questions already submitted and the fix long in, who needs to be nervous when all you have to do is just follow the script?
"He is not a bad guy. I think people misread him,” he said. “However, my interview this time is going to be very precise”. (HuffPost, Feb. 3, 2014).
“He is not a bad guy”? Obama’s the guy that’s inflicting real pain on real people with ObamaCare during the unasked for and unwanted Constitution-killing Fundamental Transformation of America.
And for “However, my interview this time is going to be very precise”. This time? LOL, shouldn’t all interviews be precise?
A very precise question many are now asking about Fox News: Why grant to Obama a pre-Super Bowl ‘interview’ at the end of the same week when only 11% of Americans watched the pathetic State of The Union Address?
Was the only allegedly right-of-center television network helping the president make up for massive SOTU lost opportunity? Was last night’s prime time Obama interview a way for Fox to ensure its future in the cable television network lineup?
Correctly predicting the “lies, lies and more lies”, millions of Americans deliberately tuned out on SOTU, switching channels the moment they saw Barack Obama.
Fox News lives on ratings. Obama lives on low-information voters. Could a deal between both parties have been made to boost their oxygen source?
Canada Free Press (CFP) is “not nervous” to ponder.
Slice it and dice it, but Fox News gave Obama the perfect opportunity of ducking controversies a dysfunctional White House believes have already been settled. What a requiem for the four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, left to die in the 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Anyone could predict that Obama, who is ringmaster ‘O-blame-a’ when it comes to who’s at fault for what he calls some “boneheaded decisions” from his regime, that the current White House Artful Dodger would blame Fox News for spreading the wrong kind of news.
In ‘O-Blame-A’s’ own words: “These kinds of things keep on surfacing in part because you and your TV station will promote them.”
Many would argue correctly that the news of the day is spread in equal parts on the masses by both Fox News and the White House.
“They’re coming to take your guns; they’re coming to take you away”...
If Fox News is really “fair and balanced”, why did it grant to Obama an interview that aired before the NFL’s SuperBowl—the most-viewed sports event in the United States of America?
Many who tuned in for the big game were attracted by creative commercials like the Budweiser one where a lovable puppy who can’t stay away from the big boys in the horse barn ends leading the horses back to their stalls.
Meanwhile, Budweiser’s adorable puppy is closer to reality than either bloviating Bill or the made-for-television, suck-’em-in-on-prime-time Barack ‘O-Blame-a’.
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh,, Drudge Report,, and Glenn Beck.Judi can be emailed at:
Also See:
Will Obama Be Impeached?
(Part 1)
16 January 2013
 Enough Already - Time for Impeachment!!
15 December 2007