Sunday, April 19, 2015

Will Hillary Run For President?

The Hillary Enigma
I suggest that Hillary ceases to be an enigma if you just think of the Wellesley student who thought the best topic for her senior thesis was the book by a dedicated Communist, Saul Alinsky
AuthorBy Alan Caruba
May 28, 2015
Does it strike anyone as strange that the only candidate for the Democratic Party’s nomination to be the next President of the United States is the wife of a former President? There is no historic precedent for this, no way to measure this against how Americans have selected Presidents in the past.
Like most Americans, I first took notice of her when Bill began his campaign to become President. I recall being struck by the fact that in 1969 as a student at Wellesley College, her 92-page senior thesis was devoted to the community organizer, Saul Alinsky’s book. The title of the thesis was “There is Only the Fight…”: An Analysis of the Alinski Model.” She would request Wellesley to deny access to it.
Alinksy was a Communist. His twelve rules for radicals, unlike the Ten Commandments, are devoid of a moral message. Instead, the message is “this is how you can win.”  Hillary would do well to review Rule 7, “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”  She was already old news when she announced her candidacy and it is becoming older with every passing day as she fails to take questions from the media, participating in totally staged events to look like “one of the people.”
She and Bill are not one of the people. They, like the Bushes, are political royalty. They have both been around a very long time.
Hillary, however, despite the millions of words that have been written about and by her remains an enigma. Other than being farther to the Left than Bill, she is a woman whose “achievements” in life have largely been the result of having married Bill. She would spend eight years in the White House as the First Lady and, pursuing her college dreams of political power, they would move to New York State where she ran and won a Senatorial election.
There isn’t a single Senate bill that she introduced or that is credited to her
There isn’t a single Senate bill that she introduced or that is credited to her. She is said to have worked hard and gotten along well with her colleagues, but her Senate years are a blur in her public life. Then she made a bid to be the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate in 2008 and along came Barack Hussein Obama with whom the voters fell in love. When he was elected, he asked her to become his Secretary of State.
With the exception of the Benghazi tragedy on September 11, 2012, a clear failure of judgment and duty, and about which she lied, her years as Secretary of State reflect her years in the Senate; nothing of any significance resulted, no major treaties, no major anything, except for one more scandal.
So the question remains; who is Hillary Rodham Clinton? What are her fundamental principles beyond the acquisition of political power? And money. Lots of it while uttering nonsense such as she and Bill being “dead broke” when they left office?
What are we to make of her deletions of thousands of emails on her private server—something she was not supposed to use as Secretary of State—and her assertion that those we may never see were of no importance? They’re important if, as is widely believed, foreign governments hacked her private email server and thus had access to information about policies affecting themselves and others. She may not have broken a law, but she surely did not obey Obama White House policy regarding the emails.
Alinski’s Rule 1 is “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have. Power is derived from two main sources—money and people.”
You cannot buy trust and the polls indicate that is seeping away
We are told that Hillary has a huge amount of money with which to wage a campaign to become the first woman President. In light of the revelations about the Clinton Foundations, virtual slush funds, and the millions earned by her and Bill to give speeches, there is little doubt of that.
You cannot, however, buy trust and the polls indicate that is seeping away.
Her die-hard supporters probably know as little about her as the rest of us, but it is their trust she is depending on right now. Should she actually receive the Democratic Party’s nomination, the distrust of independent voters, disaffected Democrats, and of course Republicans, will play a crucial role in who is elected in 2016. It is not likely to be Hillary Clinton.
It is not likely because, as we have already seen, she seems to have reached a point where her political abilities have grown tired and out-of-date. These are not the 1990s. A whole generation has been born since Bill was President.
Like her, the Democratic Party seems tired as well. Can you believe there is not another Democrat, a Governor or Senator who could emerge to represent the Party? How devoid of any real leadership has the Democratic Party become if the only candidate they can offer is a former First Lady? That has been her primary claim to fame despite the two offices she has held since the 1990s.
I suggest that Hillary ceases to be an enigma if you just think of the Wellesley student who thought the best topic for her senior thesis was the book by a dedicated Communist, Saul Alinsky.
© Alan Caruba, 2015
A Contentious Woman
By Donna Wasson
April 28, 2015
"These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood, an heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief, a false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren." Proverbs 6:16-19 (KJV)
America's National Gas-Bag has once again broken wind. Hillary Clinton, the former First "Lady," the former Secretary of State; the woman who has never accomplished anything noteworthy in her entire political career; who's convinced she is above the law and traded the rights to much of America's uranium to Russia in exchange for huge contributions to her "charitable" organization, spoke today at the 6th Annual Women in the World Summit at the Lincoln Center.
It's already exhaustingly apparent we can now look forward to a year and a half of her and her brainless acolytes screeching "sexism" every time her views or record are challenged. At least we can get some relief from the accusation of being "racist" when we disagree with Captain Tee-Time and his lapdog, Eric Holder.
The Hildabeast, as I will now refer to her, called for an overhaul of America's "religious beliefs" so that women can have access to birth control, abortion and women's health care. I'm not sure what parallel universe she inhabits, but every woman in this country already HAS access to those things, ad nauseum.
She brayed "More to the point, deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed" to give women full access to "reproductive health care and save childbirth." Funny, but I don't recall hearing of any woman here being forced to give birth in some vacant lot or desert wilderness!
She continued "Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and, not just for women, but for everyone - and not just in faraway countries, but right here in the United States."
Huh?! Oh great and mighty Hildabeast, what aspects of American society are females kept from participating in? As a woman myself, I can't think of one job or opportunity I'm excluded from. The federal government already backs up equal-rights laws with OUR money and political will. This vacuous blather is typical Hillary. Steel yourself for the coming avalanche.
WND reports she slammed Hobby Lobby for its legal battle over the Obamacare mandate, which would have forced the Christian-owned company to provide its employees "with contraception coverage." This is a blatant lie. Hobby Lobby had no problem covering contraceptives. They objected to being forced by the government to provide abortifacients.
She howled "There are those who offer themselves as leaders…who see nothing wrong witth denying women equal pay, who offer themselves as leaders who would de-fund the country's leading provider of family planning and want to let health insurance companies once again charge women just because of our gender." Hilariously, this is from the same woman who paid her female staff 72 cents for every dollar paid to males.
She finds it outrageous that some of us don't appreciate having the government use our hard-earned tax dollars to fund free abortions and subsidize the slaughter houses of Planned Parenthood, a eugenics program originally designed to eradicate the black race.
The screeching feminazi's like Hillary think there's something wrong with people who believe in the old maxim, "If you want to dance in the kitchen, you have to pay the piper"; A/K/A, if you're promiscuous and get yourself knocked up with an unwanted pregnancy, WE don't want to be forced to participate in the murder of that innocent life.
That's right. We strenuously object to being forced by the government at gunpoint to pay for the poor choices of those who are too stupid or lazy to utilize the free contraception that's available to them, that we already pay for! Deal with it. It's called 'personal responsibility.' Look it up. Study it.
Perhaps someone in the political arena will advise the presidential-hopeful who sports more testosterone than her husband, to stick a sock in it! We're already tired of her.
© 2015 Donna Wasson - All Rights Reserved
Donna, a sinner saved by grace, awaiting her Bridegroom. A married mom, Hospice RN and owner of 2 dogs, 1 obese cat and a bearded dragon. Beware! She is unabashedly politically INcorrect and unafraid to speak the truth.
Hillary: Deep-seated religious beliefs have to change so there can be more abortions
Aw . . . get the kids!
By Dan Calabrese -- Bio and Archives 
April 27, 2015

Do you oppose abortion because you believe God views all life - including that of the unborn - as sacred and deserving of protection? Well you’d better change that belief! Hillary Clinton thinks its a problem. We need to have more abortions, you see, and that’s not going to happen if you keep clinging to the same religious beliefs you’ve held up to now.
So give it up, suckers. The queen-in-waiting has spoken:
"Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will," she explained. "And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed."
Yeah, she really said that, at the Women in the World Summit, whatever that is:

Hillary Clinton's keynote address at the 2015 Women in the World Summit

I will just remind you that this is a woman who claims no book has influenced her more than the Bible. Of course, she also claims she didn’t trade favors for cash when she was Secretary of State, and that she made exclusive use of a personal e-mail server so she would only have to carry one device - even though she carried two. And she claims she learned how to turn $1,000 into $100,000 trading cattle futures by reading the Wall Street Journal. And she claims . . . OK, I think you get the idea.
I don’t suppose it’s Earth-shaking news that one of the most self-involved and dishonest people to stain the political scene in decades has little use for people’s deep-seated religious beliefs. People of faith don’t tend to vote for her in very large numbers so why even maintain the illusion of being a Christian? The left is culturally predisposed to cheer attacks on Christianity, and they’d really like it if she would give them a reason to get behind her. All she’s done lately is claim on the one hand that the so-called 1 percent needs to be "toppled" while simultaneously demonstrating to everyone that she and her husband are the epitome of it.
By the way, how exactly is it that women in the United States are "denied access to reproductive health care and safe child birth"? Abortion is legal in all 50 states, and has been since 1973. No hospital can turn a woman away for any reason if she shows up in labor and needs assistance delivering her baby. Am I missing something here? Are rabid Christians blocking the entrances to doctor’s office and emergency rooms when pregnant women show up to give birth?
The only people who stand in the way of safe childbirth are the abortion champions who can’t stand it when any fetus sees the light of day still breathing. Apparently these are the people Hillary not only wants to court, but wants to challenge the very underpinnings of the Bible in order to please.
Perhaps Hillary could check with God and see if He would mind changing His principles so more babies can die. While she’s at it, maybe she could ask Him if He would also bend the rules so she and Bill can take bribes without having people ask so many nitpicky questions about it. He could always say no. Then again, He already did, which is exasperating Hillary to no end.
Hillary dodges influence-peddling questions - can’t understand why you’re talking about it
Even MSNBC recognizes how pathetic it is.
Hillary Clinton is right about one thing. Everyone is talking about her. We’ve been told, for about 15 years, that she would someday be President.
In 2008, she was the "inevitable" choice who would defeat the always-unelectable John McCain. Then, she was trounced by an experience-free newcomer with a modicum of charm and an interesting narrative. Now that he’s leaving office Hillary is, once again, inevitable. She’s been called the smartest woman in the world, she’s the odds-on favorite to win the Democrat nomination, and yet her supporters are incapable of naming a single tangible achievement from her time as First Lady, Senator, and Secretary of State.
Still, however much they wish it wasn’t the case, she’s the libs’ top dog. So, yeah. People are talking.
On rare occasion, a reporter might even get close enough to ask her a legitimate question like:
"Your reaction please to these book allegations. Did foreign entities receive any special treatment for making any kind of donations to the Clinton Foundation or your husband?"

...And disastrous answers like the one below aren’t helping her.
First of all, we’ll answer her question. If we weren’t talking about Hillary, we’d be talking about whoever the next-in-line "inevitable" left-wing statist candidate was. As it is, Republicans are talking about Hillary because she’s the only candidate the Dems have managed to produce. That’s how this works. Politically minded people talk about their opponents. When the GOP frontrunners emerge, we’ll talk about them, too. We’ve already spent a good deal of time on Scott Walker and Rand Paul. More will follow.
In the meantime, let’s talk about Hillary’s dodge. It’s absolutely one of the most hollow, rhetorically-empty, campaign moments we’ve ever seen.
"They’re saying I sold influence at the State Department for cash? Golly! Why are they talking about me? I’m just little old Hillary!"
The lack of a substantive answer is duly noted - and not just by conservatives. Even the lefties at MSNBC are talking about her refusal to come clean.

In other words, it’s time to attack the messenger because he’s making uncomfortable allegations about the woman who is - so far - the Dems solitary, meager, 2016 hope.
Of course Hillary doesn’t want her opponents talking about her. She’s had a ridiculously bad campaign launch, is mired in scandal and criminal accusations, and is trying to grab the political brass ring after four decades of provable lies.
Her problem is that - clowns like David Brock aside - even her allies can’t find any real reason to elect her…
Will the Real Hillary Clinton Please Stand Up?
By Attorney Jonathan Emord
Author of "The Rise of Tyranny" and "Global Censorship of Health Information" and "Restore The Republic"
April 20, 2015
Whether you are a Democrat, Republican, or Independent, you should be troubled by the fact that Hillary Clinton in each campaign has remade herself fundamentally, adopting a new persona each time in an effort to capture the changing electorate. True, all candidates hone their messages, but Hillary’s transformations are radical make-overs. Given the number of iterations of Hillary Clinton over the years, we really should ask: Will the real Hillary Clinton please stand up?
Since leaving the White House as First Lady, Hillary has amassed a very large fortune. Hillary’s world is far different from the typical American’s. That would not be a problem were she to own up to that fact, but she chooses to obscure that reality. Consider, by contrast, the Kennedys. Democrats Jack, Robert, and Ted never hid their family’s opulence and, instead, actually harbored intellectual values and ran for office predicated on well-defined liberal values. While I do not agree with the Kennedy’s political creed, I nevertheless respect them for having one that was intellectually developed and not bereft of foundational substance. The same cannot be said for Hillary. There is no well-developed intellectual foundation for each of Hillary’s positions, no explanation of her core beliefs and how her public service has been consistent in its advancement of those core beliefs.
Hillary is a liberal Democrat, but she has always avoided any clear articulation of her policy positions on a host of key issues. Her present run endeavors to make her out to be more of a centrist than she has been in the past. She has a very narrow group of elites advising her, but she is desperately trying to fashion herself as a populist, as every man, fully appreciative of what it is like to work a 9 to 5 job for a minimum wage. She feigns familiarity with the common struggles of those in the service industry, who work in fast food restaurants, convenience stores, grocery stores, hotels and shopping malls, but her lifestyle is that of a jet setter and her society is with national and international figures.
This duplicity is rather transparent, so one wonders why she thinks the public so fickle or ignorant that it will buy into her latest remake. There is in the latest remake a rather disturbing condescension. By not projecting an image of herself that is, well, herself, and by choosing instead to feign fraternity (sorority?) with the common man, Hillary is in fact preying upon what she perceives to be the ignorance of those who receive her. In other words, she thinks the average Joe and Josephine will accept her as a populist with intimate knowledge of their needs and interests and not view her as an elitist out of touch with their daily travails.
The fact is, however, virtually every Joe and Josephine knows Hillary is not at all like them. She comes from privilege, having been First Lady and having amassed a fortune since the old days in the Arkansas Governor’s mansion with Bill. There is nothing wrong with wealth in a capitalist society, of course, unless you think (as Hillary does) that capitalist society is itself evil and that government should divide the nation based on income, redistributing it from those who have to those who have not. The Robin Hood argument (take from the rich and give to the poor) has a rather hollow ring to it when you discover that Robin Hood is as wealthy as King Richard the Lionheart. Aware of that, Hillary tones down the jewelry, eats a burger and fries, and shops at J.C. Penny’s for campaign season.
Because her campaign aims to encourage Middle Class and poor Americans to think of her as one of them, her current remake aims to cast her as a soccer mom, a kind matron from the neighborhood, a person like you, and not a rich former First Lady whose shoe collection and wardrobe is worth more than your annual salary. If she were to represent herself as she truly is, and bring out the expensive jewelry, clothes, cars, and dining preferences, she fears that the average American would have a hard time accepting that she is sincere. So, she painfully leaves the private jet and travels about the country in a van. She abandons her favorite dining preferences and pops up with small groups of every day folks, rubbing elbows, eating rubbery chicken, and trying to engage in small talk. Why shouldn’t we be disgusted with a phoney? The Kennedy approach is far better. They never denied their wealth, never gave up the Kennedy compound in Hyannis Port in favor of a one bedroom condo in Spanish Harlem, never eschewed Catholicism despite public attacks. They did the hard thing. They tried to convince people that they were right. Hillary is not of that stature. She tries to persuade you that her way of thinking is like ours, that she is one of us.
She does not appreciate the dangers associated with duplicity in politics because, so far, she has gotten away with it. But for a few embarrassing moments, she has found redefinition far easier than resolute defense of core beliefs. That is not especially difficult for her, because, truth be told, she really does not think there are any immutable truths or core beliefs incapable of being modified or tweeked for political advantage.
Her willingness to remake herself again and again presents a major problem in the general election. Her campaign is likely to be one of pronounced contrasts, not with others per se but with herself. I can see opponents running split screen images of her in campaign ads, wherein on one side of the screen she makes pronouncements from moments in her long political career that conflict with her pronouncements today. The contrasts between the Hillary of yesterday and the Hillary of today will likely be numerous and profound. She cannot today praise unreservedly the politically unpopular Obamacare but she did so in the past and, indeed, she advocated an even more intrusive and oppressive version of it in the form of a single payer socialized government health care system. She cannot be the champion of Obama’s foreign policy which she as Secretary of State helped create, a foreign policy that is largely incomprehensible, because a clear majority of the American people reject that foreign policy as weak, fickle, and harmful to American interests around the world. She cannot advocate transparency in government today when she herself has kept from congressional inquiry key facts and circumstances surrounding the Benghazi tragedy and her own private/public emails. She cannot portray herself as truly compassionate, one whose every effort is that of humanitarianism, given the cavalier manner in which she rejected pleas for help from the U.S. embassy in Benghazi or the horrible mistreatment she caused the poor folks in the White House Travel Office to suffer (whom she helped vilify and falsely accuse of embezzlement to rid them) in favor of Clinton cronies who wanted the travel office job.
We have a right to demand to know precisely what Hillary believes, even if the true answer to that question is nothing in particular. Her series of political remakes over the years combined with her present remake as a populist centrist justify a demand from the electorate to know whether she has any deep ideological beliefs, grounded in collectivist philosophy, that define her view of law and government. Is there any limit to the power she thinks she can wield as President? Does she agree with Obama’s reliance on his pen and phone as an alternative to compliance with the Constitution’s separation of powers? Is there anything that Obama has done as President that she regards as unconstitutional? Is there anything Obama has done in foreign policy with which she disagrees fundamentally? Does she think that compelling every American who does not have health insurance to buy it a constitutional power of government? If so, to serve a public health objective, is there any constitutional limit on what government may demand we do with our own resources to serve a public interest defined by those in power?
The media has thus far treated Hillary with kid gloves. She has never been forced to explain the intellectual foundations of her political creed. In point of fact, she is not deep in that regard.
She has broadly liberal values but no deep understanding, appreciation, or desire of rights theory, separation of powers, or limited government in the American tradition. It is precisely because she has no rights or limited power foundation that she can dispense with individual liberty and freedom of choice in, for example, the Obamacare context, without a second thought. She is, in that regard, essentially indistinguishable from Barack Obama. The election of Hillary Clinton will necessarily be an extension of Obama, leaving in place all of the economically deleterious and freedom depriving burdens of government he has put in place and adding to them.
Click here to visit home page.
© 2015 Jonathan W. Emord - All Rights Reserved
Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney who practices constitutional and administrative law before the federal courts and agencies. Ron Paul calls Jonathan "a hero of the health freedom revolution" and says "all freedom-loving Americans are in [his] debt . . . for his courtroom [victories] on behalf of health freedom." He has defeated the FDA in federal court a remarkable eight times, seven on First Amendment grounds, and is the author of the Amazon bestsellers The Rise of Tyranny, Global Censorship of Health Information, and Restore the Republic. He is the American Justice columnist for U.S.A. Today Magazine and joins Robert Scott Bell weekly for "Jonathan Emord’s Sacred Fire of Liberty," an hour long radio program on government threats to individual liberty. For more info visit, join the Emord FDA/FTC Law Group on Linkedin, and follow Jonathan on twitter (@jonathanwemord).
Hillary Continuing the Great Democratic Party Deception
By Lloyd Marcus
April 17, 2015
Upon hearing Hillary's ad announcing that she is running for president, I thought, these despicable people (Democrats) have no shame. The substance of Hillary's ad is same old, same old; standard Democrat low rent campaign tactics; class envy and victimhoodism.
In her ad, Hillary says, "...the deck is still stacked in favor of those at the top." Her message is vote for me and I'll stop those SOBs from hogging and stealing your share of the American pie.
Hillary's ad also mentioned that Americans have gone through challenging economic times and the importance of family. Well, the truth of the matter is the greatest enemy of business and families is the Democratic party. Democrats continuously exhibit hostility towards business, implementing anti-business policies, intrusive and job killing government regulations.
Democrats continue to make it easier and even encourage more Americans to forget working for a living and simple rely on government handouts. One can only conclude that this is Democrats' insidious strategy to win new voters. Who is going to bite (vote out of office) the hand feeding them? Folks, we are talkin' over 92 million Americans unemployed, but still have cellphones, flat screen TVs and not missing meals.
As for the American family, Democrat policies which enable and even nurture bad behavior contributes to the destruction of families. As an American who happens to be black, I have experienced in my family the devastating effects of Democrats' low expectations of blacks; numerous cousins addicted to government welfare which birthed serial out-of-wedlock births, crime, drug abuse, incarceration and early deaths.
Whenever Conservatives and Republicans compassionately address the havoc in the black community left in the wake of the Democrats' failed policies, Democrats flock to their mainstream media buddy's microphones to proclaim these good Samaritan Conservatives and Republicans white-insensitive-racists.
So, when Hillary and her fellow Democrats pretend to champion families, I want to say, "You got to be kidding me. Gag me!"
Here we go again. Hillary comes out promising to be a champion of the suffering and down trodden which she and her party created. Hillary's campaign is standard Democratic Party bait and switch; a continuation of their screwing of America. These people are disgusting. Have they no shame?
Hillary's game plan to win the White House is to continue the Great Democratic Party Deception: pretend to be an advocate for the common man while being the source of their problems; keeping them stuck in just barely getting-by-mode, enslaved to government and making it extremely challenging to rise to higher economic levels. Hillary is banking on a complicit mainstream media to help her pull it off, duping clueless voters.
I pray that our GOP presidential wannabes will have the courage and wisdom to speak out against Hillary's deceptive, disgusting and arrogant I-think-voters-are-idiots standard Democrat campaign strategy.
Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American
© 2014 Lloyd Marcus - All Rights Reserved
Self proclaimed Black Unhyphenated American, Lloyd Marcus is a featured columnist on American Thinker, Renew America, Canadian Free Press and numerous other Internet websites. A speaker, activist, singer/songwriter, recording artist and entertainer, Marcus was a featured act on the historical 2009 Tea Party Expressed Tour. The finale event was the Sept. 12th Taxpayers March and Rally in Washington DC where Marcus performed for a million people.
His appearances include FoxNews, CNN, PJTV and numerous TV and radio programs. He emcees and performs his patriotic original songs at rallies and special events across America. He was the featured entertainment at the 2009 Free Republic National Convention. Marcus' mission is to use his God given gifts to spread the "truth" that Conservatism is best for all Americans. He resides in Central Florida.
An elected official, Marcus is Chairman for Precinct 424, Volusia County Florida. He is also Creative Director for the Republican Executive Committee of Volusia County.
Lloyd Marcus, Singer/Songwriter of the national "American Tea Party Anthem." President, NAACPC (National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of Color)
Taking Down Hillary Clinton Once and For All
By: Devvy Kidd
April 11, 2015
I have been saying for more than a year Hillary the Hun would not run for president. Allegedly, she will make the announcement today. Bill & Hillary Clinton are committed Marxists and anyone who doesn't believe that hasn't done their homework nor do they understand the issue. For this column I will refer to Comrade Hillary as Mrs. Clinton because I know how much she hates it; sexist, empowerment and the other nonsense spewed by feminists.
Why did I believe she wouldn't run? Why on earth would anyone with her amount of political baggage, scandals and outright criminal activities subject herself to having it all dragged out in public again?
Why would Mrs. Clinton, married to a rapist and serial adulterer worth in the neighborhood of $10 - $50 million dollars (no one knows for sure because the famous duo are masters at hiding the truth) put herself through such a stressful, expensive and rigorous schedule? It's not as if she needs another paycheck.
Poor Hillary: "Clintons raked in more than $100 million in personal income since leaving the White House in 2001. The idea that they would have any trouble paying back their campaign debts or compensating themselves (regardless of what the campaign laws say) for their own money spent on the campaign is laughable. Mr. Clinton's lucrative new career is almost indistinguishable from political fund-raising -- he gives speeches and shows up in rooms where wealthy people have paid big money to spend time with him. Meanwhile, Mrs. Clinton intends to remain in the Senate and will continue to be besieged by corporations, labor unions and wealthy individuals who want to give her money."
Yes, Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick. All the details and more are in my May 26, 2013, column, Hillary Rodham Clinton: Liar, Globalist Traitor; a must read.
Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment - the book that proves beyond any doubt named Republican and Democratic/Communist Party USA members of Congress sabotaged the impeachment of Billy." The author, Bill Schippers was an icon in Democrat circles, but he told the truth. Schippers is an attorney and was hired by Republican congressman Henry Hyde to lead an oversight investigation of the Justice Department, then was redirected to handle the impeachment." As I covered in my column above, I had the opportunity to see him speak in Washington, DC. Whores in the 'mainstream' media made sure what came out in Schipper's book never made it to the nightly news or any semblance of balanced coverage in rags like the New York Times; all the news that's fit to fake.
Mrs. Clinton became a grandmother last year; Bill did not. A large number of Hillary's supporters are too young to remember the Clinton heydays in Arkansas and the White House. Too young to remember all the sordid details, i.e., Hillary allegedly sleeping with a married man, Vince Foster, who was later found murdered in Fort Marcy Park, VA. Act surprised: it was officially declared a suicide. It was not; documents most have never seen. Comrade Hillary was neck deep in the cover up.
Too young to remember all the shady dealings when Mrs. Clinton worked at the Rose Law Firm which became famous for shredding everything except the toilet paper. Web Hubbell also worked at the Rose Law Firm with Mrs. Clinton. There's no question in my mind Chelsea Clinton is the daughter of Web Hubbell - not Bill Clinton. The serial adulterer was known to be shooting blanks, but don't take my word for it - go look at these pictures because as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. Did Bill know? Of course he did: "When Bill left the presidency in Jan, 2001, he pardoned everyone else, including Marc Rich and big time drug dealers - but not Webb Hubbell."
Like her slutty husband, Mrs. Clinton joins the ranks of pathological liars who have held high offices; think the criminal impostor in the White House.
"It seems that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been publicly saying that we took sniper fire on that trip to Bosnia twelve years before when she was first lady. Some observers theorize that Clinton is saying this now because she believes that getting shot at in a war zone would help voters view her as being qualified to serve as commander in chief. More so than a young senator from Illinois named Barack Obama with no such experience. She must be speaking of a different trip," I postulate.
"Nothing else makes sense. I do a little research and discover Clinton is referring to the trip on which I accompanied her. She’s claiming that, as our military plane landed in Bosnia, we took sniper fire. She even says she had to duck and run for cover to escape the flying bullets. The idea is ludicrous. Yes, we flew into a recent war zone and were told it could be dangerous. We were prepared for the possibility of hostile fire. But it never materialized. And the fact is, had hostile forces fired upon our aircraft, our military pilot wouldn’t have just flown right into them and landed."
You could fill a book with Hillary's lies smoothed over by the slobbering, useful fools who protect her in the media. She knows she's going to get hammered, so why subject yourself to what will surely be a disgusting mess? Not to mention her flip-flopping:
Hillary Clinton, First Lady, on Gay Marriage: A Case Study In Opacity - April 10, 2015 - Documents released this week at the Clinton Library reveal an unrevealing politician.
"As a Senate candidate, Clinton couldn't maintain the ambiguity. In January 2000, she said she would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act and, despite supporting some rights for same-sex couples, she did not believe that they should be entitled to marry. "Marriage has got historic, religious and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman," she said then. "In 2013, after she left the State Department, Clinton said she had changed her position and now favored recognition of gay marriages. But even last year, fifteen months after her husband conceded in a Washington Post op-ed that he had come around to the view that the Defense of Marriage Act had always been unconstitutional, Hillary appeared to be still defending the bill, at least on practical grounds."
On the issues: Mrs. Clinton. "Let states decide gay marriage; they’re ahead of feds. (Aug 2007). "FactCheck: Accomplished but exaggerated foreign experience. (Mar 2008)" Her voting record was typical "social justice" Marxist propaganda. Mrs. Clinton is a shred player so she naturally supports murdering unborn babies and "gay rights" which promotes the spread of HIV/AIDS and dozens of filthy 'lavendar' diseases from bowel movement sex.
All these lying politicians are like John's to a prostitute. Tell them anything they want to hear as long as it provides them with the money. Money buys power.
Then, there's the issue of her health. While age 67 isn't particularly old, while traveling as the impostor Secretary of State, Mrs. Clinton took a number of falls and shaking of her hands was quite noticeable. European newspapers took note of these 'awkward moments', but the discredited MSM here in the U.S. remained silent. There was one instance she couldn't hide back in December, 2012: Hillary Clinton Concussion: Secretary of State Falls and Hits Head: "Hillary Clinton has suffered a concussion after fainting earlier this week. The U.S. Secretary of State reportedly fell and hit her head, causing the concussion, after suffering from a stomach virus that had led her to become dehydrated." Allegedly she spent six months recovering. Maybe she was busy shredding emails during her convalesence.
Like the malignant narcissist in the White House, Hillary Rodham Clinton usurped the office of Secretary of State. Yes, she did and I wrote about it back in 2009. In announcing her run for Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, a lawyer, knew full well she was ineligible because of the emoluments clause in the U.S. Constitution. A perfect case to file a Quo Warranto was in the hands of Judicial Watch, yet they did not file one and instead filed a srtaight lawsuit. As I predicted, they lost. The details are in my column above, Hillary Rodham Clinton: Liar, Globalist Traitor.
There's no question at that time, Senator Patrick "Leaky" Leahy [D] knew and plowed forward getting her through. And, what did Republicans on the Senate Judiciary at the time do? Why, nothing, of course - the same as they did to accommodate the ineligible con artist in the White House. Here is this massive legal question hanging and a lawsuit by Judicial Watch and Republicans, as usual, sat with deflated private parts. "The two who opposed her nomination were Republican Senators Jim DeMint of South Carolina and David Vitter of Louisiana." Here is the vote. I wasn't surprised the jackass who "represents me", Sen. John Cornyn, vote to confirm her. Then the Republicans bitch and moan and groan when she did something they didn't like.
A major focus will be: what accomplishments can Mrs. Clinton claim as U.S. Senator? None. She is a committed Marxist for "social justice" and the completely debunked 'global warming' aka 'climate change'. I highly recommend you take the time to watch this presentation: A John Casey Climate Change Debunk Video - "Mr. John L. Casey is a former White House space program advisor, consultant to NASA Headquarters, and space shuttle engineer. He is one of America’s most successful climate change researchers and climate prediction experts. Mr. Casey is the leading advocate in the US for a national and international plan to prepare for the next climate change to one of a dangerous cold climate era. This new cold era is caused by a historic decline in the Sun’s energy output, what he calls a "solar hibernation."
"In the spring of 2007, he became the first researcher to announce this dramatic change in the Sun to the White House and the mainstream media. In addition to correctly predicting the hibernation of the Sun, recently confirmed by NASA and other science organizations, he has correctly predicted the end of global warming, and the long term decline in the Earth’s temperatures. He is the author of the internationally acclaimed climate science book, "Cold Sun" which describes the rationale for understanding why global warming has ended and the effects of the new cold climate era. Mr. Casey is currently President of the climate research company, the Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC), in Orlando, Florida. Through his years in climate research he has been outspoken in saying that the Sun is the primary driver to climate change. He was named "America's best climate prediction expert," by in March 2013."
Barry Soetoro/Obama, countless politicans and even high ranking generals in the military claim 'climate change' is at the top of national security. Some are true belivers like Al Gore(bechev) who has made a king's fortune peddling that crap. Mrs. Clinton falls into that category - after all, it's good for donations. Hillary Clinton calls out climate change deniers. Others are simply brainwashed, hysterical zealots that have cost we the people hundreds of millions of dollars chasing a hoax. I refer everyone back to a thoroughly researched paper by Jeri Lynn Ball in 2000 from her book, Masters of Seduction, pg 4:
"Bill Clinton, Al Gore, former President George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev, and other New World Order architects are relentlessly pursuing the "Program of the Third International adopted at the Sixth Party Congress in Moscow in 1928. The new communitarian masters are seducing Americans into the New World Order and carrying the communistic, global environmental program to its conclusion - a world police state." A very important read.
Her so-called accomplishments as Secretary of State are? The most travelled Secretary of State in history who accomplished nothing except getting 4 Americans killed in Benghazi.
Hillary's "Experience" Lie - 2008 from Slate of all places: "Oh, please. Thirty-five years takes you back to 1973, half of which Hillary spent in law school, for crying out loud...But in government, Clinton's chief role over the years has been that of kibitzer. An important kibitzer, to be sure what spouse isn't? but not a direct participant. Clinton emphasizes in particular her profound experience in foreign policy. Here she is on Dec. 20:" Well worth the read.
If, God forbid, that conniving piece of baggage ever became the Democrat nominee, Republicans would have a field day. Nationwide ads of Mrs. Clinton in front of a senate committee with the most vicious look on her face, barely able to control her anger: "What difference does it make?" Find a few Democrats, preferably retired military, looking straight into the camera: I will never vote for Hillary Clinton. Another ad saturating the country: Mrs. Clinton whining about being broke. Remember that last year when she rolled out her book tour what was a monumental bomb? Poor Hillary. Worth only $10 - $15 million bux. Throw in some photos of her dolled up exiting a stretch limo. That should appeal to the 'po folk' she counts on for votes.
Hillary Rodham Clinton's accomplishments as a senator and Secretary of State are zero. Nothing but BS, political posturing and banking on the media's support - just like Soetoro/Obama. She resigned as SOS in Febraury 2013 and left behind a global mess.
And, speaking of money: Hillary Clinton's money problems keep getting worse (March 19, 2015). The Clinton Foundation is rolling in dough and a whole pile of it is dirty. Always follow the money and that's just what Larry Klayman (Former founder of Judicial Watch who started up a new organization years ago, Freedom Watch.) is doing. Klayman has filed several lawsuits against Bill & Hill who he calls the Bonnie & Clyde of American politics.
What self respecting woman would put up with Bill Clinton's serial adultery? Love? Oh, please. Does anyone really believe such tripe? Billy was banging Jennifer Flowes right under her nose for 12 years. Sexual harrassment: Clinton Settles Paula Jones Lawsuit for $850,000
The War on Women: Juanita Broaddrick and Bill Clinton. Yes, he raped that woman. Ask the Republicans and Democrats who were allowed into a secure room with all the evidence during the phony impeachment; some had tears in their eyes when leaving.
Mrs. Clinton is known for her very salty language, temper and vindictivness. Get on her bad side and it's forever. The old battle ax went after Kathleen Wiley with a vengeance, but Wiley fought back and paid dearly for standing up to the dirty duo: Kathleen Willey suspects Clintons murdered husband - New book details evidence of 'smear' campaign orchestrated by Hillary
But then again, perhaps this testimony under oath might open a few eyes and would answer the question as to why Mrs. Clinton put up with it:
"On Nov. 10, 1997, Brown gave a deposition at the DoubleTree Hotel in Little Rock. The text of the deposition, published in full by The Washington Post on March 13, 1998, was released by Paula Jones’s lawyers, as part of their response to the Clinton legal team’s motion for summary judgement.
"In his deposition, former state trooper Brown described how he had solicited women for Bill Clinton: "I would talk to them personally, sometimes give them my business card. If they were from out of town, I would find out where they were staying. If we were out of town and/or in town anywhere in Arkansas, I would try to get their telephone number and introduce them subsequently to the Governor. I would usually say something like that I was his bodyguard or I was his state police officer.
"Brown described a particular occasion when he accompanied Gov. Clinton to a Southern Regional Education board meeting in Boca Raton, Florida: "..when it was time to go and pay the bill, the governor got in the car with the girl that I had given the card to, and we followed them to an area that was under development. It was kind of a remote area from this club and they stayed back there in the car for a few minutes. I can’t remember how long and then the governor came back and jumped in the backseat and we left and went back to the hotel. Well, he [Clinton] indicated in so many words that she had performed oral sex on him.
"Altogether, Brown said he’d solicited women for Clinton "maybe ten of fifteen times out of state" and "hundreds of times" in Arkansas."
I have many books about the slimy duo; I have listd but a few below that are meticulously researched. The state trooper above wrote his book, Crossfire: Witness in the Clinton Investigation; a horrifying read when you're talking about the president and first lady:
"L. D. Brown has been a witness to almost all of the alleged offenses circling around Bill Clinton in Arkansas: misuse of state funds for sexual liasons, Whitewater, illegal campaign fundraising and bribery, as well as cocaine use and cocaine smuggling. Through his cooperation with prosecutors and congressional investigators, Brown has learned the inside story on Robert Fiske's and Kenneth Starr's operations and on congressional hearings.
"But most of all, L. D. Brown can tell the story of the methods used by the Clinton White House to control potentially damaging witnesses. Most of what is written in this book has been told under the penalty of perjury to investigators for Congress and the Office of Independent Counsel. Documentation for many events has been included in an appendix. However incredible as some details may seem, they are backed up by evidence including recent disclosures confirming an incident involving Brown in England."
Just like the unvetted ineligible Barry Soetoro/Obama, the Clinton's were protected by a corrupt, rotten media so the American people really had no idea about Bonnie & Clyde except attacks by the media to stop real journalists from investigating and reporting on the real Bill & Hill.
The other question I have: why would the Democratic/Communist Party USA want a presidential nominee that has substantial negative ratings and more baggage than AMTRAK as their nominee? The Clinton's are 'political royalty'! Really? Royal mountains of dirty laundry and Larry Klayman breathing down Mrs. Clinton's throat. A man on a mission. I like that. And, no, I belong to no political party; not since 1996. Well, perhaps not all are excited: Democrats getting a bad sense of déjà vu in Hillary scandals and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Is Now Effectively Over.
The links below are very detailed about lawsuits filed by Larry Klayman. The first one deals with Clinton's email cover-up: Keeping the wicked witch from escaping again
To be fair and balanced, RINO Jeb Bush is also going to get hammered - well, maybe. What's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander when it comes to Demorats: Jeb Bush's Emails: Why Are So Many Key Episodes MIA?
"The 250,000-plus messages he released say almost nothing about the 2000 recount and other major controversies of his governorship.....But Bush is hardly in a position to take potshots at Clinton over her emails. Like Clinton, he conducted government business using a personal email account (two of them, actually). He released only a portion of his correspondence from his time as governor of Florida. And it took Bush more than seven years to hand over his self-selected emails, as required under a Florida public records law." Where there's smoke there's fire.
I also have a question brother Jeb that might be answered if he's forced to turn over his missing emails:
"On September 7, 2001, only four days before the "event," Florida Governor Jeb Bush issued an executive order. This was only one business day from 911. His brother, President Bush, is due in his state on September 11th. What is the significance of this rather timely EO? "Among the reasons cited in the document for the action was prophetically "potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism" (Executive Order #01-261, Section 3)....However, what is most startling about EO #01-261 is its predecessor.
"Executive Order #01-261 concludes by revoking Executive Order #01-17 which is nearly identical to EO #01-261 except for the language addressing "potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism." Issued on January 19, 2001, EO #01-17 wasn't to expire until June 30, 2003. This raises the question as to what events occurred on or prior to September 7, 2001 that compelled the president's brother to replace an existing executive order with another executive order which effectively inserted a reference to "acts of terrorism."
"Some will say it was just a coincidence, just like the biggest voting mess in a presidential election ever witnessed in this country just also happened to take place in the candidate's brother's state (brother Jeb, Florida) who also serves as governor. And, the candidate, George Bush, is also the governor of one of the biggest states of the Union! Gee, what a coincidence.
"Does brother Jeb's new EO, only four days before 911, indicate prior knowledge of something? That new EO gives Jeb the authority to call up the National Guard for "an act of terrorism" and declare martial law. Could the timing be anymore suspect? Why did Jeb issue this new EO four days before 911 when the existing EO, which didn't include terrorism, wasn't due to expire for two plus years?" What did brother Jeb know and when?
Larry Klayman's detailed lawsuits against the Clintons - including a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corruption Organizations).
Long arm of the law closing in on Hillary! - The Clinton Foundation's dirty money
Hillary Rodham Clinton, like the criminal impostor in the WH belongs in a federal prison right along with Billy. No one is above the law. Not even "royalty" like Bonnie & Clyde Clinton.
As I said in the beginning, I really am very surprised Mrs. Clinton is going to run for all the reasons in this column - including the DNC nominating a cargo ship of political you-know-what. Something just doesn't feel right here.
Educational Links:1 - Judge Napolitano: Whether Hillary Is Prosecuted Depends On This ONE THING
3 - Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton by the late Barbara Olson who perished on board Flight 77 (Pentagon) on 9/11
4 -
Unlimited Access : An FBI Agent Inside the Clinton White House

[Just a short note about 9/11. The cost of America's undeclared "war" (invasion) in Afghanistan has now reached $1 trillion borrowed dollars - massive debt heaped on us all based on what happened on 9/11. Regular readers of my column know I continue to press for the truth about the events of 9/11. Military grade nanothermite is not a conspiracy theory. It was found and tested from the rubble at the twin towers. A new, powerful film has been released: The Anatomy of a Great Deception. For full disclosure I receive no compensation, but I want you to get a copy (or a few) and share it with others or give a copy as a present. I've purchased half a dozen copies and given them to individuals I believe seek the truth. It's very powerful simply because it's one 'ordinary' man's story who ask a simple question that led him to a not so simple journey. There is factual information in this film that many have never heard about but everyone should. Just a suggestion, order more than one and give one to a friend. The more people we wake up the better.]
© 2015 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserved
Click here to visit home page.
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Devvy is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is:
Hillary Rodham Clinton: Liar, Globalist Traitor
By: Devvy Kidd
May 26, 2013
There is much speculation whether or not Hillary Rodham Clinton, will run for president in 2016.
The former co-president with her lying, cheating husband, Bill Clinton, received enormous support in 2008, but those who really call the shots decided a bi-racial, constitutionally ineligible candidate, Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, would be the better choice to continue the planned destruction of America. Hillary Rodham Clinton carries a lot of old, dirty baggage. Perhaps wait eight more years to install Comrade Clinton.
Much of Hillary Rodham's support comes from ignorant women who have no facts other than the carefully polished image built to portray Comrade Clinton as a friend of women. By championing murdering unborn babies using clever propaganda like "protecting women's reproductive rights", Comrade Clinton is lauded by women who kill their unborn babies as some sort hero. By championing the filth of sodomy and promoting AIDS/HIV by supporting sexual deviants, Comrade Clinton assured herself a nice fat bankroll for her run for the senate and president. Bushels of money from sexual deviants in Hollywood.
Tens of millions of ignorant women have been played by the one of the most skilled, consummate liars ever to hold public office. And, quite frankly, they don't care just as long as Comrade Clinton continues to promise them your paycheck to pay for things like their sexual activities. In February 2011, I wrote a column titled, Get My Wallet Out Of Your Vagina. Oh, how the "feminists" squealed on their web sites because they can't stand the truth:
"How many times have we heard female politicians bleat about "women's issues" during elections? How many times have we heard the old chant about "empowering women" from female members of Congress? The feminization of Congress and our state legislatures is destroying constitutional government, running America into oceans of unpayable debt and breeding generations of helpless women, whining for mother government to take care of them and their every need...
"The legions of females out there are herded in the desired direction with promises of stealing from the people's treasury for their wants and needs. All those "independent, strong women" are nothing but whiners demanding the fruits of your labor. Real women take care of the babies they bring into this world. Real women know that family planning means keep your panties on and being a responsible adult. Strong, independent women do not demand mother government steal from taxpayers to fund their personal lives. Strong and independent? Horsecrap. Strong, independent women do not demand someone else pay their way whether it's health care, day care or "basic family planning."
Such concepts are alien to millions of women under the age of 50. They have gone through the government's indoctrination centers called pubic schools. They "look up to" hard core feminists from the Hollywood crowd. Female political figures are their toxic role models. All who tell those "empowered" women it's their right to steal your paycheck to pay for their bad choices in life. Her success is why Comrade Clinton became so important to the masters of the game who own Washington, DC.
The nauseating accolades bestowed upon Comrade Clinton for her failed and unlawful stint as Secretary of State is simply more propaganda fed to ignorant sycophants who haven't a clue about world events. I say unlawful because Hillary Rodham Clinton usurped the office of Secretary of State. Prior to her confirmation, members (both parties) of the joke called the Senate Judiciary Committee were told by Judicial Watch a lawsuit would be filed to stop Comrade Clinton from holding that office because it violated the emolument clause of the U.S. Constitution. What is that?
Article I, section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides: "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time....This provision, known as the "Emoluments" or "Ineligibility" clause is an absolute prohibition and does not allow for any exceptions. The "Ineligibility Clause" is interpreted by most as designed by our Founding Fathers to protect against corruption and ensure the separation of powers among the three branches of government. On January 29, 2009, Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit against newly confirmed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on the ground that she is constitutionally ineligible to serve as Secretary of State under the Ineligibility Clause. The "emoluments" or salary of the U.S. Secretary of State increased at least three times during Mrs. Clinton’s most recent U.S. Senate term. That term, which began on January 4, 2007, does not expire until January 2013, regardless of Mrs. Clinton’s recent resignation."
"....there is another lawsuit that has run its course, meaning denied for hearing by the U.S. Supreme Court, you might find of interest: Rodearmel v. Clinton. That lawsuit was filed in January 2009 on behalf of a 19-year veteran of the Foreign Service Officer under the State Department, David Rodearmel, a retired Lt. Col. in the U.S. Army Reserve Judge Advocate General Corp. While I support and respect Judicial Watch in their pursuit of making sure no one is above the law, I simply did not understand why they didn't use the Quo Warranto for Rodearmel's case.
"The defendants (mother government) moved to dismiss and in their filing, there is an important footnote; number 6 at the bottom of page 25:
"The D.C. Court of Appeals has observed that a plaintiff who seeks to directly attack the appointment of an official (as opposed to attacking an action of that official) will rarely if ever have standing. See Andrade v. Lauer, 729 F.2d 1475, 1496-97 (D.C. Cir. 1984). In the same case, the court suggested that the only proper way to assert such a direct attack is through an action for a writ of quo warranto. See id. at 1497 (citing cases). A quo warranto action may only be brought by the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney or, if these Executive Branch officials decline a request, by a private party who has obtained leave of court. See D.C. Stat. §§ 16-3502-3503; see also Rae v. Johnson, 1993 WL 544295, at *1"
As I said, to this day I don't understand why Judicial Watch did not file a Quo Warranto to get Comrade Clinton removed. It was a no brainer as far as standing for Rodearmel; he absolutely qualified under Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell. In the end, the case was dismissed. The gutless cowards (both parties) on the Senate Judiciary Committee thumbed their noses at the U.S. Constitution once again with disastrous results. Benghazi comes to mind with Rodman's now famous outburst revealing the ugliness that has always been Hillary:
"What Difference Does It Make?" whether or not U.S. Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans were slaughtered because of an act of terrorism or some silly Internet video no know ever heard of? video here. If the U.S. Congress would ever seriously press for the truth, Hillary's finger prints are all over what happened September 11, 2012. Stop the tap dancing. Obama's enforcer, Eric Holder, has been jerking around congressional committees for two years over 'Fast and Furious'. It's now been nine months since the disaster in Benghazi. The families are still waiting for answers. Get a special counsel appointed and ram this down Clinton and Obama's throats. We the people are sick and tired of traitors walking free of their crimes.
Make no mistake about it: Hillary Rodman Clinton is a valuable asset to those working to destroy this country. She is a dirty traitor right along with that pathetic piece of work she's been married to for 38 years. A partnership, not a marriage. Millions who support Comrade Clinton are too young to remember Whitewater, Fostergate and the litany of scandals that plagued the co-presidents and destroyed lives forever.
While insiders and the controlled "mainstream" media know the truth about the Clinton's, few Americans were interested when the duo ran for the presidency both times. It was all just a "right-wing conspiracy" by Republicans. The Clinton duo played the American people like a fine tuned fiddle. The FBI knows all about the Clinton's and who they give their money to: The Marxist Influence and the IPS:
1. IPS has firm ties to anti-American terrorists and militant Marxists worldwide; and IPS has firm ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton.
2. IPS is described as a Washington-based 'Think Factory' which helped train extremists who incite violence in the United States
3. Clinton's appointment of Derek Shearer as his top economic advisor was no fluke. Shearer's sister, Brooke, is Hillary's traveling companion. As this booklet shall document, Clinton's close friend Derek Shearer has not only been a member of the subversive IPS, but is also a prolific advocate of Marxist socialism and is ardent in his open praises for life in communist lands. Shearer has long proposed that America's free enterprise system be dismantled and that businesses be controlled by powerful socialist planners instead.
4. Page 2: FBI Warns of IPS Infiltrating U.S. Government with Subversives.
Millions of her supporters have no idea what happened during the phony impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton. It was a set up orchestrated by prominent Republicans. One only need read David Schippers book, Sellout: The Inside Story of President Clinton's Impeachment:
"While no one came out of the Monica Lewinsky scandal looking good, David Schippers, the chief investigative counsel for the Clinton impeachment, wants to be sure Americans know just who contributed to the debacle and how. A trial attorney and a Democrat, Schippers was hired by Republican congressman Henry Hyde to lead an oversight investigation of the Justice Department, then was redirected to handle the impeachment. The quintessential honest man, Schippers was shocked, not so much by Clinton's actions (which he calls a far-reaching conspiracy to obstruct justice with perjury, lies, and witness tampering), but by Republican and Democratic politicians who sold out the impeachment process.
"If you ever want to vote again, you might not want to know what went on behind the scenes in the Capitol Hill meat grinder leading up to and during the impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Clinton.... Lies, cowardice, hypocrisy, cynicism, amorality, butt-covering--these were the squalid political body parts that, squeezed through the political processor, combined to make a mockery of the impeachment process.
"Of course, Schippers does want you to know what happened, and he also wants you to vote--against those who made the mess. And so he names names--of Republican senators who refused to allow evidence on the floor, of the five Democratic congressmen who never examined the evidence, of the GOP senator who said, "You're not going to dump this garbage on us," and also of the politicians who did an honest job, or at least asked reasonable questions (such as Joseph Lieberman). Schippers also reveals the evidence he was building against the Clinton administration regarding illegal INS actions and Chinagate, but that he was forced to drop. He reviews the successful struggle to get a full hearing in the House and the "flat-out rigged ball game" in the Senate. He discusses the president's pattern of abuse and intimidation of women, including some highly disturbing information regarding Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, and Dolly Kyle Browning."
I saw Schippers speak at the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, DC. I think it was the year 2000. It was an event put on by Judicial Watch; Schippers was the keynote speaker. Instead of going after Bill Clinton for treason (read the Cox Report), the stupid Republicans went after him on a sex charge.
Anyone old enough who has followed the Clinton duo surely knows who has always worn the pants in that "marriage". What self-respecting woman would get in bed with a husband like Bill Clinton who screws anything over legal age with or without their consent? It was reported that during the impeachment process, Democrats went into "the vault" area and viewed documents not available to you and me. Those reports also said a couple of the Democrats (in the House) came out visibly upset because they now believed Bill Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick. Yet, that didn't bother Comrade Clinton because her climb to power was not going to get derailed by a serial cheating "husband."
Comrade Hillary was a Republican until she decided to attach her loyalties to the Democratic/Communist Party USA. It would be her ticket to fortune and fame. Her treachery has been well rewarded. On December 19, 1998, the U.S. House impeached Billy. The gutless U.S. Senate failed to impeach on Feb. 12, 1999. In December 1998, Comrade Hillary visited Switzerland: "On 31 December 1998, Hillary Clinton visited Brunnen. She arrived from the Lake Lucerne and drives with a car to the railway station."
According to press reports at the time, Comrade Clinton made one unscheduled stop outside Zurich. Funny how you catch a blurb on the radio news that perks up your ears. I filed a Freedom of Information Act request at the time with the Secret Service. They refused to release her full itinerary to me citing national security. Bull. I believe she met with the real money masters and power brokers who are above the Bilderberg group.
I wish I had my old research from back then, but I've had two major computer crashes since then and it's gone. Comrade Hillary moved aside to allow the impostor now squatting in the White House to get the Democratic/Communist Party USA nomination in 2008. How it must have galled her, but make no mistake: Hillary Rodham Clinton is a tough old bird who knows how to play the game of revenge.
One other thing during that time period: September 4, 1998, Bill Clinton speaking in Ireland: "You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions - you just sign your name." The only honest thing he said while in office.
The public persona of Comrade Hillary Clinton, much like that of militant Marxist, Michelle Obama, is nothing but lies and illusions. Hillary Rodham is a very dangerous woman who is willing to do ANYTHING in her climb for power.
Rodham was a complete failure as Secretary of State. While the most traveled (one million miles) and pampered in the history of this nation, the world is more dangerous now than when she unlawfully took over; Benghazi the worst example. One need only read this piece: Secretary Clinton on American Leadership at the Council on Foreign Relations, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Washington, D.C., January 31, 2013:
"I've come to think of it like this: Truman and Acheson were building the Parthenon with classical geometry and clear lines. The pillars were a handful of big institutions and alliances dominated by major powers."
I would again remind people Harry Truman worked for the globalists or he would never have become president: "When Franklin Roosevelt died during the closing days of WWII, it fell to Truman to end the war and formulate policies for the new world order." The Smithsonian Treasury: The Presidents (1991), pg 72. Truman was instrumental in founding the communist controlled UN. He signed the unconstitutional Marshall Plan, stealing $13 BILLION dollars from we the people for the economic and technical assistance recovery of European countries. No where in the U.S. Constitution does it authorize Congress or a president to steal the fruits of our labor to give to any foreign country for any reason. But, it was just another step in building a one world order.
Comrade Clinton goes on to say this in her CFR speech:
"Now, of course, American military and economic strength will remain the foundation of our global leadership. As we saw from the intervention to stop a massacre in Libya to the raid that brought bin Ladin to justice, there will always be times when it is necessary and just to use force. America's ability to project power all over the globe remains essential."
Our global leadership? More endless wars, more sticking our military in where it doesn't belong, like Libya. It was not our government's job to assist in murdering a head of state. Necessary and just to just to use force? Bullying the world is what she really meant. Remember what former Secretary of State, the equally vile, Madeleine Albright said?
"Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that's more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it? Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it." --60 Minutes (5/12/96). And, people wonder why we are so hated in the Middle East?
Going back to Comrade Clinton's speech:
"We're also working more than ever with invigorated regional organizations. Consider the African Union in Somalia and the Arab League in Libya, even sub-regional groups like the Lower Mekong Initiative that we created to help reintegrate Burma into its neighborhood and try to work across national boundaries on issues like whether dams should or should not be built."
We created? American troops are in Africa; another mission "creep" that will cost precious American blood. YOUR paychecks are going to fund this global world order. Where is your outrage, America? It would not be possible without the cooperation of the Republican controlled U.S. House of Representatives headed up by John Boehner. All of our money spent has to originate in the house. The Republicans have done NOTHING to stop the funding of a one world government where OUR country will be subordinate to others and just another region. I do encourage you to take the time to read all of Clinton's speech to the CFR. It is a blueprint of what's planned; we have no say whatsoever because those in Congress no longer represent we the people, only their global masters.
I believe Hillary has serious health problems she's trying to hide from the world. I don't know if she will be chosen by the masters of the game to run in 2016, but I do know, we must never let that happen. The only way to stop her and those working to destroy our beloved republic is to expose their real agenda - AND Hillary's past. Americans need to have a refresher course on that evil woman. I highly recommend the books below. If Amazon doesn't have a copy left, use a search engine with the exact title and other vendors should pop up:
Hillary Rodham Clinton: What Every American Should Know by Christian Josi
Big Sister Is Watching You: Hillary Clinton and The White House Feminists Who Now Control America - And Tell The President What To Do
Bill and Hillary Clinton have been tied at the hip for 38 years. What he knows, she knows. I also recommend these books because what he knows and did, she knows and approved:
Bill Clinton: Friend or Foe by Ann Wilson
The Clinton Chronicles Book
The Secret Life of Bill Clinton - The Unreported Stories by Ambrose Evans-Prichard (Among other things: the cover up in the death of Vince Foster and Bill's connection with the underworld of drugs in Arkansas)
Hillary Rodham Clinton is a blue blood Marxist. Those who go ballistic when they read that either have done zero research on her entire life or they support Marxism. It's one or the other.

Important Links:
Click here to visit home page.
© 2013 - and Devvy - All Rights Reserv
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.
Devvy's regularly posted new columns are on her site at: You can also sign up for her free email alerts.
E-mail is:

Also See:
Three Hopeful Presidential Candidates
13 December 2007
Some News From the Democratic Race
18 April 2008
What Happened in Benghazi?
31 October 2012
The Saga of the Benghazi Report!
22 December 2012
Hillary Clinton's Testimony on Benghazi!
24 January 2013
The Next President of United States - Hillary Clinton!
21 December 2013