Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Is Trump the Martial Law President?


"Trump's Job is to Prepare America for War" ~ William Engdahl   
Published on Nov 22, 2016
A different point of view by William Engdahl with Joyce Riley in The Power Hour, November 21, 2016.

Donald Trump - Controlled by the Illuminati? New World Order
Published on Nov 19, 2016

Meet Donald Trump Your 2017 Illuminati Martial Law President!  
Published on Nov 12, 2016

 Is Trump an Illuminati - NWO stooge ?
Published on Sep 25, 2016
we absolutely know Hillary is, and has been her entire adult life, and maybe as a child. 
but what of Donald? do we know for sure he is? how could we know is he is a stooge, puppet, or free man waiting to catch a bullet????
Also See:
Duped Again! Trump and Hillary Are Both Illuminati!
30 October 2016
also check out this earlier blog (yesterday) and notice the role Donald Trump plays in the two videos.
or click on link below:
Must be Illuminati.
Let's Not Forget Bin Laden's Death and Obama's Birth Certificate!
28 November 2016

Monday, November 28, 2016

Will Fidel Castro be Remembered in History as a Tyrant or Hero?

Fidel Castro

Fidel Castro's Death Impact on Cuba  
Published on Nov 26, 2016
The Cuban government still holds political prisoners and faces criticism over potential human rights violations.

Fidel Castro Biography   
Published on Jun 27, 2015
Fidel Castro Biography - Documentary.
★Watch Most Popular Documentaries Released at http://documentary.center/
This is a beautifully made documentary packed with rare archive footage and photographs. It shows Castro's childhood, his recklessness as a youth, his blossoming talents at the University of Havana and then his swift and complex ride to lawyer, jailbird, guerilla, politician and revolutionary. Adored and deplored, Castro's life makes compelling viewing.
★Let's keep in touch: https://twitter.com/DocumentaryFull
The Murderous Kleptocrat Fidel Castro is Dead
By Reverend David Whitney
December 11, 2016
The left was effusive with praise this week in the wake of the death of that brutal dictator Fidel Castro. “It wasn’t just liberal politicians who lavished praise.… Major newspapers, network television shows and celebrities also offered their adulation. But why is the political left so enamored with a man who killed more than 100,000 people, stifled basic rights and even canceled Christmas?…
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump pulled few punches in outlining his opin-ion of Castro’s reign.
“Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights,” stated Trump.
“While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve,”
Many people don’t know that, “Prior to Castro, Cuba took in more immigrants as a percentage of population than the United States, including the Ellis Island years. Most of these immigrants came from the first world. More Americans lived in Cuba prior to Castro than Cubans lived in the U.S. And that was at a time when Cubans were perfectly free to leave.”
The Castro record pales in comparison.
“He took that prosperous and happy country that attracted immigrants from around the world and turned it into a place where 20 times as many people have died trying to escape it as died trying to escape East Germany.”
Anyone not on board with Fidel’s rule was ripe for execution, imprisonment or persecution.”[1]
Fidel was a Stalinist to the core turning a new page in the marxist mantra, ‘from each according to his ability to each according to his need.’ What this looked like in real time was “According to the scholars and researchers at the Cuba Archive, the Castro regime’s total death toll–from torture, prison beat-ings, firing squads, machine gunning of escapees, drownings, etc.–approaches 100,000. Cuba’s population in 1960 was 6.4 million. According to the human rights group Freedom House, 500,000 Cubans (young and old, male and female) have passed through Castro’s prison and forced-labor camps. This puts Fidel Castro political incarceration rate right up there with his hero Stalin’s.”[2]
In reality the marxist maxim is this ‘from each according to his ability to enrich the ruling elite who live in luxury while everyone else is ground to powder.’ What is Castro’s legacy? Suspension of human rights, no freedom to travel, speak, publish, read and see media, imprisonment, torture and summary executions, massive theft of everyone’s property and among other human rights violations, forcing one neighbor to spy on the other. That, is Fidel's Legacy.
Castro was a murderous outlaw, a vicious torturer and as of this Friday he begins to receive a just reward for all of his evil. His wicked tyrannical rule raises this question what is human civil government for? Is it for the powerful thieving, murdering, torturing class of elites to abuse every human being they can sink their blood thirsty claws into? Or was human civil government de-signed by God for something good in this world? And in light of what God designed human civil government for, how much of the earnings and wealth of the citizens should the government take? Should they take 90% as FDR at-tempted to do? Or is 50% acceptable, or should something less than that be the norm? Join me in studying Exodus 35 and Exodus 30 for the answer.
Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.
© 2016 Rev. David Whitney - All Rights Reserved
1. Cuban exile: Castro's true legacy of murder and persecution.
2. Here’s a Handy List of Atrocities for All You Liberal Fidel Castro Lovers.
Rev. David Whitney has been teaching the Christian heritage and history of our country with Institute on the Constitution for over a decade where he serves as Senior Instructor, and Radio show host on Dr. Stan Monteith’s Radio Liberty.
David is an Honors Scholar graduate from Rutgers University with a Masters Degree from Denver Seminary. A minister for 32 years he is currently the Pastor of Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church of Pasadena, Maryland.
As an member of Clergy, Activist and Radio personality David has appeared in Washington Times, on Voice of America, Fox, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, BBC, and more…
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/InstituteontheConstitution
Twitter: @theAmericanView
E-Mail: dwhitney@iotconline.com
Obama does ‘the wave’ with the mass-murderer who tried to kill my father-in-law
Obama and Raul Castro. Disgusting
By Robert Laurie ——Bio and Archives 
November 28, 2016
We first ran this piece about 8 months ago, when Obama took his “historic” trip to Cuba.  Needless to say, my family’s pretty happy to hear that Fidel Castro, the mass-murdering tyrant who stole so much from them, is dead.  Herman suggested I re-post the piece today.
My wife is Cuban. If we’re getting technical, she’s Cuban-Italian, but the point is that her father was a Cuban gentleman who - until the Castro brothers took over - owned a hospital in Havana.
Since he was smart enough to see that Castro spelled trouble, he sent his wife and children to Miami during the run-up to Fidel’s takeover. He stayed behind to try and ride out the storm. Unfortunately, his ability and willingness to care for the poor was seen as a threat to the new regime and he was marked for death once the rebel army took complete control of the country. Things continued to deteriorate and he decided that he too would have to leave - even if that meant leaving extended family members behind.
As the wheels of his plane left the ground, Raul Castro’s goons showed up at his former home. He escaped to South America, and eventually made his way to the US. He re-established himself as a doctor and, years later, my wife was born.
He was one of the lucky ones.  In the process, though, he lost everything. He and his family lost the lives they knew. Their home, their hospital, their careers, and their life’s savings were stolen. He spent the next 20-some years bribing Cuban officials to secure the release of family members who were imprisoned in Castro’s jails.  ...And even that was better than facing Raul Castro’s firing squads.
Here’s a nice picture of Raul blindfolding one of his victims.
If the Castro Brothers and Che Guevara had their way, my wife’s father would have shared a similar fate. She would never have existed and my child would never have been born. I’m not sharing this story because it’s in any way special or unique. To the contrary; there are millions of people whose lives have been touched by the monstrous actions of these animals.
So you can imagine that when my family sees this… (See Below)
The man with whom Obama is yukking it up is nothing but a cheap mass-murderer whose crimes are too numerous to list. He can throw on a chintzy suit and “do the wave” with a despicable American President, but he can’t make the world forget that his hands are soaked in blood. While Obama sycophants talk of the President’s “legacy,” they ignore the fact that Raul’s is a legacy of brutality, oppression, torture, and mass graves.

Published on Mar 23, 2016
But hey, at least he seems to have shown Obama a good time.
Robert Laurie’s column is distributed by CainTV, which can be found at caintv.com
Be sure to “like” Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You’ll be glad you did.

Former Cuban Leader Fidel Castro Dies,Fidel Castro Survived 600 Assassination Attempts   
Published on Nov 27, 2016

Fidel Castro, Cuba's leader of revolution, dies at 90 - BBC News   
Published on Nov 26, 2016
Fidel Castro, Cuba's former president and leader of the Communist revolution, has died aged 90, his brother Raul has announced.
James Robbins looks back on his life.
Please subscribe HERE http://bit.ly/1rbfUog

Fidel Castro Interview With Barbara Walters   
Published on Nov 26, 2016
Walters reflected on some of the most memorable moments from her meetings with the former Cuban leader.
Fidel Castro funeral presents dilemma for world leaders
Most countries choose middle-ranking delegations for ceremony in Havana next week, with Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Britain’s Theresa May opting out
Patrick Wintour Diplomatic editor
Monday 28 November 2016
 Britain’s prime minister, Theresa May, has decided not to attend the funeral in Cuba next week. Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP
Vladimir Putin, Justin Trudeau and Theresa May are among the world leaders who have already decided not to attend the funeral of Fidel Castro, and it seems very likely that Barack Obama will also stay away despite his historic visit to Cuba earlier this year.
The seniority of politicians sent to attend a funeral is carefully calibrated in diplomatic circles, and most countries – apart from Latin American countries with leftwing governments – have chosen distinctly middle-ranking delegations for Castro’s ceremony.
Russia has announced that Vyacheslav Volodin, a close ally of Putin and chairman of the lower house of parliament, will head the Russian delegation for the 4 December funeral. The decision underlines the extent to which Moscow no longer regards Cuba as a client state, as it seeks to focus on extending its influence in the Middle East, Asia and central Europe.
The Canadian prime minister’s office said on Monday that he will not attend the funeral even though Castro attended the funeral of his father, Pierre Trudeau.
Justin Trudeau was widely mocked and criticized for praising Castro, who he referred to as a “remarkable leader”. Governor General David Johnston – the queen’s representative in Canada, will attend the commemoration instead.
The US administration has given no indication so far how it will attend. The secretary of state, John Kerry, issued a relatively bland statement saying: “We extend our condolences to the Cuban people today as they mourn the passing of Fidel Castro. Over more than half a century, he played an outsized role in their lives, and he influenced the direction of regional, even global affairs.”
With few effective decisions left for Obama to take during the transition before the inauguration of Donald Trump, Republican leaders have warned Obama not to go to Havana.
Newt Gingrich, once seen as a potential candidate for secretary of state, warned Obama, Vice-President Joe Biden and Kerry to stay away, labelling the deceased Cuban leader a tyrant.
In a series of tweets on Saturday, he said: “Under no circumstance should President Obama or VP Biden or Sec state [sic] Kerry go to Cuba for Castro’s funeral. He was a tyrant”.
US senator Ted Cruz – who is of Cuban descent – said: “I very much hope that we don’t see any US government officials going to Fidel Castro’s funeral. I hope we don’t see Barack Obama and Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and Democrats lining up to lionize a murderous tyrant and thug.”
“If you wouldn’t go to Pol Pot’s funeral or Stalin’s funeral or Mao’s funeral because they were murderous communist dictators, then you shouldn’t be doing what Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau are doing, which is celebrating Fidel Castro: a murderous, communist dictator.”
Spain’s delegation will be led by former king Juan Carlos, and it is expected that the Sinn Féin leader, Gerry Adams, will fly to Havana to pay his respects.
The British government said it was unlikely that the foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, would attend, making Sir Alan Duncan – the deputy foreign office minister responsible for the Americas – the most likely candidate to represent the UK.
The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, will not attend the funeral, and will be represented by the shadow foreign secretary, Emily Thornberry.
Ireland’s president, Michael D Higgins, has also been criticised for signing the book of condolences in Dublin without mentioning human rights abuses. The president is not expected to attend the funeral.
Leftwing leaders from across Latin America will attend, including Ecuador’s Rafael Correa, Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro, Bolivia’s Evo Morales and Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega.
Mexican president Enrique Pena Nieto has also decided to travel to Cuba for the commemoration, as has the President of South Africa Jacob Zuma, who will probably view the visit as a welcome relief from efforts to oust him from office.
Argentina will be represented by its foreign minister, Susana Malcorra, rather than its conservative leader Mauricio Macri. In its message of condolence, Argentina thanked Castro for his support of its claim to the Falklands Islands.
India will send its home minister, Rajnath Singh, as the head of an all-party delegation a include leaders from various political parties such as Congress, CPI(M), CPI and the Samajwadi party.

Juanita Castro – Fidel’s sister, who has lived in exile in Miami for more than 50 years – will not attend, saying whatever her personal family sadness her belief in freedom was stronger.
Justin Trudeau defends initial remarks about 'polarizing' Fidel Castro
Canadian prime minister praised Castro as ‘remarkable leader’ of Cuba
Statement prompted criticism online and from US Republicans
Sunday, 27 November 2016
Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, who was widely criticized for fondly remembering Fidel Castro without mention of his human rights record, has defended his comments but said the late Cuban leader was a dictator.
Trudeau sparked fury and online mockery after he referred to Castro as a “remarkable leader” and expressed his sorrow at the death of “Cuba’s longest-serving president”.
A Twitter hashtag, #trudeaueulogies, sprung up, prompting users to share unlikely tributes to the organizational and leadership abilities of figures such as Adolf Eichmann, Pablo Escobar and the Nightmare on Elm Street horror character Freddy Krueger.
Many critics were quick to point out that Castro suppressed dissent and there was no option for other leadership on the island under his regime.
On Sunday, Trudeau said his statement was simply meant “to recognize the passing of a former head of state” of a country that Canada had longstanding ties with, and not to gloss over unflattering history.
“The fact is Fidel Castro had a deep and lasting impact on the Cuban people,” Trudeau told reporters in a televised news conference at a Madagascar Francophonie summit.
“He certainly was a polarizing figure and there certainly were significant concerns around human rights. That’s something I’m open about and that I’ve highlighted.”
Asked if he thought Castro was a dictator, Trudeau said: “Yes.” He also said he raised the issue of human rights during an official visit to Cuba earlier this month.
Some Conservative opposition lawmakers on Sunday urged Trudeau to boycott Castro’s funeral while contenders for the Conservative leadership criticized his comments.
The prime minister’s office said no decision had yet been made on who would be representing Canada at the funeral.
Castro was an honorary pallbearer at the 2000 funeral of Trudeau’s father, the former Canadian prime minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau, who in 1976 was the first Nato leader to visit Cuba.
Trudeau’s initial statement, which was markedly more positive than those from most western leaders, sparked a backlash on Saturday, especially among Republicans and Cuban exiles in the US.
“You wouldn’t go to Pol Pot’s funeral,” Texas senator Ted Cruz told ABC’s This Week on Sunday. “You shouldn’t be doing what Obama and Trudeau are doing, celebrating Castro.”
Canada has long been one of Cuba’s closest western allies, maintaining ties after its 1959 revolution.

During his visit this month, Trudeau said Canada would maintain its relationship with Cuba even if that put it at odds with President-elect Donald Trump, who has threatened to reverse the US-Cuban detente.
SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS: Fidel finally buys it
The evil Fidel Castro, longtime dictator of Communist Cuba, dies at 90
By Matthew Vadum —— Bio and Archives
November 26, 2016
Oppressor and torturer of millions, murderer of thousands, and billionaire thief Fidel Castro is finally dead.
This death of this evil Communist and avowed enemy of the United States who took a wealthy, relatively free country and transformed into a poverty-stricken totalitarian hellhole was reported on Cuban television about an hour ago. Castro reportedly died at 10:29 p.m. Friday.
He was 90. Fidel handed his wee baby brother Raul the Cuban presidency in 2008.
Fidel’s inactivation makes the despoiler of Zimbabwe, 92-year-old Robert Mugabe, the heavy favorite in the dictator death pool.
But little Raul isn’t far behind.
He is 85.
Also See:
Who Is Fidel Castro?
11 May 2015

Let's Not Forget Bin Laden's Death and Obama's Birth Certificate!


Osama Bin Laden Fake Death, Obama Fake Birth Certificate
Published on Jul 9, 2013
Did Osama Bin Laden die for the very first and only time on May 1, 2011?
I had thought he had been dead since at least 2002 when I saw this September 11, 2002 interview with President Bush where he implied not once, but twice that Osama Bin Laden was no longer a factor.
I had also seen this video with the late Aaron Russo where he implied that the entire War on Terror was make-believe.
In the film Iron Man 3, The Mandarin Character was a phony terrorist acting in front of a green screen to advance the agenda of the real villain.
I watched TV for 2 hours on the day Osama Bin Laden was supposedly killed in hopes of seeing a dead body or some form of evidence. I never saw one. They said they dumped his body in the ocean.
The supposed death occurred on May 1. May 1 is a communist holiday known as May Day.
Three days earlier on April 27, Obama released his Long Form Birth Certificate, which instantly was criticized for having numerous photoshop layers and appeared to be an intentionally poor forgery. Once Obama supposedly got Osama 3 days later, the Birther Legacy began and ended with Donald Trump and no one ever heard of Sheriff Joe Arpaio and The Cold Case Posse, nor Phillip Berg, nor Jerome Corsi.... Or Larry Sinclair or Donald Brown for that matter.
Exactly 10 months later on March 1, 2012, Andrew Brietbart died at age 43 of natural causes, the day before he was going to release information about Barack Obama's past. Hardly any questions were asked about his death, and everyone took it as normal, that a guy at age 43 would just drop dead.
His website brietbart.com would later release his Harvard Law Review Bio where it read that he was born in Kenya and raised in Hawaii.
After that information came out, it was poo poo'd and silenced by saying it was a typo and a misprint.
Everyone went along with it.
Everyone takes it as normal when Michelle Obama said, "Barack's Homeland of Kenya".
The College Transcripts are still sealed. It was a total non-issue during both the '08 and '12 election and anyone who asked questions were silenced, and the courts did not hear any of the cases.
There seems to be more Anti-Birther websites online now than Birther sites.
If you type in Tim Osman into Google, you find results and pictures about Osama Bin Laden and Zbigniew Brizinsky.
If you look at Obama Biden, it looks like Osama Bin Laden.
Here is what we covered:
• Bush's Sept 11 2002 comments
• Aaron Russo's comments about what Nick Rockefeller told him.
• The Mandarin Character in Iron Man 3
• The May Day May 1st killing of Osama Bin Laden 4 days after the Birth Certificate was released which shifted the national discussion
• The death of Andrew Brietbart at age 43 of "natural causes"
• The Harvard Law Review Bio
• Michelle Obama's comment of "Baracks Homeland of Kenya"
It's all just a coincidence I'm sure.
My question is the following:
If Osama Bin Laden has been dead since at least 2002 or never really existed at all .... What did May 1, 2011 actually mean or symbolize then?
Does it simply mean the war on terror is over? That can't be, because it seems to still be going on.
If Osama Bin Laden did exist, do any of you really think his skills were sophisticated enough to evade detection for 9 and a half years?
Assuming Bin Laden was a hoax, Why did it his fake killing have to happen on May 1st? Why did they not do it April 28, 29, 30 or May2nd.
This confusion is what causes most people to want to firmly plant their heads into the sand. Lets all just go along to get along and everything will be fine.
Finally, and this is the reason I made this video .... If you think Osama Bin Laden was real, and died for the first time ever on May 1, 2011 while possessing no physical proof at all .... Then you have to forever give me the lifetime pass for saying that Extraterrestrials exist, and have visited and seeded our planet, and trade technology with our government for experiments on humans.
You've all demanded proof from me, even after I've provided thousands of FOIA documents and testimony, and it's never been enough, so now, I'm demanding you show me the smoking gun that Osama Bin Laden died for the first time on May 1, 2011.
You have no evidence except Obama's word, and two conveniently released movies Zero Dark Thirty and ___. And if you use that as your proof, then you have to allow me to use movies as my proof when I explain things without ridicule.
We are reversing the game on you now.
More and more people are waking up to mainstream status quo being a hoax lie.

Obama Didn't Kill Osama Bin Laden! Donald Trump Interview pt.2
Published on Dec 19, 2012
Obama Didn't Kill Osama Bin Laden! Donald Trump Interview pt.2 politics, news, mox news, fox news, msnbc, cnn, wall street journal, ron paul, marijuana legalization, barack obama, mitt romney, debate, police state, drone warfare, afghanistan, pakistan, libya, israel, iran, iraq, palestine, russia, china, jobs, economy

Saturday, November 26, 2016

Will Melania Divorce Donald Trump?


Melania Trump divorce?
Published on Oct 8, 2016

Melania Trump divorce? 
Melania Trump could soon divorce Donald in the wake of the bombshell tape in which he bragged about sexually assaulting women and cheating on his then-pregnant wife.
At least, if she turns to the internet for advice she will be.
Late on Friday afternoon, the Washington Post published an audio tape recorded in 2005 that showed Donald Trump and Access Hollywood host Billy Bush engaged in some degrading banter regarding women. In the audio — which was recorded just months after Donald and Melania were married and when Melania was pregnant with their child — Trump bragged about pursuing married women and aggressively going after women he found attractive.
Melania Trump Files for Divorce
Reports that Mrs. Trump has voiced concerns over her role as the First Lady of the United States, claiming that she “Didn’t sign up for this,” are fake news.
David Mikkelson, Snopes.com
Nov 13, 2016
CLAIM: Melania Trump has filed for divorce over her role as the First Lady of the United States.
ORIGIN:On 13 November 2016, the Now8News web site published an article positing that Melania Trump had filed for divorce from her husband, President-Elect Donald Trump, over concerns about her role as the First Lady of the United States:
The world is in shock over the weekend after sources close to Donald and Melania Trump confirm that Melania filed for divorce over the weekend. The Slovenia born model has voiced concerns over her role as the First Lady of the United States, claiming that she “Didn’t sign up for this.” Sources close to the couple say Melania is not prepared to be ridiculed for the next four years over her immigration status, accent and her husbands infidelities.
“She’s been very upset ever since Donald announced he was running for president last year,” said a woman close to the family. “She wanted a role as a kept woman, not as a woman in charge of being a role model in this country. She is also not prepared to leave her luxurious lifestyle to live in a home as old as the White House. She thinks that the decor is despicable and beyond repair.”
There was no truth to this story, which originated with Now8News, a clickbait fake news site that masquerades as the online arm of a local television news outlet.


Thursday, November 24, 2016

Some People Didn't Vote For Trump! (Part 1)


Jill Stein Suspiciously Wants Recount Only In States Won By Trump
Published on Nov 25, 2016

Butt-Hurt Losers Demand Recount!
Published on Nov 24, 2016
Smashing up cities & sending death threats to electors didn't work....now this.

WATCH: The Biggest Media Meltdowns to Trump's Win
Published on Nov 11, 2016
Warning: Explicit Language. The top media reactions to Donald Trump's win in the 2016 presidential election. Compiled of clips captured by the Media Research Center's NewsBusters. Produced by Katie Yoder.

90 Million People Didn't Vote In The Election And Now They're Protesting Donald Trump FNN
Published on Nov 10, 2016
Brought to you by Desert Diamond: http://ddcaz.com
Republican Donald Trump won the presidency fueled by a surge of working-class whites across a band of Midwestern states.

Trump protesters are clueless idiots
Published on Nov 9, 2016
These people don't even know why they're protesting folks. These people are so stupid I'm not even sure if George Soros needs to pay them. SAD!

Crybaby Cowards Protest Their President Elect Trump
Published on Nov 9, 2016
University of Texas students protested President Elect Trump less than 24 hours after his triumph over Hillary Clinton was announced. Jon Bowne delves into the misinformation brainwashing a generation of cowards succumbing to fears born of the lies they were fed during the campaign that is finally over.
Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

Clinton Crybabies! Funniest Compilation of Hillary Supporter Crying!!!
Published on Nov 9, 2016
The best compilation of hillary supporters crying!!!!!!
This video is covered under fair use laws!

Crying Hillary supporters lololol
Published on Nov 9, 2016
Oh the joy of Election night 2016. 

LIBERALS Freak Out over TRUMP winning the election. (Documentation of the Fall out)
Published on Nov 9, 2016

LIBERALS Freak Out over TRUMP winning the election. PART 2 
Published on Nov 11, 2016

LIBERALS Freak Out over TRUMP winning the election. PART 3
Published on Nov 20, 2016

Zombie Trump Protesters Shut Down By Simple Questions
Published on May 20, 2016
Outside the Trump rally in Lawrenceville, NJ protesters gathered to scream and yell at Trump supporters, but when they were asked simple questions to back up their beliefs they didn't have any substantial answers or explanations, forcing viewers to see their mindless mainstream media talking points.
Noam Chomsky: People Who Didn’t Vote For Clinton To Block Trump Made A ‘Bad Mistake’
“I didn’t like Clinton at all, but her positions are much better than Trump’s on every issue I can think of.”
Paige Lavender 
Senior Politics Editor, The Huffington Post

Noam Chomsky, the renowned scholar and MIT professor emeritus, said people who didn’t vote for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to block a Donald Trump presidency made a “bad mistake.”
Chomsky told Al Jazeera’s Mehdi Hasan there’s a “moral issue” in voting “against the greater evil” ― Trump, in this case ― even if you don’t like the other candidate. But he also said there was a factual question regarding this year’s candidates, pointing out Trump and Clinton’s “very different” records.
“I didn’t like Clinton at all, but her positions are much better than Trump’s on every issue I can think of,” Chomsky said.
Chomsky said in January he’d vote for Clinton if he lived in a swing state, despite his support for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who ran against Clinton in the Democratic presidential primary.
“Every Republican candidate is either a climate change denier or a skeptic who says we can’t do it,” Chomsky said. “What they are saying is, ‘Let’s destroy the world.’ Is that worth voting against? Yeah.”
Chomsky criticized Trump in May, calling his refusal to accept the science behind climate change “a death knell for the [human] species.” Chomsky has also been critical of the Republican Party, saying the GOP’s policies pose “serious danger to human survival.”
Chomsky told The Huffington Post in February, Trump’s success could be attributed to his ability to appeal to “deep feelings of anger, fear, frustration, hopelessness, probably among sectors like those that are seeing an increase in mortality, something unheard of apart from war and catastrophe.”

An American Tragedy
By David Remnick
November 9, 2016
The electorate has, in its plurality, decided to live in Trump’s world.SOURCE PHOTOGRAPH BY JOE RAEDLE / GETTY
The election of Donald Trump to the Presidency is nothing less than a tragedy for the American republic, a tragedy for the Constitution, and a triumph for the forces, at home and abroad, of nativism, authoritarianism, misogyny, and racism. Trump’s shocking victory, his ascension to the Presidency, is a sickening event in the history of the United States and liberal democracy. On January 20, 2017, we will bid farewell to the first African-American President—a man of integrity, dignity, and generous spirit—and witness the inauguration of a con who did little to spurn endorsement by forces of xenophobia and white supremacy. It is impossible to react to this moment with anything less than revulsion and profound anxiety.
There are, inevitably, miseries to come: an increasingly reactionary Supreme Court; an emboldened right-wing Congress; a President whose disdain for women and minorities, civil liberties and scientific fact, to say nothing of simple decency, has been repeatedly demonstrated. Trump is vulgarity unbounded, a knowledge-free national leader who will not only set markets tumbling but will strike fear into the hearts of the vulnerable, the weak, and, above all, the many varieties of Other whom he has so deeply insulted. The African-American Other. The Hispanic Other. The female Other. The Jewish and Muslim Other. The most hopeful way to look at this grievous event—and it’s a stretch—is that this election and the years to follow will be a test of the strength, or the fragility, of American institutions. It will be a test of our seriousness and resolve.
Early on Election Day, the polls held out cause for concern, but they provided sufficiently promising news for Democrats in states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, North Carolina, and even Florida that there was every reason to think about celebrating the fulfillment of Seneca Falls, the election of the first woman to the White House. Potential victories in states like Georgia disappeared, little more than a week ago, with the F.B.I. director’s heedless and damaging letter to Congress about reopening his investigation and the reappearance of damaging buzzwords like “e-mails,” “Anthony Weiner,” and “fifteen-year-old girl.” But the odds were still with Hillary Clinton.
All along, Trump seemed like a twisted caricature of every rotten reflex of the radical right. That he has prevailed, that he has won this election, is a crushing blow to the spirit; it is an event that will likely cast the country into a period of economic, political, and social uncertainty that we cannot yet imagine. That the electorate has, in its plurality, decided to live in Trump’s world of vanity, hate, arrogance, untruth, and recklessness, his disdain for democratic norms, is a fact that will lead, inevitably, to all manner of national decline and suffering.
In the coming days, commentators will attempt to normalize this event. They will try to soothe their readers and viewers with thoughts about the “innate wisdom” and “essential decency” of the American people. They will downplay the virulence of the nationalism displayed, the cruel decision to elevate a man who rides in a gold-plated airliner but who has staked his claim with the populist rhetoric of blood and soil. George Orwell, the most fearless of commentators, was right to point out that public opinion is no more innately wise than humans are innately kind. People can behave foolishly, recklessly, self-destructively in the aggregate just as they can individually. Sometimes all they require is a leader of cunning, a demagogue who reads the waves of resentment and rides them to a popular victory. “The point is that the relative freedom which we enjoy depends of public opinion,” Orwell wrote in his essay “Freedom of the Park.” “The law is no protection. Governments make laws, but whether they are carried out, and how the police behave, depends on the general temper in the country. If large numbers of people are interested in freedom of speech, there will be freedom of speech, even if the law forbids it; if public opinion is sluggish, inconvenient minorities will be persecuted, even if laws exist to protect them.”
Trump ran his campaign sensing the feeling of dispossession and anxiety among millions of voters—white voters, in the main. And many of those voters—not all, but many—followed Trump because they saw that this slick performer, once a relative cipher when it came to politics, a marginal self-promoting buffoon in the jokescape of eighties and nineties New York, was more than willing to assume their resentments, their fury, their sense of a new world that conspired against their interests. That he was a billionaire of low repute did not dissuade them any more than pro-Brexit voters in Britain were dissuaded by the cynicism of Boris Johnson and so many others. The Democratic electorate might have taken comfort in the fact that the nation had recovered substantially, if unevenly, from the Great Recession in many ways—unemployment is down to 4.9 per cent—but it led them, it led us, to grossly underestimate reality. The Democratic electorate also believed that, with the election of an African-American President and the rise of marriage equality and other such markers, the culture wars were coming to a close. Trump began his campaign declaring Mexican immigrants to be “rapists”; he closed it with an anti-Semitic ad evoking “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”; his own behavior made a mockery of the dignity of women and women’s bodies. And, when criticized for any of it, he batted it all away as “political correctness.” Surely such a cruel and retrograde figure could succeed among some voters, but how could he win? Surely, Breitbart News, a site of vile conspiracies, could not become for millions a source of news and mainstream opinion. And yet Trump, who may have set out on his campaign merely as a branding exercise, sooner or later recognized that he could embody and manipulate these dark forces. The fact that “traditional” Republicans, from George H. W. Bush to Mitt Romney, announced their distaste for Trump only seemed to deepen his emotional support.
The commentators, in their attempt to normalize this tragedy, will also find ways to discount the bumbling and destructive behavior of the F.B.I., the malign interference of Russian intelligence, the free pass—the hours of uninterrupted, unmediated coverage of his rallies—provided to Trump by cable television, particularly in the early months of his campaign. We will be asked to count on the stability of American institutions, the tendency of even the most radical politicians to rein themselves in when admitted to office. Liberals will be admonished as smug, disconnected from suffering, as if so many Democratic voters were unacquainted with poverty, struggle, and misfortune. There is no reason to believe this palaver. There is no reason to believe that Trump and his band of associates—Chris Christie, Rudolph Giuliani, Mike Pence, and, yes, Paul Ryan—are in any mood to govern as Republicans within the traditional boundaries of decency. Trump was not elected on a platform of decency, fairness, moderation, compromise, and the rule of law; he was elected, in the main, on a platform of resentment. Fascism is not our future—it cannot be; we cannot allow it to be so—but this is surely the way fascism can begin.
Hillary Clinton was a flawed candidate but a resilient, intelligent, and competent leader, who never overcame her image among millions of voters as untrustworthy and entitled. Some of this was the result of her ingrown instinct for suspicion, developed over the years after one bogus “scandal” after another. And yet, somehow, no matter how long and committed her earnest public service, she was less trusted than Trump, a flim-flam man who cheated his customers, investors, and contractors; a hollow man whose countless statements and behavior reflect a human being of dismal qualities—greedy, mendacious, and bigoted. His level of egotism is rarely exhibited outside of a clinical environment.
For eight years, the country has lived with Barack Obama as its President. Too often, we tried to diminish the racism and resentment that bubbled under the cyber-surface. But the information loop had been shattered. On Facebook, articles in the traditional, fact-based press look the same as articles from the conspiratorial alt-right media. Spokesmen for the unspeakable now have access to huge audiences. This was the cauldron, with so much misogynistic language, that helped to demean and destroy Clinton. The alt-right press was the purveyor of constant lies, propaganda, and conspiracy theories that Trump used as the oxygen of his campaign. Steve Bannon, a pivotal figure at Breitbart, was his propagandist and campaign manager.
It is all a dismal picture. Late last night, as the results were coming in from the last states, a friend called me full of sadness, full of anxiety about conflict, about war. Why not leave the country? But despair is no answer. To combat authoritarianism, to call out lies, to struggle honorably and fiercely in the name of American ideals—that is what is left to do. That is all there is to do.
More on Donald Trump’s victory: Amy Davidson on Trump’s stunning win, Evan Osnos on Trump’s supporters, and Benjamin Wallace-Wells on who is to blame. John Cassidy on how Trump became President-elect. Evan Osnos on Trump’s supporters.
David Remnick has been editor of The New Yorker since 1998 and a staff writer since 1992. MORE
WATCH: David Remnick and Nicholas Thompson discuss what Donald Trump’s victory means for America’s future.

Hillary voters are totally shocked when they hear the truth about her.
Published on Nov 13, 2016
Hillary voters were told to answer who made certain statements. Hillary or Trump, and boy did they get a surprise.