Monday, January 09, 2017

When the Absurd Becomes Reality! (Part 15)

*******

Hillary Supporters are as dumb as you think!   
Published on Oct 11, 2016
Ignorance is prevalent especially among liberals.
*******

Hillary Clinton Supporters are the World's Dumbest People   
Published on Aug 6, 2015
I have lost count on how many felonies Hillary has committed over the past 30 years.
Here is a short list:
Obstruction of justice
Withholding evidence
destruction of evidence
lying to Congress
money laundering
abuse of power
accepting foreign cash
violating a subpeona
violation of executive orders
The Clintons = The 1% Family 
Bill Clinton Over 80 Million Net Worth (http://www.therichest.com/celebnetwor...)
Hillary Clinton Over 21.5 Million Net Worth (http://www.celebritynetworth.com/rich...)
Also Own At Least 2 Mansions. 
1 At 15 Old House Ln Chappaqua, NY (http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/15-...)
And 1 At 3067 Whitehaven St NW, Washington, DC 20008 (http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/306...)
Actual Numbers Are Much More But They Hide Most Of Their Money In Off Shore Accounts And In Their Fake Charity Foundation.
Hillary The 1%er That Is For The Rich Elite:
The following is the list of Hillary Clintons Income from various styles:
1)Abu Dhabi Global Environmental Data Initiative (AGEDI) (Partner) Abu Dhabi, UAE $500,000
2) Bank Administration Institute (Partner) Chicago, IL $200,000
3)HSM Americas, Inc. (Partner) New York, NY $175,000
4)Deloitte Services LP (Partner) New York, NY $200,000
5)Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. (Spouse) New York, NY $200,000
6)Highland Capital (Spouse) New York, NY $175,000
7)TD Ameritrade (Partner) Las Vegas, NV $200,000
8)American Express (Spouse) New York, NY $200,000
9)World Marketplace Center SPE, LLC (Partner) Las Vegas, NV $175,000
10)UBS Wealth Management (Partner) Dallas, TX $165,000
11)Jeffries & Company, Inc. (Partner) New York, NY $200,000
Besides these Hillary Clinton Brings In over $10 million from other political Contributions. Bill & Hillary Clinton own a huge Estate situated in Chappaqua, NY that will be spread over 17 acres and lovely landscaped gardens. the house is three level building offering a living space of 5300 sq. feet and 5 bedrooms, 4 bathrooms, dining room and living room. It’s a big pool, tennis court, attached to it and the house features high-end comforts. The house is valued at over $8 million. They also own a huge 12000 sq. feet villa in East Hampton. The villa has 8 bedrooms, a big living salon, dining room, two powder rooms, a library, 5 bathrooms and a kitchen while offering a superb view of the Atlantic Ocean. The property is valued at over $20 million.
*******
Convicted killer: California will pay for his sex-change
By Jon Rappoport
January 8, 2017
Rodney Quine, 57, is serving a life-without-parole sentence for murder, kidnapping, and robbery. He now calls himself Shiloh Heavenly Quine.
He has been battling for the right to obtain full sex-change procedures from the state of California; he has won his case; and now he has received the surgery, paid for by the state.
After long opposition, California corrections officials finally gave in.
The legal basis for Quine's claim? The Eighth Amendment to the US Constitution: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
Presumably, it is the "cruel and unusual punishment" phrase that is considered relevant and binding.
In order to bolster that claim, there would need to be an official designation of "transgender person." However, from the state's point of view, a person simply saying he is transgender or wants to be transgender is sufficient to establish that he IS transgender. Whether or not he carries biological or genetic factors that could, possibly, dispose him to want to change his sex, those factors aren't necessary.
Therefore, when Quine claims he wants to be female, this is enough to invoke the "cruel and unusual" designation. He is in prison. He is under the absolute authority of the state of California. He wants to become female. If the state didn't pay for the full medical procedure, the state would be punishing him beyond an allowable Constitutional limit.
That's quite a stretch.
It permits a prisoner's subjective opinion to carry the day---in this case, a convicted kidnapper's and murderer's opinion.
This is moral relativism at its finest. The state of California must honor the opinion, assertion, and values of a convicted killer, and pay for it with tax dollars.
To justify and elevate a person's subjective opinion and assertion, there is a medical condition called gender dysphoria. But on examination, this turns out to be a "feeling."
WebMD: "People who have gender dysphoria feel strongly that they are not the gender they physically appear to be. For example, a person who has a penis and all other physical traits of a male might feel instead that he is actually a female. That person would have an intense desire to have a female body and to be accepted by others as a female. Or, someone with the physical characteristics of a female would feel her true identity is male. Feeling that your body does not reflect your true gender can cause severe distress, anxiety, and depression. 'Dysphoria' is a feeling of dissatisfaction, anxiety, and restlessness. With gender dysphoria, the discomfort with your male or female body can be so intense that it can interfere with the way you function in normal life, for instance at school or work or during social activities."
In our society, this feeling (accompanied by a vapid medical label) is now considered sufficient to force the state to pay for radical medical procedures that will satisfy an intensely unhappy person serving a life sentence for murder.
It's clear that an agenda is operating here. If this prisoner, Quine, will have his sex-change paid for by the state, then why can't any person in California demand the state pay for the same medical treatment?
To take this even further, why should we stop at the issue of gender dysphoria? It's merely a social and political movement that has gained enough support to exert influence over government decisions. Why can't ANY individual's feeling, reflecting ANY preference or desire, win the approval of the state and its funding apparatus?
If a person claims he can't function in a place that has refused to declare itself a sanctuary city, why can't he demand the state pay for his relocation to San Francisco?
If a person declares he can no longer retain his sanity in a state that voted for Trump in the election, why can't he obtain funding from that state or the federal government so he can move to New York?
---"But gender issues are more real, more basic, more compelling." Are they? By what standard? It all comes back to an individual and what he says he feels. From that basis, a social movement has developed---what used to be called a pressure group.
I'm sure, with some funding from George Soros or another humanitarian saint, a movement of people who are afflicted with "non-sanctuary city disorder" could band together, and they could, over time, make a compelling case for state-sponsored relocation to a more amenable social climate.
In case you hadn't noticed, society has turned into a "tolerance scoreboard." Under the unspoken rules of political correctness, citizens are pressured to give assent to the most outrageous demands, even to the extent of funding them with their taxes. This abject acceptance is part of the "progressive agenda."
On the other hand, zero tolerance is deployed to oppose, neutralize, and punish trivial or even constructive actions. A child comes to school with a pop-tart and chews it into a shape resembling a gun and all hell breaks loose. A homeowner grows vegetables on her front lawn and local officials issue a fine and a cease and desist order. A homeowners' association in Southern California orders the wife of a Marine to take down an American flag she placed in a "common area," where residents have placed signs and other types of flags.
This is operant conditioning. "Accept these behaviors. Reject those behaviors."
And now a prisoner serving life in California will have his demands met.
Stand up and salute a victory for "social awareness."
*******
*******
Woman Unknowingly Prays to ‘Lord of the Rings’ Figurine for Years
By Spooky on January 6th, 2017
A great-grandmother from Brazil has accidentally been praying to a figurine of Elrond, and elf from J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings, after mistaking it for Saint Anthony, the late Portuguese priest and patron saint of lost things.

Gabriela Brandão, a make-up artist from Florianópolis, Brazil, made this hilarious discovery last week, posting a series of photos of the Elrond figurine on Facebook. “My daughter’s great-grandmother prays to this figure of Saint Anthony every day, but looking more closely…,” she wrote. She had noticed that something wasn’t right about the figurine, so she started doing some online research. She managed to find an exact replica on an online store, which listed it as Elrond, an Elven character from The Lord of the Rings fantasy universe. She called it the “funniest discovery of 2016.”
*******
Iraqi refugee who raped a 10-year-old boy at a swimming pool in a 'sexual emergency' has his conviction overturned because the Austrian court 'didn't prove he realised the boy was saying no'
Rapist, known as Amir A, 20, said he attacked boy in a 'sexual emergency'
He had not had sex in four months, so dragged him into changing rooms
Supreme Court in Austria now say prosecution did not prove the rape claim
They want harder evidence the boy, 10, was forced to act against his will
By Gareth Davies for MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 21 October 2016 
An Iraqi refugee who raped a 10-year-old boy at a swimming pool has had his conviction overturned because a court didn't prove he realised the boy was saying no.
The rapist, identified as Amir A, 20, violently sexually assaulted the boy in the changing room of Theresienbad pool in Austria claiming it was a 'sexual emergency' because he had not had sex for four months.
But an appeal court in the country accepted the defence lawyer's claim that the lower court had not done enough to prove he knew the schoolboy was saying no and overturned the conviction.
The migrant was jumping from the diving board at Theresienbad pool (pictured above) when police came to arrest him with the man now sentenced to six years jail
The incident occurred in December 2015 as part of the integration process where he traveled with a 15-year-old helper and translator who was meant to be teaching him how to integrate into life in Vienna.
He seized his moment at the pool and dragged the boy into the changing rooms and locked the door before raping him.
The boy, known as Goran, required immediate medical treatment and has been suffering with post-traumatic stress disorder ever since.
Brazen predator Amir A even went back to the swimming pool after the rape and was playing on the diving board when police came to arrest him. 
Confessing to the rape in an interview with officers, he said he knew what he did was wrong but did it anyway because it was a 'sexual emergency' having gone four months without sex, according to The Local.
The young victim loved going swimming at the local pool in Vienna but now suffers from severe post-traumatic stress disorder and panic attacks
In the initial court hearing, he was found guilty of sexual assault and the rape of a minor and was sentenced to six years in jail.
But the Supreme Court rescinded the sentence and ordered a re-trial with the court's president Thomas Philipp calling the verdict 'watertight' when it came to the sexual assault of a child, but that rape could not be sufficiently proved, says The Local.
The higher court said it should have been ascertained whether or not the victim agreed to the sexual act or whether Amir A had acted against the will of the boy. 

A second trial for the rape is expected to take place next year, but the attacker is likely to remain in custody until then.
*******
Also See:
When the Absurd Becomes Reality! 

(Part 1)
23 March 2009
and
(Part 2)
07 August 2009
and
(Part 3)
21 February 2011
and
(Part 4)
21 November 2011
and
(Part 5)
24 December 2011
and
(Part 6)
13 April 2012
and
(Part 7)
19 June 2013
and
(Part 8)
21 March 2014
(Part 10)
12 November 2015
and
(Part 11)
03 May 2016
and
(Part 12)
10 August 2016
(Part 14)
29 Octobert 2016
Science Fiction or Future Reality?
01 November 2008
and
What is Truth? - Is Everything Relative? Does the End Justify the Means?
28 August 2009
and
Are You Reality Denied?
25 March 2011
and
"Wrongful Birth" Insanity!
14 November 2011
and
It's Everywhere: Be Wary of Myths, Fabricated Lies, and Distorted Data!
 29 August 2015
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2015/08/its-everywhere-be-wary-of-myths.html
and
Did Paul McCartney Die in 1966?
26 September 2016
http://arcticcompass.blogspot.ca/2016/09/did-paul-mccartney-die-in1966.html
*******