Monday, May 15, 2017

Muslim Rape Gangs Flourish In Britain Since Late 1980s!

A Sikhs Response to Pakistani Muslim Grooming Gangs in Rotherham - Sikh Awareness Society
Published on Feb 28, 2016
A Sikhs Response to Pakistani Muslim Grooming Gangs in Rotherham
By Sikh Awareness Society (SAS)
'Easy Meat.' Britain's Muslim Rape Gang Cover-Up
Published on Aug 26, 2016
Douglas Murray On Islamic Child Grooming Rape Gangs Within Britain
Published on Dec 27, 2015
UK: Muslim rape gang victim says “I was made to feel as though I was racist”
By Robert Spencer
May 14, 2017
She was also told not to mention the ethnicity of her attackers. British authorities were (and are) more concerned about protecting the Muslim community than about protecting their own children. They are condemning the British people to a future of civil strife, violence, and subjugation — all to avoid accusations of racism and “Islamophobia.”
“Rotherham Child Rape Victim: ‘Authorities Did Nothing’, Was Told Not to Mention Ethnicity of Attackers,” by Victoria Friedman, Breitbart, May 14, 2017:
A survivor of a Muslim grooming gang in Rotherham said she reported being raped when she was 13 years old, but authorities did nothing and told her not to mention the ethnicity of the attackers.
The rape survivor, Emma, told Katie Hopkins on LBC radio on Sunday: “I actually reported my abuse 14 years ago. I went to the authorities, my parents did. I sat and gave video interviews with the police, I was willing to work with them.
“But as soon as I said the names, I was made to feel as though I was racist and I was the one who had the problem.”
“I was specifically told not to comment on the ethnicity of the perpetrators,” Emma said, adding she was told “numerous times” by police and social workers not to mention race.
“I knew I wasn’t racist, but I felt like that was used as a way to silence me.”
Asked by Ms. Hopkins how that made her feel at the time, Emma said: “My perpetrators made me feel like I was in the wrong and they [police and social workers] fed into that. And I felt like: ‘Maybe my perpetrators are right. Maybe it’s not them that’s got the problem, maybe it’s me’.”
Groomed from 12, Emma told LBC listeners she was a virgin when she was raped at age 13. Detailing that the rapes happened regularly, she described one occasion where she was locked in a property and sexually assaulted by multiple men.
The Muslim grooming gang then began blackmailing the young teen, and threatened to gang rape her mother if she told her parents.
“That was my life,” she said.
The rapes continued after she reported it to police, as authorities told her it was “[her] word against his”. The police had also lost the clothes she had been raped in, leaving her with no evidence for a prosecution.
Let down by authorities, she found herself being further abused by other rape gangs. She reported rape again at the age of 14, but police said there was not enough evidence.
Eventually, her parents moved her out of the country.
“Nobody wanted to stop it, and that was the only way they could stop it,” Emma said.
Ms. Hopkins told Emma that other parents of victims of Muslim grooming gangs had moved their daughters abroad, saying moving girls to different parts of the country was ineffective as the rape gangs are “networked between cities”.

The Rotherham child sex abuse scandal is the biggest child protection scandal in Britain’s history, where, since the late 1980s, police and social services failed to protect girls from predatory grooming gangs made up of Muslim men for fear of being labelled racist, leading to institutional cover-ups….
UK: Muslim rape gang in court over 170 charges of sexual exploitation of 18 children
By Robert Spencer
April 13, 2017
Not all the defendants have Muslim names; the two with Sikh names and the one other name could be converts to Islam, or non-Muslim degenerates who got in on the action. The other 26 are Muslim names, including two (hijabbed, and hence unmolested, cf. Qur’an 33:59) women who apparently helped the men use and destroy these non-Muslim girls.
Why would they do that? Perhaps because in Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni 
declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri said in April 7, 2016 that a man could offer slave girls to a friend for sex.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.
“29 people in court over 170 charges of sexual exploitation of 18 children,” by Richard Hartley-Parkinson,, April 13, 2017:
Twenty nine people have appeared in court facing a total of more than 170 charges relating to the sexual exploitation of 18 children.The 27 men and two women appeared before a district judge at Huddersfield Magistrates Court charged with offences including rape, trafficking, sexual activity with a child, child neglect, child abduction, supplying drugs and making of indecent images of children….The allegations are non-recent sexual offences, dating back to between 2004 and 2011, and relate to 18 women, who were children at the time. The youngest child involved was 11 years old….
The defendants are:
Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, Huddersfield is charged with 54 offences. He is charged with 21 counts of rape, 14 counts of trafficking, as well as inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, sexual touching, possession of indecent images of a child, racially aggravated assault and inciting a child into prostitution.
Raj Singh Barsran, 33, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual touching and rape.
Abdul Rehman, 29, Sheffield. He is charged with rape, trafficking, supplying drugs, supply of a controlled substance with intent to engage in sexual activity and sexual touching.
Nasarat Hussain, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape, attempted rape and inciting a female to engage in sexual activity.
Irfan Ahmed, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with six counts of trafficking, sexual assault, making indecent images of a child and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.
Zubair Ahmed, 30, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape and possession of extreme pornography.
Mohammed Riswan Aslam, 29, Dewsbury. He is charged with two counts of rape.
Mohammed Kammer, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with two counts of rape.
Mohammad Nahman, 31, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking, sexual assault, and two counts of rape.
Hamzha Ali Saleem, 37, Old Trafford, Greater Manchester. He is charged with three counts of trafficking.
Zahid Hassan, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with eight counts of rape, five counts of trafficking, racially aggravated assault, supplying drugs, inciting a child into sexual activity, child abduction and attempted rape.
Mohammad Azeem, 31, Bradford. He is charged with three counts of rape.
Sajid Hussain, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape, facilitating the commission of sexual activity on a child and inciting a child into sexual activity.
Mansoor Akhtar, 25, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape, attempted rape and two counts of trafficking.
Mohammed Asaf Akram, 31, Huddersfield. He is charged with seven counts of rape, three counts of trafficking, child abduction, supplying drugs, sexual assault and making threats to kill.
Zulwarnain Dogar, 29, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual touching and trafficking.
Manzoor Hassan, 37, Huddersfield. He is charged with supply of a noxious substance with intent to injure, annoy or aggrieve a female, supply of Class A drugs and inciting a child into prostitution.
Mohammad Ifraz, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking a female within the UK with a view to her sexual exploitation, rape, false imprisonment, child abduction, taking indecent images of a child and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.
Wiqas Mahmud, 36, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape.
Faisal Nadeem, 30, Huddersfield. He is charged with supplying drugs, rape and possession of extreme pornography.
Niaz Ahmed, 53, Slaithwaite, Huddersfield. He is charged with inciting a child into sexual activity and sexual assault.
Asif Bashir, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with four counts of rape and attempted rape.
Mohammad Imran Ibrar, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking, facilitating the commission of sexual activity on a child, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, supplying drugs.
Aleem Javaid, 27, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape and supplying drugs.
Mohammed Saqib Raheel, 30, Dudley. He is charged with trafficking and child abduction.
Usman Khalid, 29, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual assault, child abduction and sexual touching.
Everton La Bastide, 50, Huddersfield. He is charged with two counts of sexual assault.
Shahnaz Akhtar Malik, 55, Huddersfield. She is charged with one count of child neglect.

Naveeda Habib, 38, Huddersfield. She is charged with one count of child neglect….
UK: Muslim rape gang victim whose life was destroyed slams Rotherham authorities
By Robert Spencer
March 26, 2017
In Rotherham, British officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnicorigins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
If the British authorities really want to root out this problem, they need to prosecute Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal and the other Leftists who are responsible for the stigmatization of scrutiny of the Muslim community and demonization of those who were calling attention to this barbarity.
“Grooming Victim Whose Life Was ‘Destroyed’ Slams Rotherham Authorities,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, March 25, 2017:
Rotherham grooming victim Sammy Woodhouse has said she was “betrayed” by authorities in the town, who failed to act on the violent child rapist for fear of “being perceived as racist”.
Now campaigning for other victims of sexual abuse, she said she was “just one of dozens of girls… exploited and viewed as white trash” in Rotherham by Arshid Hussain, a drug dealer ten years her senior from a notorious family of criminals.
“He took everything from me: my loving family, my future, my friends”, Woodhouse told the Mail, recalling that she had “just turned 14” when the then 24 year old began the grooming process.
“He became controlling, possessive and he’d batter me. But the scars of the mental abuse took longer to fade than the bruises. He used to tell me that without him I was nothing and nobody.
“For four or five years, there were times I was so depressed I couldn’t get out of bed. At my lowest point, I wanted to take my own life.”
Woodhouse’s parents were distraught when they learned Hussain was having sex with their daughter, but the “manipulative” rapist told her people’s concern was borne of racism.
“Your dad just doesn’t like me because he’s a racist”, Woodhouse was told.
The relationship escalated when she began disappearing for days or weeks at a time, moving between flats and B&Bs in Rotherham, many apparently owned by the Hussain family.
“Dad scoured the streets looking for me. He took my photo to every B&B and hotel in the area, asking if anyone had seen me. Mum would cry herself to sleep. It ripped our family apart,” she said.
Fearing for their daughter’s safety, Woodhouse’s parents put her in the care of social service. But despite Rotherham Council knowing that Hussein was a serial abuser, social services did nothing to protect the girl from him.
“They failed me massively. I was betrayed by them”, she said. “Mum and Dad were distraught but powerless. The police were scared to be perceived as racist. Nothing was done.
“Meanwhile, I was being sexually abused on a daily basis. Sometimes it was as if I was a dead body lying on a slab. I’d become emotionless. I weighed 7st — I was like a rag doll.
“I started to hear rumours that he was sleeping with my friends, and whenever I confronted him he’d kick off and hit me.”
Woodward described how, during one row while she was pregnant, the violent heroin dealer sped off with her in his car, and crashed it into a wall. Although police charged Hussain with having no tax or insurance, they failed to do anything about the battered, pregnant 15-year-old with him in the car.
The anti-abuse campaigner described how, as a 14 year old, police found her half-naked at one of Hussain’s properties, hiding under the bed.Rather than being concerned about her position as an under-age girl, they cautioned Woodhouse for possession of an offensive weapon after discovering a truncheon — which belonged to Hussain — in her handbag.
“Today, I realise the police failed me. It’s disgraceful that they did not even question Ash, who was 25, about why he was with a girl as young as me,” she said.
Woodhouse is today seeking support from the Prime Minister and Duchess of Cambridge for ‘Sammy’s Law’, a campaign which seeks to wipe clean sexual exploitation victims’ records, asserting that they are often coerced into committing crimes by their abusers.
“The questions have to be asked,” she says: “How and why were they convicted? Are they likely to re-offend, and are they a risk to society?”
She described how, as a 14-year-old, Hussain “had given me the truncheon so I’d get into trouble, not him … Such circumstances should be taken into account, so victims like me can move on with their lives.”

It was not until February last year that the drug dealer was jailed for his crimes against Woodhouse….
‘Easy Meat.’ Britain’s Muslim Rape Gang Cover-Up
Original article courtesy of CBN
September 4, 2016
Some scandals are so massive that they’re simply hard to believe. As many as one million white English children may have been the victims of Muslim rape gangs, better known as grooming gangs, in towns up and down Great Britain.
Policy analyst George Igler says, “When you encounter an issue that is just so unbelievable, just so outside your frame of reference and understanding, the immediate human reaction is just one to not believe it at all.”
Perhaps even harder to believe is that while there have been prosecutions, the British government has still not stopped this criminal activity. Former Home 
Secretary and parliament member Jack Straw once said, “There’s a particular problem involving Pakistani heritage men who target young, vulnerable, white English girls.” He also said these Pakistani heritage men view white English girls as “easy meat.” This is when some shout ‘racism,’ but here are the facts: calculations based on convictions show that a British Muslim male is 170 times more likely to be a part of sex grooming gang than a non-Muslim. And there are no recorded instances of non-Muslims doing this to Muslim girls as part of a criminal enterprise. In one local jurisdiction, it was estimated that six out of seven Muslim males either knew about, or were part of, a grooming gang.
Igler says, “What you do not have is any example of non-Muslim men targeting Muslim girls for this organized form of abuse. So, the argument that this crime exists everywhere is not only false, but is being deliberately cultivated by the media and by the government inquiry that is kicking the can down the road.”
The grooming gangs have been traced back as far as the late 1980s. At-risk white English girls, often from broken homes and some as young as nine years old, were wooed or “groomed” by teenage Muslim boys called ‘Romeos’ and even by groups of Muslim men who hung around school gates. The girl would be made to feel important; given gifts and drugs. She was being groomed to be a drug addicted prostitute. Then came the gang rapes. They were threatened with death if they tried to flee.
Igler says, “The thing you have to understand about this rape of children is it’s not just sexual abuse. It is unspeakable levels of violence, victims being raped with knives, victims being raped with bottles, victims having their tongues nailed to tables. These are sometimes girls who are picked up from a children’s home on a Friday, are being raped during the course of a weekend by hundreds of men and returned with bleeding groins back to the children’s’ home on a Monday morning and they don’t do anything about it at all.”
UK Police Knew and did Nothing to Protect Girls from Muslim Predators
Better to sacrifice some British kids on the altar of multiculturalism than overturn the altar altogether
Raymond Ibrahim
July 2, 2015 
Not only do recent revelations concerning  the endemic sexual grooming of British girls by Muslim men demonstrate how crippling political correctness is, but they show how political correctness complements the most abusive elements of Islamic law, or Sharia.
According to a June 24 report by the Birmingham Mail, as far back as March 2010, West Midlands Police knew that Muslim grooming gangs “were targeting children outside schools across the city—but failed to make the threat public.”
A confidential report obtained under a Freedom of Information Act indicates that police were well aware that British pupils were being targeted by mostly Muslim men.  Several passages from the report make this clear:
In one heavily redacted passage, entitled ‘Schools’, it states: “In (redacted) a teacher at a (redacted) that a group of Asian males were approaching pupils at the school gate and grooming them. Strong anecdotal evidence shows this MO (modus operandi) is being used across the force.”
The 2010 report also reveals how these “Asian” gangs used victims to target other girls.  For example, by using “a young girl in a children’s home to target and groom other residents on their behalf….   The girl’s motivation to recruit new victims is often that the provision of new girls provides her a way to escape the cycle of abuse.”
Other victims were systematically “forced into prostitution and high levels of intimidation and force are used to keep the victims compliant.”
Although police knew all this, the Birmingham Mail said it “is unaware of any police public appeals or warnings from that time”—appeals and warnings that no doubt would have saved many girls from the Islamic sex rings.
So what paralyzed police from any action, even warnings to the community?  The report sheds light:
The predominant offender profile of Pakistani Muslim males... combined with the predominant victim profile of white females has the potential to cause significant community tensions…. There is a potential for a backlash against the vast majority of law abiding citizens from Asian/Pakistani communities from other members of the community believing their children have been exploited.
Once again, then, political correctness—this time under the pretext of fear of a “backlash”—was enough to paralyze the police from arresting Muslim sex predators and releasing their victims. 
And what if a “backlash” were to occur?  Why is it okay for innocent children to be plied with drugs and passed around in kabob shops and taxicabs while police standby—but it’s not okay for the so-called “majority of law abiding citizens from Asian/Pakistani communities” to ever experience anything negative? 
Maybe if they did, they’d actually reign in the sexual predators of their community—some of whom are, in fact, “pillars of their community.”   Maybe they’d implore their imams in the UK—the majority of whom reportedly promote the sexual grooming of “infidel” children—to change their tune. 
In reality, the great fear is that a backlash would demonstrate once and for all that multiculturalism—especially in the context of Islam—is an abysmal failure; it would be an admittance that even the West is part of the “real world,” one full of ugly truths that must be combatted, not merely “understood” or appeased.
Better sacrifice some British kids on the altar of multiculturalism than overturn the altar altogether.
It’s also interesting to see that political correctness not only exonerates Islamic-inspired crimes, but has a symbiotic relationship with the supremacist elements of Sharia.
For example, some know that, while Islamic law bans any mockery of its founder, Muhammad, so too does Western censorship in the name of political correctness accommodate this Sharia statute (meanwhile, Islamic teachings—based on the precedent of Muhammad—holds it the right of a Muslim to curse, mock, and desecrate other religions).
In the case of Muslim-led sex grooming rings in Britain, just as Islamic law permits the sexual exploitation of “infidel” women, so too does Western political correctness allow it to flourish in Western lands.
Worst of all, it’s not just politicians and other jesters who are engaging in this form of Sharia-enabling political correctness.  In the UK, it’s the very police departments themselves. 
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
UK: It was “Racist” to Prosecute Muslim Rape Gangs
So they operated with impunity for over twenty years
Robert Spencer
November 23, 2014 
More Scumbags
Britain’s Birmingham Mail reported last week that Birmingham’s City Council buried a report about Muslim cab drivers exploiting non-Muslim girls back in 1990.
A researcher, Dr. Jill Jesson, drafted a report on this issue. But, she explained, “the report was shelved, buried, it was never made public. I was shocked to be told that copies of the report were to be destroyed and that nothing further was to be said. Clearly, there was something in this report that someone in the department was worried about.”
Authorities were worried because Jesson’s report illustrated that virtually all of the exploitative cab drivers were “Asians,” the British media euphemism for Muslims, and their victims were “white,” i.e., non-Muslim. The exploitation of these girls stems from Qur’an-based religious beliefs, but British officials were terrified because stopping this exploitation would appear “racist.”
Jesson elaborated:
“There was a link between the sexual abuse of the girls and private hire drivers in the city. I thought at the time I did the work that there was an issue with race. Most of the girls were white. I was asked to take this link out, to erase it….Every time a news item has come on about sexual grooming of young girls and girls in care, and the link, too, between private hire drivers, I have thought ‘I told them about that in 1991 but they didn’t want to acknowledge it.’”
“The sad part of this story,” Jesson concluded, “is not the suppression of evidence but that the relevant organisations have failed to address this problem.”
Indeed so – and that is because of its racial and religious aspects. British authorities persist in seeing this as a racial issue, when in fact these cabbies only preyed upon these girls because they were non-Muslims, and thus eligible to become “captives of the right hand” (cf. Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50) and used as sex slaves.
But the fact that they see it as a racial issue, and their anxiety to avoid “racism,” led them to cover up these cases and allow thousands of girls to be victimized for twenty-three years. The officials responsible for this should be arrested, tried, and imprisoned; and the race-mongers on the current British scene, such as far-Left smearmongers such as Nick Lowles of Hope Not Hate and Fiyaz Mughal of Tell Mama UK, denounced by opinion-makers and policymakers from all points on the political spectrum — and tried also if their complicity in this behavior is found to have risen to criminal culpability.
Instead, British authorities are looking for scapegoats. The BBC reported last week that “the police watchdog is to investigate 10 South Yorkshire Police officers over the handling of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham,” where 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
These managers are the ones who are really responsible for this, along with opinion-makers such as Lowles and Mughal who created the culture in which people cower in fear of charges of “racism.” These ten police officers who are being investigated are just being set up to take the fall; they originated neither the police policies nor the cultural climate that led to the abandonment of these 1,400 abused children to their fate. Those who created the climate in which those who knew about this hesitated to speak out, for fear of being called “racist,” are the ones who ought to be put on trial — Lowles and Mughal and their ilk. These police officers, if they did cover up the activities of these rape gangs, are just the symptoms of the problem, not its cause.
But they will nonetheless see the ruin of their careers, at very least, and jail time at most – all for being cognizant of the fact that modern-day Britain is busy choosing death over “racism.” They will see their lives destroyed simply for following the zeitgeist. If they had the wit and the courage to do so, they ought to point an accusing finger at the judges who condemn them, and the politicians who appointed those judges, and the media figures who applauded those appointments. They are the ones responsible for the imminent demise of Britain. But Britain will fall before their trial date comes around.
Nick Lowles of "Hope Not Hate"

The Glazov Gang - Victim of Muslim Grooming/Rape Gangs Speaks Out
The Glazov Gang
Published on Aug 10, 2015
The Glazov Gang - Victim of Muslim Grooming/Rape Gangs Speaks Out.
Toni Bugle (Founder, M.A.R.I.A.S)


The Glazov Gang-Gavin Boby's Fight Against Muslim Rape Gangs
The Glazov Gang
Published on Apr 11, 2014
The Glazov Gang-Gavin Boby's Fight Against Muslim Rape Gangs
Gavin Boby (Law and Freedom Foundation)
The Glazov Gang-'Easy Meat' -- Inside the World of Muslim Rape Gangs, Part II.
Published on Apr 19, 2014
The Glazov Gang-'Easy Meat' -- Inside the World of Muslim Rape Gangs, Part II.