Monday, May 08, 2017

Global Warming - Fact or Fiction? (Part 2)

WHOA! Tucker Carlson's INSANE Interview with Bill Nye the Science Guy!
Published on Feb 28, 2017
Fox News' Tucker Carlson interviewed/debated Bill Nye the Science Guy last night and things got SUPER heated! Bill Nye says that climate change deniers suffer from "cognitive dissonance" and "we're looking for an explanation for why you guys are having so much trouble with" climate change. When Tucker said it's up to climate change advocates to prove to what degree human activity is causing the change, things started getting intense. At the end of the interview, Bill Nye makes a bizarre statement saying that White House leakers are coming from the inside and says "carry on, Mr. Carlson, I'm sure we will cross paths again."
Please LIKE, SHARE, and SUBSCRIBE if you are a Donald Trump supporter!
Follow me on FACEBOOK:

Follow me on TWITTER:
Tucker Carlson vs. Bill Nye: Round Two – The Science Guy's Reply
Big Think 
Published on Mar 11, 2017
On February 27, Fox News presenter Tucker Carlson invited Bill Nye onto his show to talk about climate change, only to yell over him, belittle his qualifications, and bafflingly interrupt answers to demand answers. Here, Bill Nye addresses the heated exchange and how the polarization of the media has skewed the climate change “debate”. He also wonders why climate deniers won’t put their money where their mouth is, because Nye is ready to make a wager, and has publicly been offering for years—with no takers. Bill Nye's most recent book is Unstoppable: Harnessing Science to Change the World.
Climate Realist Marc Morano Debates Bill Nye the Science Guy on Global Warming
Published on Dec 4, 2012
Would you believe it? That was the Science Guy, bought and paid for by the government, to spread the false claim that humans cause global warming. 
Nye, Obama, de Grasse
This picture should explain a lot!
Global Warming Is A blatant LIE & This video scientifically Proves it
Published on Jan 22, 2017
I have posted this video so people can hear for themselves how the Global warming Issue is a lie and the Data has been altered by those pushing the Global warming Agenda so they can deliberately spray us.
Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax
Published on Jul 12, 2015
Nobel Laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015.
Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate.

Copyright is owned by 2015 Council for the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings.

This is for educational purposes only and is not a commercial use.

According to their terms (See end of video) Lindau allow non-commercial sharing and embedding of this video.
Climate Change Global Warming HOAX! The BIGGER Agenda REVEALED!!!
Published on Mar 16, 2016
Still believe in climate change?
How about global warming?
What about everything Al Gore tells you?
Because professional scientists, weather experts, physicists, meteorologists, Nobel Laureates, and the like, have ALL proven and exposed climate change and global warming to be HUGE FRAUDS! Frauds that are orchestrated by the same Alphabet Soups who orchestrate just about everything else! Funded by yours truly, The Elite!
Not only that, but weather experts and scientists have also exposed the fraudulent reports and fake documentation conducted by these Alphabet Soups, who are only paid to lie to us every single day; every single chance they get!
But why the Big Lie? Why the Big Scheme? Why the Big HOAX?
What's the Bigger Agenda here? And why are they lying on such an exponential rate when it comes to this seemingly little lie?
The lie goes much deeper than you think!!!
Conservative Tribune:
Observational (Edward Snowden):
World News Daily (Edward Snowden):
NOAA Falsified Report:
NOAA Report Exposed:
Nobel Laureate EXPOSES Lie:
Governments ADMITS to Weather Modification:
Such a Hoax costs BILLIONS per day!
Why "Global Warming" Failed & Why Climate Change is Real
Published on May 12, 2014
Global warming models/predictions have been an abject failure for 20 years, and yet the IPCC claims ever-higher certainty?
How does this happen and what comes next?
All papers and charts are publicly available information, or you send us an email and we will forward the source/citation for any information. Most of the citations can already be found at the Links button at our website, under the Counterstrike Links.
Our Websites:
The Great Global Warming Swindle Full Movie
Uploaded on Aug 17, 2011
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Originally broadcasted March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4.
A documentary, by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. A statement from the makers of this film asserts that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming could very well be "the biggest scam of modern times."
A must see for truth-seekers everywhere...
'LOOK into my EYES: You are feeling very worried about the climate ... SO worried'
Psychohistory prof Pidgeon strikes again
29 Jan 2015
Comment A trick-cyclist who promised several years ago to use a new form of mass hypnosis to get the public motivated to fight climate change claims that he's done it. In fact the claim is bogus: it is itself part of his attempt to carry out his plan of manipulating public opinion.
The trick-cyclist is, as regular readers of these pages will have guessed, Professor Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff uni. Several years ago, the prof (a specialist in "social and decision sciences") stated publicly that he and his fellow soft-studies academics should develop a new method of manipulating public opinion, one that would work better than normal advertising or propaganda. This new and more powerful discipline of mass hypnosis should be used to condition the public into a state where they would support drastic action against the perceived dangers of man-made climate change.
At the time, we compared Pidgeon's proposed new methods to Isaac Asimov's science-fictional discipline of "psychohistory", a set of methods which could be used to manipulate the behaviour of large populations without their knowledge.
Pidgeon wrote then that the key was to arouse the right emotions in the public:
Emotion is an integral part of our thinking ... Emotion creates the abiding commitments needed to sustain action on difficult problems, such as climate change ... appropriately framed emotional appeals can motivate action, given the right supporting conditions (in particular a sense of personal vulnerability ... and [a sense of] the support of others).
(Our italics.)
Obviously when you want to give people the feeling that they are personally vulnerable to climate change it would make sense to point to some natural disaster such as the 2013/14 floods and suggest that they were caused by climate change, and tappeals can motivate action, given the right suppohat there will be more of this as a result of climate change. If you want to suggest that there is strong support from other people for action on climate change, it would be a cunning plan to tell them that other people overwhelmingly support such action.
Funnily enough, Professor Pidgeon has done just those things. In a press release issued today, he says:
The British public’s belief in the reality of climate change and its human causes rose significantly last year - and is now at its highest since 2005 ... In December 2013 and January 2014, an exceptional run of winter storms hit the UK, leading to widespread flooding ... such extremes of weather are predicted to be more frequent and severe in the UK under a changed climate ... The flooding events were seen as a sign of things to come ... Regarding support for political action, around three-quarters (74 per cent) of people surveyed in the national sample supported the UK signing up to international agreements to limit carbon emissions, with only 7 per cent opposing this measure ... This finding above all sends a clear signal to the UK government.
In summary: YOU are PERSONALLY VULNERABLE to climate change and there is strong SUPPORT FROM OTHERS for action against it (that is against carbon emissions).
But hold on - Professor Pidgeon didn't just say those things. They are the result of "research" in the "social and decision sciences". Specifically, they are the result of a massive survey of what the British people think carried out by Ipsos MORI, which the prof got the government (ie, you) to pay for.
It's just an amazing bit of luck for the prof, then, that the survey said exactly what he had specified it should say several years previously.
Oh wait, no it isn't. Because actually it doesn't really back up his message at all. Skipping over Pidgeon's waffley advertorial propaganda "research paper" (it's not a peer-reviewed publication or anything, just a lengthy pseudoscientific polemic written by the prof and some pals*) to the actual survey results, we find out the following things.
No we don't all think climate change is a big deal. No we don't all agree it's mainly human-caused. No we don't all want massive government action on it.
The British people don't think climate change is very important. It's not even in the top five. The survey showed that people ranked it as the ninth most important issue facing Britain today, behind race/immigration, the economy, unemployment and lack of industry, health care, terrorism, crime, poverty, housing, and education.
A substantial and increasing majority of Brits are largely unconcerned about climate change. In 2005, 72 per cent of respondents answered that they were not very concerned about climate change. That has now risen to 82 per cent.
Only a minority of people think that climate change is mainly or entirely due to human activity. In this survey, 36 per cent thought that climate change is mainly or entirely caused by humans: the rest disagreed with this idea, apart from 2 per cent who put "don't know".
Right away it's clear that people don't really care about climate change and don't agree that it's mainly caused by humans.
Going on, we see:
There is very little support for "Tax increases to pay for more renewable energy". Some 60 per cent didn't support that idea at all, and only 9 per cent strongly supported it. Which is a shame as such tax increases are happening and will keep happening under current government policy, albeit hidden on energy bills rather than in plain sight on your P60. Democracy not really working, there.
Professor Pidgeon was being especially mendacious when he claimed that "around three quarters of people surveyed in the national sample supported the UK signing up to international agreements to limit carbon emissions". Just 29 per cent said they "strongly supported" this policy, the other 46 per cent the prof claims merely ticked "tend to support". A more truthful statement would be "around 70 per cent of Brits do not strongly support the UK signing up to international carbon agreements".
Hardly anyone wants political action on climate change. Just 14 per cent thought it likely they would ever even write to their MP on climate matters.
People don't agree that changing their lifestyle can make a difference to climate change. Just 27 per cent supported that idea.
People don't think the reason the '13/'14 floods happened was climate change. The three main factors, according to the survey respondents, were (in order): building in flood-prone areas, insufficient investment in flood defences, and poor river and coastal management. Climate change came a distant fourth.
All this is indeed a "clear signal to the UK government": but it's not the signal Professor Pidgeon wants to send, quite the reverse. And nor does the survey send the message that the prof wants to send to the British people. The fact is, Brits, on the evidence of this survey your fellow Britons do not think that they or you are threatened by climate change. Nor do your fellow Britons show any sign of strongly supporting political action against it.
It has to be said, so far Professor Pidgeon's brilliant new Psychohistory-style green activism tactics seem pretty similar to old-school 1940s style propaganda. Just say what you wish was true - "everybody thinks climate change is very serious and supports massive action against it" - and if you repeat it frequently and loudly enough people will start to believe it. ®

*It's not available online as this is written: the link at the bottom of the press release which ought to take you to it actually goes somewhere else. But we got hold of a copy by asking for one, and lots of pre-selected journalists were sent it well in advance of today's announcement.
Historic deep freeze across North America conclusively proves global warming is getting worse, right?
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Sunday, January 05, 2014
(NaturalNews) Global warming is getting worse. It's so bad now that it has thrust most of North America into an historic deep freeze with plummeting temperatures that haven't been seen in decades. This is absolute proof that global warming is worsening, and the way I know that is because the same people who told me that record HOT temperature last summer were caused by global warming -- "See? It's really, really hot!" -- are now saying that record COLD temperatures are also caused by global warming. "See? It's really, really cold!"
Global warming, in other words, is climate voodoo. Worshippers of the false science can invoke it to explain any event whatsoever: hurricanes (or lack of hurricanes), tornados (or lack of tornados), too much rainfall or too little rainfall, high temperatures, low temperatures, and basically any event that we used to simply call "weather."
Well, gee, if ALL weather events are evidence of global warming, then you have to ask yourself this simple, commonsense question: Which weather evidence would be evidence of global cooling? The answer is "None." Because ALL weather events are invoked as evidence of global warming.
It's delusional thinking, in other words.
"Global warming" and the mass hypnosis of the public
Like any sort of false belief system, global warming involves the mass hypnosis of the public -- a kind of hypnosis so deep that even when people are shivering from frightful cold, they can still convince themselves, in their own minds, "This is global warming!" in total denial of reality.
Global warming is based on the same sort of wishy washy thinking as flu shots. "Get a flu shot and you won't get the flu!" Except most people who get flu shots still get the flu. In fact, the drug industry's own scientific studies show that flu shots don't work on nearly 99 out of 100 people. The shots are quackery "medical voodoo" that are so fraudulent even Merck's own scientists blew the whistle and went public with proof that the company entirely fabricated its vaccine science by spiking samples with animal antibodies. This was designed to spread the mumps and measles epidemic, thereby creating widespread panic that would result in more vaccine sales.
Global warming marketed with doomsday predictions
The global warming cultists are using the same kind of false science to spread fraudulent fear in order to sell something else: total government control over all emissions and, hence, all economic activity. If they can spread their doomsday theories far and wide enough, they can demand huge sums of money by forcing entire economies to pay "carbon taxes" which are nothing more than a high-level moneymaking scam.
The lamestream media is so desperate to push this fraudulent delusion of global warming that 98% of the media stories covering the ship full of climate scientists that got stuck in the ice and had to be rescued failed to mention the ship was on a global warming mission. That little fact wouldn't go over well with the media's global warming delusion, so they simply decided to censor that fact from the public.
This is just one small example of the routine mental contortions that take place in the lamestream media to front a massive lie. There are many more...
Every cult is based on sheer belief, not real evidence
Like any cult, global warming is based on "belief" instead of actual evidence. People who push global warming do not need to see any real evidence. They only need to have their beliefs reinforced by the media and by others who share their irrational beliefs. That alone is enough to confirm that they are right.
Remember, the lamstream media is the same media that claims the national debt doesn't matter, Obamacare is awesome, you don't need the Bill of Rights, war is fun, GMOs are safe to eat and vaccines will increase your IQ. This is the same media where MSNBC, the most wretched tabloid anti-journalism organization to ever exist, makes fun of adopted black children or insists that people should poop in the mouths of political personalities they don't like.
The same media that says GMOs are safe, vaccines are awesome, war is fun and all white people are racist is now peddling global warming doom-and-gloom theories that fly in the face of reality. They even claim this extreme cold weather is caused by "global warming" and that if you don't agree to pay more carbon taxes next year, the cold will get even worse. Yep, "warming" is now invoked to explain "freezing."
How stupid does this get? If the same media were pushing a theory of "global speeding" and claiming the Earth's spin was accelerating and we would all die from being flung into outer space, they would also proclaim that a slowing of the Earth's spin was yet more evidence of "global speeding." Slowing is speeding, you see. Just like cooling is warming. Who needs logic when you own the media and can push total lies day after day to a mind-numbed public dosed up on fluoride and Prozac?
Delusional thinking explained
One of the mental contortions frequently invoked to support delusional thinking is to filter out all the evidence that contradicts your current belief. We are all guilty of this to some degree, but global warming conspiracy theorists take it to a new extreme.
Here's how it works: When the Midwest suffers a terribly hot drought, global warming theorists proclaim the drought is due to global warming. "It's hotter, see?" That actually makes logical sense at some level. But by the same logic, when a deep freeze sweeps across the same region, they would logically have to concede that cold is the opposite of hot, and therefore if extreme hot weather is evidence of global warming, then extreme cold weather must be evidence against global warming. This is the litmus test of scientific sanity, you see: If a person is a consistent, clear thinker, they must concede that this current freeze is, indeed, evidence that the planet is not warming.
But that's not what happens: They proclaim that cold weather, too, is yet more proof of global warming! And with that statement, all their credibility vanishes. Because at that point they are admitting that, essentially, all events are somehow evidence of global warming. All "weather events" somehow magically support their theory.
That idea is, of course, absurd. There are weather events during periods of global cooling, obviously. When the planet is cooling, the wind doesn't stop blowing. The Earth doesn't stop rotating. Earthquakes and hurricanes don't magically cease. Thus, a rational person must be forced to admit that, yes, there are storms, and freak weather events, and droughts and floods when the planet is cooling, too. (The planet has warmed and cooled many times in its long history. These are natural cycles.)
But explaining all this is a waste of time to global warming conspiracy theorists in the first place, because they are not engaged in an exercise of logic and rational thinking. The evidence doesn't matter. Global warming is their religion, and thus no amount of evidence, or explanation, or logic, or rationality will ever overcome their religious belief in the doom-and-gloom conspiracy theory that we will all soon die as our planet is destroyed.
At some level, it's quite hilarious because many of the global warming faith believers are the very same people who make fun of conservative Christians and their belief in "the rapture" which essentially says much the same thing. Somehow, "Christians are stupid," they say, for believing that we will all be destroyed in a massive clean sweep of human civilization caused by God, but they say "we are smart" for believing we will all be destroyed in a massive clean sweep of human civilization caused by carbon emissions.
Also See:

When It Comes To Climate Change, Fake Science Baffles Brains!

09 March 2016
02 December 2015

Global Warming! Are You Sure?

19 March 2015

What Do You Know About Global Warming?

(Part 1)
21 November 2014
(Part 2)
27 April 2015

Climate Change! Global Warming! Think Again!

12 May 2014

Climategate II: Liers Are Still Pushing Global Warming! 

(Part 1)
04 November 2011
(Part 2)
04 January 2014

Biodiversity Replaces Climate Change as the Weapon for Political Control

22 October 2010

Carbon Tax & the Global Warming Hoax

18 June 2010

Global cooling: Global warming myth-makers must now switch to "climate change"

16 January 2010


24 November 2009

Global Warming - Fact or Fiction?