Monday, May 21, 2018

The Real Justin Trudeau! (Part 6)


Justin Trudeau wants to change the rules for everyone...except himself
Published on May 18, 2018

Gavin McInnes: Canada's Justin Trudeau is ashamed of ... Canada
Published on May 16, 2018

People Need To See This... This Is Why People Dislike Justin Trudeau
Published on May 12, 2018

Canada's Illegal Invasion
Published on May 4, 2018

Justin Trudeau Stupidest Moments!!!
Published on Mar 31, 2018
Jordan Peterson - Justin Trudeau is a TRAITOR who CANNOT be Re-elected
Conservative Guru
Published on Mar 28, 2018
Goldstein: Justin Trudeau's climate of intolerance
Lorrie Goldstein
May 21, 2018
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is interviewed by MIT's Danielle Wood at Solve At MIT: Plenary - True Stories Of Starting Up at Massachusetts Institute of Technology on May 18, 2018 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Photo by Paul Marotta/Getty Images for MIT Solve)
PM likens disbelief in man-made climate change to belief in female genital mutilation
If any more proof is needed that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s brain is an irony-free zone, he provided it in his speech to the graduating class of New York University at Yankee Stadium last week.
Trudeau, awarded an honorary doctor of laws by NYU, was at his grandiose best, or worst, in his commencement address.
The whole affair was tailor-made for Trudeau’s ego.
He was introduced to the students with gushing praise from university officials that sounded as if it had come straight out of the Prime Minister’s Office.
Given how much Trudeau likes to dress up, he was clothed in the official robes of the university.
To satisfy his theatrical bent, he had before him an adoring audience of young people, who hung on his every word.
Ever the actor, Trudeau played his part to the hilt.
He smiled and halfbowed before the cheering and applauding students, mouthed the words “thank you” in appreciation, employed the familiar “hand on heart” gesture he uses when he wants to show he’s being really, really sincere.
Then Trudeau revealed his superficial understanding of the theme that ran throughout his address on the importance of listening to and respecting the views of people you disagree with, if you hope to bring them around to your way of thinking.
Because in the middle of his stirring speech about respecting diversity of opinion, Trudeau compared people who don’t believe in human-influenced climate change to people who do believe in female genital mutilation.
Having gone on for 20 minutes about being open to the views of others, Trudeau said in a voice rising with indignation, complete with dramatic arm-waving and hand gestures for effect:
“Now let me be very clear, this is not an endorsement of moral relativism, or a declaration that all points of view are valid.
“Female genital mutilation is wrong, no matter how many generations have practised it.
“Anthropogenic climate change is real, no matter how much some folks want to deny it,” he thundered. Think about that.
FGM is a crime in Canada and Trudeau’s comparing it to not believing in man-made climate change.
A recent Abacus Data poll found 21% of Canadians surveyed don’t believe in manmade climate change. They believe climate changes due to natural causes.
So Trudeau is saying that more than one in five Canadians are in the same league as people who believe in female genital mutilation.
How can we take a PM who says something that ridiculous seriously?
FGM is an illegal assault on a woman in Canada, so of course we don’t debate whether it’s a valid idea.
Not believing in manmade climate change isn’t endorsing a crime, it’s expressing an opinion.
That Trudeau doesn’t seem to understand the difference is appalling.
Indeed, a cynic might suggest Trudeau has more tolerance for believing in FGM than he does for not believing in anthropogenic climate change.
Recall that in opposition, Trudeau chastised the then Conservative government for calling FGM a “barbaric” practice in its citizenship guide, because, Trudeau said, this did not demonstrate “responsible neutrality”.
This before Trudeau had to promptly apologize in the face of outrage expressed by Canadians across the country.
Today, Trudeau’s government, belatedly, calls FGM, “abhorrent”.
What’s truly abhorrent is his linking of people who disagree with him about climate change, to supporters of an illegal, barbaric, practice that mutilates women.
That Trudeau doesn’t know the difference, is appalling.
Canada gifts $50K to charity to celebrate royal couple
Nick Kirmse,
Published Saturday, May 19, 2018
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced today that Canada will donate $50,000 to charity to celebrate the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
Trudeau, who was not invited to the wedding, 
released the statement following the ceremony, celebrating the couple’s marriage.
“Sophie and I congratulate the newlyweds on behalf of the Government of Canada,” Trudeau said in the statement. “We wish Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Sussex a lifetime of happiness, and all the best as they start this new chapter together.”
The donation will be made to the Jumpstart charity, a Canadian charity that works to make sports more accessible to disadvantaged children, helping with the costs of registration, equipment, and more.
Jumpstart quickly responded to the statement, tweeting out their thanks for the gift.
Before the wedding, Kensington Palace released a statement from the couple saying they would prefer donations be made to charity instead of gifts.
While Jumpstart wasn’t one of the charities Harry and Meghan had picked, both Prince Harry and Meghan have worked extensively with charities that use sports to empower young people in the past. 
Even More Narcisstic Than Barack Obama …Canada’s Naive, Inexperienced & Feckless New Prime Minister!
by Murray Soupcoff 
posted: April 30, 2016
Justin Trudeau and Obama... regular photo but look like gay buddies
Buyer's Remorse … Adventures in Narcisstic Stupidity, featuring Justin Trudeau
By Murray Soupcoff
So here he was without maps or supplies,
A hundred miles from any decent town;
The desert glared into his blood-shot eyes;
The silence roared displeasure: looking down,
He saw the shadow of an Average Man
Attempting the exceptional, and ran.
-- W.H. Auden, The Average Man
Oh my goodness, just a few forlorn days ago, it was the three year anniversary of one the most regretted days in Canadian politics – by the few remaining sane voters in Canada, that is.
On April 14th 2013, Justin “lightweight” Trudeau was elected leader of the party of Chretien, Martin and Canada’s socialist Socrates, Pierre Trudeau – oh what a coincidence, the father of young Justin whose recognizable last name happens to be the same as Justin's.
Indeed, on that fateful day Justin Trudeau’s chief work qualifications for becoming Liberal leader included having been a teacher, boxer and actor.
Now if that isn’t an act of narcissistic ‘ambitious reach exceeding reality’, what is?
And why do I use this clinical descriptive adjective (narcissistic) here, to describe this political decision (and future political decisions) by Trudeau the Younger?
Well, although I’m not a psychiatrist, I earned my PH.D-equivalent graduate degree as a sociologist many, many years ago; and I base my opinions on knowledge gained as a sociology graduate student, when I did a full practicum with the psychiatric department of the University of Toronto medical school.
And it’s part of what Swiss psychoanalyst Alice Miller – author of the classic monograph on narcissists, “Prisoners of Childhood,” would have described as Justin Trudeau’s “as if” behavioral patterns — acting as if he had accomplished his grandiose ambitions for himself (such as eventually becoming Canada's prime minister), even though he hadn’t done so at that time!
And what about his current self-described “accomplishments” as Prime Minister these days?
Well, let’s make our point, the simplest way – comparing the historically unique achievements of Trudeau father and son:
And the tragic truth (for ordinary Canadians)?
When Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau left office the Canada debt had risen to over $154 billion, shockingly 738% higher than when previous Conservative Prime Minister Joe Clark left office.
When Stephen Harper was voted out of power – in favour of Justin Trudeau – the budget was balanced, with no deficit, and new economic policies implemented to ensure a budget surplus in future years.
Recently, however, Justin Trudeau’s first budget projected $113 billion more debt for Canada – with no budget surplus in sight.
To summarize, as one disgruntled online conservative Web site phrased it:
“Pierre Trudeau puts Canada in the toilet, and his son pulls the handle!”
But let’s now turn to another trait of what psychiatrists often call the “functioning” narcissist -- functioning in the sense of being capable of impressive achievements (versus the kind of schizoid personality whose grandiose fantasies might land them in prison or in a psychiatric institution).
And that impressive achievement might perhaps include becoming Prime Minister of Canada, thanks to a superficial charm and learned ability to “empathize” with the needs and wishes of those whom he or she interacts with [just as he or she learned to “empathize” with every need or wish of a gifted but remote parent, in order to please them -- for example, a parent like Pierre Elliot Trudeau?]
Another narcissistic trait relevant to our discussion?
Grandiose “fantasies” and “magical thinking”.
This troubled individual’s interior psychology is rooted in the narcissistic belief that his dreams, thoughts, and wishes can magically affect reality.
So as mentioned earlier, despite possessing the modest qualifications for being elected leader of a major political party in Canada -- having been a teacher, boxer and actor – Justin Trudeau’s decision to run for the position of leader of the Liberal Party might well have been based on narcissistic “magical thinking” (in my opinion, anyway) --- specifically, that he what he wished for could “magically” become reality.
And of course, mainly because of his surname and mythical biographies of his father written by Liberal acolytes, Justin the Younger did get elected – which would only reinforce his inner belief that what he wished for, in the future, could become reality.
And that might mean being able to promise all kinds of expensive “goodies”, to metaphorically bribe voters, and yet additionally promise to still be able to generate "a modest short-term deficit" of less than $10 billion for each of the first three years of his incumbency, and then a balanced budget by the 2019-2020 fiscal year (a promise which, in reality, he actually did make).
Some of those promised “goodies” (ie, free “handouts”) for voters?
(1)Tax benefit for teachers; (2) lifelong pensions for injured vets including hundreds of millions of dollars in expanded benefits; (3) $150 million in new annual funding for the CBC; (4) $1.5 billion for public transit in Calgary; (5) up to $1.5 billion over four years on a youth job strategy to help 125,000 young people find a job; (6) increase federal infrastructure investment to almost $125 billion (compared to the Harper government allocation of $65 billion); (7) over the next decade, invest $200 million a year to develop clean technologies in forestry, fisheries, mining, energy and farming; (8) put another $100 million into organizations that promote clean technology firms; and (9) add $515 million a year to funding for First Nations education, rising through the mandate to a total of $2.6 billion.
Talk about magic thinking and grandiose dreams!
And what about that promise of a modest short-term deficit" of less than $10 billion for each of the first three years, and then a balanced budget by the 2019-2020 fiscal year?
Justin & his finance minister are now projecting a $29.4-billion deficit in 2016-17, followed by a $29-billion shortfall in 2017-18, and over $22 billion in 2018-19.
According to “National Post” columnist John Ivison: “Over the next five years, Tuesday’s budget shows $113.2 billion in red ink, including a $14.3 billion shortfall for 2020-21 — after the next scheduled federal election.”
Returning to the writings Alice Miller, let’s see whether we can identify another typical narcissistic trait which might well apply to Canada’s current Prime Minister?
In particularly, Ms. Miller “deconstructed” the typical behavioral patterns of children raised by gifted and often emotionally remote parents who caused the child to feel “inferior” to their successful parent, and consequently want to win their praise to mollify that inner psychological insecurity.
This child then develops what Miller described as an amazing ability to perceive and respond intuitively (ie,
unconsciously) to the wishes of that parent – and consequently the ability to superficially “emphasize” with needs & wishes of others, a particularly valuable trait for an adult politician.
Combine that with a typical narcissistic need to be admired, and you have a potent stew for what I would label as stupid political actions with likely tragic consequences for the country involved (yes, Canada).
And as revealed by “Rebel TV”, that includes news that the Canadian military has been ordered by Justin Trudeau’s
Liberals to draft plans to house more than 6,000 Muslim migrants on a long-term basis at military bases.
Also according to the same “Rebel TV” report, the Trudeau government plans to set up refugee camp-style accommodations on seven Canadian Forces Bases across Quebec and Ontario – with $46 million of spending budgeted for the first six months.
The bad news for Canadian taxpayers?
For a typical refugee family, that’s a $200,000/year subsidy — not including Medicare or welfare!
Worse, many Canadian armed-service members have been sent eviction notices to make way for the foreign migrants.
So how to best end this er, personal primal scream against the injurious deeds of Canada’s new narcissistic Prime Minister?
Well how about the views of a prominent Brazilian journalist, written after Justin Trudeau recently visited her fair land?
Vilma Gryzinski targeted Mr. Trudeau’s “dazedly well-intentioned” (naive) policies, suggesting that his “inclusive” attitude on immigration and refugees signals "he's soft on terror".
She also sarcastically commented on the “narcissistic” leader’s recent celebrity over the attention he received for a five-year-old photo of him leaning into a table in a peacock pose — and skewed his alleged genetics as follows:
“Justin Trudeau is the incarnation of the dreams of vaguely left-wing liberalism, which is dazedly well-intentioned; a handsome guy who shows off his physics with no shame and in yoga poses — an Oedipean reproduction of his father, Pierre Trudeau.”
Nuff said, on this  distressing subject, I would think.
Murray Soupcoff is the author of 'Canada 1984' & co-author of 'Good Bye Canada'.
He was formerly a Senior Partner with Ian Sone & Associates Ltd., Canada's pioneering social-research consulting firm evaluating (bloated) government programs assisting "the needy", and is now the publisher and editor of this conservative/libertarian Web site.
He was also a computer columnist for "Globe & Mail Report on Business"? for 20 years, and producer & head writer, "Inside From The Outside"?, CBC Radio (starring Max Ferguson & Barbara Hamilton).
You can contact Murray at the following e-mail address:
His Facebook page Web address is:  
Politics and Commentary Recommended Reading Socio-cultural analysis
Murray Soupcoff
Publisher of "Soupcoff Report"​ investment newsletter Senior Associate & founding partner of Ian Sone & Associates Ltd, Canada's first independent social-research firm, as well as original Canadian initiator of (sociological) "evaluations"​ of federal and provincial social programs set up to assist Canada's disadvantaged populations Computer columnist for "Globe & Mail Report on Business"​ for 20 years Producer & head writer, "Inside From The Outside"​, CBC Radio (starring Max Ferguson & Barbara Hamilton) Currently retired, but still active investor and (until recently) contributor to the "Globe Mail" online investment blog. You can contact Murray Soupcoff at the following e-mail address:
Why Justin Trudeau may be more dangerous than Harper
by Damien Gillis in Politics
Posted May 6, 2013
Adrian Wyld/CP
Justin Trudeau just may be Canada’s most dangerous man.
He of the throngs of adoring supporters, the pretty new face that promises to resurrect “Canada’s party”.
The key positions he’s taken thus far – supporting the sellout of our strategic energy resources to the 
Chinese Government, giving away our sovereignty through the Canada-China Trade deal, new pipelines to expand the Tar Sands – hardly vary from those of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. They just look and sound far more attractive coming from Canada’s prodigal son.
And that’s what scares me.
Trudeau’s latest decision to out-Harper Mr. Harper on boosting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to Texas gives us a sobering sense of where the young Liberal leader is headed. Perhaps more troubling is the question of what he actually believes – or whether these positions derive from polling data, focus groups, and a cynical drive to get elected at all costs (more on that in a moment).
In his first swing out west following a successful leadership bid, Trudeau took the time to praise Alberta Premier Alison Redford’s efforts to secure access for Keystone by talking up improved “environmental sustainability” in the Tar Sands (exactly how, we’re left to wonder, beyond a carbon tax proposed by Redford).
“I’m very hopeful despite the political games being played by the NDP…that we will see the Keystone pipeline approved soon,” Trudeau proclaimed.
If Bay Street and the energy sector see that Trudeau is prepared to fulfill the same key objectives as Harper, they will not think twice about swinging their support back to the Liberals. This latest statement on Keystone signals that Mr. Trudeau is truly open for business. For this reason, while backing Keystone may be unpopular with certain segments of the Canadian public, it could prove a shrewd political move in the long-run.
Harper is uncharacteristically weak at the moment. There is the infighting within his usually locked-down caucus, the cratering polling figures (a recent Nanos poll has the Liberals leading the Conservatives for the first time in years, at 34 to 31% support), and an authoritarian image that is becoming increasingly problematic. He and his embattled foot soldiers, the likes of Joe Oliver and Jason Kenney, have had a very bad month.
Oliver overplayed his hand a couple of weeks ago when he attacked the world’s most respected climate scientist, the recently retired James Hansen of NASA, while on a “diplomatic” mission to Washington to build support for Keystone.
The tone-deaf Oliver ranted that Hansen should be “ashamed” of “exaggerating” the effects of climate change and impacts of the Tar Sands, apparently missing the irony of attacking his hosts while trying win them over. The comments, which backfired severely, were picked up by everyone from the New York Times to the UK’s Guardian. Hansen shot back, aptly branding Oliver a “Neanderthal”.
On this score, Trudeau seems to understand something his Conservative opponents don’t – i.e. cultivating buy-in for Keystone requires more sophisticated framing and at least a modicum of tact with our southern neighbours.
Meanwhile, the most likeable and politically adept figure in the Harper Government, Immigration Minister Kenney, finds himself embroiled in the growing scandal over his government’s foreign temporary worker program. The seriousness of this political pitfall is evident in the unusual backtracking Harper is doing on the program.
He’s right to do so. The problem for Harper with issues like this one, the buyout of Canadian energy company Nexen by Chinese state-owned CNOOC, and the botched fighter jet program, is the way they rile his base. Unpopular with small “c” conservatives, they drive division within Harper’s tenuous right-wing alliance.
With these troubles brewing on the home front and attack ads aimed at Trudeau falling short of the effect they had on his predecessors – Michael Ignatieff and Stéphane Dion – things are shaping up nicely for Harper’s young challenger.
The question is, what does this mean for Canada?
If all Mr. Trudeau represents is a better-packaged version of Harper’s economic vision, then how will the Canadian public and environment – not to mention the planet – be any better off?
The thing that has always bothered me about Justin – ever since his entry onto the public scene at his famous father’s funeral – is that he’s never appeared to stand for anything real. Years later, even following a lengthy leadership race and literally thousands of media clips and public appearances, I still don’t know what core principles motivate his drive to lead the country. He speaks in platitudes, clever but meaningless tweets – which is partly what makes him so effective with social media and our soundbite-obsessed mainstream press.
He is our version of Robert Redford’s character in The Candidate.
Evidently, if Justin stands for anything, it’s selling out Canada’s strategic resources and exploiting the climate-destroying Tar Sands. Where his father tried and failed to build a made-in-Canada energy policy, the younger Trudeau is going in the opposite direction.
Even that, though, I suspect, is more a reflection of his willingness to shape-shift his policies into whatever form advisers tell him will track best politically.
With Harper, by contrast, we have a sense that his zeal for expanding Canada’s fossil fuel industries through foreign ownership is something in which he believes on a deep, ideological level. I’m not sure which is better – the guy who believes in something I and many other Canadians patently don’t, or the guy who probably doesn’t but is willing to say he does, just to get elected. If these are our two choices, then I’m ready for a third.
Real leadership means fighting for real principles, even when they’re unpopular. Great politicians find a way to sell good ideas to the public and media
Justin Trudeau does none of these things. But, boy, does he look good not doing them.
Also See:

Gay Lifestyle Not Easy!

27 April 2018


Is Fidel Castro Justin Trudeau's Father?

25 March 2018

Is Justin Trudeau Mentally Unstable?

(Part 1)
16 December 2017
(Part 2)
23 December 2017

Trudeau Gives Terrorists Another $31 Million!

07 November 2017

Canada To Legalize Marijuana By 01 July 2018!

01 December 2017

Pierre Poilievre Exposes Trudeau and the Liberal Government!

05 December 2017

Trudeau Connecting With Canadians!

02 November 2017

ISIS Strikes: Terrorist Attack in Edmonton, Canada.

02 October 2017

Trudeau Piling More Taxes On Canadians!

09 September 2017

Did You Vote For Justin Trudeau?

20 August 2017

Kevin Johnson Charged with "Hate Crime" For Criticizing Islam!

27 July 2017


Backlash Against $10.5 Million Deal To Khadr!

12 July 2017

Trudeau Gives $10-million To Terrorist Omar Khadr!!

06 July 2017

Trudeau Wants Our Guns!

07 June 2017

Mao, Admired by Trudeau, is Worse than Hitler!

20 May 2017

Does Trudeau Practice Taqiyya?

16 May 2017

Is Trudeau a Muslim?

11 May 2017

How Long Before We See This In Canada, Trudeau?

29 April 2017

Trudeau Will Always Be Remembered As A Traitor To Canada! 

(Part 1)
24 March 2017
(Part 2)
21 April 2017

Canada Passes Motion 103 Prohibiting "Islamophobia"!

09 March 2017

Is Alternate News a Thorn In Trudeau's Side? I Hope So?

04 April 2017

Where Is Trudeau When You Need Him?

23 March 2017

Trudeau Donates $650 Million For Global Abortions!

13 March 2017

Canada Passes Motion 103 Prohibiting "Islamophobia"!

09 March 2017

Trudeau Wants a Bill to Stop Islamophobia in Canada!

01 March 2017

Canadian Girls Sexually Assaulted By Trudeau Refugee!

13 February 2017

First Meeting Between Trudeau and Trump!

14 February 2017

The Real Justin Trudeau! 

(Part 1)

19 January 2017
(Part 2)
13 April 2017
(Part 4)
08 July 2017
(Part 5)
10 January 2018

Justin Trudeau's First Year as Prime Minister!

24 October 2016

Is Justin Trudeau a Victim of MK Ultra Mind Control?

24 September 2016

Canadian Senate, Senators, and Other Related Stuff!?

29 July 2016

Harper's Gone! Here's Justin! 

(Part 1)
09 February 2016
(Part 2)
17 March 2016
(Part 3)
25 May 2016

How Does the Future Look for Canada?

17 December 2015

Are You a Fan of Justin Trudeau?

18 November 2015

Why is Obama Getting Involved with Canadian Politics?

24 October 2015

Abolish the Senate! We Don't Need It!

30 May 2013

Canada, It's Time to Abolish the Senate!

18 March 2013

Will Fidel Castro be Remembered in History as a Tyrant or Hero?

28 November 2016

Who is Fidel Castro?

11 May 2015