Thursday, February 28, 2019

Corruption in the Trudeau Liberal Party!

Image result for canada liberal corruption

BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY: Prime Minister's Office Directs the News
Amazing Polly
Published on Feb 28, 2019

FUREY FACTOR: Possible #LAVSCAM collateral damage
Toronto Sun
Published on Feb 22, 2019

Trudeau Liberals | Unethical Half Wits
Published on Feb 20, 2019
The Trudeau Liberals are far from scandal-free
Lorne Gunter
July 19, 2018
In its coverage of Wednesday’s federal cabinet shuffle, the government-funded CBC (perhaps paraphrasing Simon Fraser University political scientist David Moscrop, perhaps editorializing on its own), concluded that “with no significant scandals or major blunders raging, it makes sense for the prime minister to keep key ministers in place, while lightly demoting underperformers and promoting up-and-comers.”


How can anyone except a Trudeau-lover assert the federal Liberals are scandal- and blunder-free?

Let’s just start with the current big scandal, the Kokanee Grope.

Have they not heard how Prime Minister Justin Trudeau groped a small-town newspaper reporter in 2000?

That’s possible, I suppose, if your only source of news is the CBC. When the grope story first materialized in June, the CBC admitted it had known about the allegations since “earlier this year,” but had chosen not to report on them.

The CBC, which receives a taxpayer subsidy of over $1 billion a year, claims it sat on the story to protect the victim’s privacy. Fascinating, though, how their concern for her privacy coincided so conveniently with keeping their prime minister’s image clean.

If you believe there is no bias at the CBC, ask yourself whether the broadcaster would have sat on these accusations had they been made against Stephen Harper while he was PM?

It’s not just the grope. What about the two free family vacations Trudeau accepted from the Aga Khan to his private Bahamian island? Or the carbon tax? Or the Liberals’ refusal to disclose how much their “green” tax will cost ordinary Canadian families?
Trudeau is the first prime minister ever to have violated federal conflict of interest rules over the trips to the Aga Khan’s Bell Island retreat. Can you imagine the CBC declaring the Harper government free of major scandals had PM Harper been the first to violate federal ethics rules?

There is also the current flood of illegal refugees coming into Canada, mostly in Quebec. Lots of voters are scandalized that the Liberals don’t think this is a problem, even though the RCMP suspect gang members and drug and gun smugglers are among the thousands pouring in every month.

But, of course, if you agree with the Liberals, as the CBC does, that these “irregular migrants” are no big deal, then you also get to declare your favourite party is free of “major blunders.”

The same can be said for the way the Liberals spent most of last summer and fall stirring up anger towards nearly four million small business people in the country by claiming they’re rich tax cheats who are not paying their “fair share.”

Again, if you agree with the Liberals and their class-envy opinion of middle-class entrepreneurs, I guess you can claim the government is blunder-free.
But what about the prime minister’s Mr. Dressup Goes to India tour? Or his elbowing of an NDP MP in the House of Commons? Or his fundraisers selling “cash for access” to himself and his ministers?

This summer the Liberals refused to give summer job grants to more than 1,400 groups that wouldn’t “attest” their support for Liberal abortion policy. Surely that’s at least a blunder, if not a scandal?

How about Trudeau’s praise for Cuban Communist Dictator Fidel Castro, or his claim that returning ISIS fighters were no threat to national security and might even help prevent radicalization in their communities?

There’s the $10.5-million payout to terrorist Omar Khadr, the Liberals’ overspending and massive deficits, the restrictions on free speech in the name of preventing Islamophobia, and the refusal to hold a referendum on electoral reforms, then the failure to introduce any reforms.

But other than these minor missteps, I guess the Trudeau Liberals have had no scandals or blunders.
BLOCKED: Trudeau-Appointed Senators Are REFUSING To Pass A Bill That Bans Foreign Money In Canadian Elections
Spencer Fernando
March 6, 2018
Conservative Senators - China Trip
Supposedly ‘independent’ senators appointed by Justin Trudeau are blocking Bill S239. Refusing to pass it will leave Canada open to foreign manipulation in the next election.

Senators appointed by Justin Trudeau are blocking passage of Bill S239.

Bill S239 was put forth by Senator Linda Frum, who has been speaking out for a long time about the very real threat of foreign money manipulating Canada’s elections.

After all, in 2015, millions in foreign money flowed into Canada – almost all of it against the Conservatives – and much of it was reportedly funded by the Soros-linked Tides Foundation.

More people are waking up to the threat, which was well-explained in a 2017 press release from the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.
Here were a few of the facts the committee shared:
Under the Canada Elections Act, only Canadian citizens and permanent residents are allowed to “induce” electors to vote a particular way or to refrain from voting for a particular candidate. However, foreign entities are able to provide unlimited contributions to third parties before the six months leading up to an election period without any reporting requirements.
With fixed election dates in Canada, anyone can make unreported contributions to third parties six months prior to an anticipated election.
The Canada Elections Act regulates “third-party” involvement in election campaigns but does not address costs incurred for websites, social media, polling and other activities intended to influence elections.
As Senator George Baker said, “Much of the talk about foreign influence in elections refers to what’s happening in other countries. There is, however, a growing concern that Canada’s own electoral process is vulnerable to foreign interference.”

To help fix this serious problem, Senator Frum introduced Bill S239, a summary of which can be seen below:
“This enactment amends the Canada Elections Act to broaden the prohibition on inducements of electors by non-residents and to clarify the meaning of “induce”. It also makes it an offence for a third party to accept a foreign contribution for any purposes related to an election and expands the list of foreign contributors in section 358.”
Passing this is a no-brainer, and it should pass unanimously.

Yet, as noted by Senator Denise Batters, Trudeau-appointed Senators are blocking it:
The growing consensus is that the Trudeau Liberals benefited most from foreign money in the last campaign, so people would be justified in thinking they are doing everything they can to make sure the flow of money keeps going.

Otherwise, they would be supporting the bill and making sure it passes.

If the Trudeau Senators keep blocking the bill, it will be a totally anti-Canadian and disloyal action against our nation, and it shows that the idea of “independent” Senators is a total farce. Clearly, they are still doing Trudeau’s bidding.

Trudeau Has United Canada! Everyone Wants Him To Resign!

Image result for justin trudeau caricature

Justin Trudeau | Fake Feminist Crunch
Jay Black
Published on Feb 28, 2019

REVEALED: What Happened To Justin...
Published on Feb 19, 2019

The World’s Dumbest “Leader”
ProperGander TV
Published on Apr 19, 2018

Justin Trudeau Stupidest Moments!!!
Domination Station
Published on Mar 31, 2018
Daily Poll: Should Prime Minister Trudeau resign in wake of SNC-Lavalin affair?
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said Trudeau had lost the moral authority to govern the country and should resign.
Scott Brown   
Updated: February 28, 2019
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government was rocked Wednesday by testimony from former Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould.

Testifying before a House of Commons justice committee, Wilson-Raybould said she came under relentless pressure — including veiled threats — from Trudeau, his senior staff, the top public servant and the finance minister’s office to instruct federal prosecutors to prevent construction giant SNC-Lavalin from being prosecuted in a bribery case.

“For a period of approximately four months, between September and December of 2018, I experienced a consistent and sustained effort by many people within the government to seek to politically interfere in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in my role as the attorney general of Canada,” she told the committee.

They were charges that Trudeau denied.

“I and my staff always acted appropriately and professionally,” he said. “I completely disagree with the characterization of the former attorney general about these events.”

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said Trudeau had lost the moral authority to govern the country and should resign.


Jody Wilson-Raybould's Testimony on 27 February 2019!

Image result for trudeau jail

Trudeau responds to Wilson-Raybould's testimony
CBC News
Streamed live 27 February 2019

Scheer calls on PM Trudeau to resign after SNC-Lavalin testimony
CTV News
Published on Feb 27, 2019

Watch Jody Wilson-Raybould's opening remarks to the justice committee
CTV News
Published on Feb 27, 2019

JWR Testifies - Absolutely Savage - Trudeau is in TROUBLE
Published on Feb 27, 2019

Canada's No Justice Committee
Published on Feb 27, 2019
Michelle Rempel is MAD - SNC Lavalin, JWR Says Need More Waived and More!
Published on Feb 27, 2019

Michelle Rempel asks about alleged prostitutes for Gaddafi's son - Watch Trudeau's unreal "answer"
Published on Feb 27, 2019

Monday, February 25, 2019

Jody Wilson-Raybould Will Testify on SNC Lavalin Details!

Image result for wilson-raybould cartoon

Trudeau government clears Wilson-Raybould to give SNC-Lavalin details
CBC News
Published on Feb 25, 2019
Something Strange is Happening
Pierre Poilievre
Published on Feb 24, 2019

Time to Testify Trudeau! SNC Lavalin / Justin Trudeau affair explained | Michelle Rempel
Published on Feb 25, 2019
Also See:

Is Trudeau Going Down?

(Part 1)
13 February 2019
(Part 2)
18 February 2019
(Part 3)
20 February 2019
(Part 4)
23 February 2019

Did Trudeau Pressure Justice Minister to Intervene in SNC-Lavalin Fraud Case?

09 February 2019

When the Absurd Becomes Reality! (Part 20)

Image result for absurd

Chicago Police: Overwhelming Evidence Jussie Smollett Staged Crime
26 February 2019

UCLA Students Support Concentration Camps for Trump Supporters
Liberty Hangout
Published on Feb 23, 2019

What's the deal with the Green New Deal? | Fact Checker
Washington Post
Published on Feb 13, 2019
Ocasio-Cortez: People Maybe Shouldn’t Reproduce Due To Climate Change
"Is it okay to still have children?"
By Ryan Saavedra @REALSAAVEDRA
February 25, 2019
Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) suggested on Sunday night that people should consider not having children due to climate change because there is a "scientific consensus" that life will be hard for kids.
"Our planet is going to hit disaster if we don't turn this ship around and so it's basically like, there's a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult," Ocasio-Cortez said while chopping up food in her kitchen during an Instagram live video. "And it does lead, I think, young people to have a legitimate question, you know, 'Is it okay to still have children?'"

Ocasio-Cortez then took a shot at Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) over an incident that happened in Feinstein's office on Friday when a far-left fringe group tried to pressure Feinstein into supporting the Green New Deal.

"You know what’s interesting about this group?" Feinstein told the group on Friday, in response to the group storming into her office. "I’ve been doing this for 30 years. I know what I’m doing."

"You come in here, and you say it has to be my way or the highway. I don’t respond to that," Feinstein continued. "I’ve gotten elected, I just ran. I was elected by almost a million-vote plurality. And I know what I’m doing. So you know, maybe people should listen a little bit."

Ocasio-Cortez said Feinstein's response was "like not good enough" because the legislation that the Democrats support is "frankly going to kill us."

"This idea that 'I've been working on this for x-amount of years,' um, it's like not good enough," Ocasio-Cortez said. "Like, we need a universal sense of urgency, and people are like trying to introduce watered-down proposals that are frankly going to kill us. A lack of urgency is going to kill us."

Socialist @AOC discusses how people should reconsider having children due to global warming, and reminds us that we are all going to *literally* die if the Green New Deal doesn’t pass. She also takes some shots at Dianne Feinstein. *Sidenote: She failed to compost her potatoes*

1,066 people are talking about this
"The issue has gotten worse," Ocasio-Cortez continued. "So I don't think that working on an issue for 30 years alone is what qualifies as, as what someone qualified to solve an issue."

"That said, there are a lot of people that have been doing this work for decades that have proposed ambitious solutions for years and have not been listened to," Ocasio-Cortez added. "So it's not just, 'I've been doing this for 30 years,' so we need to listen to them because frankly people have been failing at the same things for 30 or 40 years. What we need to do is say, 'What solutions have not been tried yet? And what ambitious scale have we not shot at yet.' And let's do it."
Socialist @AOC eviscerates @SenFeinstein and calls her a political coward. This is wild.

1,052 people are talking about this
Ocasio-Cortez has often used alarmist language when discussing climate change, repeatedly comparing fighting climate change to fighting Nazi Germany. Ocasio-Cortez has gone as far as to claim that the world is going to end in 12 years if her far-left policies are not implemented.

"I think the part of it that is generational is that millennials and people, in Gen Z, and all these folks that come after us are looking up and we’re like, the world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change," Ocasio-Cortez said during a Martin Luther King forum in New York City in January. "And your biggest issue, your biggest issue is how are we going to pay for it? — and like this is the war, this is our World War II."
Top Democrat Presidential Hopefuls Say They Support Reparations for Slavery
News Commentary
By Rusty | Featured Contributor
February 22, 2019
Image result for Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris
Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris, two of the Democrat party’s top contenders for the White House in 2020, have expressed support for providing reparations for black Americans affected by slavery.

Harris, the Senator from California, was asked directly if she is “for some type of reparations” during a radio interview last week, to which she responded, “Yes, I am. Yes I am.”

“I think that we have got to address that again, it’s back to the inequities,” she added, after referencing Jim Crow laws and 200 years of slavery, both concepts that the Democrat party fought tooth and nail to keep intact.

“We have got to recognize … people aren’t starting out on the same base in terms of their ability to succeed and so we have got to recognize that and give people a lift up.”

People aren’t starting out on equal footing because of something that ended over 150 years ago?

Warren Agrees With Harris
Warren, the Senator from Massachusetts, who has struggled to find her own truth since her campaign launch with beer-drinking videos and finally admitting she falsified her own heritage to further her career, jumped on board with Harris.

“We must confront the dark history of slavery and government-sanctioned discrimination in this country that has had many consequences, including undermining the ability of black families to build wealth in America for generations,” Warren told the New York Times. “We need systemic, structural changes to address that.”
From NYT: Elizabeth Warren follows Kamala Harris in supporting payment of reparations for slavery. ‘Embracing specific goals and overtly race-conscious legislation that even the most left-wing elected officials stayed away from in recent years.’ 

Slavery was abolished in 1865 with the ratification of the 13th amendment. Some policy experts say the idea could cost trillions of dollars in an effort to offer financial backing to those who have never actually experienced slavery.

Following the Radical Left
Harris and Warren are two of the more blatantly pandering politicians on the left. Everything they say is calculated – in the case of Harris, craftily, and in the case of Warren, sloppily. But make no mistake, they are saying these things as a means to garner support from their radical base.

Prior to now, reparations have typically been a concept only embraced by the fringe of the Democratic party.

Rep. Maxine Waters, the intellectually void Democrat from California, told a crowd in Selma, Alabama, that the concept of reparations is one she would highly consider.

New York socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she backs reparations, not simply for slavery but for non-white communities who were negatively impacted by America’s New Deal.

“Slavery was abolished a century and a half ago, nobody today has a grandparent who was a slave, and in that sense I think you reach a point where you need to move on,” Mark Steyn told Tucker Carlson Thursday night.

He’s right.

Perhaps somebody should remind these Democrats that President Trump has done more to help the black community in just over two years than the previous president did in eight. He’s providing minorities jobs and an opportunity. Democrats simply want to hand minorities free money in exchange for a vote.
Arizona Democrats want to get rid of ‘In God We Trust’ license plates, claim they fund ‘hate group’
A portion of the proceeds help support Alliance Defending Freedom
Jana J. Pruet
February 12, 2019
Image result for arizona plate in god we trust
Arizona Democrats want to get rid of "In God We Trust" license plates, which they claim supports a conservative "hate group," the Arizona Republic 

A portion of the proceeds from the specialty plate goes to the Scottsdale-based Alliance Defending Freedom group, which the Southern Poverty Law Center designated as a "hate group" because it doesn't support same-sex marriages. ADF's mission 
is "to keep the doors open for the Gospel by advocating for religious liberty, the sanctity of life, and marriage and family."

State Sen. Juan Mendez (D) proposed legislation that would prevent the state's department of transportation from selling the plates.

"State dollars should not be funding an organization that works to strip residents of our state of their human rights and human dignity," Mendez told the newspaper. "It's appalling that we've already sent over a million dollars to this extremist hate group."

ADF has received $900,000 in proceeds from the sale of the license plates since 2014, the Republic confirmed with the transportation department.

"We were appalled by it," said Tory Roberg, director of government affairs for the Secular Coalition for Arizona. "People really need to know where their money is going."

The plates help promote the national motto, First Amendment rights, and the heritage of state and nation, according to ADOT's website.

What did ADF say?

Senior Vice President of U.S. Legal Division Kristen Waggoner defended the group's mission in a statement published on the group's website.

"It's disappointing to see elected officials become uncritical pawns in these ugly propaganda campaigns," Waggoner said.

Jeremy Tedesco, senior counsel for ADF, told the Republic that the state hasn't violated any laws with the plates.

"Arizona is well within its rights to offer its citizens an opportunity to voluntarily purchase license plates affirming the First Amendment and contributing to ADF's work on behalf of the freedom of all Americans to live and work according to their beliefs," Tedesco said.

What else?
ADOT contributes $17 of the $25 purchase price of specialty plates to various causes and groups, according to the report.

Mendez proposed a second bill that would require more transparency by the transportation department about the groups receiving proceeds from specialty plates.

Also See:

Is This For Real? What Do You Know About "Transpocalypse"?

17 March 2018

Facebook Wants Nude Pictures Of You!

08 November 2017

Are Nuclear Weapons a Hoax to Keep Us in Fear?

10 September 2017

Sex-Change Operations at Four Years of Age!

22 July 2017

Mysterious Events That Will Question Your Perception Of Reality!

20 July 2017

When the Absurd Becomes Reality!

(Part 1)
23 March 2009
(Part 2)
07 August 2009
(Part 3)
21 February 2011
(Part 4)
21 November 2011
(Part 5)
24 December 2011
(Part 6)
13 April 2012
(Part 7)
19 June 2013
(Part 8)
21 March 2014
(Part 10)
12 November 2015
(Part 11)
03 May 2016
(Part 12)
10 August 2016
(Part 14)
29 Octobert 2016

Science Fiction or Future Reality?

01 November 2008

What is Truth? - Is Everything Relative? Does the End Justify the Means?

28 August 2009

Are You Reality Denied?

25 March 2011

"Wrongful Birth" Insanity!

14 November 2011

It's Everywhere: Be Wary of Myths, Fabricated Lies, and Distorted Data!

 29 August 2015

Did Paul McCartney Die in 1966?

26 September 2016